Text · Resolution motion
On the case of Bülent Mumay in Türkiye
Motion B-10-2024-0100 · 2024/2856(RSP)
- Kind
- Resolution motion B-10-2024-0100
- Date
- 7 October 2024
- Committee
- on behalf of the ECR Group
- Rapporteur
- Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Adam Bielan, Veronika Vrecionová, Ondřej Krutílek, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Assita Kanko
- Dossier
- 2024/2856(RSP)
More facts (3)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Subject matter
- PESC, DDLH
- Reference
- 2024/2856(RSP)
In short
A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.
AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
This resolution concerns the case of journalist Bülent Mumay in Türkiye, who was sentenced to 20 months in prison for social media posts. It calls for the annulment of all charges against him and expresses concerns about press freedom in Türkiye. It also recognizes the decrease in jailed journalists but remains concerned about the deterioration of free press, and calls for revision and monitoring of Türkiye's Disinformation Law.
Key points
- Calls for the immediate and unconditional annulment of all charges against Bülent Mumay.
- Recognises that 90% of national media in Türkiye is under government control, and that DW's websites were blocked in 2022 due to lack of licenses.
- Recognises the decrease in jailed journalists but remains concerned about the deterioration of free and open press.
- Calls for revision and close monitoring of Türkiye's Disinformation Law to prevent punitive use against free press.
- Considers press freedom under constant duress and recognises a pattern of arbitrary charges against journalists.
Who is affected
- Journalists in Türkiye, particularly Bülent Mumay, who face legal charges for social media posts.
- Turkish government and courts, which are urged to annul charges and revise the Disinformation Law.
Figures and deadlines
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
A.whereas Bülent Mumay is a journalist working in Türkiye for Deutsche Welle (DW) who posted a story on Twitter (now X), naming a construction company that had unfairly seized the funds from the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (IMM) that were meant for a Istanbul subway project;
B.whereas the construction company Mumay exposed, Met-Gün İnşaat, got the Criminal Judgeship of Pease to issue a ban on Mumay’s tweet based on ‘violation of personal rights’;
C.whereas Mumay was charged with ‘illegally obtaining or distributing personal data’ and sentenced to 20 months in prison for social media posts where he criticized the pro-government construction company’s seizure of Istanbul Municipality’s subway fund; whereas Mumay’s appeal was rejected by the Appeals court on 20 August 2024;
D.whereas the Turkish court orders Twitter (now X), to remove any post related to the issue after already ordering the removal of Bülent Mumay’s posts at the request of the construction company owner while simultaneously ordering the Information and Technologies Authority (BTK) to block access to any news reports that Mumay’s appeal was rejected;
E.whereas Türkiye had 13 journalists jailed as of a census counted in 2023, which is considered an improvement from the previous count of 40 in 2022 while many of those freed are still under investigation or are awaiting trial;
2.Recognises that 90% of the national media in Türkiye is now under government control, while DW Germany's state-owned broadcaster, had their websites blocked in the country in 2022 because the company did not have the necessary licenses and decided not to apply for them.
3.Recognises that the number of jailed journalists has decreased considerably in Türkiye in the past two years, yet remains concerned with the deterioration of free and open press within the country.
4.Recognises that within the context of gross regional instability, the attempted coup d’etat in 2016 and frequent terrorist attacks and cross border raids, Türkiye’s “Disinformation Law”, which allows the state to sentence someone to up to 3 years for sharing, liking or reposting posts on social media that the Turkish government considers to be disinformation that is meant to cause panic, should be revised and implementation closely monitored so it is not used punitively against free and independent press.
5.Considers the freedom of the press to be under constant duress under Erdogan’s government and recognises the pattern of levelling arbitrary charges against journalists.
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2024). “MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the case of Bülent Mumay in Türkiye”. Text, 7 October 2024. docId B-10-2024-0100, reference B10-0100/2024. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2024-0100 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: The text on the European Parliament’s website, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-10-2024-0100_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/B-10-2024-0100 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-b-10-2024-0100,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the case of Bülent Mumay in Türkiye}},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-10-07},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2024-0100}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2024-0100},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId B-10-2024-0100, reference B10-0100/2024. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-10-2024-0100\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}