Text · Opinion parliamentary committee
On the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on discontinuing seasonal changes of time
Document AGRI-AD-630764 · COM(2018)639 – C80408/2018 – 2018/0332(COD)
- Kind
- Opinion parliamentary committee AGRI-AD-630764
- Date
- 20 February 2019
- Committee
- Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
- Rapporteur
- Ulrike Müller
- Dossier
- 2018-0332
More facts (2)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Reference
- COM(2018)639 – C80408/2018 – 2018/0332(COD)
In short
A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.
AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-flash · 25 Sept 2026
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development gives its opinion on the Commission proposal to discontinue seasonal clock changes. It supports ending the bi-annual change but asks to postpone the start from 1 April 2019 to 1 April 2020. It proposes that member states jointly choose either permanent standard time or permanent summer time across the Union, and that they coordinate time zone changes by groups of neighbouring countries. It also proposes returning to wintertime as the standard time, and adds that member states should consult each other and coordinate any time zone changes.
Position. The committee supports discontinuing seasonal clock changes but asks the lead committee to amend the proposal: postpone the start to 2020, return to wintertime as standard time, and coordinate member states by neighbouring groups and time zones.
Key points
- The committee supports the Commission proposal to discontinue the seasonal change of time, following the public consultation that showed strong citizen support for abolishing the bi-annual clock change.
- It notes that discontinuing the change affects citizens' and animals' health, and that member states' territories span three time zones (GMT 0, +1 and +2), so an uncoordinated approach could disrupt the single market.
- It proposes postponing the entry into force from 1 April 2019 to 2020, because the current date is too early for member states to prepare and coordinate.
- It proposes returning to wintertime as the standard time, since year-round summertime would technically be a change of time zone.
- It proposes coordinating member states by groups of neighbouring countries, in line with the time zones, to preserve the current situation.
- Amendment 1 adds that the resolution confirmed it is essential to maintain a harmonised approach to time arrangements throughout the Union.
- Amendment 2 adds that harmonised Union rules create legal certainty and long-term dependability, and that evidence shows the benefits of summer-time arrangements do not outweigh the inconveniences of the biannual change.
- Amendment 3 adds that modern agricultural equipment and practices have made most earlier concerns about summer time no longer relevant, while concerns about animals' biorhythm and farmers' working conditions remain.
- Amendment 4 adds that national action groups and specialists from human and veterinary medicine, agriculture, education and tourism assessed the adverse effects of the yearly clock change.
- Amendment 5 adds that member states should be given time and opportunity to carry out their own public consultations and impact assessments on discontinuing seasonal time changes.
- Amendment 6 adds that member states shall consult each other and coordinate any time zone changes to avoid impractical time zones and burdensome disruptions to the internal market.
- Amendment 9 adds that member states shall jointly choose either permanent standard time or permanent summer time to apply across the Union, to avoid a patchwork of times.
Who is affected
- Member states: they would jointly choose a permanent time and coordinate any time zone changes.
- The agricultural sector: the amendments cite effects on livestock farmers, animals' biorhythm and agricultural productivity.
- Citizens: the text cites public support for abolishing the clock change and concerns raised by citizens' initiatives.
- The Commission: it would be notified of member states' intentions to change standard time and would inform other member states and the public.
Figures and deadlines
- 1 April 2019: the date the committee says is too early and proposes postponing to 2020.
- 1 April 2020: the proposed new date of application, replacing 1 April 2019.
- 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 29 March 2020: the start of the last summer-time period under Directive 2000/84/EC.
- 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 31 October 2020: when member states adopting wintertime as standard time should change their standard time.
- GMT 0, +1 and +2: the three time zones the member states' territories span.
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
Jump to an amendment (13)
Short justification
In its resolution of 8 February 2018, the European Parliament called the European Commission to conduct an assessment on summer time arrangements and, if necessary, come up with a proposal for its revision.
Subsequently, the European Commission held a public consultation during the 2018 summer. The consultation showed a great support from the citizens to abolish the bi-annual change of clock.
The rapporteur underlines the will of the Parliament to listen to this clear demand from the European citizens. Therefore, the rapporteur supports the Commission proposal that was presented on 12 September 2018 to discontinue seasonal change of time.
Discontinuing seasonal change has several important implications. These implications concern the health of citizens because of the impact on biorhythm, but also the health of animals. The implications are also great regarding EU-harmonisation. The territories of the Member states stretch over three different time zones (GMT 0, +1 and +2) and any unprepared or non-coordinated approach could disturb the workings of single market. The competence to choose a standard time for its territory remains indeed in the hands of the Member states. Consequently, there is a high risk of fragmentation concerning the different time zones, as neighbouring countries could opt to switch to different time.
The rapporteur has also taken into account that the Austrian presidency did not make it a priority and that the Transports ministers remain divided on the issue when it was discussed during their meeting in October and June 2018 and December 2017.
Considering these limitations to the discontinuation of the summertime directive, the rapporteur proposes the following approach:
Coordination is crucial to ensure the functioning of the single market, for having a different time has implications on numerous of economic sectors and on the movements of citizens. This is especially true since the previous directive on time change was adopted when there were still only 15 member states. For these reasons, the rapporteur considers that an entry into force on 1 April 2019 is too early and needs to be postponed to 2020 in order to allow member states to prepare for the change, but also to coordinate.
Notwithstanding the Member states competence to set, the rapporteur proposes to return to the wintertime as the standard time. As a year round summertime would technically represent a change of time zone, all countries opting for wintertime as standard time would ease the process of discontinuing time change and prevent the fragmentation between member states.
Similarly, another way to ease the process is the coordination of Member states by groups of neighbouring countries and especially in line with the time zones (GMT 0, +1 and +2) to preserve the current state of play.
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (2) In its resolution of 8 February 2018, the European Parliament called on the Commission to conduct an assessment of the summer-time arrangements provided by Directive 2000/84/EC and, if necessary, to come up with a proposal for its revision. That resolution also confirmed that it is essential to maintain a harmonised approach to time arrangements throughout the Union. | (2) In its resolution of 8 February 2018, the European Parliament called on the Commission to conduct an assessment of the summer-time arrangements provided by Directive 2000/84/EC together with the Member States and, if necessary, to come up with a proposal for its revision. That resolution also confirmed that it is essential to maintain a harmonised approach to time arrangements throughout the Union. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services. Evidence is not conclusive as to whether the benefits of summer-time arrangements outweigh the inconveniences linked to a biannual change of time. | (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market, create legal certainty and long-term dependability and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling and performance of passenger and goods transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services and effects on agricultural productivity. Evidence shows that the benefits of summer-time arrangements do not outweigh the inconveniences linked to a biannual change of time. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3 a) In this context the situation of livestock farmers can serve as an example where the summer-time arrangements had been initially deemed incompatible with agricultural working practices, notably regarding the already very early start of the working day under standard time. Also, the bi-annual transition to summer-time was thought to make it harder to get the produce or animals out to the markets. And finally, due to cows following their natural milking rhythm, a reduction of milk yields was assumed. However, modern agricultural equipment and practices have revolutionised farming in a way that makes most of these concerns no longer appear relevant while concerns regarding the biorhythm of animals as well as farmers' working conditions still prevail. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to summer-time arrangements. | (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements thanks to the active participation of national action groups in many Member States, and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. During the discussions held, specialists from various fields, including human and veterinary medicine, agriculture, education and tourism, assessed the adverse effects of the yearly changing of the clocks. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to summer-time arrangements. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (4 a) A number of citizens' initiatives have highlighted citizens' concerns about the biannual clock change and Member States should be given the time and opportunity to carry out their own public consultations and impact assessments in order to better understand the implications of discontinuing season time changes in all regions. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (4 b) In order to ensure a harmonised implementation of this Directive, Member States shall consult each other and coordinate any time zone changes in order to avoid impractical time zones and burdensome disruptions to the internal market. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The Commission should, on the basis of that notification, inform all other Member States so that they can take all necessary measures. It should also inform the general public and stakeholders by publishing this information. | (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications, the agricultural sector and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The Commission should, on the basis of that notification, inform all other Member States so that they can take all necessary measures. It should also inform the general public and stakeholders by publishing this information. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 2019, so that the last summer-time period subject to the rules of Directive 2000/84/EC should start, in every Member State, at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 31 March 2019. Member States that, after that summer-time period, intend to adopt a standard time corresponding to the time applied during the winter season in accordance with Directive 2000/84/EC should change their standard time at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 27 October 2019, so that similar and lasting changes occurring in different Member States take place simultaneously. It is desirable that Member States take the decisions on the standard time that each of them will apply as from 2019 in a concerted manner. | (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 2020, so that the last summer-time period subject to the rules of Directive 2000/84/EC should start, in every Member State, at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 29 March 2020. Member States that, after that summer-time period, intend to adopt a standard time corresponding to the time applied during the winter season in accordance with Directive 2000/84/EC should change their standard time at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 31 October2020, so that similar and lasting changes occurring in different Member States take place simultaneously in a well-coordinated manner. It is desirable that Member States take the decisions on the standard time that each of them will apply as from 2020 in a concerted manner. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Member States shall not apply seasonal changes to their standard time or times. | 1. Member States shall not apply seasonal changes to their standard time or times. They shall jointly choose either permanent standard time or permanent summer time to apply across the Union. |
The aim is to avoid a patchwork of times between EU countries. A common choice at EU level would be good for the single market and citizens’ everyday lives.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 2019, provided that they do so at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 27 October 2019. The Member States shall notify this decision in accordance with Article 2. | 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 2020, provided that they do so at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 31 October 2020. The Member States shall notify this decision in accordance with Article 2. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 2019 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions. | Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 2020 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 2019. | They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 2020. |
Procedure pages and committee votes
How the committees handled the text and how their members voted on it. Collapsed.
Procedure – committee asked for opinion 1 block
| Title | Discontinuing seasonal changes of time | |
| References | COM(2018)0639 – C8-0408/2018 – 2018/0332(COD) | |
| Committee responsible Date announced in plenary | TRAN 13.9.2018 | |
| Opinion by Date announced in plenary | AGRI 13.9.2018 | |
| Rapporteur Date appointed | Ulrike Müller 9.10.2018 | |
| Date adopted | 19.2.2019 | |
| Result of final vote | +: –: 0: | 25 9 3 |
| Members present for the final vote | Clara Eugenia Aguilera García, Eric Andrieu, José Bové, Daniel Buda, Matt Carthy, Jacques Colombier, Michel Dantin, Albert Deß, Jørn Dohrmann, Herbert Dorfmann, Norbert Erdős, Luke Ming Flanagan, Karine Gloanec Maurin, Beata Gosiewska, Martin Häusling, Esther Herranz García, Jan Huitema, Ivan Jakovčić, Norbert Lins, Philippe Loiseau, Mairead McGuinness, James Nicholson, Maria Noichl, Marijana Petir, Laurenţiu Rebega, Jens Rohde, Bronis Ropė, Maria Lidia Senra Rodríguez, Ricardo Serrão Santos, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Tibor Szanyi, Maria Gabriela Zoană, Marco Zullo | |
| Substitutes present for the final vote | Franc Bogovič, Angélique Delahaye, Karin Kadenbach, Elsi Katainen, Thomas Waitz |
Final vote by roll call in committee asked for opinion 6 blocks
25 · For
- ALDE
- Ivan Jakovčić, Elsi Katainen
- ECR
- Jørn Dohrmann
- ENF
- Jacques Colombier, Philippe Loiseau
- GUE/NGL
- Maria Lidia Senra Rodríguez
- EPP
- Franc Bogovič, Daniel Buda, Angélique Delahaye, Albert Deß, Herbert Dorfmann, Norbert Erdős, Esther Herranz García, Norbert Lins, Marijana Petir, Czesław Adam Siekierski
- S&D
- Eric Andrieu, Karine Gloanec Maurin, Karin Kadenbach, Maria Noichl, Tibor Szanyi, Maria Gabriela Zoană
- VERTS/ALE
- José Bové, Martin Häusling, Bronis Ropė
9 · Against
- ALDE
- Jan Huitema, Jens Rohde
- ECR
- James Nicholson
- EFDD
- Marco Zullo
- GUE/NGL
- Matt Carthy, Luke Ming Flanagan
- EPP
- Michel Dantin
- S&D
- Clara Eugenia Aguilera García, Ricardo Serrão Santos
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2019). “OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on discontinuing seasonal changes of time”. Text, 20 February 2019. docId AGRI-AD-630764. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AGRI-AD-630764 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/AGRI-AD-630764 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-agri-ad-630764,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on discontinuing seasonal changes of time}},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-02-20},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AGRI-AD-630764}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AGRI-AD-630764},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId AGRI-AD-630764. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}