Text · Resolution motion
On Russiagate: allegations of Russian interference in the democratic processes of the European Union
Motion B-9-2024-0123 · 2024/2548(RSP)
- Kind
- Resolution motion B-9-2024-0123
- Date
- 5 February 2024
- Committee
- on behalf of The Left Group
- Rapporteur
- Manon Aubry
- Dossier
- 2024-2548
More facts (3)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Subject matter
- PESC
- Reference
- 2024/2548(RSP)
In short
A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.
AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-flash · 26 Sept 2026
Parliament's resolution on allegations of Russian interference in EU democratic processes expresses serious concern about the alleged acts and offers full cooperation with ongoing investigations. It calls for EU vigilance against undue influence by any third country, including Russia, while stressing due process, the rule of law and that political choices cannot be criminalised. It warns against the 'foreign agents' approach in the Commission's defence of democracy package but supports common transparency rules for interest representation paid from outside the EU. It reiterates calls for a dedicated vice-president for integrity and anti-corruption and for an independent ethics body.
Key points
- Parliament expresses serious concern about the alleged acts and offers full cooperation with ongoing investigations.
- It remains committed to fighting corruption, alleged attempts to influence Members and other undue interference in EU democratic processes.
- It calls for the EU to be vigilant against attempts by any third country, including Russia, to unduly influence its democratic processes.
- It recalls the need to respect due process, the rule of law and fundamental rights, and states that political choices cannot be criminalised and MEPs must not face further restrictions on expressing opinions in their mandate.
- It notes the Commission proposal on a defence of democracy package and warns against the 'foreign agents' approach, which could restrict civic space in the EU and globally.
- It strongly supports common transparency and accountability rules for interest representation services paid for or directed from outside the EU.
- It reiterates its call for a dedicated vice-president in charge of integrity and fighting corruption and foreign interference in Parliament.
- It reiterates its support for establishing an independent ethics body as soon as possible.
Who is affected
- Members of the European Parliament, who must not face further restrictions on expressing opinions in their mandate.
- Interest representation services paid for or directed from outside the EU, which would face common transparency and accountability rules.
- The European Parliament, which is called on to have a dedicated vice-president for integrity and anti-corruption.
- The European Union, which is called on to be vigilant against undue influence by third countries.
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
European Parliament resolution on Russiagate: allegations of Russian interference in the democratic processes of the European Union
–having regard to its resolution of 16 September 2021 on strengthening transparency and integrity in the EU institutions by setting up an independent EU ethics body,
− having regard to its resolution of 9 March 2022 on foreign interference in all democratic processes in the European Union, including disinformation,
− having regard to its resolution of 15 December 2022 on suspicions of corruption from Qatar and the broader need for transparency and accountability in the European institutions,
− having regard to its resolution of 13 July 2023 on recommendations for reform of the European Parliament’s rules on transparency, integrity, accountability and anti-corruption,
− having regard to Rules 9 and 10 of its Rules of Procedure and Annex I on the Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency,
A.whereas according to media reports, the Latvian security service intends to open an investigation into allegations of espionage on behalf a third country by MEP Tatjana Ždanoka;
B.whereas the case was immediately handed over to the European Parliament’s Advisory Committee on the Conduct of Members;
C.whereas the possible penalties under the Rules of Procedure include forfeiture of the entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance, temporary suspension from participation in all or some of the activities of Parliament and limitations on the right to access confidential or classified information;
D.whereas trust in Parliament’s integrity and the rule of law is paramount for the functioning of European democracy;
3.Remains committed to fighting all forms of corruption, alleged attempts to influence Members and other forms of undue interference in the EU’s democratic processes;
4.Calls for the European Union to be vigilant with regard to attempts by any third country, including Russia, to unduly influence its democratic processes;
5.Recalls the need to respect due process, the rule of law and fundamental rights; reiterates that political choices cannot be criminalised and that MEPs must not face further restrictions to the expression of their opinions when exercising their legitimate mandate;
6.Takes notes of the Commission proposal on a defence of democracy package (COM(2023)0630); warns against the approach proposed to tackle so-called ‘foreign agents’, which could lead to significant restrictions on civic space in the EU and globally; strongly supports, however, common transparency and accountability rules for interest representation services paid for or directed from outside the EU, with the aim of protecting the EU democratic sphere from covert outside interference;
7.Reiterates its call for a dedicated vice-president be put in charge of integrity and fighting corruption and foreign interference in Parliament;
8.Reiterates its support for the establishment of an independent ethics body as soon as possible, in line with its resolution of 16 September 2021;
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 27 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2024). “MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russiagate: allegations of Russian interference in the democratic processes of the European Union”. Text, 5 February 2024. docId B-9-2024-0123, reference B9-0123/2024. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-9-2024-0123 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: The text on the European Parliament’s website, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2024-0123_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/B-9-2024-0123 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-b-9-2024-0123,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russiagate: allegations of Russian interference in the democratic processes of the European Union}},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-02-05},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-9-2024-0123}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-9-2024-0123},
urldate = {2026-09-27},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId B-9-2024-0123, reference B9-0123/2024. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2024-0123\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}