Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report

AFET-PR-784260 → A-10-2026-0162

From
AFET-PR-784260 report parliamentary committee draft of 12 Feb 2026
To
A-10-2026-0162 Plenary report of 9 Jun 2026
Changes
21 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+84 added · −27 removed · 17 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on the 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia
Title (to)
on the 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds extensive new positions on accession, including calls for constitutional changes, intergovernmental conference, and gradual integration.4513 Expands concerns on rule of law, corruption, judiciary, and media freedom with detailed calls for reforms and anti-corruption measures.91112 Adds new sections on fundamental rights, minorities, gender equality, and migration, with specific calls for legal changes and protection.710 Adds new paragraphs on environment, energy, infrastructure, and regional cooperation, including specific projects and concerns.14151617 The other changes are formal: updated addressees and minor wording adjustments.1236

The notes class 18 changes as substance, 1 as formal, 2 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 4 of 4: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

9 unchanged paragraphs

This year, I have the honour of presenting my second country report on North Macedonia. The report seeks to provide a balanced and objective assessment of the country’s progress in the accession process and, as per established practice, comes in response to the Commission’s 2025 Enlargement Package.

North Macedonia currently finds itself in a difficult position, as the accession process remains at a standstill:

Despite some positive reform steps, progress on the EU reform agenda - particularly in key areas such as the rule of law, judicial reform, and the fight against corruption - has been insufficient. This is attributable to the election campaign, limited capacities within the public administration, and a lack of sustained political commitment.

No progress has been made on the constitutional amendments, due to concerns about potential additional bilateral blockades or demands from its neighbouring country. There is an urgent need for increased political will on both sides to move beyond this impasse.

However, at a time of major shifts in the international order as Europe has known it - notably linked to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, unprecedented uncertainty surrounding the future of the transatlantic alliance, and broader threats to the rules-based international order - it is essential that Europe stands together. There is no room for ambiguity.

Against this geopolitical backdrop, opportunities may arise to reinvigorate and accelerate the accession process. That process will, in any scenario, remain merit-based and firmly grounded in progress on the fundamentals, particularly the rule of law. It is therefore essential that all political stakeholders in North Macedonia, notably the Government and Members of Parliament of the ruling majority, recognise this renewed sense of urgency and start delivering tangible, convincing, and genuine results in these core areas without any further delay.

Advancing reforms in the rule of law is not only decisive for moving closer to EU membership; it is equally vital for building a prosperous and resilient state that serves all its citizens. A functioning rule of law and a predictable, trustworthy investment climate are prerequisites for sustainable economic development. It will also enable the country and its citizens to fully benefit from gradual integration schemes and projects offered by the European Union.

At the same time, the EU and its Member States must also deliver. We must fully support the country, including through active diplomatic engagement to help North Macedonia making progress on its own commitments and overcome existing obstacles.

As for this House, and as in the previous reporting period, I remain committed to fostering a stable, constructive, pro-European, pro-democratic, and pro-enlargement majority in support of North Macedonia’s EU accession. I look forward to securing the backing of all Members who share this strategic objective.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Changes between AFET-PR-784260 and A-10-2026-0162”. Text, 9 June 2026. from AFET-PR-784260, to A-10-2026-0162, reference 2025/2254(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-PR-784260/compare/A-10-2026-0162?all=1&part=4 (retrieved 28 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2026-06-09,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between AFET-PR-784260 and A-10-2026-0162}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-PR-784260/compare/A-10-2026-0162?all=1&part=4}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-PR-784260/compare/A-10-2026-0162?all=1&part=4},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from AFET-PR-784260, to A-10-2026-0162, reference 2025/2254(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}