Text · Resolution motion
On the case of Bülent Mumay in Türkiye
Motion B-10-2024-0098 · 2024/2856(RSP)
- Kind
- Resolution motion B-10-2024-0098
- Date
- 7 October 2024
- Committee
- on behalf of the S&D Group
- Rapporteur
- Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Nikos Papandreou
- Dossier
- 2024/2856(RSP)
More facts (3)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Subject matter
- DDLH, PESC
- Reference
- 2024/2856(RSP)
In short
A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.
AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
The resolution concerns the conviction of journalist Bülent Mumay in Türkiye. It deplores the upheld prison sentence and blocked news reports, calls for his release, and condemns judicial harassment of journalists.
Key points
- Expresses deep concern over the conviction of journalist Bülent Mumay for his press investigations and social media posts.
- Deplores the appeals court decision to uphold the 20-month prison sentence and order blocking of access to related news reports.
- Calls for revision of the sentence and immediate release of Bülent Mumay, citing absence of solid legal charges.
- Considers the sentence part of a broader pattern of judicial harassment targeting independent journalists, activists, and opposition members in Türkiye.
- Recalls previous positions condemning prosecution, censorship, and harassment of journalists and independent media in Türkiye.
- Calls on Turkish authorities to respect press freedoms and let journalists practise freely.
- Continues to condemn lack of independence of prosecution and judiciary and political instrumentalisation of the judicial system in Türkiye.
Who is affected
- Journalist Bülent Mumay, who faces imprisonment and blocked news coverage.
- Independent journalists, activists, and opposition members in Türkiye affected by judicial harassment.
Figures and deadlines
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
A.whereas on May 6, 2023, Bülent Mumay was sentenced to 20 months in prison for "spreading personal data" and for his social media posts about a pro-government construction company's alleged seizure of Istanbul Municipality's subway funds in the period of the previous administration,
B.whereas a Turkish court ordered to block access to his tweet, which alleged that the contractors were government-affiliated,
C.whereas on August 20, 2024, an appeals court upheld the 20-month prison sentence, and ordered the Information and Communication Technologies Authority (BTK) to block access to news reports about the upheld prison sentence,
D.whereas the charges against Bülent Mumay include illegally obtaining or disseminating personal data, and appear to be only an attempt to silence critical journalism,
E.whereas several press organizations have condemned the recent sentence, citing it as a grave assault on press freedom,
F.whereas Bülent Mumay was also arrested and later released in 2016 in the days following the coup attempt in Türkiye,
1.Is deeply concerned for the conviction of journalist Bülent Mumay following his press investigations and social media posts criticizing the seizure of municipal funds by a pro-government company,
2.Deplores the decision by Turkish appeals court to uphold the 20-month prison sentence and to order the blocking of access to related news reports,
3.Calls for the revision of the sentence and for the immediate release of Bülent Mumay, in the patent absence of solid legal charges, in line with Türkiye’s international and constitutional obligations;
4.Considers that the sentence on Bülent Mumay follows a broader pattern of judicial harassment targeting independent journalists, activists and opposition members in Türkiye, where legal intimidation, censorship, and financial coercion are often reported as ways to suppress criticism and investigative press,
5.Recalls its previous positions condemning the prosecution, censorship and harassment of journalists and independent media in Türkiye;
6.Calls again on the Turkish authorities to respect press freedoms in accordance with international standards and to let journalists practise its profession freely, as this provides for an overall healthier democracy and society;
7.Continues to condemn the lack of independence of the prosecution and judiciary and the political instrumentalisation of the judicial system in Türkiye;
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2024). “MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the case of Bülent Mumay in Türkiye”. Text, 7 October 2024. docId B-10-2024-0098, reference B10-0098/2024. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2024-0098 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: The text on the European Parliament’s website, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-10-2024-0098_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/B-10-2024-0098 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-b-10-2024-0098,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the case of Bülent Mumay in Türkiye}},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-10-07},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2024-0098}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/B-10-2024-0098},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId B-10-2024-0098, reference B10-0098/2024. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-10-2024-0098\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}