Text · Resolution motion
On shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela
Motion B-10-2026-0231 · 2026/2704(RSP)
- Kind
- Resolution motion B-10-2026-0231
- Date
- 27 April 2026
- Committee
- on behalf of the ECR Group
- Rapporteur
- Adam Bielan, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Carlo Fidanza, Rihards Kols, Marlena Maląg, Alberico Gambino, Mariusz Kamiński, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Ivaylo Valchev, Aurelijus Veryga, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Alexandr Vondra, Bogdan Rzońca, Ondřej Krutílek, Veronika Vrecionová
- Dossier
- 2026/2704(RSP)
More facts (2)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Reference
- 2026/2704(RSP)
In short
A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.
AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
This resolution addresses the shortcomings of Venezuela's Amnesty Law, which was terminated prematurely and arbitrarily, undermining reconciliation and legal certainty. Parliament reaffirms support for the Venezuelan people, condemns repression by the Maduro regime, and calls for the release of political prisoners and democratic reforms.
Key points
- Condemns the arbitrary and unconstitutional termination of the Amnesty Law by Venezuela's Acting President on 23 April 2026.
- Notes that at least 473 individuals remain arbitrarily detained and that applications were rejected without clear criteria, raising concerns about limited scope and transparency.
- Criticises the amnesty process for failing to ensure safe return for exiles, lacking compensation and accountability, and leaving repressive laws in place.
- Stresses that the premature termination risks undermining legal certainty and equality before the law, and appears symbolic rather than a genuine break with repression.
- Reaffirms support for the Venezuelan people and condemns repression by the Maduro regime, whose election victory has never been recognised by the EU.
- Calls for close monitoring of developments and consideration in decisions on relations with Venezuela, including any potential lifting of sanctions.
- Calls on Venezuelan transitional authorities to ensure immediate and unconditional release of all political prisoners, including European, foreign and dual nationals.
- Calls for rebuilding democratic and civic space, restoring judicial independence, ending criminalisation of dissent, and enabling inclusive political transition.
- Calls for free and fair elections, including review of the National Electoral Council's composition, implicated in restricting opposition candidate registration.
Who is affected
- Venezuelan transitional authorities: must release political prisoners and implement democratic reforms.
- Political prisoners in Venezuela, including European, foreign and dual nationals: targeted for release.
- Venezuelan people: supported in their aspiration for democratic transition.
Figures and deadlines
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
whereas the Amnesty Law passed in Venezuela on 19 February 2026 was presented by the transitional authorities as a step toward national reconciliation, granting amnesty for individuals accused or convicted of “political crimes or related offenses” linked to 13 specific political crises between 1999 and 2026; whereas on 23 April 2026, Venezuela’s Acting President unilaterally declared the end of the application of the Amnesty Law, in an arbitrary and unconstitutional move;
whereas, while hundreds have benefited from the Amnesty Law, human rights organisations report that at least 473 individuals remain arbitrarily detained, and that numerous applications were rejected without clear criteria or procedures, raising concerns over its limited scope, lack of transparency, and unequal access to justice;
whereas the amnesty process had relied on politically criticised judicial review, failed to ensure safe return for exiled Venezuelans, and providing no compensation or accountability mechanisms and leaving repressive laws in place enabling continued criminalisation of dissent;
whereas the premature termination of the law before its effects were fully exhausted, and in the absence of clear monitoring mechanisms, risks undermining legal certainty and equality before the law; whereas the measure appears to have had a largely symbolic character aimed at improving the international image of the transitional authorities rather than constituting a genuine break with past patterns of repression;
Reaffirms its unconditional support for the Venezuelan people, and for its aspiration for a democratic transition in Venezuela, condemning the acts of repression by the Maduro regime, whose self-proclaimed election victory has never been recognised by the EU or its main international partners;
Underlines that, although the Amnesty Law initially appeared to be a relevant step towards easing tensions and supporting the release of detainees, its premature termination, contrary to the rule of law, together with its limited scope and discriminatory implementation, undermine the objectives of coexistence and peace and hamper political reconciliation; stresses that developments should be closely monitored and taken into account in decisions on relations with Venezuela, including any potential lifting of sanctions;
Calls on the Venezuelan transitional authorities to ensure the immediate and unconditional release of all political prisoners, including European, foreign and dual nationals, who remain arbitrarily detained in Venezuela;
Reiterates its call on Venezuelan transitional authorities to take concrete steps towards rebuilding democratic and civic space, restoring judicial independence, ending the criminalisation of political dissent and opposition, and enabling an inclusive political transition;
Calls on the Venezuelan transitional authorities to create the conditions for free and fair elections, including a review of the composition of the National Electoral Council, whose current membership has been implicated in restricting the registration of opposition candidates in previous elections;
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Shortcomings and deficiencies of the 'Amnesty Law' in Venezuela”. Text, 27 April 2026. docId B-10-2026-0231, reference B10-0231/2026. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2026-0231 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: The text on the European Parliament’s website, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-10-2026-0231_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/B-10-2026-0231 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-b-10-2026-0231,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Shortcomings and deficiencies of the 'Amnesty Law' in Venezuela}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-04-27},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2026-0231}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2026-0231},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId B-10-2026-0231, reference B10-0231/2026. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-10-2026-0231\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}