Text · Amendment list
2025 Commission report on Türkiye
Document AFET-AM-785351 · 2025/2256(INI)
- Kind
- Amendment list AFET-AM-785351
- Date
- 12 March 2026
- Committee
- Committee on Foreign Affairs
- Dossier
- 2025/2256(INI)
More facts (2)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Reference
- 2025/2256(INI)
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
Jump to an amendment (360)
- Amendment 403
- Amendment 404
- Amendment 405
- Amendment 406
- Amendment 407
- Amendment 408
- Amendment 409
- Amendment 410
- Amendment 411
- Amendment 412
- Amendment 413
- Amendment 414
- Amendment 415
- Amendment 416
- Amendment 417
- Amendment 418
- Amendment 419
- Amendment 420
- Amendment 421
- Amendment 422
- Amendment 423
- Amendment 424
- Amendment 425
- Amendment 426
- Amendment 427
- Amendment 428
- Amendment 429
- Amendment 430
- Amendment 431
- Amendment 432
- Amendment 433
- Amendment 434
- Amendment 435
- Amendment 436
- Amendment 437
- Amendment 438
- Amendment 439
- Amendment 440
- Amendment 441
- Amendment 442
- Amendment 443
- Amendment 444
- Amendment 445
- Amendment 446
- Amendment 447
- Amendment 448
- Amendment 449
- Amendment 450
- Amendment 451
- Amendment 452
- Amendment 453
- Amendment 454
- Amendment 455
- Amendment 456
- Amendment 457
- Amendment 458
- Amendment 459
- Amendment 460
- Amendment 461
- Amendment 462
- Amendment 463
- Amendment 464
- Amendment 465
- Amendment 466
- Amendment 467
- Amendment 468
- Amendment 469
- Amendment 470
- Amendment 471
- Amendment 472
- Amendment 473
- Amendment 474
- Amendment 475
- Amendment 476
- Amendment 477
- Amendment 478
- Amendment 479
- Amendment 480
- Amendment 481
- Amendment 482
- Amendment 483
- Amendment 484
- Amendment 485
- Amendment 486
- Amendment 487
- Amendment 488
- Amendment 489
- Amendment 490
- Amendment 491
- Amendment 492
- Amendment 493
- Amendment 494
- Amendment 495
- Amendment 496
- Amendment 497
- Amendment 498
- Amendment 499
- Amendment 500
- Amendment 501
- Amendment 502
- Amendment 503
- Amendment 504
- Amendment 505
- Amendment 506
- Amendment 507
- Amendment 508
- Amendment 509
- Amendment 510
- Amendment 511
- Amendment 512
- Amendment 513
- Amendment 514
- Amendment 515
- Amendment 516
- Amendment 517
- Amendment 518
- Amendment 519
- Amendment 520
- Amendment 521
- Amendment 522
- Amendment 523
- Amendment 524
- Amendment 525
- Amendment 526
- Amendment 527
- Amendment 528
- Amendment 529
- Amendment 530
- Amendment 531
- Amendment 532
- Amendment 533
- Amendment 534
- Amendment 535
- Amendment 536
- Amendment 537
- Amendment 538
- Amendment 539
- Amendment 540
- Amendment 541
- Amendment 542
- Amendment 543
- Amendment 544
- Amendment 545
- Amendment 546
- Amendment 547
- Amendment 548
- Amendment 549
- Amendment 550
- Amendment 551
- Amendment 552
- Amendment 553
- Amendment 554
- Amendment 555
- Amendment 556
- Amendment 557
- Amendment 558
- Amendment 559
- Amendment 560
- Amendment 561
- Amendment 562
- Amendment 563
- Amendment 564
- Amendment 565
- Amendment 566
- Amendment 567
- Amendment 568
- Amendment 569
- Amendment 570
- Amendment 571
- Amendment 572
- Amendment 573
- Amendment 574
- Amendment 575
- Amendment 576
- Amendment 577
- Amendment 578
- Amendment 579
- Amendment 580
- Amendment 581
- Amendment 582
- Amendment 583
- Amendment 584
- Amendment 585
- Amendment 586
- Amendment 587
- Amendment 588
- Amendment 589
- Amendment 590
- Amendment 591
- Amendment 592
- Amendment 593
- Amendment 594
- Amendment 595
- Amendment 596
- Amendment 597
- Amendment 598
- Amendment 599
- Amendment 600
- Amendment 601
- Amendment 602
- Amendment 603
- Amendment 604
- Amendment 605
- Amendment 606
- Amendment 607
- Amendment 608
- Amendment 609
- Amendment 610
- Amendment 611
- Amendment 612
- Amendment 613
- Amendment 614
- Amendment 615
- Amendment 616
- Amendment 617
- Amendment 618
- Amendment 619
- Amendment 620
- Amendment 621
- Amendment 622
- Amendment 623
- Amendment 624
- Amendment 625
- Amendment 626
- Amendment 627
- Amendment 628
- Amendment 629
- Amendment 630
- Amendment 631
- Amendment 632
- Amendment 633
- Amendment 634
- Amendment 635
- Amendment 636
- Amendment 637
- Amendment 638
- Amendment 639
- Amendment 640
- Amendment 641
- Amendment 642
- Amendment 643
- Amendment 644
- Amendment 645
- Amendment 646
- Amendment 647
- Amendment 648
- Amendment 649
- Amendment 650
- Amendment 651
- Amendment 652
- Amendment 653
- Amendment 654
- Amendment 655
- Amendment 656
- Amendment 657
- Amendment 658
- Amendment 659
- Amendment 660
- Amendment 661
- Amendment 662
- Amendment 663
- Amendment 664
- Amendment 665
- Amendment 666
- Amendment 667
- Amendment 668
- Amendment 669
- Amendment 670
- Amendment 671
- Amendment 672
- Amendment 673
- Amendment 674
- Amendment 675
- Amendment 676
- Amendment 677
- Amendment 678
- Amendment 679
- Amendment 680
- Amendment 681
- Amendment 682
- Amendment 683
- Amendment 684
- Amendment 685
- Amendment 686
- Amendment 687
- Amendment 688
- Amendment 689
- Amendment 690
- Amendment 691
- Amendment 692
- Amendment 693
- Amendment 694
- Amendment 695
- Amendment 696
- Amendment 697
- Amendment 698
- Amendment 699
- Amendment 700
- Amendment 701
- Amendment 702
- Amendment 703
- Amendment 704
- Amendment 705
- Amendment 706
- Amendment 707
- Amendment 708
- Amendment 709
- Amendment 710
- Amendment 711
- Amendment 712
- Amendment 713
- Amendment 714
- Amendment 715
- Amendment 716
- Amendment 717
- Amendment 718
- Amendment 719
- Amendment 720
- Amendment 721
- Amendment 722
- Amendment 723
- Amendment 724
- Amendment 725
- Amendment 726
- Amendment 727
- Amendment 728
- Amendment 729
- Amendment 730
- Amendment 731
- Amendment 732
- Amendment 733
- Amendment 734
- Amendment 735
- Amendment 736
- Amendment 737
- Amendment 738
- Amendment 739
- Amendment 740
- Amendment 741
- Amendment 742
- Amendment 743
- Amendment 744
- Amendment 745
- Amendment 746
- Amendment 747
- Amendment 748
- Amendment 749
- Amendment 750
- Amendment 751
- Amendment 752
- Amendment 753
- Amendment 754
- Amendment 755
- Amendment 756
- Amendment 757
- Amendment 758
- Amendment 759
- Amendment 760
- Amendment 761
- Amendment 762
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 18. Notes that the continued erosion of the rule of law and legal certainty will inevitably have an impact on investor confidence and on the economy; | 18. Notes that the continued erosion of the rule of law and legal certainty will inevitably have a negative impact on investor confidence and on the economy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 18 a. Acknowledges the recent important discovery by the Turkish government of large reserves of rare earth elements (REEs) in Eskişehir province, which could position Türkiye as an important actor in a global strategic market; highlights the potential of this discovery in contributing to diversification and resilience in global REE supply chains as well as the major challenges it implies, including the access to advanced extraction and processing technologies and the need to ensure high standards of environmental protection and sustainable resource management; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19. Calls on Turkish authorities to implement Türkiye’s international obligations in relation to the fight against corruption, in particular the UN Convention Against Corruption and the relevant Council of Europe conventions; | 19. Calls on Turkish authorities to implement Türkiye’s international obligations in relation to the fight against corruption, in particular the UN Convention Against Corruption and the relevant Council of Europe conventions, and to ensure effective follow-up to the recommendations issued by GRECO, including by adopting the necessary legislation, which is one of the remaining benchmarks for the visa liberalisation; stresses the need to improve the integrity of public procurement processes, political party financing, the judiciary, the public administration, and the construction sector, which remain particularly vulnerable to corruption; deeply regrets that the recent high-level corruption cases launched by the authorities have been targeted exclusively on opposition-elected mayors and municipalities, further diminishing the trust in the effectiveness and real will of the authorities in fighting against corruption; urges the Turkish authorities to ensure impartiality and transparency in their anti-corruption efforts; calls on Turkish authorities to enhance the fight against counterfeiting and to restore property rights regime according to international standards; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19. Calls on Turkish authorities to implement Türkiye’s international obligations in relation to the fight against corruption, in particular the UN Convention Against Corruption and the relevant Council of Europe conventions; | 19. Calls on Turkish authorities to implement Türkiye’s international obligations in relation to the fight against corruption, in particular the UN Convention Against Corruption and the relevant Council of Europe conventions; emphasises preventing corruption effectively as an additional way to increase economic activity while the investment environment improves as a result of reducing corruption; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19. Calls on Turkish authorities to implement Türkiye’s international obligations in relation to the fight against corruption, in particular the UN Convention Against Corruption and the relevant Council of Europe conventions; | 19. Urges Turkish authorities to implement Türkiye’s international obligations in relation to the fight against corruption, in particular the UN Convention Against Corruption and the relevant Council of Europe conventions; |
Geadis Geadi, Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19 a. Takes note of the recent judicial developments in the United States concerning Halk Bankası A.Ş. (Halkbank), including proceedings related to sanctions' evasion and money laundering schemes; recalls that Turkey was placed on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list in 2021 due to serious strategic deficiencies in its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) framework and was removed in 2024 following legislative and regulatory adjustments; underlines, however, that legislative amendments alone do not constitute sufficient proof of sustainable progress where concerns persist regarding the effective, independent and impartial enforcement of financial supervision, prosecutorial action and judicial oversight; expresses concern about credible reports pointing to structural weaknesses, political interference and corruption risks within state-linked financial institutions and supervisory authorities; calls on the Commission to conduct a thorough assessment of the extent that corruption, lack of institutional independence or selective enforcement practices may undermine effective scrutiny of politically exposed persons and state-affiliated entities, thereby hindering compliance with international financial transparency standards; stresses that demonstrable, consistent and independently verifiable enforcement, including effective investigations, prosecutions and sanctions, must be a prerequisite for any discussion concerning EU–Turkey financial and trade relations. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19 a. Points out that a number of critical challenges concerning the labour market remain unaddressed, such as informal employment, the gender gap, and income inequality; continues to be worried about the low coverage of collective bargaining and the serious impediments to unionisation in the private sector; believes that more efforts are needed to enhance social dialogue mechanisms and address emerging occupational safety challenges; recalls that trade union freedom and social dialogue are crucial to the development and prosperity of a pluralistic society; calls on Turkish authorities to remove obstacles that limit the unionisation and collective bargaining rights by using social dialogue mechanisms effectively, and to recognise the right to strike for civil servants; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19 a. Deplores that Türkiye´s remains a very low performer in the field of climate mitigation and calls on Ankara to work on a credible legal emissions reduction framework; highlights that the plan by the Ministry of Energy and Natural resources to uphold subsidies for domestic coal generation and carbon-intensive electricity generation slows down the progress in the rollout of renewables; calls on the Turkish government, also in the light of its hosting of the 31st UN Climate Conference in 2026, to decide a a coal phase-out pathway and pull forward its CO2 peak from 2038; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19 a. Recalls concerns raised by international partners regarding the use of the Russian Mir payment system in Türkiye after the imposition of financial sanctions against Russian banks; stresses that such developments highlight the broader challenges related to financial cooperation with sanctioned Russian entities and calls on Türkiye to ensure full compliance with international financial safeguards. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19 a. Expresses concern over animal welfare in transports from and through the Republic of Türkiye; calls for compliance with international standards and prevention of overcrowding and heat stress; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19 b. Deeply regrets that Türkiye continues to refuse the entry of goods originating from the Republic of Cyprus into its market, in violation of its obligations under the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement; underlines that such discriminatory practices create conditions of unfair competition, particularly in the fields of maritime transport, trade and customs arrangements, and undermine the integrity of the EU–Türkiye customs relationship; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19 b. Takes note of Türkiye´s new 2025 Climate Law that went into effect in July 2025 and welcomes the inclusion of an Emissions Trading System, while some improvements, such as on certificate caps, need to be addressed; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19 b. Condemns the reported killing and mistreatment of stray dogs and cats; calls for humane population control in line with international standards; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19 c. Calls on the EU and Turkish authorities to deepen and prioritise cooperation on the Green Deal, notably carbon pricing in the context of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), address implications for Turkish exporters, support industrial decarbonisation financing and grid modernisation as well as policies of just transition; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19 c. Expresses deep concern that, despite certain reforms linked to Türkiye’s removal from the FATF grey list, the Commission underlines that Türkiye still needs to align more closely with the EU acquis and FATF recommendations to further strengthen its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) framework; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19 d. Notes that in 2025 Türkiye entered the fifth round of mutual evaluation under the revised FATF standards; stresses, in particular, the need for a sustained track record of effective investigations, prosecutions and convictions; calls on Türkiye to fully align its AML/CFT framework with EU standards, including on the traceability of transfers and the prevention of misuse of new payment and crypto-asset channels for illicit finance; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19 e. Notes with concern that the Republic of Türkiye has applied to become a member of BRICS+, whereas it currently has partner status, and is considering doing likewise with regard to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO); is deeply concerned about the fundamental incompatibility of the Republic of Türkiye's possible full membership of BRICS with the EU accession process; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; | 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection in January 2026; reiterates the importance of Türkiye’s collaboration for the effective and orderly management of migration flows; further welcomes the fact that since 2011 the EU has contributed close to EUR 12,5 billion to assist Türkiye in supporting refugees and host communities; notes that some EU funding has been allocated to strengthening Turkish border control and containment capabilities; supports the continuation of the EU funding to further sustain the healthcare, education, protection and integration of refugees in Türkiye; calls on the Commission to ensure utmost transparency and accuracy in the allocation of funds and that EU-funded projects, particularly those related to removal centres and border control, comply with all relevant human rights standards; is alarmed by credible reports uncovering grave human rights violations at EU-funded removal centres in Türkiye and calls on the Commission to launch a transparent and independent review into the matter; calls on Türkiye to ensure the full and non-discriminatory implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement of 2016 and the EU-Türkiye Readmission Agreement vis-à-vis all Member States; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; | 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; notes that in recent years there has been a significant rise in anti-Syrian rhetoric and violent attacks against refugees, fuelled by economic pressures and polarising political discourse; further notes that major incidents of mob violence have been reported, including the attacks against Syrian homes, businesses and vehicles in Kayseri in June–July 2024 and the subsequent spread of violence to other cities such as Istanbul, Konya, Hatay and Gaziantep, as well as earlier large-scale attacks against Syrian residents in Ankara’s Altındağ district in August 2021; notes that human rights organisations have documented cases of ill-treatment and abuse in removal centres, reports of refugees being coerced into signing “voluntary return” documents, and allegations of excessive use of force by border guards against asylum seekers attempting to cross from Syria; further notes that these developments raise serious concerns regarding the protection of refugees and compliance with international human rights and refugee law; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; | 20. Takes note of the fact that Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; calls on the EU not to remain complacent and rely on the 2016 EU-Turkey statement, which should be terminated; instead, a change in its immigration policy must be based on real solidarity, respect of the core principles of asylum and migration international law vis-à-vis everyone refraining from double standards; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; | 20. Notes that Türkiye, as a safe third country, hosts around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; notes, however, persistent concerns regarding the instrumentalisation of migration for political leverage; recalls in particular the events at the EU’s external borders in 2020, when migrants were encouraged to move towards the Greek border; stresses that migration cooperation must fully respect the principles of international law and the integrity of the EU’s external borders; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; | 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; notes that following the fall of the Bashar al-Assad regime, the pace of voluntary returns increased significantly, with over 550,000 to 560,000 Syrians returning between December 2024 and late 2025; supports Türkiye's policy of facilitating these returns and encourages EU Member States to follow the Turkish example; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; | 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; notes that, according to Frontex reporting in January 2025, irregular migration along the Türkiye–EU border declined by approximately one quarter in absolute numbers; underlines the importance of Türkiye’s continued efforts in managing migration in close cooperation with the EU; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; | 20. Acknowledges that Turkey continues to host a large migrant population; emphasizes that protection in the region must remain the primary solution for migration flows; insists, however, that this responsibility must not be used by the Turkish government to weaponise migration in order to extract financial concessions or political favours from the European Union; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; | 20. Continues to support Türkiye´s efforts hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; reaffirms that neighbourhood relations between Türkiye and the EU are incompatible with any attempt to weaponize migration; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; | 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; stresses, however, that migration must not be instrumentalised for political purposes against the European Union or its Member States |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; | 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; notes that EU continues its substantial financial support to Türkiye with approximately €10 billion mobilised since 2016; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Continues to commend Türkiye for hosting around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; | 20. Notes that Türkiye has hosted around 2.7 million refugees, including 2.3 million Syrians under temporary protection; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 a. Remains deeply concerned about Türkiye being considered by the Union as a "safe country of origin" in light of wide evidence of persecution and serious harm of its citizens. Highlights that this represents a breach of article 61.1 of the Asylum Procedure Regulation that states that a third country may only be designated as a safe country of origin where, on the basis of the legal situation, the application of the law within a democratic system and the general political circumstances, it can be shown that there is no persecution as defined in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1347 and no real risk of serious harm as defined in Article 15 of that Regulation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 a. Welcomes the fact that Türkiye is building an 8.5 kilometre security wall along its western border with Greece in Edirne province to prevent illegal migration into the EU; notes that Türkiye has already constructed a 828 kilometre wall along its entire Syrian border and that a similar shorter wall exists along the Iranian border; calls on the EU and its Member States to learn from the Turkish example in order to combat illegal migration and human smuggling; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20a. Stresses that Türkiye has been a significant source of instability in the region in recent years; stresses that its unjustified intervention in the Syrian civil war was unilateral and had no mandate from the UN or NATO; recalls that Türkiye, the armed groups that it supports, and the new Syrian Government have fought against the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), who have been the closest ally to the West in the fight against ISIS; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 a. Notes with concern that the military operations against the Iranian regime will have implications for Türkiye, due to its geographic proximity, including through spill-over effects, in particular with regard to renewed migration pressures; underlines the importance of regional coordination and close cooperation with Türkiye and other international partners in this context; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 a. Commends Türkiye’s support for Ukraine amid Russia’s ongoing war of aggression, including through the provision of military assistance, and reiterates the importance of continued support for Ukraine’s sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity within its internationally recognised borders; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 a. Expresses serious concern about the deterioration of the protection environment for Syrians in Türkiye, including the suspension of health insurances, the closure of refugee camps without adequate alternatives, and the downscaling of international non-governmental organisation and UN services; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 a. Expresses its strong disappointment at attempts to exploit the migration issue, particularly to the detriment of the Republic of Cyprus and calls on Turkey to implement the EU-Turkey readmission agreement with all Member States; |
Geadis Geadi, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Loucas Fourlas, Michalis Hadjipantela, Sebastian Tynkkynen
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 a. Denounces the lack of initiatives to prevent Turkish aggression against the Republic of Cyprus, Greece, Syria, Iraq and Armenia, as well as Turkey's ongoing genocidal acts against 18 million Kurds in Turkey, Syria and Iraq; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 a. Recognizes Türkiye's key role in the fight against illegal migration affecting Europe; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 b. Highlights that as Syria is not a safe country, many Syrian refugees will not be able to return in the short-to medium term, and that protection obligations in Türkiye must not be sidelined in favour of return programming; urges Türkiye to maintain the necessary protection space, legal status, and access to services for Syrian refugees and calls on the EU to advocate for a comprehensive approach that links continued protection in refugee-hosting countries with intensified reconstruction support in Syria, in order to create the conditions for large-scale sustainable, safe, voluntary and dignified returns; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 b. Expresses deep concern over Türkiye’s continued military occupation in northern Syria; recalls that the Turkish military invasion into Syrian territory has caused serious issues regarding respect for international law and the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria; condemns the establishment of long-term military infrastructure and administrative structures in occupied areas under Turkish control; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20b. Condemns in the strongest possible terms the aggressive action taken by Türkiye; emphasises that the sovereignty of states and respect for territorial integrity are key principles of international law; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 c. Calls on the EU and Member States to maintain and, where possible, scale up financial support for the humanitarian and protection space in Türkiye and increase efforts around localisation of aid and provide financial and political support to refugee-led organizations (RLOs), Turkish civil society organizations and RLO-led consortia that provide protection to refugees and migrants in Türkiye; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 c. calls on Türkiye to withdraw all its troops from Syria and to respect international law and the sovereignty of Syria; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 d. Regrets that for more than two decades Türkiye has refused to fully implement the obligations it assumed towards the European Union, including those relating to the Republic of Cyprus; recalls in particular the Council Declaration of 21 September 2005, which clarified that Türkiye’s recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the accession process; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 d. Calls on Turkish authorities to reinstate 'go-and-see' visits or equivalent mechanisms enabling informed return decisions, and to ensure gender-sensitive return programmes that are developed in genuine consultation with refugees and refugee-led organisations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 e. Reiterates that Türkiye’s continued refusal to recognise the Republic of Cyprus and open its ports and airports to Cypriot vessels and aircraft constitutes a persistent breach of its commitments towards the European Union; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20 f. Condemns the continued usurpation, sale and illegal development of properties belonging to Greek Cypriots in the occupied areas of the Republic of Cyprus; expresses serious concern over increasing attempts to promote and exploit such properties; calls on Türkiye to halt these practices and to respect the property rights of the lawful owners in accordance with international law and the relevant judgments of the European Court of Human Rights; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; | 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; deplores the fact that Türkiye continues to violate the sovereignty and sovereign rights of EU Member States, such as Greece and the Republic of Cyprus, including through the promotion of the Blue Homeland doctrine, the so called “grey zones” narrative and by linking the demilitarisation of Greek islands in the Eastern Aegean to Greece’s sovereignty over them; underlines that, although Turkish violations of Greek airspace remain at relatively low levels, a significant increase has been recorded compared to 2024; similarly, violations of Greek territorial waters and systematic illegal fishing activities by Turkish vessels within Greek territorial waters, in breach of the relevant EU legal framework on IUU fishing, have risen considerably compared to 2024; expresses its deep concern that Türkiye objected to Greece’s establishment of a marine park in the Aegean entirely within Greek territorial waters, announced the establishment of two marine parks extending into areas under Greek jurisdiction, rejected the publication of the Greek Maritime Spatial Planning under the relevant EU directive and presented its Μaritime Spatial Planning challenging Greece’s sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction; also regrets that Türkiye persists in instrumentalising the NAVTEX system to advance unfounded political claims related to sovereignty and sovereign rights of EU Member States; expresses its deep concern that Türkiye continues to uphold a formal threat of war against Greece (casus belli), should the latter exercise its lawful right to extend its territorial waters up to 12 nautical miles into the Aegean Sea, in accordance with Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; calls on Türkiye to fully respect the sovereignty of all EU Member States over their territorial sea and airspace, and their sovereign rights, including the right to explore and exploit natural resources in accordance with EU and international law, including the Law of the Sea as reflected in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which is part of the EU acquis; reiterates its view that the memorandum of understanding between Türkiye and Libya on delimitation of the maritime jurisdiction areas in the Mediterranean infringes upon the sovereign rights of third States, does not comply with the Law of the Sea and cannot produce any legal consequences for third States; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; | 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment in the Eastern Mediterranean but regrets that these efforts have not been translated in a serious and real de-escalation; expresses its serious concern about the introduction of revisionist ideas, such as the “Blue Homeland” doctrine which directly dispute the Greek sovereign rights and sovereignty in the Aegean Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean, as well as the “National Oath” in Turkish school curricula; regrets the fact that Türkiye continues to dispute the sovereignty and sovereign rights of EU Member States such as Greece and the Republic of Cyprus; regrets that the Turkish violations of the Greek airspace including with armed military airplanes and drones have increased; expresses its concern for the increase of military presence and of offensive equipment in the coastline opposite the Greek islands; deplores the fact that theTurkish violations of Greek territorial waters continue to rise; notes the systematic illegal fishing activities which have been conducted by Turkish vessels within Greek territorial waters, in breach of the European legislation related to Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fisheries (IUU); expresses its deep concern that Türkiye objected to Greece’s establishment of a marine park in the Aegean entirely within Greek territorial waters, announced the establishment of two marine parks extending into areas under Greek jurisdiction, rejected the publication of the Greek Maritime Spatial Planning under the relevant EU directive and presented its Maritime Spatial Planning challenging Greece’s sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; | 21. Regrets that the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, has not fostered a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; regrets also that despite a partial de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Aegean, Türkiye continues its unilateral illegal actions and aggressive rhetoric and to unfoundedly dispute the sovereignty and sovereign rights of EU Member States, including by expressing its determination to continue its illegal activities in the Eastern Mediterranean and to impose the so called ‘Blue Homeland’ doctrine; calls on Türkiye to respect the sovereignty of all EU Member States over their territorial sea and airspace, as well as their sovereign rights, including, inter alia, the right to explore and exploit natural resources, in accordance with EU and international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which is part of the EU; acquis; stresses that all delimitation agreements must fully abide by the International Law of the Sea as reflected in UNCLOS and not encroach neighbouring state’s rights on their maritime zones; continues to call Turkey to show genuine collective engagement to the settlement of the delimitation of exclusive economic zones (EEZs) and the continental shelf in both the Aegean Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean, in good faith and in line with international law and the principle of good neighbourly relations, and to refrain from any unilateral illegal actions or threats; ; reiterates its view that the memorandum of understanding between Türkiye and Libya Government of National Accord (GNA) on the delimitation of the maritime jurisdiction areas in the Mediterranean infringes upon the sovereign rights of third States, does not comply with the Law of the Sea and cannot produce any legal consequences for third States and condemns all recent activities towards its implementation; condemns Türkiye’s continued attempts to impede the implementation of the Great Sea Interconnector, an EU project of common interest, and regrets that it has persisted in its plans for an illegal electricity interconnector with the occupied area of Cyprus; reiterates the EU’s readiness to use all instruments and options at its disposal, including those under Article 29 TEU and Article 215 TFEU, in order to defend its interests and those of its Member States, as well as to uphold regional stability; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; | 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, including high-level meetings such as the summit between Prime Minister Mitsotakis and President Erdoğan in February 2026, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; reiterates its strong interest in the stability and security in the region and encourages all sides to further advance in this line of dialogue and cooperation with an aim at resolving any pending dispute and difference in the framework of international law; expresses its deep concern that Türkiye continues to uphold a formal threat of war against Greece (casus belli) which is inconceivable among allies and good neighbours; reiterates its call on Türkiye to fully respect the sovereignty of all EU Member States over their territorial sea and airspace in accordance with EU and international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS); reiterates its view that the memorandum of understanding between Türkiye and Libya on delimitation of the maritime jurisdiction areas in the Mediterranean infringes upon the sovereign rights of third States, does not comply with the Law of the Sea and cannot produce any legal consequences for third States; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; | 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; deplores the fact that Türkiye continues to violate the sovereignty and sovereign rights of EU Member States, such as Greece and the Republic of Cyprus, including through the promotion of the "Blue Homeland doctrine", the so called “grey zones” narrative and by linking the demilitarisation of Greek islands in the Eastern Aegean to Greece’s sovereignty over them; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; | 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; reiterates its view that the memorandum of understanding between Türkiye and Libya on delimitation of the maritime jurisdiction areas in the Mediterranean infringes upon the sovereign rights of third States, does not comply with the Law of the Sea and cannot produce any legal consequences for third States; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; | 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; stresses that genuine de-escalation requires full respect for international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and respect for the sovereignty and sovereign rights of EU Member States; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; | 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; stresses, however, that deep and recurring disagreements persist, notably with regard to maritime boundary delimitations, Cyprus, and respect for international law in the Eastern Mediterranean; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; | 21. Notes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; stresses, however, that Türkiye still maintains the casus belli threat against Greece, which remains incompatible with good neighbourly relations and regional stability; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; | 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; stresses its support for Greece, an EU Member State, in the face of all kinds of provocation by Türkiye; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment and further de-escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean; | 21. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, which can foster a constructive environment that is of paramount importance amidst the dangerous escalation of conflict in the wider region |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 a. Deplores the fact that Türkiye persists in instrumentalising the NAVTEX system to advance unfounded political claims related to sovereignty and sovereign rights of EU Member States, including the call for demilitarisation of several Greek islands, by simultaneously disputing Greek sovereignity over them; condemns Turkiye’s provocative actions and threats, violating the Greek Exclusive Economic Zone by impeding survey activities for the Great Sea Interconnector, an EU Project of Common Interest and one of the Energy Highway initiatives identified in the European Grids Package; notes that Turkiye bases its provocative actions, which dispute Greek Exclusive Economic Zone and territorial rights, to the illegal 2019 memorandum of understanding (MoU) on the delimitation of maritime jurisdiction areas between Türkiye and the Libyan Government of National Accord (GNA); recalls that this text has been deemed by the European Council (December 2019) as “infringing upon the sovereign rights of third States, not complying with the Law of the Sea, and not producing any legal consequences for third States”; deplores that Türkiye also continues to uphold a formal threat of war against Greece (Casus Belli) since 1995, should the latter exercise its lawful right to extend its territorial waters up to 12 nautical miles, in accordance with Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, violating criteria 4 and 5 of the Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 a. Welcomes the continued dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, including high-level meetings such as the summit between Prime Minister Mitsotakis and President Erdoğan in February 2026. Reiterates its strong interest in the stability and security in the Eastern Mediterranean and encourages Türkiye to engage in dialogue with Greece and Cyprus with an aim at resolving any pending dispute and difference in line with international law; expresses its deep concern that Türkiye continues to uphold a formal threat of war against Greece (casus belli) which is inconceivable among allies and good neighbours; deplores the fact that Türkiye continues to violate the sovereignty and sovereign rights of EU Member States, such as Greece and the Republic of Cyprus, including through the promotion of the Blue Homeland doctrine; reiterates its call on Türkiye to fully respect the sovereignty of all EU Member States over their territorial sea and airspace in accordance with EU and international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS); reiterates its view that the memorandum of understanding between Türkiye and Libya on delimitation of the maritime jurisdiction areas in the Mediterranean infringes upon the sovereign rights of third States, does not comply with the Law of the Sea and cannot produce any legal consequences for third States and condemns all recent activities towards its implementation ; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 a. Welcomes the steps taken by the UNSG towards a resumption of comprehensive settlement talks, including his appointment of a Personal Envoy on Cyprus, as well as the appointment of the European Commission’s Special Envoy for Cyprus; welcomes the two informal meetings in a broader format under the auspices of the UNSG held in Geneva (March 2025) and New York (July 2025) and the agreement on trust-building initiatives, the meeting of President Mr Christodoulides, Turkish Cypriot leader Mr Erhürman (in the presence of the UNSG’s Personal Envoy Ms Holguin) on 11.12.2025 in Cyprus and their agreement which stated that “the real aim is the solution of the Cyprus problem with political equality as described in the UNSC Resolutions”, stressing the importance to use this momentum to move towards the resumption of formal negotiations in a broader format under the auspices of the UNSG from the point at which they were interrupted in Crans Montana in 2017; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 a. Reiterates its call on Türkiye to refrain from all kinds of provocative rhetoric and actions ,fully respect the sovereignty of all EU Member States over their territorial sea and airspace, as well as all sovereign rights exercised in accordance with international law, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the EU acquis including the lawful right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and explore and exploit natural resources within its lawfully delimitated EEZ |
Geadis Geadi, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 a. Notes that the EU must act in accordance with international law, in particular with regard to the protection of its Member States; calls, accordingly, for the full implementation of the Treaty of Lausanne; calls, more specifically, for the return of property to the Greeks of Constantinople, Imvros and Tenedos and the payment of compensation for the appalling persecutions by Turkey over the last 60 years; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 a. Reiterates its strong interest in stability and security in the Eastern Mediterranean; strongly condemns the continued violations by Türkiye of the sovereignty and sovereign rights of EU Member States, notably Greece and the Republic of Cyprus, including through the promotion of the revisionist “Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan)” doctrine and through persistent maritime and aerial infringements; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 a. Underlines that violations of Greek territorial waters and systematic illegal fishing activities by Turkish vessels within Greek territorial waters, in breach of the relevant EU legal framework on IUU fishing, have risen considerably compared to 2024; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 a. Is worried about the recent letter of Türkiye to the United Nations targeting Greece, Cyprus and Egypt over maritime boundaries in the Eastern Mediterranean; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 b. Reminds that the respect of the sovereignty and the sovereign rights of all EU Member States which are inextricably linked to the integrity of the Union as a whole, in accordance with European and International Law, including the Law of the Sea, as reflected in the UNCLOS, as well as the principles of Good Neighbourly Relations is core part of the accession process and a precondition for any future EU – Türkiye relations; reiterates EU readiness to use all instruments and options in its disposal, including those under article 29 TEU and article 215 TFEU, in order to defend its interests and those of its Member States, as well as to uphold regional stability; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 b. Reiterates that the memorandum of understanding between Türkiye and Libya on the delimitation of maritime jurisdiction areas in the Mediterranean is illegal, violates the sovereign rights of third States, including those of an EU Member State, Greece, does not comply with the Law of the Sea and cannot produce any legal consequences for third States or the European Union; |
Geadis Geadi, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 b. Deplores the complete absence of initiatives to compensate the Greeks of Constantinople, Imvros and Tenedos who were driven from their ancestral homes by the turkish government and the "deep state" during the events of September 1955 and thereafter; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 c. Notes that the EU must act in accordance with international law, in particular with regard to the protection of its Member States; accordingly, calls for the literal implementation of the Treaty of Lausanne; in particular, calls for the return of property to the Greeks of Constantinople, Imvros and Tenedos and for compensations for the atrocious persecutions by the Turkish "deep state"; furthermore, calls for diplomatic and military measures to be taken to address the illegal occupation by the turkish army in the lands of the Republic of Cyprus, Syria and Iraq; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 c. Calls on Türkiye to fully respect the implementation of the Great Sea Interconnector and East Med Pipeline, both recognised by the European Union as Projects of Common Interest (PCI), and to refrain from any actions that could obstruct or undermine the development of this strategic energy infrastructure connecting the electricity systems of Greece, Cyprus and Israel, which contributes to the energy security and the diversification of the Union’s energy supply. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 d. Condemns the systematic illegal fishing activities by Turkish vessels within Greek territorial waters in the Aegean sea and in maritime areas around the Tillyria region of the Republic of Cyprus; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 e. Expresses its serious concern that Türkiye continues to maintain a formal threat of war (casus belli) against Greece should it exercise its legitimate right under international law to extend its territorial waters to 12 nautical miles in accordance with Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS); considers such a threat incompatible with the principles of good neighbourly relations and with the obligations of a candidate country to the European Union; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 f. calls on Türkiye to immediately withdraw the casus belli decision adopted by the Turkish Grand National Assembly in 1995 and to fully respect the sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction of all EU Member States over their territorial sea, airspace and maritime zones, including their rights to explore and exploit natural resources in accordance with international law and the EU acquis; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21 g. Strongly condemns the illegal visit by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to the occupied part of the Republic of Cyprus in July 2025, which constitutes a blatant violation of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Cyprus; further condemns his participation in celebrations marking 51 years from the 1974 Turkish invasion and ongoing occupation of Cyprus, which demonstrates profound disrespect for international law, the sovereignty of an EU Member State and the suffering of the victims of the Turkish invasion and occupation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. Reiterates its call on Türkiye to work on a constructive, and not assertive nor aggressive, approach in its neighbourhood; regrets that Türkiye continues to dispute the sovereignty and sovereign rights of an EU Member State; recalls that Türkiye’s accession process is contingent on its full compliance with the Copenhagen criteria and on its normalisation of relations with all EU Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus; calls for the status of the buffer zone and the mandate of the UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus to be respected; urges Türkiye and the Turkish Cypriot leadership to cease and reverse all such unilateral activities and refrain from any further actions; calls for engagement in peaceful UN-led negotiations and for real progress to be made in the Cyprus settlement talks; strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; |
Sebastian Tynkkynen, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. Highlights the deterioration in European security and the ongoing illegal occupation in Cyprus; stresses that this situation demands that the EU step up its defence capacities and show greater willingness to act in order to deliver the security expected by the EU’s citizens; underlines the need to ensure the defence, territorial integrity and sovereignty of every EU Member State; calls on the EU to provide a timeline of one year for the complete withdrawal of Turkey's troops from the Republic of Cyprus, before the activation of Article 42(7) TEU, aiming to provide military assistance to the Republic of Cyprus in order to liberate its occupied northern part; moreover, calls on the EU to sustain its efforts to strengthen the EU security and defence capabilities; trongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and equality; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality as set out in the relevant UNSC including Resolution 2815 of 30 January 2026, in accordance with international law and values on which the Union is founded and calls on Türkiye to abandon the unacceptable proposal for a two state – solution in Cyprus, return to the agreed UN Framework and encourage the Turkish Cypriot leader to participate in the UN led process with the active participation of the EU; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. Regrets the fact that the Cyprus problem remains unresolved and reiterates its call on Türkiye, to commit and contribute to a comprehensive settlement in line with United Nations Security Council relevant resolutions; calls, as a matter of urgency, for negotiations on the reunification of Cyprus to be resumed under the auspices of the UN Secretary-General as soon as possible; strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality and in accordance with the relevant UNSC resolutions, international law, EU acquis and the principles on which the Union is founded; calls on Türkiye and its subordinate Turkish Cypriot leadership to abandon the unacceptable proposal for a two-state solution in Cyprus and to return to the agreed basis of a solution and the UN framework; strongly condemns all efforts by Türkiye to upgrade the status of the secessionist illegal entity in occupied Cyprus, including in the context of the Organisation of Turkic States and calls all states to respect sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Cyprus and not to recognise, facilitate or in any way assist the international recognition of the aforementioned secessionist entity in line with the relevant UNSC resolutions; welcomes and supports the proposals of the President of the Republic of Cyprus which aim at breaking the stalemate in the settlement process and stresses the importance of EU’s active engagement in supporting all stages of the UN-led process, with all appropriate means at its disposal; further calls on Türkiye to withdraw its troops from Cyprus and refrain from any unilateral action which would entrench the permanent division of the island and to refrain from action altering the demographic balance on the island through a policy of illegal settlements; strongly condemns the ongoing efforts by Türkiye to “open” and settle Varosha by people other than its inhabitants in violation on UN SC Resolutions; calls on Türkiye to reverse its illegal actions and to transfer the area of Varosha to its lawful inhabitants under the temporary administration of the UN as called for by UN Security Council resolutions 550(1984) and 789(1992); strongly condemns the efforts to turn Varosha into a dark- tourism attraction which sensationalizes tragedy insulting the dignity and rights of the lawful inhabitants; takes the view that those illegal actions undermine mutual trust and hence the prospect of a resumption of talks on a comprehensive solution to the Cyprus problem and calls on Türkiye to reverse these actions and avoid any other unilateral and illegal actions that could raise further tensions on the island; |
Michalis Hadjipantela, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. calls for progressively increasing measures to be taken every year that Turkey fails to comply, in order to press Turkey to withdraw its troops from the island of Cyprus and to reverse its policies altering the demographic balance on the island; strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the possible basis of a federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and equality, if the citizens of the Republic of Cyprus decide it; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; as set out in the relevant UNSC including Resolution 2815 of 30 January 2026, in accordance with international law and values on which the Union is founded and calls on Türkiye to abandon the unacceptable proposal for a two state – solution in Cyprus, return to the agreed UN Framework and encourage the Turkish Cypriot leader to participate in the UN led process; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality, as set out in the relevant UN Security Council resolutions, the agreed areas of convergence and the Framework of the UN Secretary General, as well as in accordance with international law and the principles and values on which the Union is founded; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; welcomes recent developments signalling political willingness to revive the stalled UN-brokered talks to unify Cyprus and calls on the EU to seize the opportunity and use all its diplomatic channels to advocate for the resumption of negotiations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the UN Charter, leading to the liberation of the island and the reintegration of the occupied areas under the effective control of the Republic of Cyprus, without territorial, religious, racial, ethnic or other distinctions, in full respect of international and European law, with the complete withdrawal of Turkish occupation troops and settlers; |
Giorgos Georgiou, Danilo Della Valle, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Pernando Barrena Arza, Özlem Demirel, Irene Montero
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality as set out in the relevant UN Security Council resolutions, in accordance with international law and the principles and values on which the Union is founded and the agreed convergences and the Framework of the UN Secretary General,; |
Giorgos Georgiou, Danilo Della Valle, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Pernando Barrena Arza, Özlem Demirel, Irene Montero
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. Reiterates its strong support for the resumption of substantive negotiations for the comprehensive solution of the Cyprus problem and encourages all parties involved to step up efforts in this direction; Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. Urges Türkiye to end its military presence in the northern part of the Republic of Cyprus, an EU Member State; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, requiring the withdrawal of Türkiye’s occupying forces and on the basis of the Republic of Cyprus having complete sovereign control of the entire territory; |
Geadis Geadi, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, aiming not to justify the results of the illegal turkish invasion against the Republic of Cyprus and illegal occupation of 37% of its territory; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; | 22. Strongly reaffirms that the only acceptable solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement within the agreed UN framework; unequivocally condemns any actions undermining the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Cyprus, an EU Member State; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 a. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Cyprus problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within the agreed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality, as set out in the relevant UN Security Council resolutions, the agreed areas of convergence and the Framework of the UN Secretary General, as well as in accordance with international law and the principles and values on which the Union is founded; strongly condemns Türkiye’s attempts to upgrade the status of the secessionist entity in occupied Cyprus, including via the Organisation of Turkic States and the Organisation of Islamic States and calls on all states to respect Cyprus’ sovereignty according to UNSC resolutions and to fully respect UNSC resolutions 541 and 550; calls, as a matter of urgency, for the resumption of negotiations on the reunification of Cyprus under the auspices of the UN Secretary-General as soon as possible, from the point at which they were interrupted in Crans-Montana in 2017; calls on Türkiye to abandon the unacceptable proposal for a two-state solution in Cyprus and to return to the agreed basis for a solution and the UN framework; further calls on Türkiye to withdraw its troops from Cyprus and refrain from any unilateral action which would entrench the permanent division of the island and from action altering the demographic balance; |
Giorgos Georgiou, Danilo Della Valle, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Pernando Barrena Arza, Özlem Demirel, Irene Montero
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 a. Welcomes the support of the new leader of the Turkish Cypriot community to the resumption of the negotiations from where they left off in Crans-Montana in 2017 and considers the joint statement of the two leaders on 11 December 2026 as a positive step; calls on all sides to use this momentum to strengthen the renewed hope for settlement negotiations in concrete terms; warmly welcomes the resumption of direct meetings between both communities’ leaders and the agreement on further confidence-building measures as a positive and relevant step and encourages them to advance in their implementation; strongly supports the continuation of the contacts between both sides under the auspices of the UN Secretary-General and the work of his Personal Envoy for Cyprus, María Ángela Holguín Cuéllar; calls on the EU and its Member States to firmly support the continuation of this dialogue and to stand ready to support, in any way needed, the potential success of this process; encourages all sides to use this momentum to move towards the resumption of negotiations and not to miss this window of opportunity; welcomes the designation of Johannes Hahn as EU Special Envoy for the Cyprus issue by the European Commission and calls for the EU to use its diplomatic influence effectively to contribute to this process; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 a. Welcomes the stance of the newly elected Turkish Cypriot leader, and the renewed hope for creating a conducive environment for the resumption of settlement negotiations; warmly welcomes the resumption of informal meetings between both communities’ leaders and the agreement on further confidence-building measures as a positive and relevant step; strongly supports the continuation of the contacts between both sides under the auspices of the UN Secretary-General and the work of his Personal Envoy for Cyprus, María Ángela Holguín Cuéllar; calls on the EU and its Member States to firmly support the continuation of this dialogue and to stand ready to support, in any way needed, the potential success of this process; encourages all sides to use this momentum to move towards the resumption of negotiations and not to miss this window of opportunity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 a. Strongly condemns the continued unilateral actions by Türkiye and the illegal regime in the occupied areas of the Republic of Cyprus regarding the fenced area of Varosha; recalls the European Parliament resolution of 8 July 2021 on the situation in Varosha, which condemned the partial reopening of the area; reiterates that any attempt to reopen or settle Varosha is contrary to international law and the relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions, in particular Resolutions 550 (1984) and 789 (1992); calls on Türkiye to immediately reverse these actions aand return the enclosed Famagusta to its lawful inhabitants; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| - | 22 a. Calls on Turkiye to respect the status of the buffer zone and the mandate of the UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP); urges Türkiye to cease and reverse all unilateral actions and violations within and in the vicinity of the buffer zone and refrain from any further such actions and provocations; reiterates its call on Türkiye to implement concrete measures for demilitarisation along the Turkish Forces ceasefire line and beyond in Cyprus in order to reduce tensions and contribute to a conducive environment for the resumption of the UN-led negotiations; calls on Türkiye to withdraw from Strovilia and facilitate the full implementation of the Pyla Understanding; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 a. Reaffirms that the Republic of Cyprus is the sole legitimate authority on the island of Cyprus and strongly rejects the Turkish position in favour of "two state entities with legal status"; emphasises that the EU and the international community only recognise the Republic of Cyprus; considers that the agreements between Türkiye and the self-declared Turkish Cypriot administration on continental shelf delimitation and joint resource exploitation are a violation of international public law; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 a. Strongly condemns the efforts of Türkiye to upgrade the secessionist entity’s status in occupied Cyprus, including via the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation and the Organisation of Turkic States, and calls upon all states to respect the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of the Republic of Cyprus, as the sole legitimate and recognized Government on the island and not to recognize, facilitate or in any way assist the illegal secessionist entity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 a. Expresses its deep concern that Türkiye objected to Greece’s establishment of a marine park in the Aegean entirely within Greek territorial waters, announced the establishment of two marine parks extending into areas under Greek jurisdiction, rejected the publication of the Greek Maritime Spatial Planning under the relevant EU directive and presented its Μaritime Spatial Planning challenging Greece’s sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 a. Strongly reaffirms its view that the only solution to the Kurdish problem is a fair, comprehensive, viable and democratic settlement, within a proposed UN framework, on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22a. Strongly condemns the invasion of Cyprus by Turkish troops in 1974 and the occupation of the northern part of the island since then; urges the Turkish Government to withdraw them without delay and to recognise the full sovereignty of the Republic of Cyprus over the entire island; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 a. Strongly condemns the rise of antisemitism and anti-Armenian sentiment in Turkey, as well as the strong hate-rhetoric against the state of Israel; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 b. Reiterates its call on Türkiye to give the Turkish Cypriot community the necessary space to act in accordance with its role as a legitimate community of the island, which is a right guaranteed by the constitution of the Republic of Cyprus; reiterates its call on the Commission to step up its efforts to engage with the Turkish Cypriot community, with a view to facilitating the resolution of the Cyprus problem and recalling that its place is in the European Union; calls for all parties involved to demonstrate a more courageous approach to bringing the communities together; stresses the need for the EU body of law to be implemented across the entire island following a comprehensive resolution of the Cyprus problem; remains concerned by restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including violence or threats of violence against Turkish Cypriot human rights activists and particularly journalists; takes note of the significant work of the Committee on Missing Persons in Cyprus (CMP) and calls for improved access to occupied military zones by the Turkish army, access to its military archives and information as to the relocation of remains from former to subsequent burial sites; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 b. Notes the different stance of the new Turkish Cypriot leader, calls on him to engage constructively with a view to reaching a settlement within the UN-agreed framework irrespective of Türkiye’s positions; welcomes the renewed hope for settlement negotiations and the resumption of direct meetings between both communities’ leaders and the agreement on further confidence-building measures as a positive and relevant step; strongly supports the continuation of the contacts between both sides under the auspices of the UN Secretary-General and the work of his Personal Envoy for Cyprus, María Ángela Holguín Cuéllar; calls on the EU and its Member states to firmly support the continuation of this dialogue and to stand ready to support, in any way needed, the potential success of this process; calls on Türkiye to engage with the EU’s Special Envoy for Cyprus; encourages all sides to use this momentum to move towards the resumption of negotiations and not to miss this window of opportunity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 b. Notes with concern statements by the new occupation leader in Cyprus, Tufan Erhürman, indicating that he will conduct negotiations and political activities in close consultation with the Government of Türkiye; recalls his public remarks that no Turkish Cypriot leader has negotiated without coordination with Ankara; underlines that such statements highlight the decisive control exercised by Türkiye over the political process in the occupied areas of the Republic of Cyprus; notes with deep concern his repeated statements presenting the concept of “political equality” in Cyprus, as implying sovereign equality between two separate founding states on the island and calling for joint decision-making mechanisms over issues such as maritime zones, hydrocarbons, energy and security; stresses that such positions risk undermining the sovereignty of the Republic of Cyprus and are incompatible with a democratic settlement of the Cyprus problem; |
Giorgos Georgiou, Danilo Della Valle, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Pernando Barrena Arza, Özlem Demirel, Irene Montero
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 b. Deplores the official position of Türkiye for a two-states solution in Cyprus and reiterates its call to abandon this and return to the agreed basis for a solution and the UN framework; calls, as a matter of urgency, for the resumption of negotiations on the reunification of Cyprus under the auspices of the UN Secretary-General as soon as possible, from the point at which they were interrupted in Crans-Montana in 2017; regrets that despite repeated calls for a constructive approach to facilitate the prospects of the reunification of Cyprus, Türkiye continues its unlawful attempts to nurture secessionism, including via the Organisation of Turkic States; |
Geadis Geadi, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay, Michalis Hadjipantela
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 b. Regrets the complete absence of initiatives to support Cypriot citizens such as Titina Loizidou, who have been displaced from the occupied territories of the Republic of Cyprus by the Turkish occupying army, whose cases have been repeatedly, and rightfully, upheld by the courts; |
Geadis Geadi, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 b. Reiterates its call on Turkey to respect the role of the Ecumenical Patriarchate for Orthodox Christians throughout the world and to recognize its legal personality and the public use of the ecclesiastical title of Ecumenical Patriarch; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| - | 22 b. Takes note of the significant work of the Committee on Missing Persons in Cyprus (CMP) and calls on Turkiye to give the CMP unrestricted access to all areas, as well as to all information necessary for its work, including information from its military archives and information on the relocation of remains; calls on Turkiye to account for the fate of those persons still missing; further calls for the continuation and the increase of the CMP EU funding also in light of the new MFF; remains deeply concerned about the education and religious restrictions and impediments faced by the enclaved Greek Cypriots in the occupied areas; calls on Türkiye to fully implement the ECtHR judgements with respect to Cyprus and to respect the rights of the Cypriot citizens guaranteed by the European Convention of Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental rights of the EU including property right, respecting the freedom of religion and the freedom of opinion and expression, and the right to access and enjoy cultural heritage, and to stop the deliberate destruction of cultural and religious heritage; condemns the repeated attempts by Türkiye to intimidate and silence Turkish Cypriot journalists, trade unionists, human rights defenders and progressive citizens in the Turkish Cypriot community, thus violating their right to freedom of opinion and expression; strongly condemns the unlawful and politically motivated detention of Greek Cypriots by the Turkish military, including recent abductions in the buffer zone; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 b. Calls on Türkiye to withdraw its troops from Cyprus and refrain from any unilateral action, that would threat the sovereignty of Cyprus, as well as from any action altering the demographic balance of the island; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 b. Regrets that Türkiye persists in instrumentalising the NAVTEX system to advance unfounded political claims related to sovereignty and sovereign rights of EU Member States; |
Giorgos Georgiou, Danilo Della Valle, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Pernando Barrena Arza, Özlem Demirel, Irene Montero
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 c. Urges Türkiye to refrain from any unilateral action which would entrench the permanent division of Cyrpus and from actions altering the demographic balance; calls on Turkiye to respect the status of the buffer zone and the mandate of the UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP) and reverse all unilateral actions and violations within and in the vicinity of the buffer zone and refrain from any further such actions and provocations; condemns the ongoing ‘opening’ of Varosha by Türkiye, as this negatively alters the situation on the ground, undermines mutual trust and negatively impacts the prospects for the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive solution of the Cyprus problem; calls on Türkiye to reverse its illegal actions in violation of UN Security Council resolutions 550(1984) and 789(1992) on Varosha, which call on Türkiye to transfer the area of Varosha to its lawful inhabitants under the temporary administration of the UN, and to withdraw from Strovilia and facilitate the full implementation of the Pyla Understanding; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| - | 22 c. Calls on Türkiye to halt its proclaimed aggressive policy of the sale and exploitation of Greek Cypriot properties in the occupied areas, a policy designed to create irreversible effects on the ground and in complete disregard of the European Code of Human Rights ruling on this issue; deeply regrets about the active involvement of European citizens in this illegal and fraudulent economic chain that has been set up by Türkiye and its subordinate authorities; is also extremely concerned that this policy is inextricably linked with sanction evasion and money laundering as per media reports; stresses that any tolerance to individuals or companies facilitating, by any means, the sale or exploitation of Greek Cypriot properties, within Cyprus’ national territory, is in direct violation of public international law as well as European Union law; asks the European Commission and the Members States to actively support the Republic of Cyprus’s effort to eliminate this blatant violation of human rights as well as to bring to justice those who usurp the properties of Cyprus citizens; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 c. Calls on Türkiye to respect the status of the buffer zone and the mandate of UNFICYP; urges Türkiye and Turkish Cypriot leadership to reverse and refrain from any kind of unilateral actions, violations and provocations against the buffer zone’s status; recalls the important status of Varosha, condemns all Türkiye ’s unilateral actions that run contrary to UN Security Council Resolutions, reiterates its call for their immediate reversal and calls on Türkiye to respect all relevant UN Security Council Resolutions, to withdraw from Strovilia and to facilitate the full implementation of the 2023 UN Understanding, on Pyla; |
Giorgos Georgiou, Danilo Della Valle, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Pernando Barrena Arza, Özlem Demirel, Irene Montero
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 d. Takes note of the significant work of the Committee on Missing Persons in Cyprus (CMP) and calls for improved access to occupied military zones by the Turkish army, access to its military archives and information as to the relocation of remains from former to subsequent burial sites; condemns the repeated attempts by Türkiye to intimidate and silence Turkish Cypriot journalists, trade unionists, human rights defenders and progressive citizens in the Turkish Cypriot community, thus violating their right to freedom of opinion and expression; calls on Türkiye to halt its proclaimed illegal policy of the sale and exploitation of Greek Cypriot properties, aimed at creating new fait acompli and additional obstacles to the settlement of the property issue in the context of the comprehensive solution; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 d. Takes note of the significant work of the Committee on Missing Persons (CMP) function and calls on Türkiye to intensify its efforts, by cooperating with the CMP and providing access to relevant information from its military archives and unhindered access to all the military areas in Cyprus, take concrete measures to protect known burial sites and avert any future relocation of remains and disturbance of burial sites; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| - | 22 d. Reiterates its call on Türkiye to comply with the EU declaration issued on September 21, 2005 and to fulfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the EC-Turkey Association Agreement vis-a-vis all Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus; regrets that Türkiye has still not made progress towards the normalisation of its relations with the Republic of Cyprus; reiterates that recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the accession process, of Customs Union and every agreement between the EU and Türkiye and calls for progress without any further delay; stresses that Türkiye’s own constructive engagement across the cross the board of EU-Türkiye relations, including in relation to the resumption of and progress in the Cyprus settlement talks within the UN-agreed framework, remains indispensable in advancing the various areas of cooperation with Türkiye; underlines the fact that cooperation remains essential in areas such as justice and home affairs with all EU Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus; Regrets Türkiye’s continuing refusal to comply with intenational civil aviation law and establish a channel of communication between air traffic control centres in Türkiye and the Republic of Cyprus, the absence of which entails real safety risks and dangers as identified by the European Aviation Safety Agency and the International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations; takes the view that this could be an area where Türkiye could prove its commitment to confidence building measures and calls on Türkiye to collaborate by fully implementing EU aviation law; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 d. Regrets the complete absence of initiatives to support Cypriot citizens such as Titina Loizidou, who have been displaced from the occupied territories of the Republic of Cyprus by the Turkish occupying army, whose cases have been repeatedly, and rightfully, upheld by the courts; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 d. Condemns the fact that Türkiye continues to be a gateway for Russian capital and tourists to the world; recalls that Türkiye remains only one of two places in Europe, which still facilitade air connectivity with Russia; |
Giorgos Georgiou, Danilo Della Valle, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Pernando Barrena Arza, Özlem Demirel, Irene Montero
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 e. Regrets that for 20 years Türkiye has refused to implement the obligations assumed towards the EU, including those in relation to Cyprus, as per the Negotiating Framework of October 2005; stresses that recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the accession process; reiterates its call on Türkiye to fulfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement in relation to all Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus; further calls on Türkiye to ensure that the human and political rights of all Cypriots are fully respected and that compliance with the fundamental principles of the European Union and the European acquis is guaranteed; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 e. Remains deeply concerned about the condition of the enclaved Greek Cypriots in the occupied territories of Cyprus due to the severe restrictions and pressure imposed by Türkiye hindering their freedom of religion, education, opinion, expression access to cultural heritage and medical care; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 f. Calls on Türkiye to halt the usurpation of Greek Cypriot properties in the occupied territories of Cyprus, a policy designed to create irreversible effects on the ground and which completely disregards the rules of the ECHR and the respective judgements of the ECtHR; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22 g. Regrets that Türkiye has refused to implement the obligations assumed towards the EU, including those in relation to Cyprus, as per the Negotiating Framework of October 2005; stresses that recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the accession process; reiterates its call on Türkiye to fulfill its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement in relation to all Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and potential shifts in US foreign policy; | deleted |
Geadis Geadi, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Ivaylo Valchev
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and potential shifts in US foreign policy; | 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape, regrets therefore the fact that Türkiye refuses to align with EU's restrictive measures against Russia in relation to Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine; recalls that Türkiye continues to allow Russian military and civilian aircraft to use its airspace in stark contrast to other EU and NATO allies ; regrets the decision of the authorities of Türkiye to acquire Russian S-400 missle system; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and potential shifts in US foreign policy; | 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in regional security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and potential shifts in US foreign policy; reaffirms, in this context, the strategic and geopolitical importance of Türkiye, also as an ally in NATO, and its increasing presence, influence and mediation role in areas critical to international security and EU strategic interest, such as the Black Sea region, including Ukraine, the South Caucasus, and the Middle East; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and potential shifts in US foreign policy; | 23. Stresses that reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and potential shifts in US foreign policy, shall be based on strict conditionalities, including the respect of the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States and of international law; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and potential shifts in US foreign policy; | 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and potential shifts in US foreign policy; recognises Türkiye’s strategic importance as a NATO ally located at the crossroads of Europe and the Middle East, and underlines the importance of enhanced EU–Türkiye cooperation on defence, security and regional stability in an increasingly fragile Middle East security environment; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and potential shifts in US foreign policy; | 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and potential shifts in US foreign policy; notes with concern reports that Türkiye is not doing enough to prevent Russia's circumvention of EU sanctions. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and potential shifts in US foreign policy; | 23. Stresses the importance of EU-Türkiye cooperation on security matters; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and potential shifts in US foreign policy; | 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and potential shifts in US foreign policy; | 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and potential shifts in US foreign policy; | 23. Stresses the key relevance of reinforcing EU-Türkiye cooperation in global security matters, particularly in the light of the changing geopolitical landscape and dangerous shifts in US foreign policy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 a. Welcomes the steps taken by the UNSG towards a resumption of comprehensive settlement talks, including his appointment of a Personal Envoy on Cyprus, as well as the appointment of the European Commission’s Special Envoy for Cyprus; welcomes the two informal meetings in a broader format under the auspices of the UNSG held in Geneva (March 2025) and New York (July 2025) and the agreement on trust-building initiatives; the meeting of President Mr Christodoulides, Turkish Cypriot leader Mr Erhürman (in the presence of the UNSG’s Personal Envoy Ms Holguin) on 11.12.2025 in Cyprus and their agreement which stated that “the real aim is the solution of the Cyprus problem with political equality as described in the UNSC Resolutions”; stresses the importance to use this momentum to move towards the resumption of formal negotiations in a bi-zonal, bi-communal federation under the auspices of the UNSG from the point at which they were interrupted in Crans Montana in 2017; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23a. Condemns Türkiye’s military operations against Kurdish forces in Syria and Iraq, including against groups that played a decisive role in the international fight against the Islamic State terrorist organisation; stresses that the Syrian Democratic Forces are currently guarding detention centres and camps holding thousands of IS fighters and members; warns that any destabilisation of these forces could lead to a serious deterioration in regional security and promote a resurgence of the terrorist organisation; recalls that the management of these detainees is also directly linked to the security of European democracies, and calls on Türkiye to exercise restraint, respect international humanitarian law and prioritise political solutions to the Kurdish question; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 a. Expresses deep concern over the continued close political engagement between President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and President Vladimir Putin despite Russia’s ongoing war of aggression against Ukraine; stresses that sustained strategic cooperation between Russia and Türkiye risks undermining the unity of the international response to Russia’s aggression. Notes with concern investigations and monitoring activities by European and international authorities regarding the circumvention of sanctions through the re-export of Russian energy products and other goods via third countries, including Türkiye; stresses that such practices undermine the EU’s sanctions regime adopted in response to Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 a. Strongly encourages progress towards the opening of land border crossings and the full normalization of relations between Türkiye and Armenia; welcomes the dialogue between the two countries towards the full opening of the border and the recent simplification of visa procedures for diplomatic, special, and service passport holders as of January 1, 2026; calls on both countries to continue to work towards better connectivity in order to facilitate the land connection between Europe and Asia, promote historical reconciliation, improved business climate, and stronger people-to-people contacts; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 a. Notes that Türkiye has established itself as a leading international mediator, utilising its foreign policy to mediate regional conflicts and facilitate dialogue; welcomes, in this regard, that Türkiye has positioned itself as a key mediator in the Russia-Ukraine war, maintaining strong ties with both sides; notes that these mediation efforts, driven by a desire for regional stability and economic interests, have led to brokering the 2022 Black Sea Grain Initiative and negotiating prisoner exchanges; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 a. Expresses its strong concern about the continuation of military aggression by the Türkiye-Syrian National Army alliance in northeast Syria, including deadly attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure, causing new displacement and putting further strain on a peaceful transition; denounces Türkiye´s unlawful military incursions and occupation of parts of Syria urges Türkiye to respect Syria´s territorial integrity and comply with international humanitarian law; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 a. Expresses its deep concern that Türkiye continues to uphold a formal threat of war against Greece (casus belli), should the latter exercise its lawful right to extend its territorial waters up to 12 nautical miles into the Aegean Sea, in accordance with Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| - | 23 a. Notes with concern that Türkiye has applied to be a member of BRICS+ while it currently holds a partnership status, and is considering the same for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO); expresses serious concern about the fundamental incompatibility of Türkiye's potential full BRICS membership with the EU accession process; notes also that Türkiye continued to seek opportunities to strengthen links with China, through various initiatives (Belt and Road Initiative, Middle Corridor, etc.); |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 a. Underlines Türkiye`s strategic and geopolitical significance within the broader regional context in addressing pressing regional challenges, including the stability of the Black Sea region, migration management, counterterrorism, and energy security; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 a. Acknowledges the strategic and geopolitical importance of Türkiye and takes note of its increasing political, economic, and military presence and influence in areas critical to international security; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 a. Notes that Turkish foreign policy is increasingly framed within a logic of regional power projection, often described as “neo-Ottoman.” |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 b. Calls on Türkiye to fully respect the sovereignty of all EU Member States over their territorial sea and airspace, and their sovereign rights, including the right to explore and exploit natural resources in accordance with EU and international law, including the Law of the Sea as reflected in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which is part of the EU acquis; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 b. Takes note of the growing anti-Western position of the Turkish authorities; expresses concern about its possible implications for the EU’s interests in the Western Balkans, the Black Sea region, the South Caucasus, the Mediterranean, and the Middle East; but remains open to exploring avenues for improved security cooperation in all these areas; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 b. Expresses concern regarding Türkiye’s continued energy cooperation with Russia, including the construction of the Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant by the Russian state corporation Rosatom; stresses that this arrangement creates long-term strategic energy dependence and raises concerns regarding energy security and geopolitical influence. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| - | 23 b. Reaffirms its call expressed in its resolution of 15 April 2015, and once again encourages Turkey to recognise the Armenian Genocide, thus paving the way for a genuine reconciliation between the Turkish and Armenian peoples; calls on Türkiye, in this regard, to refrain from any anti-Armenian propaganda and hate speech, and to fully respect its obligations to protect Armenian and other cultural heritage; warns Türkiye to refrain from fuelling bellicose behaviour from Baku as well as from participating in any potential military adventurism carried out by the Aliyev regime against Armenia; strongly encourages Turkiye to further advance on the normalization of its relations with Armenia and exert pressure on Azerbaijan to do the same; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 b. Calls on Türkiye to refrain from any military action across north-east and north-west Syria, particularly in Kurdish-majority areas; calls on the Government of Türkiye to engage constructively with the Syrian authorities and contribute to ensuring that a diverse and inclusive political structure can flourish within Syria; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 b. Regrets that Türkiye has not undertaken any steps to align with EU sanctions against Russia and is complicit in Russian sanction evasion; welcomes, at the same time, that Türkiye hosts negotiations between Ukraine and Russia, invests in reconstruction projects in Ukraine, and provides Ukraine with military support; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 b. Stresses that the expansion of Turkish influence in certain regions of the Union’s wider neighbourhood, notably in Africa, through a combination of humanitarian, religious, economic and security instruments, may generate divergences in strategic interests with the European Union and its Member States. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 c. Reiterates its concern about Türkiye’s close cooperation with Russia on the development of large nuclear power plants, including Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant, which is expected to become operational in 2026, and which is owned and will be operated by Russia’s State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom; notes that a number of accidents and fire explosions have already occurred during the construction of the plant; warns that the impact of a failure in the safety systems or an earthquake poses a high risk with inevitably catastrophic consequences for the region; expresses its concern about Türkiye's growing energy dependence on Russia and highlights comments by Energy Minister Alparslan Bayraktar that Türkiye relies entirely on Russia’s state-owned Rosatom for the uranium that will power its first nuclear plant; calls on the Turkish Government to stop the construction plans for the Akkuyu nuclear power plant; regrets reports of plans for the construction of more foreign-owned nuclear power-plants in Türkiye, including in Sinop along the northern Black Sea and Thrace in the northwest; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 c. Regrets Türkiye`s continued engagement policy vis-a-vis Russia, its reliance on Russian energy supplies, that Türkiye neither aligns on EU’s sanctions against Russia nor gives support to their implementation and fails to restrict the operations of Russian state-controlled media outlets in the context of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine; acknowledges Türkiye`s efforts to facilitate talks between Russia and Ukraine; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 c. Stresses that pragmatic cooperation with Türkiye on security and defence can be strengthened where it serves mutual strategic interests; reiterates, however, that progress towards EU membership remains strictly merit-based and conditional on full compliance with the Copenhagen criteria, in particular democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, and cannot be subject to transactional trade-offs; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 c. Is deeply concerned over ongoing discussions between Türkiye and Russia regarding the establishment of a regional gas trading hub in Türkiye, which could enable Russian gas to be redirected to international markets under alternative branding; stresses that such initiatives undermine European efforts to reduce dependence on Russian energy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 c. Reiterates its view that the memorandum of understanding between Türkiye and Libya on delimitation of the maritime jurisdiction areas in the Mediterranean infringes upon the sovereign rights of third States, does not comply with the Law of the Sea and cannot produce any legal consequences for third States; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 d. Expresses deep concern over repeated inflammatory statements by senior Turkish officials, including statements by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, that contribute to the spread of antisemitism and hatred, as well as threats directed against the State of Israel; stresses that such rhetoric risks further destabilising an already fragile regional environment and undermines efforts aimed at de-escalation and diplomatic engagement in the Middle East; calls on Türkiye to cease such rhetoric and to align with international efforts to combat antisemitism and all forms of religious hatred; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 d. Expresses its deep concern that Türkiye continues to uphold a formal threat of war against Greece (casus belli), should the latter exercise its lawful right to extend its territorial waters up to 12 nautical miles into the Aegean Sea, in accordance with Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; calls on Türkiye to cease all threats and intimidatory actions against Greece and return to full compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS); |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 d. Welcomes, after a confrontational period, Türkiye’s recent steps towards normalising relations with several countries, such as Armenia; encourages Türkiye to maintain this positive trend and open its land border with Armenia; stresses such a step is likely to have significant benefits to the normalisation of relations, cross border people-to-people contacts as well as regional economic development; |
Geadis Geadi, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Galato Alexandraki, Marion Maréchal, Guillaume Peltier, Nicolas Bay
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23 f. Calls on the Republic of Türkiye to fully comply with the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) of 10 May 2001, by taking all effective measures to resolve the humanitarian problem of missing persons in Cyprus which, unfortunately, has still not been resolved 50 years after the invasion; reiterates its call on Türkiye, regarding the missing persons cluster, to provide all necessary information from its military archives, as well as unrestricted access to witnesses to the burial sites in areas under its military control; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; | deleted |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; | 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; notes however that this indicator, based on mechanic statistics on the alignment to the statements by the HR/VP and Council decisions on sanctions, might not fully capture all levels of engagement and dialogue in the framework of foreign and security cooperation; welcomes, in this sense, the recently increased level of dialogue with the EU and the active participation and substantial contribution to EU crisis management missions and operations under the CSDP; believes that, in the current geopolitical landscape, it is important to explore the possibilities for the cooperation with Türkiye in the context of current and future EU policies in the field of security and defence, such as SAFE; urges Turkish authorities, nevertheless, to urgently address the extremely low level of alignment in CFSP and to remove other key obstacles in ensuring the necessary trust among partners and allies, such as maintaining a casus belli against one EU Member state or keeping the Russian-made S-400 air defence system; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; | 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; calls on Türkiye to make significant steps in aligning with the EU’s CFSP, including on sanctions and on respecting the sovereignty of its Member States; underscores that circumvention of EU sanctions undermines its collective efforts; reiterates that as Türkiye continues to violates the sovereign rights of EU Member States in Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean, including the right to explore and exploit natural resources in accordance with EU and international law and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which is part of the EU acquis, it cannot be part of any EU initiative in the areas of CFSP or defence industry cooperation, as it would go against the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; | 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; deplores, in this respect, Türkiye’s overall destabilising role in many areas of concern for the EU and in its neighbourhoods (such as in the Eastern Mediterranean, Middle East and South Caucasus and its role in conflicts in Syria, Iraq and Libya), which threatens regional peace, security and stability; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; | 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; calls on Türkiye to make significant steps in aligning with the EU’s CFSP, including on sanctions and against their circumvention; underscores that circumvention of EU sanctions undermines its collective efforts; remains duly concerned that Türkiye continues to exclude a Member State from cooperation with NATO, posing a continued obstacle to the enhancement of a genuine relationship between the EU and NATO; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; | 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; expresses concern over activities linked to the Russian “shadow fleet” that undermine the enforcement of EU restrictive measures and pose risks to maritime security; urgently calls on Türkiye to intensify efforts to prevent sanctions circumvention and to align more closely with the EU sanctions framework against Russia; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; | 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; regrets, in particular, how Türkiye continues to refrain from aligning with the EU’s restrictive measures against Russia in relation to the latter’s war of aggression against Ukraine and Türkiye`s overall reluctance to support the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions regime; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; | 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; takes the view that this means Türkiye has, in practice, ceased its endeavours to become a member of the EU; calls on the EU to make decisions on this point and terminate Türkiye’s status as a candidate country; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; | 24. Regrets the historic low rate of alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; reiterates that full and unwavering alignment with CFSP for any country willing to engage with the EU; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; | 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; calls on Türkiye to make significant steps in aligning with the EU’s CFSP; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Regrets the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; | 24. Notes the low alignment of Türkiye with the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP), which has decreased from 6 % in 2024 to a record low of 4 % in 2025; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 a. Recognizes, as regards Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, Türkiye’s efforts in having a facilitation and potential mediation role, as underpinned by hosting several direct talks between both sides in Istanbul; acknowledges that Türkiye has traditionally maintained a position of not supporting sanctions adopted outside the UN framework; continues to regret, nevertheless, that Türkiye does not align with the EU’s restrictive measures against Russia, but welcomes the measures it has taken to prevent the circumvention of sanctions via Turkish territory, such as to prevent the re-export of Common High Priority Items, delivering some results; urges Turkish authorities to increase their efforts to detect and prevent circumvention of restrictive measures, in particular on advanced technology items used for military purposes by Russia, to prevent the “false transit” of these items to Russia via Central Asia, to extend these measures to other economically critical goods, and to address the risks linked with Russia’s ‘Shadow Fleet’ in terms of maritime and environmental safety; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 a. Expresses serious concern over repeated contacts between senior Turkish officials and representatives of Hamas, an organisation designated as a terrorist organisation by the European Union; recalls that several Hamas political figures have reportedly been hosted in Türkiye and have held meetings with high-ranking Turkish authorities; stresses that such engagement risks undermining international counter-terrorism efforts and raises serious questions regarding Türkiye’s alignment with the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy; calls on Türkiye to refrain from providing political legitimacy, logistical support or safe haven to members of organisations listed as terrorist by the European Union. |
Geadis Geadi, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Malika Sorel
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 a. Expresses its concern about Turkey's presence in Africa, including in the fields of warfare and strategic infrastructure; expresses concern that this engagement conflicts with EU objectives, notably regarding the implementation of UN frameworks, maritime security and regional stabilisation efforts; notes that such policies have often been described by observers as reflecting a neo-colonial approach, raising concerns about long-term dependency dynamics; calls for actions aiming to greater transparency and alignment with international law and multilateral commitments in order to prevent tensions with EU strategic interests in Africa; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 a. Rejects the use of Article 122 TFEU as the legal basis for the SAFE initiative, emphasizing that this provision, intended for exceptional financial assistance in the event of serious difficulties, is not appropriate for a common security and defence instrument; underlines that participation of third countries with which the Union has established a Security and Defence Partnership within the framework of SAFE must be based on unanimity among Member States and contingent upon the strict fulfilment of conditions safeguarding the security and defence interests of the all its Member states indiscriminately; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 a. Calls on Türkiye to respect the European Court of Human Rights decision of 24 January 2008, which found Türkiye guilty of breaching Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, due to its failure to locate and prosecute those responsible in the case of the murders of Tassos Isaak and Solomos Solomou, which were committed in Cyprus in 1996; calls on the Turkish authorities to enforce the international arrest warrants against the murder suspects, and hand them over to the Republic of Cyprus; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| - | 24 a. Recalls its position, as expressed in previous resolutions, on the introduction of an initiative in the Council for all EU Member States to halt the licensing of arms exports to Türkiye in accordance with Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 a. Expresses concern that Türkiye has not restricted the operations of Russian state-controlled media in the context of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine; notes the widespread presence of pro-Russian narratives and Russia-linked disinformation in the Turkish information space, particularly on Ukraine, NATO and energy security; calls on Türkiye to align with the EU’s restrictive measures and strengthen efforts to counter foreign information manipulation and disinformation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 a. Calls on Türkiye to increase its alignment with EU CFSP positions and to step up structured cooperation with the EU to prevent and detect the circumvention of EU restrictive measures, including with regard to advanced technology items used for military purposes and activities linked to Russia’s “shadow fleet”; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 a. Stresses that high-level political engagement with Hamas is incompatible with the EU’s counter-terrorism policies; calls on the Commission to address Turkey’s support to Hamas as well as Muslim Brotherhood associated organisations in Europe, which seek to undermine European social cohesion; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 a. calls on the Grand National Assembly of Türkiye to revoke the 1995 resolution threatening casus belli against Greece, recalling that the threat or use of force is prohibited under Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24a. Takes the view that historical responsibility and open dialogue about crimes committed in the past are key requirements for reconciliation, regional stability and genuine neighbourly relations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 a. Notes with concern that, through the TurkStream and Blue Stream pipelines, Türkiye is Russia’s major customer of natural gas, as well as a major source of oil and petroleum products; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 a. Expresses deep concern about Türkiye’s continued military presence and support for armed militias in Syria; urges Türkiye to respect Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 b. Condemns the continued violations and provocations by Turkish occupation forces within the United Nations buffer zone in Cyprus, including recent incidents reported on 8 November 2025, 30 December 2025 and 5 January 2026 in the areas of Deneia, Mammari and Avlona, where Turkish soldiers confronted and intimidated Greek Cypriot farmers cultivating their land; notes with concern reports that Turkish settlers cultivate land belonging to Greek Cypriot owners within the buffer zone under the protection of the Turkish military; calls on Türkiye to respect the status of the buffer zone and the mandate of the UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP); urges Türkiye and the Turkish Cypriot leadership to reverse all unilateral actions and violations within and in the vicinity of the buffer zone and to refrain from any interference with civilians lawfully accessing and cultivating land within the buffer zone; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 b. Welcomes Türkiye’s long-standing position in favour of a two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which aligns with the EU’s position, and its active participation in the ‘Global Coalition’ for its implementation; welcomes Türkiye’s contribution to mediation efforts in the Gaza ceasefire and with regard to the Gaza peace summit of October 2025 in Sharm El-Sheikh; deeply regrets, at the same time, the Turkish authorities’ active support for the EU-listed terror group Hamas; takes notes of Türkiye’s adherence to the so-called “Board of Peace” launched by US President Trump, which has not been endorsed by the EU; calls on Türkiye to remain firmly anchored in the multilateral system, with the United Nations at its core, as the essential framework to advance a comprehensive, just and lasting solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen transparency requirements regarding foreign state financing of religious institutions within Member States; urges enhanced scrutiny of third-country governmental influence, including through religious networks, consular structures or state-linked organisations and stresses that all such activities must respect Member States’ sovereignty, integration policies and public order, and must not seek to undermine the social cohesion within a Member State; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 b. Calls on the Turkish Government to sign and ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which has been signed and ratified by the EU and its Member States, without further delay; calls on Türkiye to respect international law and the sovereign rights of the Republic of Cyprus and Greece in their Exclusive Economic Zone; condemns violations of the airspace and territorial waters of EU Member States in the Aegean Sea; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 b. Stresses that any transfers or releases of adult Daesh fighters and suspects to third countries, including Türkiye, must remain subject to effective custody, monitoring and information-sharing arrangements, including in any cross-border transfers, to prevent escape or unmonitored movement, and that accountability must be ensured through evidence preservation and prosecution, in line with international standards and fair-trial guarantees; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 b. Supports the efforts made towards the normalisation of relations between Türkiye and Armenia; Reiterates that the recognition of the Armenian Genocide as a genuine gesture for reconciliation can further enhance this effort; calls on Türkiye to fully respect its obligations to protect Armenian cultural heritage; |
Geadis Geadi, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Marion Maréchal, Ivaylo Valchev, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Galato Alexandraki, Guillaume Peltier, Nicolas Bay
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 b. Expresses serious concern over Türkiye’s continued political engagement with networks and organisations affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, which several EU Member States consider a source of ideological support for radical Islam and terrorism; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| - | 24 b. Reiterates its regret that Türkiye intensified its energy ties with Russia especially in the nuclear power sector and the construction of the Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant, which will be built, operated and owned by Russia’s State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom; reiterates its call on the Turkish Government to halt its plans for the Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant, which is located in a region prone to severe earthquakes, therefore posing a major threat not only to Türkiye, but also to the Mediterranean region; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24b. Calls on Türkiye again to acknowledge the genocide of Christians (Armenians, Greeks and Assyrians); recalls that the European Parliament recognised the Armenian Genocide as far back as 1987; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 b. Warns against Türkiye’s engagement with regional actors associated with extremist agendas, noting that such ties could complicate EU-Türkiye relations and affect regional stability; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 b. Points out that Türkiye's open support to Hamas and refusal to designate it as a terrorist organization is not compatible with the EU's foreign and security policy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 c. Notes Türkiye’s increased leverage over developments in Syria following the fall of the Assad regime, heavily engaging with the current Syrian Transitional Authorities including providing it with military training and advisory support; remains concerned about the continued presence of Turkish forces in the country and about the involvement of Turkish-backed armed groups in the latest episodes of violence in the north and north-east of Syria; calls on Türkiye to address its security concerns in full accordance with international law and ensuring that all Syrians, including Kurds, can enjoy security and fundamental rights, and to refrain from any interference in Syria’s internal processes; condemns the attacks on the civilian population during the last episode of violence between the Syrian army and the Kurdish-led SDF, causing numerous deaths and the displacement of large numbers of civilians, as well as the lack of access to humanitarian aid; expresses its hope that the latest agreement between the Syrian transitional government and the SDF, which foresees the gradual integration of Kurdish forces and institutions into the state and the historic recognition of Kurdish cultural, linguistic and civil rights, will allow for the stability of the North East region of Syria, key for the success of an inclusive political transition in the country; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 c. Reiterates its call on the Turkish Government to halt its plans for the functioning of the Akkuyu nuclear power plant, located in a region prone to severe earthquakes as the recent devastating experience underlines, hence posing a major threat not only to Türkiye, but also to the entire Mediterranean region; requests, accordingly, that the Turkish Government join the Espoo Convention, which commits its parties to notifying and consulting each other on major projects under consideration that are likely to have a significant adverse environmental impact across boundaries; asks, to this end, the Turkish Government to involve, or at least consult, the governments of its neighboring countries in relation to any further developments in the Akkuyu venture; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 c. Notes Türkiye’s increased influence on developments in Syria in the context of the post-Assad transition; notes that Türkiye’s continued military presence in northern Syria carries risks of further regional destabilisation, heightened tensions and challenges to efforts towards a sustainable political settlement, as well as to the effectiveness of the continued fight against Daesh; recalls the importance of full respect for Syria’s territorial integrity and sovereignty; notes the significant investment required for the reconstruction of Syria’s economy and acknowledges Türkiye’s interest in contributing to these efforts; expresses its support for close and constructive cooperation between the EU and Türkiye in this regard; |
Geadis Geadi, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Ivaylo Valchev
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 c. Is deeply concerned over Türkiye’s close diplomatic, economic and energy relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran, including regular high-level contacts, sustained trade relations and the continued import of Iranian gas; stresses that this raises serious concerns regarding Türkiye’s alignment with the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy and with international efforts aimed at addressing Iran’s destabilising regional activities, including its nuclear, ballistic missile and drone programmes; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 c. Recalls that the status and rights of the Muslim minority in Western Thrace are governed by the Treaty of Lausanne of 1923; stresses that the protection of minorities within EU Member States is ensured under EU law and international human rights law; calls on Türkiye to refrain from any statements or actions that could be interpreted as interference in the internal affairs of EU Member States. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 c. Condemns the unacceptable conditions and restrictions affecting enclaved Greek Cypriot students and teachers at the school in Rizokarpaso in the occupied areas of the Republic of Cyprus, including obstacles to the proper functioning and maintenance of the school since 2021; stresses that such practices undermine the fundamental right to education and the human dignity of EU citizens; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 c. Expresses concern over reported efforts by Turkish authorities, including President Erdoğan, to encourage political mobilisation of Turkish citizens and dual nationals residing in EU Member States during Turkish elections and referenda; underlines that such activities must fully respect the sovereignty, democratic order and legal frameworks of the Member States concerned; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 c. Regrets the lack of Türkiye’s alignment with the EU’s reaction to the Iranian crackdown on protesters, including restrictive measures related to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC); calls on Türkiye to progressively align with the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy positions and sanctions regime; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 c. Encourages Türkiye to support the peace process between Armenia and Azerbaijan and to engage in the normalisation of its relations with Armenia, beginning with the opening of the border; believes that peace and normalisation in the region are beneficial to Türkiye and to Europe; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24c. Calls on Türkiye to normalise its relations with Armenia and to use its influence to put pressure on Azerbaijan to do the same; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 d. Reaffirms its support to the normalisation of relations between Armenia and Türkiye in the interests of reconciliation, good neighbourly relations, regional stability and security and socio-economic development, and welcomes the progress achieved so far, including the easing of certain visa procedures, the preparations for the upcoming opening of the border for third-country nationals and holders of diplomatic passports and the resumption of Turkish Airlines direct flights; encourages Türkiye to firmly advance in this process on its own merits without making it dependant on its relations with a third country; supports the Commission’s efforts in bringing forward a EU Cross-Regional Connectivity Agenda involving Türkiye, Armenia and Azerbaijan -including projects such as the Kars-Tbilisi-Baku railway line- with great potential in contributing to regional stability and economic and social development; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 d. Condemns the crimes and serious and systematic violations of international humanitarian and human rights law committed by the armed forces of Türkiye during and following the 1974 illegal invasion and ongoing occupation of the Republic of Cyprus, including widespread acts of sexual violence perpetrated against Cypriot women and girls; stresses that such crimes have had long-lasting social, psychological and economic consequences and constitute a serious violation of human dignity and gender equality; Takes note also the findings of the report of the European Parliament’s official mission and of the FEMM Committee to Cyprus on 26–28 May 2025 concerning the impact of conflict and post-conflict trauma on communities and particularly on women and girls; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24d. Expresses its concern that, although Türkiye has taken limited and selective action, as a result of external pressure, to prevent the circumvention of sanctions, it has not adapted to the restrictive measures imposed on Russia by the EU, and continues to be a significant source of trade for Russia; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 d. expresses concern that Türkiye’s continued political and military support for Azerbaijan, including during and after the conflicts in Nagorno-Karabakh and the subsequent displacement of the Armenian population of the region, has contributed to tensions in the South Caucasus; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 d. Notes that Türkiye continues to play a significant role by hosting a large number of refugees and by providing military support in regions where the EU has limited operational presence; acknowledges the strategic relevance of this engagement for regional stability; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 d. Stresses that any deepening in EU–Türkiye relations must remain conditional on respect for international law, democratic standards, the rule of law, fundamental rights and the sovereignty of EU Member States |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 d. Welcomes the steps taken toward the normalisation of relations between Armenia and Türkiye with a view to strengthening regional stability and security, and welcomes the progress achieved thus far; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 d. Calls on all EU Member States, in view of Türkiye’s militarized foreign policy, to stop all arms exports to Türkiye |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 e. Condemns the unacceptable conditions and restrictions affecting enclaved Greek Cypriot students and teachers at the school in Rizokarpaso in the occupied areas of the Republic of Cyprus, including obstacles to the proper functioning and maintenance of the school since 2021; stresses that such practices undermine the fundamental right to education and the human dignity of EU citizens; takes notes the hearing of the Minister of Education of the Republic of Cyprus, held in CULT committee of the European Parliament on the situation regarding Greek-speaking schools for the enclaved in Turkish occupied Rizokarpaso in February 2024; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 e. Notes with concern Türkiye’s pursuit of alternative partnership frameworks, including the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), its designation as a “partner country” of the BRICS bloc and its stated intention to seek full membership; underlines that such engagement reflecting a non-liberal model of global and regional governance could complicate efforts for a more comprehensive EU-Türkiye partnership; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 e. calls on Türkiye to fully respect the rights and security of the Armenian people, to protect Armenian cultural and religious heritage, and to take meaningful steps towards historical reconciliation, including by recognising the Armenian genocide; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 e. Acknowledges that Türkiye continues to actively participate in and contribute substantially to EU crisis management missions and operations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 f. Expresses deep concern over persistent manifestations of anti-Armenian rhetoric and Armenophobia in political discourse, media narratives and public statements in Türkiye; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 g. Regrets that Türkiye has hosted and supported individuals and media platforms linked to the Muslim Brotherhood following the organisation’s designation as a terrorist organisation in Egypt in 2013 and the restrictions imposed on its activities in several countries in the region; underlines that such support, risks facilitating the transnational influence of Islamist movements and may have implications for security and social cohesion in parts of the Middle East and Europe; |
Geadis Geadi, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Ivaylo Valchev, Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 h. Expresses serious concern that weapons and military equipment of Turkish origin have been found among material seized from members of terrorist organisations such as Hamas and Hezbollah; stresses that such findings raise serious concerns regarding the diversion of defence equipment and the effectiveness of export controls; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 i. Deplores the fact that Türkiye did not condemn the 7 October attack against Israel conducted by Hamas; recalls that Türkiye continues to support Hamas, which is designated by the EU as a terrorist organisation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24 j. Strongly condemns Türkiye’s continuing illegal activities within the Republic of Cyprus's Flight Information Region (FIR) and Exclusive Economic Zone and calls on Türkiye to fully respect Cyprus’s sovereign rights in accordance with international law and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; | 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the serious violations from Türkiye of the Copenhagen criteria, including the lack of democratic reforms and the non-respect of the good neighbourly relations and international law , Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest under strong conditionalities; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; | 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; recalls in this regard that Türkiye bears a key responsibility in fostering stability at both regional and global levels, especially given the current geopolitical upheavals; calls on Türkiye to refrain from using its NATO membership to block cooperation between the EU and NATO; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; | 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; reaffirms that the EU continues to be committed to pursuing the best possible relations with Türkiye, based on dialogue, respect and mutual trust, in line with international law and good neighbourly relations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; | 25. Notes that the accession process cannot continue under the present circumstances due to Türkiye’s persistent backsliding on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, freedoms, and the illegal occupation of part of the Republic of Cyprus; regrets the continued lack of meaningful reforms by the Turkish authorities and stresses that any further engagement with Türkiye must be conditional on tangible improvements in these areas; |
Sebastian Tynkkynen, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; | 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of aggression against its EU member states neighbours, the disrespect of international law and the lack of democratic reforms internally, Türkiye is a country of geographic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and principled cooperation in areas of common interest; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; | 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; | 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the serious violations from Türkiye of the Compenhagen criteria, including the lack democratic reforms, repect of rule of law, the recognition of and normalisation of relations with all EU Member States and the respect of international law, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest based on strong conditionalities, including in relation to Cyprus and in a phased proportionate and reversible manner and in line with the EUCO Conclusions of April 2024; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; | 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; | 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; | 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill and the requirements for acceding to the EU are not met because of the considerable decline in democracy, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; | 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; | 25. Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the accession process, which is currently at a standstill because of the lack of democratic reforms, Türkiye is a strategic partner; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25 a. Welcomes, in this view, the enhancing of EU-Türkiye relations beyond the accession process in areas of mutual interest in line with the recommendations of the Joint Communication on EU-Türkiye relations of 23 November 2023, in a phased proportionate and reversible manner; further welcomes the recent high-level dialogues on trade and economy, migration and security, climate, and science, research, technology and innovation; calls again for the resumption of all relevant High Level Dialogues (HLD) and for the establishment of structured HLDs on sectoral cooperation if needed to address other common challenges; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25 a. Highlights the allegations commonly referred to as “Turkeygate”, relating to possible attempts by actors linked to the Turkish authorities to exert undue influence within European political institutions; calls for thorough, transparent and independent investigations into these allegations, including potential influence networks affecting the European Parliament and other EU institutions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25 a. Condemns Türkiye’s past activities that have undermined European social cohesion, security, and democratic processes, including interference in Member States’ internal affairs through diaspora communities; condemns the targeting of Turkish nationals abroad through harassment, forced returns and substantive surveillance; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25 a. Expresses concern about the rise of nationalist currents in Turkish political life, which fuel a growing discourse of distrust towards Europe and are likely to increase tensions in relations between the Union and Turkey. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25 b. Calls on the Commission and the Council to assess, in light of credible evidence of violent activities and transnational intimidation campaigns, the possibility of including the organisation known as the “Grey Wolves” (Bozkurtlar), affiliated with the Turkish extremist movement, in the EU list of terrorist organisations; expresses concern over the activities of this network within several EU Member States and their links to extremist violence. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. Supports deepening the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts, as an example of good pragmatic and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; | deleted |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. Supports deepening the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts, as an example of good pragmatic and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; | 26. Supports deepening the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts with respect for sovereignty and sovereign rights of EU Member states as enshrined under EU and international law, including the UNCLOS, as an example of good pragmatic and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; notes, however, with regret that Türkiye continues to impede the progress of significant projects for EU connectivity, such as the Great Sea Interconnector which has been designated as a EU project of Common Interest. Also recalls, that democratic backsliding and non-alignment with the CFSP are not conducive to significant progress being made in that regard; reaffirms that the EU is committed to pursuing the best possible relations with Türkiye, based on dialogue, respect and mutual trust, in line with international law and good neighbourly relations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. Supports deepening the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts, as an example of good pragmatic and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; | 26. Supports deepening the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts with respect for sovereignty and sovereign rights of EU Member states as enshrined under EU and international law, including the UNCLOS, as an example of good pragmatic and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; recalls that Türkiye continues to impede the progress of significant projects for EU connectivity, such as the Great Sea Interconnector which has been designated as a EU project of Common Interest; strongly condemns the plans by the Turkish Authorities to set up a two-way electricity link between Türkiye and the secessionist entity in occupied Cyprus and to even ask for European funding for its implementation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. Supports deepening the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts, as an example of good pragmatic and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; | 26. Supports deepening the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts, as an example of good pragmatic and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; calls on the Commission, following the successful experience with other candidate countries, to undertake the necessary arrangements in order to extend as soon as possible the programme ‘Roam Like at Home’ also to Türkiye; calls on the Commission to consider working towards the extension of the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) and other relevant programmes so as to enhance people-to-people contacts; welcomes the good progress in the reporting period on science and research cooperation, in particular linked to participation in Horizon Europe; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. Supports deepening the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts, as an example of good pragmatic and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; | 26. Supports deepening the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts, as an example of good pragmatic and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; stresses the strategic importance of accelerating the completion of key infrastructure projects improving the connectivity between the EU and Türkiye in line with the extended Trans-European Networks; urges the timely development of the Black Sea Ring Highway and railroad connections; welcomes Türkiye's readiness to invest in the construction of a Black Sea Highway connecting Türkiye, Bulgaria and Romania; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. Supports deepening the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts, as an example of good pragmatic and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; | 26. Supports deepening the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts, with respect for sovereignty and sovereign rights of EU Member states as enshrined under EU and international law, including the UNCLOS as an example of good pragmatic and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. Supports deepening the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts, as an example of good pragmatic and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; | 26. Supports further exploring the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of transport, digital and people-to-people contacts, as an example of principled and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; deplores the fact that Turkey uses military aggression and threats, in order to prevent EU Projects of Common Interest (PCIs); |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. Supports deepening the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts, as an example of good pragmatic and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; | 26. Supports deepening the regional connectivity agenda, when needed, with the conditional engagement of Türkiye; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. Supports deepening the connectivity agenda with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts, as an example of good pragmatic and mutually beneficial cooperation with the potential to foster peace and stability in the region; | 26. Expresses reservations about collaboration with Türkiye in the fields of energy, transport, digital and people-to-people contacts; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26 a. Expresses deep concern over Türkiye’s expanding military, economic and security presence in Somalia, including the establishment of its largest overseas military base in Mogadishu, extensive training and financing of Somali security forces, and recent agreements granting Türkiye a significant role in maritime security and hydrocarbon exploration along Somalia’s coastline; underlines that such arrangements provide Türkiye with long-term strategic leverage over key security and economic sectors of a fragile state; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26 a. notes with regret that Türkiye continues to impede the progress of significant projects for EU connectivity, such as the Great Sea Interconnector which has been designated as a EU Project of Common Interest. Also recalls, that democratic backsliding and non-alignment with the CFSP are not conducive to significant progress being made in that regard; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26 a. Supports Türkiye´s participation in the EU Civil Protection Mechanism and calls on the deepening of EU-Turkey cooperation in the fields of civil protection and resilient infrastructure putting emphasis on the need to strengthen decentralised municipal capacity, civil society participation, better coordination and public communication; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26 a. Condemns the illegal military Turkish invasion in 1974 and the ongoing illegal occupation of over 36% of the territory of the Republic of Cyprus ever since; calls on Türkiye to withdraw its troops from Cyprus and refrain from unilateral actions threatening Cyprus’ sovereignty or altering the island’s demographic balance; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26 a. Notes the increase of investments by Türkiye in the development of the Middle Corridor; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26 b. Notes with concern Türkiye’s expanding political, economic and military presence across parts of Africa, including Somalia and the Sahel region; underlines that this growing engagement increasingly intersects with the strategic interests of EU Member States, particularly France, and risks contributing to geopolitical competition and instability in regions where European partners have longstanding security and development commitments; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26 b. Condemns Türkiye’s efforts to upgrade the status of the secessionist entity in occupied Cyprus and calls on all states to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Cyprus and not recognise or assist the illegal entity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26 b. reaffirms that the EU is committed to pursuing the best possible relations with Türkiye, based on dialogue, respect and mutual trust, in line with international law and good neighbourly relations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26 b. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU-Türkiye partnership by prioritizing the modernization and enhancement of the current Association Agreement; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; | deleted |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; | deleted |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; | 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; is aware of the importance that large sectors of the EU and Turkish economies attach to the updating of this instrument that has been in force for more than 30 years; stands ready to support an upgraded customs union with a broader, mutually beneficial scope, which could encompass a wide range of areas of common interest, including digital and green transition, public procurement, sustainable development commitments, contributing to the economic security of both the EU and Türkiye; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations, including Türkiye’s full implementation of the Additional Protocol on extending the Ankara Agreement to all Member States without exception and in a non-discriminatory fashion; welcomes positive steps, including the decrease in trade barriers, observed in the last period following also the holding of the high-level dialogue on trade; |
Geadis Geadi, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Loucas Fourlas, Michalis Hadjipantela, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay, Malika Sorel, Volker Schnurrbusch
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; | 27. Underlines that any discussions concerning the EU–Turkey trade relations, must be strictly conditional upon full respect for fair competition rules, transparency and the absence of distortive state aid, for instance concerning the Turkish airlines, or dumping practices, for instance concerning fishery exports, cold-rolled flat steel, ceramic tiles, textiles, glass fibre fabrics; condemns persistent practices that risk undermining World Trade Organization (WTO) rules and the level playing field; stresses that Parliament’s position concerning trade relations with Turkey must be based on strong and measurable conditionality, including respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, compliance with international law and good neighbourly relations, by first and foremost withdrawing its illegal troops from the Republic of Cyprus; considers that the EU should diversify its trade partners, in order to avoid dependence on Turkey in any sector; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; | 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union could be envisaged provided that Türkiye fully and effectively implements the Additional Protocol in relation to all Member States including the Republic of Cyprus without reserve and in a non-discriminatory manner, which is a prerequisite for the opening of the negotiations for the upgrading; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; regrets that the current customs union will not achieve its full potential until Türkiye fully and effectively implements the Additional Protocol in relation to all Member States in a non-discriminatory manner; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; | 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality and automated sanctions related to human rights and fundamental freedoms violations, respect for international law, including UNCLOS and good neighbourly relations; recalls that a precondition for the negotiations to start are the improvement of human rights situation inside the country, the abandonment of its provocative and revisionist foreign policy and the full, unconditional implementation of Ankara Protocol towards all Member States, without exceptions and in a non-discriminatory fashion, including towards the Republic of Cyprus; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; | 27. Reiterates its view that while the modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, this cannot proceed when Türkiye has not fully and effectively implemented the existing Customs Union towards all member states in a non-discriminatory manner; particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality and measurable progress related to democracy, the rule of law, to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; | 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; including Türkiye’s full implementation of the Additional Protocol on extending the Ankara Agreement to all Member States without exception and in a non-discriminatory fashion; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; | 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations, including Türkiye’s full implementation of the Additional Protocol on extending the Ankara Agreement to all Member States without exception and in a non-discriminatory fashion; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; | 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; stresses that additionally to the geopolitical aspect, an updated framework would unlock substantial economic and strategic benefits for both partners, strengthening trade, investment and supply chain resilience, while recalling that Parliament’s consent at the end of the process would need to be based on conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; | 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations and include measures to support the green transition and help SME adjustment ; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; | 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law, adherence to the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), and good neighbourly relations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; | 27. Reiterates its view that full implementation and modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be mutually beneficial, based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; | 27. Reiterates its view that modernisation of the EU customs union is needed, particularly given the current geopolitical landscape; underlines, however, the fact that for Parliament to give its consent at the end of the process, such a modernisation would need to be based on conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27 a. Underlines the relevance for EU-Türkiye trade of upcoming initiatives from the Commission such as the Industrial Accelerator Act and the “Made in Europe” approach, with possible strong requirements that could eventually require an overhaul of EU procurement rules and severely affect the already outdated customs union between the EU and Türkiye; welcomes the fact that the Commission’s proposal for the Industrial Accelerator Act already provides that content from partners with which the Union has concluded an agreement establishing a free trade area or a customs union -such as Türkiye- shall be deemed to be of Union origin; supports this approach and calls for any other relevant legislation to be proposed in the same vein in the future to keep taking into account the importance of further integrating the markets and economies of the candidate countries, particularly those having a customs union with the EU; |
Geadis Geadi, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Marion Maréchal, Malika Sorel, Volker Schnurrbusch
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27 a. Expresses concern about persistent allegations of distortive state support granted by the turkish authorities to strategic sectors, including aviation, as well as instances of dumping practices affecting EU undertakings; stresses that such practices undermine fair competition and reciprocity in EU–Turkey economic relations; calls on the Commission to closely monitor these developments and, where appropriate, to make full use of the Union’s trade defence instruments, including anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures, as well as Regulation (EU) 2022/2560 on foreign subsidies, in order to safeguard the integrity of the internal market and ensure a level playing field. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27 a. Calls on Türkiye to refrain from any military action in Syria, or support to armed groups operating there, that risks undermining the protection of civilians, including Kurdish civilians and other minorities, as well as ceasefire arrangements and prospects for an inclusive and sustainable political settlement; stresses that any security arrangements and stabilisation measures supported by Türkiye must comply with international law, including international humanitarian law and human rights law, and must not result in forced displacement or demographic engineering; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27 a. Reiterates the strategic importance of the EU–Türkiye Customs Union and underlines the mutual economic benefits derived from it; stresses the need to modernise and update the EU–Türkiye Customs Union in order to reflect current economic realities and unlock its full potential for both sides; calls on the Commission to pursue the necessary steps to enable negotiations on its modernisation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27 a. Calls on Türkiye to respect the status of the buffer zone and the mandate of UNFICYP; urges Türkiye and the Turkish Cypriot leadership to reverse and refrain from unilateral actions and provocations; recalls the status of Varosha; calls for respect of all relevant UN Security Council Resolutions and for withdrawal from Strovilia and implementation of the 2023 UN Understanding on Pyla; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27a. Reaffirms its support for a systematic review of the current trade framework, with the aim of gradually reducing Member States’ dependence on Türkiye in view of Türkiye’s sustained and reprehensible stance on human rights and fundamental freedoms, international law and good neighbourly relations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27 a. Urges Türkiye to continue cooperating in good faith with Greece in the field of migration, ensuring a clear signal is sent to human smugglers to deter further illegal flows; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27 a. Recalls that Türkiye continues to target the EU with foreign information manipulation and interference and systematically engages in patterns of transnational repression; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27 a. Stresses that it seems unrealistic to envisage any modernisation of the Customs Union; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27 b. Stresses that any transfer to Türkiye, or via Türkiye, of adult Daesh fighters or suspects originating from detention facilities in Syria must remain subject to effective custody, monitoring and information-sharing arrangements, including in any cross-border transfers, in order to prevent escape or unmonitored movement; stresses that accountability must be ensured through evidence preservation and prosecution, in line with international standards and fair-trial guarantees; warns that transfers or repatriations without effective safeguards, judicial follow-up and transparent coordination with relevant international partners would constitute a security risk for Syria, the wider region and Europe; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27 b. Condemns the ongoing efforts by Türkiye to “open” and settle Varosha by people other than its inhabitants in violation on UN Security Council Resolutions; calls on Türkiye for the immediate reversal of its illegal actions, transfer the area of Varosha to its lawful inhabitants under the temporary administration of the UN as called for by UN Security Council resolutions 550(1984) and 789(1992); strongly condemns the efforts to turn Varosha into a dark- tourism attraction which sensationalizes tragedy insulting the dignity and rights of the lawful inhabitants; calls on Türkiye to withdraw from Strovilia and facilitate the full implementation of the Pyla Understanding; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27 b. Expects Türkiye to fully implement the actions agreed upon on the basis of the EU- Türkiye Readmission Agreement (of 2013), as well as of the EU-Turkey Statement (of 2016); |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Welcomes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework; calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; | deleted |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Welcomes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework; calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; | deleted |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Welcomes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework; calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; | deleted |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Welcomes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework; calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; | deleted |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Welcomes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework; calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; | deleted |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Welcomes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework; calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; | deleted |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Welcomes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework; calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; | 28. Welcomes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework introduced on 15 July 2025, while recognizes with regret the significant problems that Turkish citizens continue to face with regard to visa requests, owing to a marked increase in demand and fears of abuse of the system; calls on the EU Member States to further increase the resources allocated to this matter; notes with deep regret that no progress has been made by Türkiye towards meeting the required benchmarks for visa liberalisation in the last year; calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue, and equally calls on the Council to do its share following such steps; strongly supports in the meantime urgent measures on visa facilitation, particularly with regard to business activities and Erasmus students; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Welcomes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework; calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; | 28. Welcomes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework; calls on the Turkish Government to fully and effectively fulfil all the outstanding benchmarks in a non-discriminatory manner towards all Member States while aligning with EU visa policy; deeply regrets the constant attempts by Turkish authorities to blame the EU for not advancing on this dossier, while not taking any necessary steps to comply with the remaining benchmarks; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Welcomes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework; calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; | 28. Recalls that the Turkish Government has still not addressed the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Welcomes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework; calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; | 28. Calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; notes the recent steps taken within the visa cascade framework; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Welcomes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework; calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; | 28. Notes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework; calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Welcomes recent progress in facilitating mobility for Turkish citizens towards the EU through the visa cascade framework; calls on the Turkish Government to address the remaining obstacles preventing the reopening of the visa liberalisation dialogue; | 28. Rejects any prospect of liberalisation of the visa cascade framework and considers that such a development would be premature and contrary to the security interests and migration management objectives of the Union and its Member States. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 a. Welcomes the visit of Pope Leo XIV to Türkiye and acknowledges this moment as an important step in strengthening dialogue and mutual understanding between the Holy See and Türkiye, as well as between Christian and Muslim communities more broadly; emphasizes that such high-level visits contribute to fostering interreligious dialogue, promoting tolerance, and reinforcing diplomatic and cultural ties; notes that this engagement can further support constructive relations with Türkiye, encouraging cooperation on issues of regional stability, cultural heritage protection, and the promotion of freedom of religion and belief, while also creating opportunities for renewed dialogue between European institutions and Türkiye on shared values and common challenges; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 a. Urges Türkiye once again to acknowledge the Christian (Armenian, Greek and Assyrian) genocide in order to pave the way for genuine reconciliation of Türkiye with its past, its people and its neighbours and to fully respect its obligations to protect the Armenian, Greek and Assyrian cultural heritage; notes that the lack of pressure to Türkiye to recognise the historical truth of the Christian genocide has resulted in the continuation of various crimes against humanity by Türkiye, like national cleansing and religious persecution internally and externally; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 a. Expresses its concern about the EU´s consideration of Türkiye as a “safe country of origin”, which fundamentally contradicts the assessments made in the annual progress report prepared by the Commission as well as the European Parliament´s reports on Türkiye, which confirm the risk of persecution and lack of the respect for human rights of citizens in Türkiye; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 a. Welcomes the reengagement of the EIB in Türkiye and the Turkey Investment Platform (TIP) under the European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD+) which enables stronger investment support through guarantee programmes in the three overarching policy priorities, namely the Green Deal, Global Gateway as well as jobs and growth; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 a. Highlights the necessity to ensure that no Union programmes benefit entities in Türkiye that are not respecting fundamental Union values, and apply conditionality rigorously, including through suspension of or programmes with Turkish partners undermining fundamental Union values; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 a. Call for the suspension of visa liberalisation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 b. Takes note of the significant work of the Committee on Missing Persons in Cyprus (CMP) and calls on Türkiye to give the CMp unrestricted access to all areas, as well as to all information necessary for its work, including information from, access to its military archives and information on the relocation of remains ; calls on Türkiye to account for the fate of those persons still missing; further calls for the continuation and the increase of the CMP EU funding also in light of the new MFF; remains deeply concerned about the education and religious restrictions and impediments faced by the enclaved Greek Cypriots and Maronites in the occupied areas; calls on Türkiye to fully implement the ECtHR judgements with respect to Cyprus and to respect the rights guaranteed by the European Convention of Human Rights with regard to respecting the freedom of religion and the freedom of opinion and expression, and the right to access and enjoy cultural heritage, and to stop the deliberate destruction of cultural and religious heritage; condemns the repeated attempts by Türkiye to intimidate and silence Turkish Cypriot journalists, trade unionists, human rights defenders and progressive citizens in the Turkish Cypriot community, thus violating their right to freedom of opinion and expression; calls on Türkiye to halt its proclaimed aggressive policy of the sale and exploitation of Greek Cypriot properties, a policy designed to create irreversible effects on the ground; strongly condemns the unlawful and politically motivated detention of Greek Cypriots by the Turkish military, including recent abductions in the buffer zone; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 b. Supports the decision taken by the EU component of the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) to postpone its 82nd meeting scheduled to take place on 14-15 April 2025 in Ankara, in the aftermath of the detention and arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu and others; retains the view that parliamentary dialogue remains a crucial part of EU-Türkiye relations and expresses the hope that the work of the JPC will resume soon when conditions allow; regrets the Turkish authorities’ decision not to invite the European Parliament, unlike the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and the Parliamentary Assembly of the OSCE, to observe the last presidential and parliamentary elections in May 2023 due to allegations of unfair treatment; expresses its hope that this decision will be revised favourably in any upcoming election in the country; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 b. Underlines the importance of Türkiye for the development and functioning of transcontinental connectivity initiatives, including the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (Middle Corridor), which provides an increasingly important alternative trade route between Europe and Asia, as well as the emerging Development Road project connecting the Gulf region to Europe through Türkiye; highlights that Türkiye’s position in these initiatives contributes significantly to strengthening EU connectivity, supply chain resilience and economic cooperation with Central Asia, the South Caucasus and the Middle East, and stresses that enhanced cooperation with Türkiye in the field of transport infrastructure and logistics can play an important role in advancing the EU’s broader connectivity and strategic autonomy objectives; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 c. Regrets Türkiye’s continuing refusal to comply with international civil aviation law and establish a channel of communication between air traffic control centres in Türkiye and the Republic of Cyprus, the absence of which entails real safety risks and dangers as identified by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency and the International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations; regrets that Türkiye has continued its attempts to impede the implementation of the Great Sea Interconnector, an EU project of common interest, and has persisted in its plans for an illegal electricity interconnector with the occupied area of Cyprus; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 c. Highlights the importance of advancing the visa liberalisation dialogue with Türkiye in order to strengthen people-to-people contacts, academic exchanges, tourism and economic cooperation; notes that in 2024 Turkish citizens submitted more than 1.17 million Schengen visa applications, demonstrating the strong demand for mobility between Türkiye and the EU 1a; | |
| 1a https://balkaninsight.com/2025/07/18/turkey-welcomes-eu-decision-to-relax-visa-rules/ |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 d. Regrets that for more than 20 years Türkiye has refused to implement the obligations assumed towards the EU, including those in relation to Cyprus, as per the Negotiating Framework of October 2005; stresses that recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the accession process; reiterates its call on Türkiye to fulfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement in relation to all Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 d. Welcomes the ongoing diplomatic efforts aimed at fostering dialogue, regional stability and economic cooperation in the South Caucasus; encourages the continued normalization of relations between Türkiye and Armenia, including progress towards the reopening of their shared border; underlines the positive role that such steps could play in strengthening connectivity, people-to-people contacts and regional development; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 h. Stresses the strategic importance of Türkiye as a key NATO ally possessing the Alliance’s second-largest armed forces, and highlights its significant role in contributing to Euro-Atlantic security; underlines Türkiye’s particular relevance for stability and security in the Black Sea region, given its geographic position and its role in safeguarding critical maritime routes and regional security dynamics; emphasizes that enhanced cooperation with Türkiye is important for the European Union in addressing shared security challenges, strengthening regional stability, and promoting coordinated efforts in the Black Sea area and neighbouring regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 a. Urges Türkiye to continue cooperating in good faith with EU Member States in the field of migration, ensuring a clear signal is sent to human smugglers to deter further illegal flows; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 b. Expects Türkiye to fully implement the actions agreed upon on the basis of the EU Turkiye Readmission Agreement (of 2013), as well as of the EU - Türkiye Statement (of 2016); |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28 e. Calls on Türkiye to actively support the Ecumenical Patriarchate and the mission of Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, recognizing the important role the Patriarchate plays in promoting interreligious dialogue, cultural heritage, and peaceful coexistence; encourages constructive engagement with the Patriarchate to further strengthen religious freedom, mutual respect, and Türkiye’s longstanding tradition as a place of diverse faiths and cultures; underlines with concern the disinformation and malign propaganda campaigns targeting Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew and the Ecumenical Patriarchate, particularly from pro-Kremlin sources, aimed at undermining the role in promoting interreligious dialogue and regional stability; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; | 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite the democratic and pro-European aspirations of a large part of Turkish society; takes note of recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement and the reopening of accession talks; expresses appreciation for this innovative and bold approach; remains, however, sceptical about supporting it unless there is a clear signal from the Turkish Government of its willingness to recommit to the EU path through concrete and credible actions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; | 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country, to recognise and normalise its relations with all EU Member States, to abandon its expansionist policy and respect international law, and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; | 29. Reiterates its view that the huge transfers of pre-accession aid have failed to bring Türkiye and the EU closer to each other; notes that each side is pleased with the current status quo, which, however, is not in the interest of taxpayers; considers that Türkiye should not become member of the EU and that pre-accession assistance and the EU accession negotiations should be officially ended, in the interest of both the EU and Türkiye; emphasises that Türkiye is and should remain an important strategic partner of the EU and invites the European Council to request the European Commission to develop a strategic partnership between the EU and Türkiye; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; | 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; Notes however, that the EU is committed to and ready towards the direction of the accession provided the Turkish Government takes these necessary steps |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; | 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; supports a shift from an accession framework cooperation with Turkey to a clearly defined non-accession third country to avoid ambiguity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; | 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; recognises that advancement of EU-Türkiye relations require political will translated into real action at the highest political level; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; | 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances and should be officially terminated, despite recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; | 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, while recognizing the recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite recent calls by relevant Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; | 29. Reiterates its view that the Turkish Government has neglected to take the necessary steps to address the existing fundamental democratic shortcomings within the country and therefore maintains that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot be resumed in the current circumstances, despite recent calls by relevant imprisoned Turkish opposition figures advocating renewed engagement; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29 a. Reiterates the importance of accessible people to people exchange for EU-Türkiye relations, notably for the promotion of democracy, the rule of law and human rights; regrets in this regard that EU-Turkish people to people exchange is severely hampered by high rejection rates and long delays for appointments for Turkish citizens to apply for visa, making it increasingly difficult if not impossible for young people, students, and journalists from Türkiye to visit the EU; takes note of the new rules for Turkish citizens applying for Schengen visas, which are meant to provide more favourable visa rules for Turkish citizens applying for Schengen visas and calls on Member States to significantly improve the Schengen visa application process for Turkish citizens: |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29 a. Recalls that, as in the case of any other candidate, the accession process is contingent on full compliance with the Copenhagen criteria and on the normalisation of relations with all EU Member States; considers, in this regard, that when advancing their declared EU aspirations, the Turkish authorities should place less emphasis on the country’s capabilities in security and defence and instead address the grave democratic situation prevailing in the country, as symbolised by places such as Silivri and Edirne; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29a. Considers it unacceptable that Türkiye continues to be a beneficiary of IPA III funding; calls for Türkiye to be removed from the list of candidate countries and for the pre-accession assistance granted to the country to be discontinued; points out, for example, that between 2021 and 2023 the EU allocated over EUR 751 million to Türkiye via the IPA III; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29 a. Reiterates that recognition of all EU Member States is a necessary component of any agreement between the EU and Türkiye; stresses that Türkiye’s constructive engagement, including in relation to the Cyprus problem, remains key to advancing closer cooperation between the EU and Türkiye; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29 a. Believes that, under no circumstances, can Turkish companies participate in joint European Defence Initiatives; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29 b. Remains deeply concerned about the conditions of the enclaved Greek Cypriots in the occupied territories of Cyprus due to the severe restrictions and pressure imposed by Türkiye hindering their freedom of religion, education, opinion, expression, access to cultural heritage and medical care; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a closer, more dynamic and strategic partnership; | deleted |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a closer, more dynamic and strategic partnership; | 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a closer, more dynamic and strategic partnership; insists on the need to begin a process of reflection on how this new constructive and progressive framework for EU-Türkiye relations can encompass the interests of all parties involved; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a closer, more dynamic and strategic partnership; | 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government to engage constructively with the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality and such progress must be based on matched and tangible progress as regards CFSP alignment, democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental values, good neighbourly relations and respect of international law; reiterates that recognition of all EU Member States is a necessary component of any agreement between the EU and Türkiye; stresses that Türkiye’s own constructive engagement across the cross the board of EU-Türkiye relations, including in relation to the Cyprus settlement talks within the UN-agreed framework, remains indispensable in advancing closer cooperation between the EU and Türkiye; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a closer, more dynamic and strategic partnership; | 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a closer, more dynamic and strategic partnership; points out that that progress in EU-Türkiye relations depends on full respect for the sovereign rights of all Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a closer, more dynamic and strategic partnership; | 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established clear and consistent conditionality grounded in respect for democratic principles, the rule of law and fundamental rights, towards a closer, more dynamic and strategic partnership |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a closer, more dynamic and strategic partnership; | 30. Urges the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to instigate measures by which Türkiye shifts from the accession process towards conventional cooperation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a closer, more dynamic and strategic partnership; | 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a closer, more dynamic and strategic partnership, including on a modernisation of the EU-Türkiye Customs Union; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a closer, more dynamic and strategic partnership; | 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a partnership distinct from any accession perspective, based on clearly identified common strategic interests; |
Geadis Geadi, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Malika Sorel, Volker Schnurrbusch
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a closer, more dynamic and strategic partnership; | 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, to push Turkey to act in full respect of the principles of the United Nations Charter; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. Continues to urge the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to keep working, beyond the currently frozen accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a closer, more dynamic and strategic partnership; | 30. Encourages the Turkish Government and the EU institutions and Member States to enter into a new dynamic beyond the unrealistic accession process, on the basis of the relevant Council and European Council conclusions and the established conditionality, towards a closer and strategic partnership; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30 a. Acknowledges the support provided by Türkiye to Ukraine following Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, including military, diplomatic and humanitarian assistance; notes in particular the provision of defence equipment, such as Bayraktar TB2 unmanned aerial systems, armoured vehicles and support for naval capabilities, which have contributed to Ukraine’s defence efforts;. recognizes Türkiye’s important diplomatic engagement, including efforts aimed at facilitating dialogue and maintaining channels of communication in the region; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30 a. Regrets that Türkiye has refused to implement the obligations assumed towards the EU, including those in relation to Cyprus, as per the Negotiating Framework of October 2005; stresses that recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the accession process; reiterates its call on Türkiye to fulfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement in relation to all Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30 a. Remains concerned by the Turkish Government's use of the Turkish diaspora as an instrument for meddling in EU Member States' domestic affairs; notes, in this regard, that most of the imams of the German-Turkish Islamic association DITIB are sent directly from Türkiye, are subordinate to the Turkish religious authority Diyanet and follow its instructions; condemns previous threats of legal challenges by DITIB against German newspapers to silence criticism of certain practices within DITIB; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30 a. Stresses that, despite ongoing challenges, the EU and Türkiye must work closely together on shared foreign and security priorities, including implementing sanctions against Russia and supporting Ukraine; underlines, therefore, that closer alignment with EU foreign and security policies requires political will and concrete action which are essential to improving EU–Türkiye relations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30 a. Is of the opinion, nevertheless, that a continued backsliding in democracy and rule of law in the coming future will only make the country drift further away from the EU, eroding the trust that is also needed for the real enhancement of our cooperation and partnership in areas of mutual interest, such as trade, energy or security; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30a. Considers that, in view of the continuing deterioration of the rule of law, increasing non-alignment with EU foreign policy and regional tensions involving Member States, the prospect of Türkiye’s accession to the EU cannot be envisaged; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30 a. Rejects any participation of Turkey in European Union financial instruments aimed at strengthening defence and security capabilities, including the SAFE programme; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30 b. Calls on Türkiye to halt the usurpation of Greek Cypriot properties in the occupied territories of Cyprus, a policy designed to create irreversible effects on the ground and which completely disregards the rules of the ECHR and the respective judgements of the ECtHR; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30b. Calls for a structured strategic partnership framework between the EU and Türkiye to be set out, separate from the accession process; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 31. Urges all the other EU institutions and the Member States to be vocal in addressing the democratic backsliding in Türkiye; | deleted |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 31. Urges all the other EU institutions and the Member States to be vocal in addressing the democratic backsliding in Türkiye; | 31. Believes that it is in the interest of the EU to reassess in which ways Türkiye can remain anchored to the EU not only in standards but also in values and principles, and to design political initiatives according to that goal; urges all the other EU institutions and the Member States to be vocal in addressing the democratic backsliding in Türkiye as this is not incompatible with pursuing the best possible relations between the EU and the country; calls on the Commission and the EEAS to ensure that the agendas of high-level officials visiting the country include a plural representation of political and civil society stakeholders to obtain a more complete vision on the country; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 31. Urges all the other EU institutions and the Member States to be vocal in addressing the democratic backsliding in Türkiye; | 31. Urges the EU institutions and Member States to respect Türkiye's national identity, its internal political process and the decisions and choices that Türkiye makes in the field of foreign policy and energy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 31. Urges all the other EU institutions and the Member States to be vocal in addressing the democratic backsliding in Türkiye; | 31. Urges all the other EU institutions and the Member States, and the European Council, to be vocal in addressing the democratic backsliding and lack of respect for human rights in Türkiye; |
Geadis Geadi, Galato Alexandraki, Emmanouil Fragkos, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Marion Maréchal, Nicolas Bay
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 31. Urges all the other EU institutions and the Member States to be vocal in addressing the democratic backsliding in Türkiye; | 31. Urges all the other EU institutions and the Member States to be vocal in addressing the the persistent and long-standing democratic backsliding in Türkiye; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 31. Urges all the other EU institutions and the Member States to be vocal in addressing the democratic backsliding in Türkiye; | 31. Urges all the EU institutions and the Member States to be vocal in addressing the democratic backsliding in Türkiye; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 31a. Denounces in the strongest possible terms all the influence operations in several Member States carried out by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s AKP party and often concentrated at municipal level, through the funding of mosques, religious institutions, language centres, the Millî Görüş Islamic Confederation, or even festivals presented as cultural events, such as the Festiexpo tour; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32. Reiterates its utmost commitment to sustaining its support for Türkiye’s independent civil society; | 32. Reiterates its utmost commitment to sustaining its support for Türkiye’s independent civil society; calls on the Commission to uphold and increase its political and financial support to the vibrant and pro-democratic civil society in Türkiye, whose efforts can contribute to generating the political will necessary for deepening EU-Türkiye relations; is of the opinion that while incentives-based and transactional approaches work in many areas of the EU-Türkiye cooperation, they have failed to advance the democratization of the country; highlights, in this view, that the resumption of the accession process depends mainly on the unwavering political will of Türkiye’s authorities and society to become a full-fledged democracy, which cannot be forced upon it by the EU; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32. Reiterates its utmost commitment to sustaining its support for Türkiye’s independent civil society; | 32. Reiterates its utmost commitment to sustaining its support for Türkiye’s independent civil society; supports projects aiming to reinforce the foundations of democracy in Türkiye; stresses, however, that the EU’s programmes cannot be harnessed for propaganda purposes by Türkiye’s authoritarian government; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32. Reiterates its utmost commitment to sustaining its support for Türkiye’s independent civil society; | 32. Reiterates its commitment to sustaining its support for Türkiye’s independent civil society; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32 a. Reiterates its call to strengthen and deepen mutual knowledge and understanding between our societies, promoting cultural growth, socio-cultural exchanges and combating all manifestations of social, religious, ethnic or cultural prejudice; encourages Türkiye and the EU to promote shared values, particularly by supporting young people; |
Geadis Geadi, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Nora Junco García, Diego Solier, Ivaylo Valchev, Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32 a. Reiterates its call on Turkey, a Nato member state and an EU candidate country, to abide by international law, recognise the Republic of Cyprus, and immediately end the occupation and withdraw its troops from the island, applying the explicit reference in the White Paper on European Defence; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32a. Considers that the EU institutions and all relevant authorities should thoroughly investigate the formal and informal activities of Türkiye’s Mission to the EU, and the ways in which it influences decision-making; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission. | 33. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission; asks that this resolution be translated into Turkish and forwarded to the President, Government and Parliament of the Republic of Türkiye. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission. | 33. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission, and to the Government and Parliament of Türkiye. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33 a. Calls on Türkiye to make significant steps in aligning with the EU’s CFSP, including on sanctions and against their circumvention; underscores that circumvention of EU sanctions undermines its collective efforts; remains duly concerned that Türkiye continues to exclude a Member State from cooperation with NATO, posing a continued obstacle to the enhancement of a genuine relationship between the EU and NATO. |
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “AMENDMENTS 403 - 762 - Draft report 2025 Commission report on Türkiye”. Text, 12 March 2026. docId AFET-AM-785351. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-AM-785351 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/AFET-AM-785351 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-afet-am-785351,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{AMENDMENTS 403 - 762 - Draft report 2025 Commission report on Türkiye}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-03-12},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-AM-785351}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-AM-785351},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId AFET-AM-785351. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}