Text · Amendment list
Shaping the EU's external action to address the human rights challenges posed by artificial intelligence
Document AFET-AM-792029 · 2026/2005(INI)
- Kind
- Amendment list AFET-AM-792029
- Date
- 4 September 2026
- Committee
- Committee on Foreign Affairs
- Dossier
- 2026-2005
More facts (2)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Reference
- 2026/2005(INI)
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
Jump to an amendment (102)
- Amendment 1
- Amendment 2
- Amendment 3
- Amendment 4
- Amendment 5
- Amendment 6
- Amendment 7
- Amendment 8
- Amendment 9
- Amendment 10
- Amendment 11
- Amendment 12
- Amendment 13
- Amendment 14
- Amendment 15
- Amendment 16
- Amendment 17
- Amendment 18
- Amendment 19
- Amendment 20
- Amendment 21
- Amendment 22
- Amendment 23
- Amendment 24
- Amendment 25
- Amendment 26
- Amendment 27
- Amendment 28
- Amendment 29
- Amendment 30
- Amendment 31
- Amendment 32
- Amendment 33
- Amendment 34
- Amendment 35
- Amendment 36
- Amendment 37
- Amendment 38
- Amendment 39
- Amendment 40
- Amendment 41
- Amendment 42
- Amendment 43
- Amendment 44
- Amendment 45
- Amendment 46
- Amendment 47
- Amendment 48
- Amendment 49
- Amendment 50
- Amendment 51
- Amendment 52
- Amendment 53
- Amendment 54
- Amendment 55
- Amendment 56
- Amendment 57
- Amendment 58
- Amendment 59
- Amendment 60
- Amendment 61
- Amendment 62
- Amendment 63
- Amendment 64
- Amendment 65
- Amendment 66
- Amendment 67
- Amendment 68
- Amendment 69
- Amendment 70
- Amendment 71
- Amendment 72
- Amendment 73
- Amendment 74
- Amendment 75
- Amendment 76
- Amendment 77
- Amendment 78
- Amendment 79
- Amendment 80
- Amendment 81
- Amendment 82
- Amendment 83
- Amendment 84
- Amendment 85
- Amendment 86
- Amendment 87
- Amendment 88
- Amendment 89
- Amendment 90
- Amendment 91
- Amendment 92
- Amendment 93
- Amendment 94
- Amendment 95
- Amendment 96
- Amendment 97
- Amendment 98
- Amendment 99
- Amendment 100
- Amendment 101
- Amendment 102
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the revised and updated EU guidelines on human rights defenders, |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders, |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders, |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders, |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 of 7 December 2020 on sanctions and restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses, including targeting individuals and entities responsible for torture, human trafficking and the systematic repression of freedom of expression, |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items, |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to its resolution of 12 September 2018 on autonomous weapon systems, |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to its resolution of 14 December 2021 with recommendations to the Commission on combating gender-based violence: cyberviolence |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to Regulation (EU) 2021/697 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2021 establishing the European Defence Fund, |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the New Pact on Migration and Asylum, |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to its resolutions of 9 March 2022 and 1 June 2023 on foreign interference in all democratic processes in the European Union, including disinformation, |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the joint communication of 19 March 2025 entitled 'Joint White Paper for European Defence Readiness 2030' (JOIN(2025)0120), |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the Commission communication of 9 April 2025 entitled 'AI Continent Action Plan' (COM(2025)0165), |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the report by Mario Draghi of 9 September 2024 entitled 'The future of European competitiveness', |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the report by Enrico Letta of April 2024 entitled 'Much more than a market', |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council of 20 June 2023 on the "European Economic Security Strategy" (JOIN(2023)0020), |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council of 5 June 2025 on "An International Digital Strategy for the European Union" (JOIN(2025)0140), |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention), adopted in 2011, |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders (United Nations General Assembly Resolution 53/144 of 9 December 1998 adopting the Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms), |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A. whereas AI is a global phenomenon that is rapidly being adopted across societies; whereas it unlocks unprecedented opportunities for prosperity, innovation and progress, including the potential to advance the protection and promotion of human rights, democracy and the rule of law in a variety of areas; | A. whereas AI is a global phenomenon that is rapidly being adopted across societies; whereas it unlocks unprecedented opportunities for prosperity, innovation and progress, while also posing significant challenges and risks to the protection and promotion of human rights, democracy and the rule of law in a variety of areas, thereby requiring appropriate safeguards and governance to ensure that innovation and progress is achieved without undermining human rights, democracy or the rule of law; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A. whereas AI is a global phenomenon that is rapidly being adopted across societies; whereas it unlocks unprecedented opportunities for prosperity, innovation and progress, including the potential to advance the protection and promotion of human rights, democracy and the rule of law in a variety of areas; | A. whereas AI is a rapidly developing global phenomenon that is being widely adopted across societies; whereas it unlocks unprecedented opportunities for prosperity, innovation and progress, including the potential to advance the protection and promotion of human rights and particularly human dignity, democracy and the rule of law in a variety of areas; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A. whereas AI is a global phenomenon that is rapidly being adopted across societies; whereas it unlocks unprecedented opportunities for prosperity, innovation and progress, including the potential to advance the protection and promotion of human rights, democracy and the rule of law in a variety of areas; | A. whereas AI is a global phenomenon that is rapidly being adopted across societies; whereas it unlocks unprecedented opportunities for prosperity, innovation, competitiveness, security and progress, including the potential to advance the protection and promotion of human rights, democracy and the rule of law in a variety of areas; whereas the Union currently lags behind other global players in the development, deployment and adoption of AI, and whereas its capacity to shape global AI governance in line with its values largely depends on its own technological and industrial strength; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A. whereas AI is a global phenomenon that is rapidly being adopted across societies; whereas it unlocks unprecedented opportunities for prosperity, innovation and progress, including the potential to advance the protection and promotion of human rights, democracy and the rule of law in a variety of areas; | A. whereas AI is a global phenomenon that is rapidly being adopted across societies; whereas it unlocks unprecedented opportunities for prosperity, innovation and progress, including the potential to advance the protection and promotion of human rights, democracy and the rule of law in a variety of areas; provided that those technologies are developed in a competitive environment, are politically and ideologically independent, and are not concentrated in the hands of a small number of non-European operators; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| B. whereas AI systems need to fundamentally comply with human rights; whereas if inherently designed maliciously, when misused for repressive purposes, or when deployed without adequate safeguards, AI systems may allow for or facilitate human rights violations and may undermine human dignity, human rights, democracy and the rule of law; | B. whereas AI systems must operate in compliance with applicable human rights obligations ; whereas if inherently designed maliciously, when misused for repressive purposes, or when deployed without adequate safeguards, AI systems may allow for and have facilitated human rights violations and undermined human dignity, human rights, democracy and the rule of law; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| B. whereas AI systems need to fundamentally comply with human rights; whereas if inherently designed maliciously, when misused for repressive purposes, or when deployed without adequate safeguards, AI systems may allow for or facilitate human rights violations and may undermine human dignity, human rights, democracy and the rule of law; | B. whereas AI systems need to fundamentally comply with human rights, social justice and democratic accountability ; whereas if inherently designed maliciously, when misused for repressive purposes, or when deployed without adequate safeguards, AI systems may undermine international human rights law and international humanitarian law and may allow for or facilitate human rights violations and may undermine human dignity, human rights, democracy and the rule of law; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| B. whereas AI systems need to fundamentally comply with human rights; whereas if inherently designed maliciously, when misused for repressive purposes, or when deployed without adequate safeguards, AI systems may allow for or facilitate human rights violations and may undermine human dignity, human rights, democracy and the rule of law; | B. whereas AI systems need to fundamentally comply with human rights; whereas, if inherently designed maliciously, when misused for repressive purposes, or when deployed without adequate safeguards, such as the "human-in-control" principle, AI systems may allow for or facilitate human rights violations and undermine human dignity, human rights, democracy and the rule of law; whereas these human rights violations may be amplified in third countries with weak or absent legal safeguards on AI; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| B. whereas AI systems need to fundamentally comply with human rights; whereas if inherently designed maliciously, when misused for repressive purposes, or when deployed without adequate safeguards, AI systems may allow for or facilitate human rights violations and may undermine human dignity, human rights, democracy and the rule of law; | B. whereas AI systems need to fundamentally comply with human rights; whereas, whether through malicious design from the outset, inadequate risk management in their design, development or placing on the market, misuse for repressive purposes, or deployment without adequate safeguards, AI systems may allow for or facilitate human rights violations and may undermine human dignity, human rights, democracy and the rule of law; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| B. whereas AI systems need to fundamentally comply with human rights; whereas if inherently designed maliciously, when misused for repressive purposes, or when deployed without adequate safeguards, AI systems may allow for or facilitate human rights violations and may undermine human dignity, human rights, democracy and the rule of law; | B. whereas AI systems need to be humancentric and fundamentally comply with human rights and ethics-by-design principle; whereas if inherently designed maliciously, when misused for repressive purposes, or when deployed without adequate safeguards, AI systems may allow for or facilitate human rights violations and may undermine human dignity, human rights, democracy and the rule of law; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| B. whereas AI systems need to fundamentally comply with human rights; whereas if inherently designed maliciously, when misused for repressive purposes, or when deployed without adequate safeguards, AI systems may allow for or facilitate human rights violations and may undermine human dignity, human rights, democracy and the rule of law; | B. whereas AI systems need to fundamentally comply with human rights; whereas if inherently designed maliciously, when misused for repressive purposes, or when deployed without adequate safeguards, AI systems may allow for or facilitate human rights violations and endanger human dignity, human rights, democracy and implementation of the rule of law; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| B. whereas AI systems need to fundamentally comply with human rights; whereas if inherently designed maliciously, when misused for repressive purposes, or when deployed without adequate safeguards, AI systems may allow for or facilitate human rights violations and may undermine human dignity, human rights, democracy and the rule of law; | B. whereas AI systems need to fundamentally comply with human rights; whereas if inherently designed maliciously, when misused for repressive purposes, or when deployed without proportionate safeguards, AI systems may allow for or facilitate human rights violations and may undermine human dignity, human rights, democracy and the rule of law; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; | C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems may include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, workers' rights, rights of migrants, environmental protection, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, foreign information manipulation and interference, an increase in transnational repression, and the potential human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in autonomous weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; | C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights and to democracy and the rule of law, as well as risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, including for human rights defenders, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI in automated weapon systems and in dual-use equipment; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; | C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; | C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of legal migrants (safeguarding the Member States' right to control their external borders in an effective and proportionate manner, always in accordance with the law), environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; | C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law, freedom of speech and information, and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, censorship, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; | C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law, national security of member states and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; | C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the children and persons with disabilities, the right to labour, the legal rights of all citizens, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; | C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, risks of unequal treatment arising from automated profiling, democracy and the rule of law, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; | C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, bioterrorism, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; | C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; | C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; | C. whereas risks to and challenges for fundamental rights and freedoms arising from AI systems include, but are not limited to, risks to human dignity, data privacy, rights of the child, freedom of speech, the right to labour, rights of migrants, environmental rights, democracy and the rule of law and risks of both positive and negative algorithmic discrimination, mass surveillance and suppression of dissent, gender-based violence, an increase in transnational repression, and human rights violations in the deployment of AI systems in automated weapon systems in conflicts and in dual-use equipment; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ca. whereas the use of AI systems in decision-making processes, particulalry in the public sector, carries an additional risk of automation bias, whereby human operators may over-rely on AI-generated outputs; whereas in high-stakes decision-making contexts AI should serve exclusively in a decision-supporting role, with full decision-making authority retained by human operators who are able to meaningfully review, question, and override algorithmic outputs; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ca. whereas AI censorship can manifest in various forms, such as blocking certain topics, avoiding politically sensitive issues, or even altering content to fit a particular politically correct narrative; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ca. whereas the number of cases of transnational repression facilitated by AI-assisted surveillance technologies against political opponents, journalists and members of the public in exile and coming from authoritarian regimes, including Russia, China, Iran, Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela, among others, has grown, including against members of their diasporas resident in Member States; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ca. whereas human rights defenders, including women human rights defenders and defenders from marginalised and discriminated communities, are particularly exposed to AI-facilitated repression; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Cb. whereas the use of emerging AI systems can lead to the creation and dissemination of untruthful, abusive and non-consensual material; whereas AI systems may create or aggravate inequalities and discrimination, particularly affecting women, minority groups and individuals in vulnerable situations, including through predictive policing and biometric recognition systems often disproportionately which often reinforce historical patterns of injustice; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Cc. whereas AI systems used for recruitment and selection, and for certain decisions concerning the terms of employment, promotion, termination, task allocation, or the monitoring and evaluation of workers, are classified as high-risk under the EU AI Act. The Act recognises that such systems may perpetuate historical patterns of discrimination, including discrimination affecting women, certain age groups, persons with disabilities, and persons of certain racial or ethnic origins or sexual orientation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ca. whereas the growing deployment of AI-powered surveillance, biometric identification, predictive technologies and automated decision-making enables unprecedented forms of mass surveillance, profiling and social control by public authorities and private actors, threatening privacy, freedom of expression, assembly and association, and facilitating political repression against human rights defenders, journalists, trade unions, social movements and marginalised communities; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Cb. whereas AI systems are not neutral and may reproduce or exacerbate structural inequalities through biased data, automated decision-making and opaque algorithms, disproportionately affecting women and girls, LGBTIQ+ persons, racialised communities, migrants, refugees and workers; whereas AI-generated content has intensified hate speech, xenophobia, racism and technology-facilitated gender-based violence, including non-consensual sexualised deepfakes, online harassment and cyberstalking; whereas a feminist and human rights-based approach to AI governance is essential to protect equality, bodily autonomy and freedom from violence; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Cc. whereas AI and automated decision-making are increasingly used in migration management, border control and asylum procedures through biometric surveillance, predictive risk assessment and profiling, leading to discrimination, racial profiling, arbitrary decisions, privacy violations and restrictions on the right to seek asylum, while disproportionately exposing migrants, refugees and racialised communities to exclusion, detention and deportation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Cd. whereas the rapid militarisation of artificial intelligence is transforming digital innovation into an instrument of warfare, surveillance and geopolitical domination, strengthening the military-industrial complex at the expense of peace and human security; whereas AI-enabled targeting systems and increasingly autonomous weapons undermine meaningful human control, democratic accountability and compliance with international humanitarian and human rights law, while their reported use in conflicts, including Gaza, has raised grave concerns over civilian harm, unlawful attacks, violations of international law, mass surveillance and the erosion of accountability; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ce. whereas the reported deployment by Israel of AI-assisted targeting and surveillance systems, including "Lavender" and "The Gospel", in Gaza illustrates the dangers of the militarisation of artificial intelligence, enabling the large-scale automation of military decision-making with devastating consequences for civilians; whereas UN experts, human rights organisations and civil society have warned that the use of such technologies risks facilitating indiscriminate or disproportionate attacks, weakening accountability and contributing to serious violations of international humanitarian and human rights law; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, detecting disinformation and hate speech, improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation, contributing to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and moderating the negative impact of climate change; | D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, helping disabilities, fighting natural disasters and environmental safety, improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, spreading information and strengthening public services; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, detecting disinformation and hate speech, improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation, contributing to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and moderating the negative impact of climate change; | D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, detecting disinformation and hate speech, improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation, contributing to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and moderating the negative impact of climate change; | D. whereas AI could present opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation, contributing to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, detecting disinformation and hate speech, improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation, contributing to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and moderating the negative impact of climate change; | D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, detecting disinformation and hate speech, improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation, broadening access to information and analysis previously confined to specialists, and contributing to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and moderating the negative impact of climate change; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, detecting disinformation and hate speech, improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation, contributing to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and moderating the negative impact of climate change; | D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, detecting disinformation and hate speech, improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, and strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, detecting disinformation and hate speech, improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation, contributing to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and moderating the negative impact of climate change; | D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, detecting disinformation spread by hostile states and incitement to violence, improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation, contributing to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and moderating the negative impact of climate change; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Leire Pajín, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, detecting disinformation and hate speech, improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation, contributing to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and moderating the negative impact of climate change; | D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including, and not limited to, the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, detecting harmful information and hate speech, improving the needs-based delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation, contributing to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and moderating the negative impact of climate change; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, detecting disinformation and hate speech, improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation, contributing to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and moderating the negative impact of climate change; | D. whereas AI also presents significant opportunities for advancing human rights globally, including the monitoring of human rights violations, facilitating access to justice and to information in health and education, supporting the fight against disinformation and hate speech improving delivery of humanitarian and emergency assistance, strengthening transparency in governance and democratic participation, contributing to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and moderating the negative impact of climate change; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| E. whereas the rapid advancement of AI technologies is profoundly reshaping the global order; whereas the EU must ensure that its external action in AI is guided by a coherent strategic vision, anchored in its core values of democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights; | E. whereas the rapid advancement of AI technologies is profoundly reshaping the global order; whereas the EU must ensure that it is not left behind in international competition to develop artificial intelligence and that its external action in AI is guided by a coherent strategic vision, anchored in its core values of democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| E. whereas the rapid advancement of AI technologies is profoundly reshaping the global order; whereas the EU must ensure that its external action in AI is guided by a coherent strategic vision, anchored in its core values of democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights; | E. whereas the rapid advancement of AI technologies is profoundly reshaping global power dynamics; whereas the EU must ensure that its external action in AI is guided by a coherent and pragmatic strategic vision, anchored in its core values of democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| E. whereas the rapid advancement of AI technologies is profoundly reshaping the global order; whereas the EU must ensure that its external action in AI is guided by a coherent strategic vision, anchored in its core values of democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights; | E. whereas the rapid advancement of AI technologies is profoundly reshaping the global order; whereas the EU must ensure that its external action in AI reflects its internal policies that should be guided by respect for fundamental rights and freedoms of the citizens of the Member States; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| E. whereas the rapid advancement of AI technologies is profoundly reshaping the global order; whereas the EU must ensure that its external action in AI is guided by a coherent strategic vision, anchored in its core values of democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights; | E. whereas the rapid advancement of AI technologies is profoundly reshaping the global order; whereas the EU must ensure that its external action in AI is guided by a coherent strategic vision, anchored in its core values of democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights; whereas that vision must be underpinned by the Union's economic security, technological sovereignty and the competitiveness of its own AI ecosystem, without which the Union will lack the capacity to project those values internationally; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| E. whereas the rapid advancement of AI technologies is profoundly reshaping the global order; whereas the EU must ensure that its external action in AI is guided by a coherent strategic vision, anchored in its core values of democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights; | E. whereas the rapid advancement of AI technologies is profoundly reshaping the global order; whereas the EU must ensure that its external action in AI is guided by a coherent strategic vision, anchored in its core values of democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights, while taking into account the economic and security interests of the Member States and their freedom to decide on foreign policy matters that remain within their remit; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ea. whereas the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) constitutes a landmark regulatory framework with significant external effects; whereas the AIA applies to third-country companies that sell AI systems within the EU internal market, compelling them to comply with Union standards; whereas it also influences the development of the candidate´s countries legal frameworks on AI in their legal harmonization process with the EU; whereas it has been used as a reference by third countries such as Brazil or South Korea in legislating on AI; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Eb. whereas the European External Action Service (EEAS) plays a key role in conducting EU digital diplomacy, including on AI, vis-à-vis third countries and through EU Delegations worldwide; whereas EU Delegations are essential for promoting the Union's AI governance model and for building long-term digital partnerships; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ec. whereas the International Digital Strategy of the European Union provides a framework for promoting the Union's digital values and standards globally; whereas it should be fully leveraged to ensure that AI governance principles — including transparency, accountability, and respect for fundamental rights — are advanced in multilateral and bilateral settings; whereas the AI Office, established within the European Commission, has an important role in coordinating the Union's approach to AI governance internationally; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ed. whereas the global AI deployment takes place in a moment of profound geopolitical changes, shifting from a logic of cooperation to one of competition, including in the technological sector; whereas AI systems rely on complex value chains that encompass access to critical raw materials, semiconductors, data, infrastructure, computing powers, a skilled workforce and frontier software; whereas AI and its governance risk being used as tools of strategic influence and power projection, as well as a liability for external dependencies and a venue for foreign information manipulation and interference; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ee. whereas the US government is actively using AI as part of its hard power; whereas the US government restricted foreign access to US AI models, as per the export control directive issued at the company Anthropic on 12 June 2026 to suspend access to its models Fable 5 and Mythos 5 on grounds of national security concerns; whereas this restriction was lifted on 30 June 2026; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ef. whereas the international AI landscape is characterised by divergent AI governance models that lead to a fragmented environment in which differing standards risk undermining interoperability, trust, and the protection of fundamental rights; whereas the US is one of the key global AI providers, and defends a market-driven model that prioritizes innovation over rights-compliant, trustworthy AI standards; whereas China is another of the key players, and offers a state-centric and heavily regulated model that favours surveillance and control; whereas both actors are exporting their competing models by means of the Pax Silica and the World AI Cooperation Organization (WAICO) initiatives; whereas both models pose significant risks to human rights; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| F. whereas the EU is championing an alternative, trustworthy model for AI design, development and governance that combines openness, transparency and fundamental rights protection with resilience and innovation, protecting its citizens and offering a level-playing field for companies; | F. whereas the EU should strive to be a global leader in the development and use of artificial intelligence and promote AI design, development and governance that combine openness, transparency and fundamental rights protection with resilience, security and innovation; whereas, at the same time, strengthening the EU’s technological capacities and reducing strategic dependencies along the entire AI value chain, from critical raw materials and semiconductors to computing capacity, data and software, is crucial for the EU’s security and competitiveness; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| F. whereas the EU is championing an alternative, trustworthy model for AI design, development and governance that combines openness, transparency and fundamental rights protection with resilience and innovation, protecting its citizens and offering a level-playing field for companies; | F. whereas the EU should be promoting a trustworthy model for AI design, development and governance that combines openness, transparency, accountability and fundamental rights protection with resilience and innovation, protecting and respecting the fundamental rights and freedoms of the citizens of its Member States and offering a level-playing field for companies; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| F. whereas the EU is championing an alternative, trustworthy model for AI design, development and governance that combines openness, transparency and fundamental rights protection with resilience and innovation, protecting its citizens and offering a level-playing field for companies; | F. whereas the EU is championing an alternative, trustworthy model for AI design, development and governance that combines openness, transparency and fundamental rights protection with resilience and innovation, protecting its citizens and offering a level-playing field for companies; whereas such a model must resist the concentration of technological power, data, computing capacity and digital infrastructure in the hands of a small number of multinational corporations, which reinforces global inequalities, technological dependency and digital extractivism; whereas AI governance should therefore be grounded in democratic oversight, public accountability, access to remedies, social justice, environmental sustainability, digital sovereignty, fair taxation of large technology companies, and the meaningful participation of civil society, trade unions and affected communities, while addressing the disproportionate environmental impacts of AI on communities in the Global South; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| F. whereas the EU is championing an alternative, trustworthy model for AI design, development and governance that combines openness, transparency and fundamental rights protection with resilience and innovation, protecting its citizens and offering a level-playing field for companies; | F. whereas the EU is championing an alternative, trustworthy model for AI design, development and governance that combines openness, transparency and fundamental rights protection with resilience, competitiveness and innovation, protecting its citizens and offering a level-playing field for companies; whereas the credibility of this model depends on combining high standards with a predictable, proportionate and simplified regulatory framework that allows European AI providers to scale up and compete globally; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| F. whereas the EU is championing an alternative, trustworthy model for AI design, development and governance that combines openness, transparency and fundamental rights protection with resilience and innovation, protecting its citizens and offering a level-playing field for companies; | F. whereas the EU is championing an alternative, trustworthy model for AI design, development and governance that combines openness, transparency and fundamental rights protection with resilience and innovation, protecting its citizens and offering a level-playing field for companies; whereas, taking account of the aforementioned objectives, the EU’s artificial-intelligence sector and its competitiveness should not be undermined by excessive regulation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| F. whereas the EU is championing an alternative, trustworthy model for AI design, development and governance that combines openness, transparency and fundamental rights protection with resilience and innovation, protecting its citizens and offering a level-playing field for companies; | F. whereas the EU AI Act promotes an alternative, trustworthy model for AI design development and governance that combines openness, transparency and fundamental rights protection with resilience and innovation, protecting its citizens and offering a level-playing field for companies; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Fa. whereas truly open-source models can contribute to the transparency and verifiability of AI systems, and the contestability of their outcomes; whereas their use provides a key added value in AI use for public administrations, particularly in delicate contexts such as electoral processes, with complete audit logs that allow for the tracing of decisions and actions; whereas the EU has a clear interest in promoting them; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Fa. whereas the EU Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy 2020-2024, extended until 2027, commits the EU and its Member States to integrating human rights concerns into the development, deployment and use of new technologies, including those in the security domain; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Fb. whereas globally, the EU was the first to introduce a legally binding prohibition of funding of lethal autonomous weapons, as the EDF (2021/697), ASAP (2023/1525), EDIRPA (2023/2418), and EDIP (2025/2643) codified the prohibition to use EU funds for the development of such weapons; whereas the lethal autonomous weapons systems' exclusion from funding in EU instruments is among the most concrete normative anchors world-wide; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Fc. whereas the AI Act supports the objective of promoting the European human-centric approach to AI and positioning the Union as a global leader in the development of secure, trustworthy and ethical AI, as stated by the European Council, and ensures the protection of ethical principles, as specifically requested by the European Parliament; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Fa. whereas international engagement at bilateral and multilateral level to protect the interests and security of the EU and its Member States constitutes an important element of the AI Act; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, should be a priority for EU external action; | G. whereas EU foreign policy should prioritise strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly with like-minded partners that possess advanced technological skills and established AI ecosystems, and with candidate countries; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, should be a priority for EU external action; | G. whereas strengthening democracy, human rights, transparency and accountability should be key principles when pursuing AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, external action; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, should be a priority for EU external action; | G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood that respect the EU acquis and recognise all EU member states, and countries in the Global South, should be a priority for EU external action; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, should be a priority for EU external action; | G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with like-minded democracies, particularly EU candidate countries and countries in the EU neighbourhood, should be a priority for EU external action; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, should be a priority for EU external action; | G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly like-minded partners, candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, should be a priority for EU external action; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, should be a priority for EU external action; | G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, should be one of the elements of EU external action; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, should be a priority for EU external action; | G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, should be a priority for EU external action, as many of these countries are developing their own AI policies and regulatory frameworks and are subject to competing influences from major AI powers; whereas the EU has both an interest and a responsibility to promote partnerships with AI models grounded in human rights, sustainable development, and digital sovereignty; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, should be a priority for EU external action; | G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, should be a priority for EU external action; whereas such partnerships should be based on knowledge transfer, public cooperation, open technologies, capacity-building, and binding human rights and labour standards, and should avoid reinforcing technological dependence or digital colonialism; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, should be a priority for EU external action; | G. whereas strengthening AI partnerships with non-EU countries, particularly candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, should be a priority for EU external action, and particular attention should be paid to partnerships with countries with close historical, linguistic, cultural and institutional ties with Member States, whose cooperation is an underused strategic asset; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ga. whereas the UN remains the key organisation to address multifaceted global phenomena such as AI, as it represents the only forum where all the countries, together with the private sector, civil society and academia can have a voice; whereas the Global Digital Compact represents a milestone in the global framework for AI governance; whereas further steps have been taken in this direction through the UN General Assembly resolution on safe, secure, and trustworthy AI, the work of the UN High-level Advisory Body on AI and UNESCO guidelines; whereas the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights provide a framework for addressing human rights across the AI value chain; whereas the Union should play an active role in shaping this framework, ensuring it thoroughly reflects universal human rights standards, and that it is not misused by authoritarian and illiberal regimes attempting to impose an alternative framework to AI models that undermines human rights; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Gb. whereas the Council of Europe's Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, ratified by the EU, as well as several candidate countries, is a pioneering legally binding international instrument addressing AI's human rights implications; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Gc. whereas there have been other notable attempts to address AI governance among the international community, such as four AI Action Summits since 2023, the last of which took place in India in February 2026; whereas the result of said summits has been limited in addressing human rights; |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Gd. whereas the EU is actively engaged in international AI governance through its participation in the UN system, the Council of Europe, and other multilateral fora, including those aiming at standard setting, as well as through bilateral and multilateral agreements, partnership and alliances; whereas such engagement is essential to ensure that global AI standards reflect the Union's values; whereas the participation of the EU should be further strengthened, better coordinated, and guided by a coherent EU external AI strategy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ga. whereas AI has the potential to contribute significantly to innovation, poductivity, economic growth and the competitiveness of the EU; whereas strengthning EU´s capacity to develop and deploy AI is essential to manteining its technological leadership, economic, resilience and strategic autonomy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Gb. whereas AI systems are increasingly used to filter, rank and moderate online content at scale, spreading disinformation, and generate addictive behaviours in users, particularly minors, through the development of dark patterns; whereas, in the absence of transparency and effective safeguards, such systems can be used to restrict freedom of expression and access to information, to destabilize the Union by outside and to obstacle a health and positive cognitive development of citizens; whereas the protection of freedom of expression and media freedom, European sovereignty and individual rights must form an integral part of the Union's external action on AI; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Gc. whereas AI can bring important benefits in the field of security and defence, including by improving threat detection, situational awareness, crisis management, cybersecurity and the protection of critical infrastructure; whereas, by extension, AI can offer new ways to counter human rights violations, in particular by tackling them online; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Gd. whereas the proposal for the Digital Omnibus examines the necessity to clarify how personal data may be used for AI training and development, while ensuring the traceability of such data throughout the entire lifecycle of the AI system, reflecting the need to adapt the Union's legal framework in view of the rapid advancement of AI in the EU and globally; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ga. whereas responsibility for the protection of fundamental rights rests in the first instance with democratically accountable national institutions; whereas the delegation of consequential decisions to automated systems, whether operated by public authorities or by private providers, displaces judgement from officials who can be questioned, dismissed or removed by an electorate to processes that are answerable to no electorate at all; whereas the legitimacy of a decision derives not only from its outcome but from the accountability of the person who took it; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Gb. whereas the Union depends on providers established outside its territory for the greater part of the computing capacity, cloud infrastructure and foundation models on which its economy, public administration and defence increasingly rely; whereas this dependence constrains the Union's practical capacity to enforce its own standards; whereas a credible external policy on artificial intelligence presupposes a corresponding internal industrial and technological capacity; |
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “AMENDMENTS 1 - 102 - Draft report Shaping the EU's external action to address the human rights challenges posed by artificial intelligence”. Text, 4 September 2026. docId AFET-AM-792029. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-AM-792029 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/AFET-AM-792029 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-afet-am-792029,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{AMENDMENTS 1 - 102 - Draft report Shaping the EU's external action to address the human rights challenges posed by artificial intelligence}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-09-04},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-AM-792029}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-AM-792029},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId AFET-AM-792029. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}