Changes from resolution motion to adopted text

27. Stresses that AI-driven search and assistant tools, when offered as or within designated core platform services, such as Google’s AI Overviews, Google’s Gemini, Apple’s Siri, Meta’s WhatsApp AI, Amazon’s Rufus or Microsoft’s Copilot, are increasingly becoming new gateways to information, commerce and digital services; calls on the Commission to examine, in a timely manner, whether and how such functionalities are used by gatekeepers in ways that may undermine contestability and fairness, including through default settings, pre-selection, or the discriminatory presentation or selection of outcomes;

28. Stresses that the integrated digital ecosystems of certain gatekeepers, composed of multiple core platform services and related services, may provide them with a structural competitive advantage in the development, training and deployment of AI systems, in particular where access to large-scale, multi-service data flows, user interfaces, distribution channels or complementary services can be leveraged across ecosystems; underlines, therefore, the need for the rigorous enforcement of Article 6(10) of the DMA, in order to ensure effective data access rights for business users and to prevent the leveraging of ecosystem-wide data advantages in ways that undermine contestability and fairness, including where AI functionalities are integrated into core platform services or may become new gateways to information, commerce and digital services;

29. Calls on the Commission to ensure sufficient human and financial resources for DMA enforcement, in line with the Regulation’s scope, complexity and strategic importance, and calls for a significant reinforcement of staffing;

30. Expects that the forthcoming review of the DMA will be transparent and firmly grounded in enforcement experience and evidence from its application, including an assessment of real-world outcomes for users and markets, as well as of the practical impact of implementation on consumers, notably in relation to access to innovation, usability, privacy and security, while taking due account of technological developments and the need to ensure that the framework remains future-proof; invites the Commission to particularly take into account feedback received from SMEs during the review process;

31. Stresses that the review should focus on strengthening the effectiveness and enforceability of the existing framework while addressing challenges posed by rapidly evolving technologies and ecosystems by making full use of the powers available under the current framework, including through clarifications and guidance where necessary, and should avoid reopening the core objectives, scope or architecture of the DMA unless clearly justified by demonstrated enforcement gaps or significant market developments;