Text · Amendment list

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153

Full title

Document CJ05-AM-787838 · COM(2025)0547 – C100167/2025 – 2025/0221(COD)

Kind: Amendment list CJ05-AM-787838
Date: 27 April 2026
Committee: Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Committee on Transport and Tourism
Dossier: 2025-0221

More facts (2)

Formats: Official page PDF Word
Reference: COM(2025)0547 – C100167/2025 – 2025/0221(COD)

Formats: Official page PDF Word
Reference: COM(2025)0547 – C100167/2025 – 2025/0221(COD)

Cite this page Official page

Link to this page

Text

The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.

Jump to an amendment (78)

Amendment 1219
Amendment 1220
Amendment 1221
Amendment 1222
Amendment 1223
Amendment 1224
Amendment 1225
Amendment 1226
Amendment 1227
Amendment 1228
Amendment 1229
Amendment 1230
Amendment 1231
Amendment 1232
Amendment 1233
Amendment 1234
Amendment 1235
Amendment 1236
Amendment 1237
Amendment 1238
Amendment 1239
Amendment 1240
Amendment 1241
Amendment 1242
Amendment 1243
Amendment 1244
Amendment 1245
Amendment 1246
Amendment 1247
Amendment 1248
Amendment 1249
Amendment 1250
Amendment 1251
Amendment 1252
Amendment 1253
Amendment 1254
Amendment 1255
Amendment 1256
Amendment 1257
Amendment 1258
Amendment 1259
Amendment 1260
Amendment 1261
Amendment 1262
Amendment 1263
Amendment 1264
Amendment 1265
Amendment 1266
Amendment 1267
Amendment 1268
Amendment 1269
Amendment 1270
Amendment 1271
Amendment 1272
Amendment 1273
Amendment 1274
Amendment 1275
Amendment 1276
Amendment 1277
Amendment 1278
Amendment 1279
Amendment 1280
Amendment 1281
Amendment 1282
Amendment 1283
Amendment 1284
Amendment 1285
Amendment 1286
Amendment 1287
Amendment 1288
Amendment 1289
Amendment 1290
Amendment 1291
Amendment 1292
Amendment 1293
Amendment 1294
Amendment 1295
Amendment 1296

AMENDMENTS

Amendment 1219

Kai Tegethoff

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
ANNEX
Amendment Deleted Justification The annex should be deleted. It was intended to illustrate the cross-border dimension of the Programme, not to define it. Retaining such an indicative list of projects risks creating confusion by suggesting that the cross-border dimension depends on whether a project is included in the Annex. Since the concept is now clarified directly in the provisions and recitals of the Regulation, the Annex is no longer needed.

Or. en

Amendment 1220

Rosa Serrano Sierra, Idoia Mendia

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Atlantic Corridor – row 1

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission Atlantic Corridor
Text proposed by the Commission Atlantic Corridor
FR – ES	Bordeaux - Burgos

Amendment

Table from the text: Atlantic Corridor
Atlantic Corridor
FR – ES	Bordeaux - Burgos - Bilbao - Zaragoza

Or. en

Amendment 1221

Borja Giménez Larraz, Esther Herranz Garcia, Javier Zarzalejos

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Atlantic Corridor– row 1

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
	Atlantic Corridor
FR – ES	Bordeaux - Burgos

Amendment

Table from the text: block 22
	Atlantic Corridor
FR – ES	Burdeos – Dax – San Sebastián - Burgos

Or. en

Amendment 1222

Valérie Devaux, François Kalfon, Isabelle Le Callennec, Benoît Cassart, Christophe Grudler

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Atlantic Corridor – row 1a new (after existing row 1)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Atlantic Corridor
FR – ES	Bordeaux - Burgos
FR – LU	Nancy – Metz - Luxembourg

Or. en

Amendment 1223

Adrian-George Axinia, Daniel Buda, Claudiu-Richard Târziu, Gheorghe Piperea, Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă, Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza, Georgiana Teodorescu

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor – row 1

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission

Table from the text: Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
RO – BG	Craiova - Sofia

Table from the text: Amendment
Amendment
Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
RO – BG	Caransebes - Sofia

Or. en

Amendment 1224

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Gheorghe Falcă, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Siegfried Mureşan, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Daniel Buda, Loránt Vincze, Iuliu Winkler, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor – row 1

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aeg
Text proposed by the Commission Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
RO – BG	Craiova - Sofia

Amendment

Table from the text: Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
RO – BG	Lugoj – Drobeta Turnu Severin - Craiova – Sofia

Justification:

This adjustment allows the completion of a critical missing link within the BBA Corridor by creating a continuous, high-capacity axis between Western and Southern Romania and onwards to Bulgaria. Extending the alignment to Lugoj ensures a direct connection between the Banat logistics and industrial hub and the Craiova – Sofia cross-border section, strengthening network continuity along the corridor.

The Lugoj - Drobeta Turnu Severin - Craiova segment provides full interoperability between the Danube corridor, the western Romanian economic pole, and Central European transport networks, significantly reducing structural bottlenecks and enhancing redundancy. By closing this gap, the corridor will support more reliable north-south and east-west freight flows and improve resilience in the event of disruptions on parallel routes.

Integrating this section substantially enhances multimodal connectivity within the corridor, facilitating efficient freight and passenger movements between the Black Sea region, the Western Balkans, and Central Europe. It improves accessibility to major industrial platforms, logistics centres, and cross-border gateways, while strengthening connections to core TEN-T nodes, including ports, intermodal terminals, and Danube crossings.

Importantly, project maturity is advancing. A feasibility study is currently underway for the Lugoj – Drobeta Turnu Severin – Calafat alignment, which represents the backbone of the proposed extension. The high-speed road section has an estimated length of approximately 215 km.

The fact that preparatory studies are already in progress demonstrates both the technical feasibility and the strategic commitment to implementation, reinforcing the credibility and readiness of the proposed amendment.

Overall, the adjustment is fully consistent with EU transport policy objectives and regional cooperation frameworks, contributing to balanced territorial development, improved network resilience, and a stronger integration of Romania into the EU single market through a coherent and fully interconnected trans-European transport system.

Or. en

Amendment 1225

Adrian-George Axinia, Daniel Buda, Claudiu-Richard Târziu, Gheorghe Piperea, Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă, Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza, Georgiana Teodorescu

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor – row 2

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission

Table from the text: Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
RO – BG	Bucharest - Giurgiu - Ruse - Varna

Table from the text: Amendment
Amendment
Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
RO – BG	Bucharest/Videle - Giurgiu - Ruse - Varna

Or. en

Amendment 1226

Gheorghe Falcă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Baltic Sea – Black Sea – Aegean Sea Corridor – row 2

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
	Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
RO - BG	Bucharest - Giurgiu - Ruse - Varna

Amendment

Table from the text: block 67
	Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
RO – BG –UA	Constanța – Varna – Odessa

Or. en

Amendment 1227

Gheorghe Falcă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Baltic Sea – Black Sea – Aegean Sea Corridor – row 2

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
	Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
RO - BG	Bucharest - Giurgiu - Ruse - Varna

Amendment

Table from the text: block 75
	Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
RO – BG –UA-MD	Varna – Constanța – Odessa - Chișinău

This amendment reflects the need to strengthen connectivity between key European Transport Corridors in the South-Eastern and Black Sea region, in line with the current geopolitical context.

While the proposal supports cross-border infrastructure and military mobility, it does not sufficiently address the strategic importance of ensuring continuity between major TEN-T corridors. Improving the connection between the Western Balkans – Eastern Mediterranean Corridor and the Baltic Sea – Black Sea – Aegean Sea Corridor strengthens network coherence, creates alternative routes and reduces vulnerabilities in the EU transport system.

The Black Sea axis, including the links between Varna, Constanța, Odessa and Chișinău, has become essential for maintaining supply chains, supporting Ukraine and enhancing the integration of the Republic of Moldova. At the same time, these connections contribute directly to military mobility objectives by enabling faster and more reliable movement of personnel and equipment across the eastern flank.

Explicitly recognising these links ensures better alignment of EU funding with strategic priorities, enhances resilience and interoperability of the transport network, and strengthens the Union’s capacity to respond to current and future challenges.

Or. en

Amendment 1228

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Gheorghe Falcă, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Siegfried Mureşan, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Daniel Buda, Loránt Vincze, Iuliu Winkler, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor – row 7

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aeg
Text proposed by the Commission Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
RO – MD	Iasi - Chisinau

Amendment

Table from the text: Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
Baltic Sea — Black Sea — Aegean Sea Corridor
RO – MD	Pascani – Chisinau

Justification:

This adjustment enables the integration of the Republic of Moldova into the TEN-T through a more feasible and higher-capacity route, ensuring direct connectivity to Romania’s main rail and road infrastructure at Pașcani. The proposed change facilitates interoperability, reduces operational bottlenecks, and strengthens Moldova’s links with the EU single market.

At the same time, the Iași – Ungheni railway section is currently financed under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), and the proposed modification ensures the logical and functional continuity of ongoing investments by extending the corridor towards Chișinău via a route with superior technical parameters and higher traffic potential.

Furthermore, the adjustment is aligned with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding between Romania, Bulgaria, and Greece on enhanced cross-border cooperation within the Black Sea – Aegean Sea Corridor Platform (BACP), notably with the Central Axis: Thessaloniki / Alexandroupoli – Ormenio – Svilengrad – Ruse – Giurgiu – București – Siret and Ungheni, thereby reinforcing the strategic coherence of the network and its role in regional connectivity.

Therefore, the proposed amendment represents not only a technical optimisation of the route, but also a strategic measure that leverages existing investments, enhances corridor resilience, and accelerates the Republic of Moldova’s integration into European transport flows.

Or. en

Amendment 1229

Carlo Ciccioli, Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Baltic Sea — Adriatic Sea Corridor – row 2a new (after existing row 2)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment	Section Baltic Sea — Adriatic Sea Corridor
AT - SI	Graz - Maribor
IT - AT	Trieste-Udine-AT border

Or. en

Amendment 1230

Nikolina Brnjac, Davor Ivo Stier

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Baltic Sea — Adriatic Sea Corridor – row 3a new (after existing row 3

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
	Baltic Sea — Adriatic Sea Corridor
AT - SK - HU	Wien - Bratislava - Budapest
AT-HU-HR	Wien – Szombathely – Zagreb

Or. en

Amendment 1231

Paolo Borchia, Anna Maria Cisint, Isabella Tovaglieri, Silvia Sardone, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Baltic Sea – Adriatic-Sea Corridor – row 3a new (after existing row 3)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment	Baltic Sea — Adriatic Sea Corridor
AT - SK - HU	Wien - Bratislava - Budapest
IT-AT	Trieste-Udine-AT border

Or. en

Amendment 1232

Paolo Borchia, Anna Maria Cisint, Isabella Tovaglieri, Silvia Sardone, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Mediterranean Corridor – row 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Mediterranean Corridor
Text proposed by the Commission	Mediterranean Corridor
Text proposed by the CommissionFR - IT	Mediterranean CorridorLyon - Turin

Amendment

Table from the text: block 118
	Mediterranean Corridor
FR - IT	Lyon – Turin: Base tunnel and access routes

Or. en

Amendment 1233

Carlo Ciccioli, Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Mediterranean Corridor – row 1

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
	Mediterranean Corridor
FR - IT	Lyon - Turin

Amendment

Table from the text: block 126
	Mediterranean Corridor
FR - IT	Lyon - Turin : Base tunnel and access routes

Or. en

Amendment 1234

Borja Giménez Larraz, Esther Herranz Garcia, Esteban Gonzalez Pons

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Mediterranean Corridor – row 2

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
	Mediterranean Corridor
FR – ES	Montpellier – Perpiñán - Barcelona

Amendment

Table from the text: block 134
	Mediterranean Corridor
FR – ES	Montpellier – Perpiñán – Barcelona - Valencia

Or. en

Amendment 1235

Rosa Serrano Sierra, Sandra Gómez López, Leire Pajín, José Cepeda, Hanna Jalloul Muro

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Mediterranean Corridor – row 2

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission Mediterranean Corridor
Text proposed by the Commission Mediterranean Corridor
FR – ES	Montpellier - Perpignan - Barcelona

Amendment

Table from the text: Mediterranean Corridor
Mediterranean Corridor
FR – ES	Montpellier - Perpignan - Barcelona - Valencia - Zaragoza - Madrid

Or. en

Amendment 1236

Valérie Devaux, François Kalfon, Isabelle Le Callennec, Grégory Allione, Christophe Grudler

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Mediterranean Corridor – row 3

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission Mediterranean Corridor
Text proposed by the Commission Mediterranean Corridor
FR – IT	Nice - Genova

Amendment

Table from the text: Mediterranean Corridor
Mediterranean Corridor
FR – IT	Marseille - Nice - Genova

Or. en

Amendment 1237

Paolo Borchia, Anna Maria Cisint, Isabella Tovaglieri, Silvia Sardone, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Mediterranean Corridor – row 4

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Mediterranean Corridor
Text proposed by the Commission	Mediterranean Corridor
Text proposed by the CommissionIT - SI	Mediterranean CorridorTrieste - Divača / Ljubljana

Amendment

Table from the text: block 158
	Mediterranean Corridor
IT - SI	Venezia – Trieste – Divača – Ljubljana

Or. en

Amendment 1238

Carlo Ciccioli, Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Mediterranean Corridor – row 4

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
	Mediterranean Corridor
IT – SI	Trieste - Divača / Ljubljana

Amendment

Table from the text: block 166
	Mediterranean Corridor
IT – SI	Venezia -Trieste - Divača / Ljubljana

Or. en

Amendment 1239

Nikolina Brnjac, Davor Ivo Stier

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Mediterranean Corridor – row 4a new (after existing row4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
	Mediterranean Corridor
IT - SI	Trieste - Divača / Ljubljana
HR-HU	Rijeka – Zagreb – Szekesfehervar

Or. en

Amendment 1240

Benoît Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Jeannette Baljeu, Sophie Wilmes

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor – row 1

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission North Sea — Rhine — Mediterr
Text proposed by the Commission North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
FR – BE	Seine – Escaut (inland waterway)

Amendment

Table from the text: North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
FR – BE-NL-DE-LU	Seine – Escaut– Network and the related Seine, Scheldt, Meuse, Rhine and Rhône river basins, including their navigable tributaries and connected canals (inland waterway)

Or. en

Amendment 1241

François Kalfon

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section North Sea— Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor – row 1

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission North Sea — Rhine — Mediterr
Text proposed by the Commission North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
FR – BE	Seine – Escaut (inland waterway)

Amendment

Table from the text: North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
FR-BE-NL-DE-LU	Seine – Escaut network and the related Seine, Scheldt, Meuse, Rhine and Rhône river basins, including their navigable tributaries and connected canals (inland waterway)

Or. en

Amendment 1242

Kris Van Dijck, Roberts Zīle

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section North Sea – Rhine - Mediterranean Corridor – row 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
Text proposed by the Commission	North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
Text proposed by the CommissionFR - BE	North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean CorridorSeine – Escaut (inland waterway)

Amendment

Table from the text: North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
FR-BE-NL-DE-LU	Seine – Scheldt Network and the related Seine, Scheldt, Meuse, Moselle, Rhine and Rhône river basins, including their navigable tributaries and connected canals (inland waterway)

Or. en

Amendment 1243

Valérie Devaux, François Kalfon, Isabelle Le Callennec, Benoît Cassart, Christophe Grudler

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section North Sea— Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor – row 1a new (after existing row 1)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
FR – BE	Seine – Escaut (inland waterway)
FR – BE	Lille - Tournai

Or. en

Amendment 1244

Valérie Devaux, François Kalfon, Isabelle Le Callennec, Benoît Cassart, Christophe Grudler

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section North Sea— Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor – row 1b new (after existing row 1)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
FR – BE	Seine – Escaut (inland waterway)
FR – BE	Lille - Courtrai

Or. en

Amendment 1245

Tilly Metz, Martine Kemp, Valérie Devaux

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section North Sea— Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor – row 4a new (after existing row 4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
BE – LU	Namur - Luxembourg
FR – LU	Metz - Luxembourg

Or. en

Amendment 1246

Carlo Ciccioli, Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor – row 5

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
	North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
IT – CH	Chiasso - Milano

Amendment

Table from the text: block 222
	North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
IT – CH	Genova - Milano/Novara - CH/IT Borders

Or. en

Amendment 1247

Paolo Borchia, Anna Maria Cisint, Isabella Tovaglieri, Silvia Sardone, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section – North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor row 5

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
Text proposed by the Commission	North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
Text proposed by the CommissionIT - CH	North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean CorridorChiasso - Milano

Amendment

Table from the text: block 230
	North Sea — Rhine — Mediterranean Corridor
IT - CH	Genova - Milano/Novara - CH/IT Borders

Or. en

Amendment 1248

Katri Kulmuni

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section North Sea -Baltic Corridor – row 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and North Sea — Baltic Corridor
Text proposed by the Commission	North Sea — Baltic Corridor
Text proposed by the CommissionEE - LV - LT - PL	North Sea — Baltic CorridorTallinn - Riga - Vilnius - Warsaw (Rail Baltica)

Amendment

Table from the text: block 238
	North Sea — Baltic Corridor
FI - EE - LV - LT - PL	Tornio - Oulu - Tampere - Helsinki Tallinn - Riga - Vilnius - Warsaw (Rail Baltica)

Or. en

Amendment 1249

Paulius Saudargas

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section North Sea— Baltic Corridor row 1

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission North Sea — Baltic Corridor
Text proposed by the Commission North Sea — Baltic Corridor
EE - LV - LT - PL	Tallinn - Riga - Vilnius - Warsaw (Rail Baltica)

Amendment

Table from the text: North Sea — Baltic Corridor
North Sea — Baltic Corridor
EE - LV - LT - PL	Tallinn - Riga - Vilnius - Warsaw (Rail Baltica, Via Baltica)

Or. en

Amendment 1250

Merja Kyllönen, Anna-Maja Henriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section North Sea — Baltic Corridor– row 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and North Sea — Baltic Corridor
Text proposed by the Commission	North Sea — Baltic Corridor
Text proposed by the CommissionEE - LV - LT - PL	North Sea — Baltic CorridorTallinn - Riga - Vilnius - Warsaw (Rail Baltica)

Amendment

Table from the text: block 254
	North Sea — Baltic Corridor
FI-EE - LV - LT - PL	Oulu - Tampere - Helsinki -Tallinn -Riga -Vilnius -Warsaw (Rail Baltica)
NO - FI	Tromssa -Kemijarvi -Rovaniemi -Oulu -Seinajoki - Tampere -Helsinki
FI	Helsinki -Tampere -Seinajoki-Oulu (Finnish Main Line)
FI	Port of Pietarsaari (to be elevated as TEN-T-port)
FI	Port ofVaasa (to be elevated as TEN-T-port)
FI	Port of Kokkola (Military mobility port)
NO - FI	Hammarfest- Inari - Rovaniemi -Oulu-Tre -Hki

Or. en

Amendment 1251

Benoît Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Sophie Wilmes

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section North Sea — Baltic Corridor – row 2

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission North Sea — Baltic Corridor
Text proposed by the Commission North Sea — Baltic Corridor
DE-PL	Berlin - Szczecin

Amendment

North Sea — Baltic Corridor

DE-PL

Berlin - Szczecin by rail and inland waterways

Or. en

Amendment 1252

Dariusz Joński, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Elżbieta Łukacijewska, Magdalena Adamowicz, Borys Budka, Adam Jarubas, Mirosława Nykiel, Krzysztof Hetman, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I –Section North Sea-Baltic Corridor – row 3

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission North Sea-Baltic Corridor
Text proposed by the Commission North Sea-Baltic Corridor
DE - PL	Berlin - Frankfurt-an-der-Oder - Poznan

Amendment

Table from the text: North Sea-Baltic Corridor
North Sea-Baltic Corridor
DE - PL	Berlin – Poznań - Warszawa

Or. en

Amendment 1253

Benoît Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Sophie Wilmes

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Rhine — Danube Corridor– row 4

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission Rhine — Danube Corridor
Text proposed by the Commission Rhine — Danube Corridor
DE - AT - SK - HU - HR - RO - BG	Rhine / Danube (inland waterway)

Amendment

Table from the text: Rhine — Danube Corridor
Rhine — Danube Corridor
DE - AT - SK - HU - HR – BIH- RS -RO – BG -MD-UA	Rhine / Danube including their navigable tributaries and connected canals (inland waterway)

Or. en

Amendment 1254

Gheorghe Falcă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Rhine – Danube Corridor – row 4a new (after existing row 4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment	Rhine - Danube Corridor
DE - AT - SK - HU - HR - RO - BG	Rhine / Danube (inland waterway)
RO – NL	Sulina-Rotterdam

Or. en

Amendment 1255

Gheorghe Falcă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Rhine – Danube Corridor – row 4a new (after existing row 4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment	Rhine - Danube Corridor
DE - AT - SK - HU - HR - RO - BG	Rhine / Danube (inland waterway)
RO – DE	Sulina-Bremen

Or. en

Amendment 1256

Gheorghe Falcă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Rhine – Danube Corridor – row 4a new (after existing row 4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment	Rhine - Danube Corridor
DE - AT - SK - HU - HR - RO - BG	Rhine / Danube (inland waterway)
HU – RO	Békéscsaba – Curtici – Arad – Aiud

Or. en

Amendment 1257

Paolo Borchia, Anna Maria Cisint, Isabella Tovaglieri, Silvia Sardone, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
Text proposed by the Commission	Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
Text proposed by the CommissionIT - AT - DE	Scandinavian — Mediterranean CorridorMunich - Verona (covering the Brenner Base tunnel)

Amendment

Table from the text: block 306
	Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
IT - AT - DE	Munich – Wörgl – Innsbruck – Fortezza – Bolzano – Trento – Verona: Brenner Base tunnel and its access routes

Or. en

Amendment 1258

Carlo Ciccioli, Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 1

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
	Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
IT – AD – DE	Munich - Verona (covering the Brenner Base tunnel)

Amendment

Table from the text: block 314
	Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
IT – AD – DE	München – Wörgl – Innsbruck – Fortezza – Bolzano – Trento – Verona: Brenner base tunnel and its access routes

Or. en

Amendment 1259

Johan Danielsson

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 2

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
DE – DK	Copenhagen - Lübeck (covering the Fehmarnbelt tunnel)

Amendment

Table from the text: Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE – DK – DE	Stockholm – Malmö - København – Lübeck (covering the Fehmarn Belt fixed link)

Or. en

Amendment 1260

Hanna Gedin, Jonas Sjöstedt, Merja Kyllönen

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 2

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission Scandinavian — Mediterranean
Text proposed by the Commission Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
DE - DK	Copenhagen - Lübeck (covering the Fehmarnbelt tunnel)

Amendment

Table from the text: Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE – DK – DE	Stockholm - Copenhagen - Lübeck (covering the Fehmarnbelt tunnel)

Or. en

Amendment 1261

Ana Vasconcelos, Emma Wiesner, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 2

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission Scandinavian-Mediterranean C
Text proposed by the Commission Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor
DE-DK	Copenhagen – Lübeck (covering the Fehmarnbelt tunnel)

Amendment

Table from the text: Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor
Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor
SE-DK-DE	Stockholm -Copenhagen – Lübeck (covering the Fehmarn beltfixed link)

Or. en

Amendment 1262

Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor – row 2

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission Scandinavian-Mediterranean C
Text proposed by the Commission Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor
DE-DK	Copenhagen – Lübeck (covering the Fehmarnbelt tunnel)

Amendment

Table from the text: Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor
Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor
DE- DK	Copenhagen – Lübeck - Hamburg (covering the Fehmarnbelt tunnel)

Justification

The hinterland connection for the Fehmarn Belt Crossing does not functionally end in Lübeck on the German side, but in Hamburg. This incomplete description diminishes its significance for the region, Germany, and Europe. With the second-largest railway station and the largest railway port in Europe, Hamburg serves as a gateway for rail traffic to and from Scandinavia in general. This important role will be further strengthened with the opening of the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link, as travel time between Hamburg and Copenhagen will be reduced to two and a half hours.

Or. en

Amendment 1263

Johan Danielsson

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 3

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE – FI	Umeå - Luleå - Oulu (Bothnian corridor)

Amendment

Table from the text: Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE – FI	Hallsberg/Stockholm – Sundsvall - Umeå - Luleå - Oulu (Bothnian corridor)

Or. en

Amendment 1264

Hanna Gedin, Jonas Sjöstedt, Merja Kyllönen

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 3

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission Scandinavian — Mediterranean
Text proposed by the Commission Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE – FI	Umeå - Luleå - Oulu (Bothnian corridor)

Amendment

Table from the text: Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE – FI	Stockholm - Umeå - Luleå - Oulu (Bothnian corridor)

Or. en

Amendment 1265

Ana Vasconcelos, Emma Wiesner, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 3

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission Scandinavian-Mediterranean C
Text proposed by the Commission Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor
SE-FI	Umeä - Luleà - Oulu (Bothnian corridor)

Amendment

Table from the text: Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor
Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor
SE-FI	Sundsvall-Umeä - Luleà - Oulu (Bothnian corridor)

Or. en

Amendment 1266

Ana Vasconcelos, Emma Wiesner, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 3a new (after existing row 3)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor
SE-FI	Umeä - Luleà - Oulu (Bothnian corridor)
SE - NO	Luleà - Kiruna - Narvik (Iron Ore Line)

Or. en

Amendment 1267

Tomas Tobé

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 3a new (after existing row 3)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment	Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE - FI	Umeå - Luleå - Oulu (Bothnian corridor)
SE - FI	Stockholm – Turku - Helsinki

Justification

The Stockholm – Turku – Helsinki strengthens connectivity in the Baltic Sea region while connecting two European capitals. This link is also connecting the Scandinavian – Mediterranean and the North Sea – Baltic transport corridors, contributing to an enhanced connection of two TEN-T Corridors.

Or. en

Amendment 1268

Katri Kulmuni

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 3a new (after existing row 3)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment	Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE - FI	Umeå - Luleå - Oulu (Bothnian corridor)
FI - SE	Kolari - Svappavaara

Or. en

Amendment 1269

Katri Kulmuni

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 3b new (after existing row 3)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment	Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE - FI	Umeå - Luleå - Oulu (Bothnian corridor)
SE - FI	Stockholm - Turku - Helsinki - Lappeenranta - Joensuu - Kaiaani

Or. en

Amendment 1270

Johan Danielsson

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 4e new (after existing row 4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE - NO	Stockholm - Oslo
SE-FI	Stockholm – Turku - Helsinki

Or. en

Amendment 1271

Katri Kulmuni

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 3c new (after existing row 3)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment	Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE - FI	Umeå - Luleå - Oulu (Bothnian corridor)
FI - SE	Tornio-Karungi

Or. en

Amendment 1272

Johan Danielsson

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 4a new (after existing row 4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE - NO	Stockholm - Oslo
SE-NO	Luleå–Kiruna–Narvik (Malmbanan/Ofotenbanan) (Bothnian corridor)

Or. en

Amendment 1273

Hanna Gedin, Jonas Sjöstedt, Merja Kyllönen

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 4a new (after existing row 4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE - NO	Stockholm - Oslo
SE – NO	Luleå–Kiruna–Narvik (Malmbanan/Ofotenbanan)

Or. en

Amendment 1274

Merja Kyllönen

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 4a and 4b new (after existing row 4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment	Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE - NO	Stockholm - Oslo
SE - FI	Stockholm - Turku - Helsinki - Porvoo - Kouvola
FI - EE	Helsinki - Tallinn-tunnel

Or. en

Amendment 1275

Tomas Tobé

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 4b new (after existing row 4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment	Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE - NO	Stockholm - Oslo
SE - NO	Luleå – Narvik (Bothnian Corridor)

Justification

Transport flows in the northern region are both north–south and east–west. The Umeå–Luleå-Oulu axis connects northern industrial hubs with two TEN-T Corridors, while the Luleå–Narvik link provides strategic access to an ice-free Atlantic port, strengthening resilience and offering an alternative to more vulnerable routes. The full Bothnian Corridor would enhance connectivity, support the green industrial transition, and strengthen European transport resilience.

Without these complementary links, there is a risk of bottlenecks limiting efficiency, resilience, and the overall benefits of current investments.

Or. en

Amendment 1276

Johan Danielsson

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 4b new (after existing row 4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE - NO	Stockholm - Oslo
SE-NO	Göteborg – Oslo

Or. en

Amendment 1277

Hanna Gedin, Jonas Sjöstedt, Merja Kyllönen

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 4b new (after existing row 4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE - NO	Stockholm - Oslo
SE – NO	Göteborg – Oslo

Or. en

Amendment 1278

Tomas Tobé

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 4a new (after existing row 4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment	Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE - NO	Stockholm - Oslo
SE - NO	Gothenburg - Oslo

Justification

The value of the Copenhagen - Lübeck (covering the Fehmarnbelt tunnel) link, listed in the annex, risks being undermined if the cross-border link between Gothenburg and Oslo is not added to the map. The Gothenburg-Oslo link is one of Scandinavia’s most important north-south corridors for freight and trade traffic. It connects Norway’s and Sweden’s largest ports with the European mainland via the Fehmarn belt fixed link and the Scandinavian – Mediterranean Corridor. Unfortunately, despite its strategic importance, the route is undersized and bottlenecked – particularly due to the lack of double tracks. This limits the capacity for rail freight traffic and hinders efficient transport flows within the Corridor.

Or. en

Amendment 1279

Johan Danielsson

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 4c new (after existing row 4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE - NO	Stockholm - Oslo
SE-NO	Luleå – Kiruna – Narvik (Bothnian Corridor)

Or. en

Amendment 1280

Johan Danielsson

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor – row 4d new (after existing row 4)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Scandinavian — Mediterranean Corridor
SE - NO	Stockholm - Oslo
SE-NO	Sundsvall – Östersund – Trondheim

Or. en

Amendment 1281

Gheorghe Falcă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Western Balkans — Eastern Mediterranean Corridor – row 3

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
	Western Balkans — Eastern Mediterranean Corridor
EL – MK	Thessaloniki - Guevgueliya - Skopje

Amendment

Table from the text: block 477
	Western Balkans — Eastern Mediterranean Corridor
RO – BG - RO	Thessaloniki – Varna – Constanța

The amendment reflects the strategic importance of strengthening connectivity along the Thessaloniki – Varna – Constanța axis, in line with the Memorandum of Understanding on Enhanced Cross-Border Cooperation under the Black Sea – Aegean Sea Corridor Platform. This axis forms part of the Eastern branch of the corridor linking the Aegean Sea to the Black Sea and is identified by Bulgaria, Greece and Romania as a priority for coordinated development of multimodal, interoperable and dual-use infrastructure. Strengthening this connection enhances continuity between major TEN-T corridors, improves cross-border transport flows and contributes to the resilience and efficiency of the internal market. In the current geopolitical context, these links are also essential for ensuring military mobility, supporting supply chains and reinforcing the Union’s capacity to respond to crises. At the same time, they contribute to regional development, economic integration and the better use of EU funding through coordinated planning and implementation.

Or. en

Amendment 1282

Nina Carberry

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Waterborne

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission

Table from the text: block 485
	Waterborne
	European Maritime Space and TEN-T ports
Amendment
Indicative list of projects of common interest with cross-border dimension as referred to in Article 3(2)(a) first indent. Unless indicated differently, the sections refer to railway connections.	Waterborne
	European Maritime Space and TEN-T ports (including hinterland connections)

Or. en

Amendment 1283

Benoît Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Jeannette Baljeu, Sophie Wilmes

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I –Waterborne

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
	Waterborne
	European Maritime Space and TEN-T ports
Amendment	Waterborne
	European Maritime Space and TEN-T ports (including hinterland connections)

Or. en

Amendment 1284

Borja Giménez Larraz, Esther Herranz Garcia

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Comprehensive network - row 1

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission Comprehensive network
Text proposed by the Commission Comprehensive network
FR – ES	Pau - Canfranc

Amendment

Table from the text: Comprehensive network
Comprehensive network
FR – ES	Pau – Canfranc Zaragoza

Or. en

Amendment 1285

Rosa Serrano Sierra

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Comprehensive network – row 1

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission Comprehensive network
Text proposed by the Commission Comprehensive network
FR - ES	Pau - Canfranc

Amendment

Table from the text: Comprehensive network
Comprehensive network
FR - ES	Pau – Canfranc-Zaragoza

Or. en

Amendment 1286

Rosa Serrano Sierra, Sérgio Gonçalves

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Comprehensive network – row 1a new (after existing row 1)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Comprehensive network
FR - ES	Pau - Canfranc
ES – FR	Zaragoza - Toulouse (Central Trans-Pyrenees crossing)

Or. en

Amendment 1287

Borja Giménez Larraz, Esther Herranz Garcia

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Comprehensive network– row 1a new (after existing row 1)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Comprehensive network
FR – ES	Pau – Canfranc
PT – FR - ES	Sines/Algeciras – Madrid – Zaragoza – París (Travesía Central de los Pirineos, TCP)

Or. en

Amendment 1288

Rosa Serrano Sierra, Lina Gálvez

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Comprehensive network – row 1a new (after existing row 1)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Comprehensive network
FR - ES	Pau - Canfranc
ES – PT	Sevilla - Faro

Or. en

Amendment 1289

Borja Giménez Larraz, Esther Herranz Garcia, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Carmen Crespo Díaz

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Comprehensive network– row 1b new (after existing row 1) –

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Comprehensive network
FR – ES	Pau – Canfranc
ES - PT	Sevilla – Huelva - Faro

Or. en

Amendment 1290

Roman Haider, Margarita De La Pisa Carrión

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Comprehensive Network – row 1a new (after existing row 1)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Comprehensive Network
FR - ES	Pau - Canfranc
FR - ES	Toulouse – Zaragoza (Central Trans-Pyrenean Crossing)

Or. en

Amendment 1291

Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Comprehensive network – row 3

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Comprehensive network
Text proposed by the Commission	Comprehensive network
Text proposed by the CommissionNL - DE	Comprehensive networkGroningen - Oldenburg

Amendment

Table from the text: block 545
	Comprehensive network
NL - DE	Amsterdam - Groningen - Oldenburg

Or. en

Amendment 1292

Roman Haider, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyova, Tomas Kubin

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Comprehensive Network – row 5a new (after existing row 5)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Comprehensive Network
AT - DE	München - Linz
CZ – AT	České Budějovice – Linz

Or. en

Amendment 1293

Johan Danielsson

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Comprehensive network – row 6a new (after existing row 6)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Comprehensive network
BE - DE - NL	Antwerpen - Venlo - Mönchengladbach
SE-NO	Vasa – Umeå – Storuman – Mo i Rana

Or. en

Amendment 1294

Tomas Tobé

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I Comprehensive network – row 6a new (after existing row 6)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment	Comprehensive network
BE - DE - NL	Antwerpen - Venlo - Mönchengladbach
SE - NO	Sundsvall - Trondheim

Justification

The Sundsvall –Trondheim corridor plays a strategic role in linking the Baltic Sea region with the Norwegian Sea, ensuring access to an ice-free Atlantic port year-round. As such, it strengthens the EU’s external connectivity and reduces dependency on more vulnerable east–west routes. The corridor is also of high relevance from a dual-use and military mobility perspective. It provides a critical westward connection to central Norway, including the Trondheim region, which hosts key NATO infrastructure. Enhancing this corridor would improve the capacity for rapid and reliable movement of military personnel and equipment, in line with EU and NATO objectives on military mobility and preparedness.

In addition, the corridor contributes to regional cohesion and economic development in sparsely populated areas of northern Sweden and Norway. It supports sustainable transport solutions, including modal shift to rail, and facilitates cross-border trade and logistics between the EU and Norway.

Or. en

Amendment 1295

Paolo Borchia, Anna Maria Cisint, Isabella Tovaglieri, Silvia Sardone, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Alpine crossings (new)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment Alpine crossings
IT - FR	Alpine crossings of the North-West (Mont Blanc, Fréjus, Tenda, Ventimiglia) as an integrated cross-border system
IT - CH - FR	Hinterland and access connections to Alpine crossings, including the Great St Bernard axis

Or. en

Amendment 1296

Merja Kyllönen, Anna-Maja Henriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – Section Kyarken Link, /Nordic Corridor (new)

Table from the text: Text proposed by the Commission
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment	Kyarken Link, /Nordic CorridorCorridor
SE – NO- SE- FI	Mo I Rana - Storuman- Umea/Holmsund -Vaasa-Tampere - Helsinki Kvarken Link/Nordic Connector)

Or. en

Connections

The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/CJ05-AM-787838
Data source: EP Open Data API: document record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “AMENDMENTS 1219 - 1296 - Draft report Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153”. Text, 27 April 2026. docId CJ05-AM-787838. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/CJ05-AM-787838 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/CJ05-AM-787838 (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-text-cj05-am-787838,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{AMENDMENTS 1219 - 1296 - Draft report Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-27},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/CJ05-AM-787838}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/CJ05-AM-787838},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. docId CJ05-AM-787838. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034…, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153

Text

Amendment 1219

Amendment 1220

Amendment 1221

Amendment 1222

Amendment 1223

Amendment 1224

Amendment 1225

Amendment 1226

Amendment 1227

Amendment 1228

Amendment 1229

Amendment 1230

Amendment 1231

Amendment 1232

Amendment 1233

Amendment 1234

Amendment 1235

Amendment 1236

Amendment 1237

Amendment 1238

Amendment 1239

Amendment 1240

Amendment 1241

Amendment 1242

Amendment 1243

Amendment 1244

Amendment 1245

Amendment 1246

Amendment 1247

Amendment 1248

Amendment 1249

Amendment 1250

Amendment 1251

Amendment 1252

Amendment 1253

Amendment 1254

Amendment 1255

Amendment 1256

Amendment 1257

Amendment 1258

Amendment 1259

Amendment 1260

Amendment 1261

Amendment 1262

Amendment 1263

Amendment 1264

Amendment 1265

Amendment 1266

Amendment 1267

Amendment 1268

Amendment 1269

Amendment 1270

Amendment 1271

Amendment 1272

Amendment 1273

Amendment 1274

Amendment 1275

Amendment 1276

Amendment 1277

Amendment 1278

Amendment 1279

Amendment 1280

Amendment 1281

Amendment 1282

Amendment 1283

Amendment 1284

Amendment 1285

Amendment 1286

Amendment 1287

Amendment 1288

Amendment 1289

Amendment 1290

Amendment 1291

Amendment 1292

Amendment 1293

Amendment 1294

Amendment 1295

Amendment 1296

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153