Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from resolution motion to adopted text

B-10-2025-0407 → TA-10-2025-0222

From
B-10-2025-0407 resolution motion of 24 Sept 2025
To
TA-10-2025-0222 Adopted text of 8 Oct 2025
Changes
4 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+4 added · −2 removed · 5 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize DP51291 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Title (to)
Genetically modified maize DP51291
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The only substantive change is that Parliament now calls for repealing the adopted decision rather than withdrawing the draft.4 The other changes are formal: the decision is referred to by its final name and number.123

The notes class 1 change as substance, 3 as formal, 0 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 2 of 2: Paragraphs 61–65

5 unchanged paragraphs

5. Calls on the Commission not to authorise the GM maize due to the increased risks to biodiversity, food safety and workers’ health in line with the One Health approach;

6. Expects the Commission, as matter of urgency, to deliver on its commitment to come forward with a proposal to ensure that hazardous chemicals banned in the Union are not produced for export;

7. Welcomes the fact that the Commission finally recognised, in a letter of 11 September 2020 to Members, the need to take sustainability into account when it comes to authorisation decisions on GMOs; expresses its deep disappointment, however, that, since then the Commission has continued to authorise GMOs for import into the Union, despite ongoing objections by Parliament and a majority of Member States voting against;

8. Urges the Commission, again, to take into account the Union’s obligations under international agreements, such as the Paris Climate Agreement, the UN CBD and the UN SDGs; reiterates its call for draft implementing acts to be accompanied by an explanatory memorandum explaining how they uphold the principle of ‘do no harm’;

9. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission, and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Changes between B-10-2025-0407 and TA-10-2025-0222”. Text, 8 October 2025. from B-10-2025-0407, to TA-10-2025-0222, reference 2025/2807(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2025-0407/compare/TA-10-2025-0222?all=1&part=2 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-10-08,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between B-10-2025-0407 and TA-10-2025-0222}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2025-0407/compare/TA-10-2025-0222?all=1&part=2}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2025-0407/compare/TA-10-2025-0222?all=1&part=2},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from B-10-2025-0407, to TA-10-2025-0222, reference 2025/2807(RSP). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}