Skip to content

Text · Resolution motion

On Georgia’s worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraud

Motion B-10-2024-0181 · 2024/2933(RSP)

Kind
Resolution motion B-10-2024-0181
Date
22 November 2024
Committee
on behalf of The Left Group
Rapporteur
Danilo Della Valle
More facts (3)
Subject matter
EXT, PESC
Reference
2024/2933(RSP)
More

In short

A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.

AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

This resolution addresses Georgia's democratic crisis after the October 2024 parliamentary elections, noting alleged fraud and concerning laws. It calls for dialogue, respect for results, and addressing recommendations. It rejects the 'family values' law as an attack on LGBTQ+ rights and media freedom, and notes risks from the 'foreign influence' law. It also regrets the abolition of gender quotas and calls for action.

Key points

  1. Takes note of the 26 October 2024 parliamentary election results and calls on all sides to respect them, work constructively, and address polarisation.
  2. Calls for the EU to engage in holistic dialogue with Georgia's new government.
  3. Regrets the European Council's decision to suspend financial assistance to Georgia, while underlining the need to maintain visa liberalisation.
  4. Rejects the 'family values and protection of minors' law as an attack on the LGBTQ+ community and a threat to civil liberties, including media censorship.
  5. Notes that the 'transparency of foreign influence' law risks labelling NGOs and media as 'foreign agents'.
  6. Emphasises that freedom of expression and assembly must be respected, and expresses concern over disproportionate force against demonstrators.
  7. Regrets the abolition of mandatory gender quotas and calls on the government to promote balanced gender representation.
  8. Encourages peaceful resolution of issues with Russia, noting statements from both sides.

Who is affected

  • The Government and Parliament of Georgia, which are called on to respect election results, address recommendations, and undertake initiatives on gender equality.
  • The EU institutions, which are called on to engage in dialogue and maintain visa liberalisation.
  • LGBTQ+ people in Georgia, affected by the 'family values' law that bans gender transition and restricts rights.
  • NGOs and media in Georgia, potentially labelled as 'foreign agents' under the 'foreign influence' law.

Figures and deadlines

  • 89 seats in the 150-seat parliament won by Georgian Dream after receiving 53.93% of the vote.
  • Four opposition parties passed the 5% threshold and received a combined 37.44% of the vote.
  • 529 observers from 42 countries monitored the elections.
  • Over 26,000 NGOs in Georgia, 1 for every 142 citizens.
  • The 'foreign influence' law requires registration for organisations receiving more than 20% of funding from overseas.

Read the text · Report a problem

Text

The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.

B100181/2024

European Parliament resolution on Georgia’s worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraud

(2024/2933(RSP))

The European Parliament,

–– having regard to its previous resolutions on Georgia,

–having regard to the European Council conclusions of 14 and 15 December 2023 and of 27 June 2024,

–having regard to the Commission communication of 8 November 2023 entitled ‘2023 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy’ (COM(2023)0690) and to the accompanying Commission staff working document of 8 November 2023 entitled ‘Georgia 2023 Report’ (SWD(2023)0697),

–having regard to the joint statement of 8 November 2023 by the Chair of the Delegation for relations with the South Caucasus and the European Parliament’s Standing Rapporteur on Georgia on the Commission recommendation of 8 November 2023 on the EU membership application of Georgia,

–having regard to the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, which entered into force on 1 July 2016,

–having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in particular Article 215(2) thereof, and to the Treaty on European Union, in particular Article 29 thereof,

–having regard to the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia and to its September 2009 report,

–having regard to the preliminary conclusions of the international election observation mission relating to the parliamentary elections of 26 October 2024,

–having regard to Rule 136(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

A.whereas the exercise of freedom of opinion, expression, association and peaceful assembly is a fundamental right enshrined in the Georgian Constitution;

B.whereas Georgia, as a signatory to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as a member of the Council of Europe and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), has committed itself to the principles of democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental freedoms and human rights;

C.whereas Russia has illegally occupied Abkhazia and South Ossetia since the August 2008 conflict that followed Georgia’s attack on Tskhinvali on the night of 7 to 8 August 2008;

D.whereas in June 2014, the EU and Georgia signed an Association Agreement that entered into force on 1 July 2016;

E.whereas in December 2023, the European Council granted Georgia the status of EU candidate country;

F.whereas in March 2017, the EU visa liberalisation agreement with Georgia came into effect, following Georgia’s successful implementation of all the benchmarks set in its visa liberalisation action plan;

G.whereas the parliamentary elections held on 26 October 2024 were the first to take place in Georgia under a fully proportional electoral system and were also the first elections since Georgia was granted the status of EU candidate country in December 2023;

H.whereas the legal framework in Georgia provides an adequate basis for conducting democratic elections but several long-standing recommendations from the OSCE’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) and the Venice Commission remain unaddressed, despite numerous changes;

I.whereas on 16 November 2024, the Georgian electoral authority announced the official results of the country’s parliamentary elections, confirming that the ruling Georgian Dream party had won 89 seats in the 150-seat parliament after receiving 53.93 % of the vote , while four opposition parties had passed the 5 % threshold and had received a combined 37.44 % of the vote;

J.whereas the international election observation mission to the parliamentary elections in Georgia comprised 529 observers from 42 countries, including 380 experts observers deployed by the ODIHR, 60 parliamentarians and staff from the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, 39 from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, 38 from the NATO Parliamentary Assembly and 12 from the European Parliament;

K.whereas the election campaign in Georgia was competitive, allowing contestants to generally campaign freely, but it was marred by the use of highly divisive rhetoric and imagery, as well as isolated incidents of violence, event disruptions, verbal abuse and the destruction of campaign materials, reported by both ruling and opposition parties;

L.whereas the administration of the elections was generally orderly but the elections took place in a tense environment, with overcrowding in many polling stations and several incidents of physical altercations and intimidation;

M.whereas President Salome Zourabichvili publicly accused the Georgian Government of electoral fraud and irregularities in the recent parliamentary elections; whereas President Zourabichvili subsequently refused to testify before the country’s Prosecutor’s Office regarding these allegations;

N.whereas Georgia has over 26 000 non-governmental organisations (NGOs) – 1 for every 142 citizens, which is greater than the EU average;

O.whereas following the 2020 parliamentary elections, the NGO International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy, which received external funding, challenged the official election results and questioned their legitimacy, but later admitted that it had made a significant error in its calculations;

P.whereas the Parliament of Georgia adopted the ‘transparency of foreign influence’ law, which was signed into law on 3 June 2024 despite the President’s veto; whereas the law was met with protest from parts of Georgian civil society; whereas the law requires organisations receiving more than 20 % of their funding from overseas to register as ‘agents of foreign influence’;

Q.whereas on 17 September 2024, the Parliament of Georgia adopted the ‘family values and the protection of minors’ law, which bans gender transition, prohibits adoption by gay and transgender people, nullifies, on Georgian territory, same-sex marriages performed abroad, and provides a legal basis for the authorities to outlaw Pride events and public displays of the LGBTQ+ rainbow flag and to impose the censorship of films and books;

R.whereas the Venice Commission stresses that, in accordance with international standards, the state has a positive obligation to ensure gender equality; whereas on 4 April 2024, the Parliament of Georgia repealed the 2020 amendments introducing gender quotas for candidate lists in parliamentary and local elections, and it abolished the associated financial incentives for political parties;

1.Takes note of the results of the parliamentary elections in Georgia that took place on 26 October 2024; calls on all sides to respect the result, work constructively while upholding the rule of law and address the increasing polarisation of Georgian society; calls for the EU to enter into a holistic and purposeful dialogue with the new Government of Georgia;

2.Takes note of the preliminary report of the international election observation mission, which stated that the overall legal framework in Georgia provides an adequate basis for conducting democratic elections, voters were offered a wide choice of 18 candidate lists, contestants could generally campaign freely and the administration of the elections was generally orderly; regrets that these elections took place in a polarised environment and on an uneven playing field, and that there were reports of pressure on voters and cases where vote secrecy was potentially compromised; encourages the new Government of Georgia to address ODIHR and Venice Commission recommendations;

3.Recalls that the EU accession process is based on objective criteria; regrets the European Council’s decision to suspend financial assistance to Georgia; underlines the benefits of the visa liberalisation agreement and the need to maintain it; emphasises the need for a constructive dialogue between the Government of Georgia and the EU;

4.Rejects, with deep concern, the adoption of the ‘family values and the protection of minors’ law, and considers it an attack on the LGBTQ+ community and a threat to civil liberties as a whole; rejects, furthermore, the law’s implications for the media, given that it imposes censorship by banning broadcasters from reporting freely on LGBTQ+ issues; reiterates that media freedom and tolerance towards sexual minorities are key factors for the functioning of a democracy;

5.Notes that the ‘transparency of foreign influence’ law entails the risk that NGOs, civil society organisations, opposition media outlets and other organisations that receive funds from other countries will be labelled as ‘foreign agents’;

6.Emphasises that the rights to freedom of expression and assembly and to peaceful protest are fundamental freedoms and must be respected in all circumstances; expresses concern over reports of the unnecessary and disproportionate use of force against demonstrators; highlights the statement by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, that ‘[a]ny restrictions to these rights must abide by principles of legality, necessity and proportionality. The use of force during protests should always be exceptional and a measure of last resort when facing an imminent threat’;

7.Regrets the Parliament of Georgia’s decision to abolish mandatory gender quotas; reiterates the need for balanced gender representation in political participation; regrets the under-representation of women in the electoral process; calls on the Government of Georgia to undertake initiatives in this regard;

8.Takes note of Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s statements at a press conference at the UN General Assembly in New York and the corresponding willingness of Georgian officials to resolve outstanding issues in a peaceful, diplomatic way; encourages both sides to undertake solid initiatives in this direction;

9.Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Council of Europe, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and the President, Government and Parliament of Georgia.

Connections

The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Georgia’s worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraud”. Text, 22 November 2024. docId B-10-2024-0181, reference B10-0181/2024. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2024-0181 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: The text on the European Parliament’s website, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-10-2024-0181_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/B-10-2024-0181 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-b-10-2024-0181,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Georgia’s worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraud}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-11-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2024-0181}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2024-0181},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. docId B-10-2024-0181, reference B10-0181/2024. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-10-2024-0181\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}