Skip to content

Text · Opinion parliamentary committee

On 2024 discharge: General budget of the EU - European External Action Service

Document AFET-AD-779394 · 2025/2150(DEC)

Kind
Opinion parliamentary committee AFET-AD-779394
Date
16 January 2026
Committee
Committee on Foreign Affairs
Rapporteur
Evin Incir
More facts (3)
Subject matter
BUDG
Reference
2025/2150(DEC)
More

In short

A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.

AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The Committee on Foreign Affairs opinion on the EEAS discharge stresses the EEAS's central role and concerns about budgetary constraints, calling for sustainable funding and modernization. It urges the EEAS to fill vacancies, strengthen internal controls, counter disinformation, improve security, and enhance capacities in strategic areas.

Position. The Committee on Foreign Affairs proposes that the Committee on Budgetary Control incorporate these suggestions into its motion for a resolution on the EEAS discharge.

Key points

  1. Stresses the EEAS's central role in diplomatic engagement and coordinating peace efforts and humanitarian aid; notes concern that budgetary constraints hinder EU external action.
  2. Calls for sustainable funding solutions and emphasizes the need to modernize the EU Delegation network, including strengthening EU INTCEN and the Crisis Response Centre.
  3. Calls on the EEAS to prioritize filling critical vacancies in Delegations, especially in complex security environments, and improve recruitment transparency.
  4. Encourages strengthening internal controls and document management, addressing weaknesses identified by the European Court of Auditors.
  5. Underlines the need for adequate resources for the Strategic Communication and Foresight Division to counter disinformation from authoritarian regimes, particularly the Kremlin.
  6. Welcomes ECA findings on effective coordination and corrective actions on procurement, but notes remaining weaknesses; urges reinforced oversight in Delegations.
  7. Welcomes strengthened capacity to counter disinformation and hybrid threats, including full operationalisation of the FIMI Toolbox; supports investment in strategic communication and partnerships.
  8. Calls for stepping up strategic engagement in Africa and asserting EU's role through coherent diplomacy and coordination with EU institutions and Member States.
  9. Stresses the need to reinforce administrative and analytical capacity in areas like the Arctic, with training and resources aligned with financial management.
  10. Calls on the EEAS to improve security of Delegations, including cybersecurity and crisis evacuation, and report on progress.

Who is affected

  • The European External Action Service (EEAS) and its staff, who are called to implement various improvements.
  • EU Delegations, which face staffing, security, and procurement oversight requirements.

Read the text · Report a problem

Text

The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.

Opinion

The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following into its motion for a resolution:

1. Stresses the central role of the EEAS in diplomatic engagement and in coordinating peace efforts and humanitarian aid in an increasingly unstable international environment; acknowledges that EEAS has made strong and sustained efforts to address the lack of sufficient funds granted and exercise budgetary discipline, e.g. by cutting non-compulsory expenditure to the minimum, freezing and postponing building maintenance, infrastructure and IT projects; notes with concern that the financial situation and the budgetary constraints of the EEAS pose a major obstacle to increasing the visibility and impact of EU's external action and is deeply concerned by its serious negative consequences for the EU’s external action; underlines the need for sustainable funding solutions to support the EEAS' operations to uphold the EU's global standing;

2. Emphasises the need to modernise the EU Delegation network, particularly by strengthening the European Union Intelligence and Situation Centre (EU INTCEN) and the EEAS Crisis Response Centre; highlights that enhancing analytical capacity and crisis preparedness requires adequate staffing, up-to-date IT security, and sufficient administrative resources;

3. Calls on the EEAS to prioritise filling critical vacancies in Delegations, especially in locations with complex security and geopolitical challenges, and to improve transparency in recruitment processes;

4. Encourages the EEAS to strengthen internal controls and document management systems, addressing weaknesses identified by the European Court of Auditors (ECA), in particular those concerning information management and reporting from EU Delegations;

5. Underlines the need to provide adequate resources to the Strategic Communication and Foresight Division of the European External Action Service (EEAS) to effectively counter disinformation campaigns deployed as strategic tools by authoritarian and illiberal regimes, in particular the Kremlin;

6. Welcomes ECA's finding that EEAS’s coordination, both internally and with the Commission and Council, was mostly effective; further welcomes that EEAS has undertaken measures to ensure the application of procurement rules and has applied corrective actions; notes the remaining weaknesses in information management, staffing and reporting; stresses the need to address these shortcomings, including the findings of the ECA Special report 02/2024: on the coordination role of the European External Action Service; urges the EEAS to reinforce oversight over procurement in Delegations, ensuring that corrective actions taken in recent years translate into sustained improvements and reduced irregularities;

7. Welcomes the EEAS’s strengthened capacity to counter disinformation spread by hostile states and hybrid threats, including the full operationalisation of the Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (FIMI) Toolbox e.g. through Information Sharing and Analysis Centre and the EU Rapid Alert System; acknowledges the EEAS's role in gathering evidence against EU-sanctioned Russian state-backed platforms, bot farms, and individuals involved in spreading disinformation and manipulating information; supports continued and effective investment in strategic communication, independent media, and civil society partnerships, particularly in Ukraine, the Middle East, including Israel and Palestine, and neighbouring regions; calls on the EEAS to step up its strategic engagement and visibility across Africa, clearly demonstrating the tangible benefits of the EU’s partnership model grounded in mutual respect, transparency and sustainability; stresses that the EEAS must assert the EU’s role and interests more effectively through coherent diplomacy, visible investment and in close coordination with the Commission, European Parliament and Member States to project a united European voice;

8. Stresses the need for the EEAS to reinforce its administrative and analytical capacity in areas of growing strategic importance, including the Arctic; calls for strengthened staff training, improved inter-service coordination, and adequate resources to support risk assessment, situational awareness and engagement with relevant partners; underlines that such capacity-building must be fully aligned with sound financial management and existing budgetary constraints;

9. Calls on the EEAS to further improve the security of EU Delegations, including cybersecurity, physical security and crisis evacuation capabilities, and to systematically report on progress and remaining vulnerabilities.

Back matter, 2

Parts that accompany the text rather than belong to it: explanatory statement, annexes, opinions appended by other committees. Collapsed.

Annex: declaration of input 1 block

The rapporteur declares under her exclusive responsibility that she did not include in her opinion input from interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies, to be listed in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.

Information on adoption by the committee asked for opinion 1 block
Table from the text: Date adopted
Date adopted15.1.2026
Result of final vote+: –: 0:49 12 6

Procedure pages and committee votes

How the committees handled the text and how their members voted on it. Collapsed.

Final vote by roll call by the committee asked for opinion 3 blocks

49 · For

ECR
Sebastian Tynkkynen
EPP
Mika Aaltola, Wouter Beke, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Loucas Fourlas, Michael Gahler, Christophe Gomart, Sandra Kalniete, Łukasz Kohut, Ondřej Kolář, Andrey Kovatchev, Miriam Lexmann, Antonio López-Istúriz White, David McAllister, Vangelis Meimarakis, Francisco José Millán Mon, Davor Ivo Stier, Michał Szczerba, Riho Terras, Angelika Winzig, Željana Zovko
Renew
Petras Auštrevičius, Dan Barna, Helmut Brandstätter, Christophe Grudler, Bernard Guetta, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans
S&D
Laura Ballarín Cereza, Robert Biedroń, Sandra Gómez López, Evin Incir, Claudiu Manda, Yannis Maniatis, Sven Mikser, Alessandra Moretti, Thomas Pellerin-Carlin, Tonino Picula, Thijs Reuten, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Andreas Schieder, Marco Tarquinio, Marta Temido
Greens
Sergey Lagodinsky, Hannah Neumann, Diana Riba i Giner, Nela Riehl, Mounir Satouri, Villy Søvndal

12 · Against

ESN
Hans Neuhoff, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
No group
Ľuboš Blaha, Kostas Papadakis
Patriots
Mieke Andriese, Jaroslav Bžoch, Viktória Ferenc, Kinga Gál, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Roberto Vannacci
The Left
Giorgos Georgiou

6 · Abstained

ECR
Alberico Gambino, Rihards Kols, Arkadiusz Mularczyk
The Left
Marc Botenga, Danilo Della Valle, Rima Hassan

Connections

The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “OPINION on 2024 discharge: General budget of the EU - European External Action Service”. Text, 16 January 2026. docId AFET-AD-779394. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-AD-779394 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/AFET-AD-779394 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-afet-ad-779394,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{OPINION on 2024 discharge: General budget of the EU - European External Action Service}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-AD-779394}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-AD-779394},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. docId AFET-AD-779394. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}