Skip to content

Text · Opinion parliamentary committee

On the ongoing negotiations on a status agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) in Senegal

Document AFET-AD-749909 · 2023/2086(INI)

Kind
Opinion parliamentary committee AFET-AD-749909
Date
21 September 2023
Committee
Committee on Foreign Affairs
Rapporteur
JanChristoph Oetjen
Dossier
2023-2086
More facts (3)
Subject matter
FRON, ELSJ, EXT
Reference
2023/2086(INI)
More

In short

A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.

AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-flash · 26 Sept 2026

The Committee on Foreign Affairs gives suggestions to the lead committee on the negotiations for a status agreement allowing Frontex to operate in Senegal. It asks for human rights safeguards, monitoring, accountability and complaint mechanisms, and for an independent assessment of Senegal's human rights situation before talks conclude. It wants Frontex staff to remain accountable under EU or member state law, with guidelines on waiving immunity, and training for Frontex staff and Senegalese border guards. It calls for EU help to Senegal on asylum processing and for support to local civil society. It says Frontex must not take part in pushbacks, that activities should be suspended if serious human rights violations persist, and that any deployment can only happen where adequate human rights protection is guaranteed. It also asks for transparent reporting, access for national and human rights institutions, dialogue with local organisations, respect for freedom of movement under the ECOWAS Treaty, and safe and legal pathways for migrants and refugees.

Position. The Committee on Foreign Affairs proposes that the lead committee incorporate its suggestions into its motion for a resolution, asking for human rights safeguards, monitoring, accountability and assessment before any Frontex status agreement with Senegal is concluded.

Key points

  1. Acknowledges the EU-Senegal negotiations on a Frontex status agreement and notes Senegal's reluctance to sign; insists on a human rights clause, accountability and reporting of violations.
  2. Calls for a human rights monitoring mechanism for Frontex missions through Fundamental Rights Monitors in third countries and commitments to transparency and information sharing.
  3. Calls on the Commission to carry out an independent assessment of the human rights situation in Senegal before concluding negotiations.
  4. Underlines that Frontex operations must respect human rights, personal data protection, non-refoulement, and the bans on arbitrary detention and torture.
  5. Says Frontex staff with immunity must stay accountable under EU or member state law; calls for guidelines on waiving immunity and for staff to denounce human rights violations.
  6. Calls for guidelines and training for Frontex staff and Senegalese border guards on human rights and humanitarian law, and for EU help to Senegal on asylum processing.
  7. Calls for regular transparent reporting on Frontex activities in Senegal, and for national and human rights institutions to have access to information to scrutinise the agreement's impact.
  8. Condemns pushbacks from the Mauritanian and Malian borders to Senegal; says Frontex must not take part in pushbacks and calls for a remedy mechanism for people affected by Frontex actions.
  9. Calls for an independent, accessible complaint mechanism and an incident reporting mechanism guaranteeing anonymity and confidentiality for reporters.
  10. Calls for inclusive dialogue in preparing the agreement and for EU dialogue with local human rights and non-governmental organisations.
  11. Says deployment can only happen where adequate human rights protection is guaranteed, and that activities should be suspended in the event of persistent and serious human rights violations.
  12. Calls for transparent, parliamentary-scrutinised development aid, support to local civil society, respect for ECOWAS freedom of movement, and safe and legal pathways to the EU.

Who is affected

  • Frontex and its staff deployed in Senegal, who would face monitoring, training, immunity and accountability rules.
  • Senegalese authorities and border guards, who would receive training, capacity building and be subject to scrutiny.
  • Migrants, refugees and asylum seekers in Senegal, who would gain protection, complaint and remedy mechanisms.
  • Local civil society and human rights organisations, which would be supported and consulted.
  • EU institutions and member states, which would provide aid, ensure safe pathways and respect freedom of movement.

Figures and deadlines

  • Article 73(2) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1896, cited as the basis for human rights conditions.

Read the text · Report a problem

Text

The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.

Suggestions

The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions into its motion for a resolution:

1.Acknowledges the negotiations between the EU and Senegal on the establishment of a status agreement that provides for the deployment of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) in Senegal; notes that the Senegalese Government is reluctant to sign the status agreement; notes that a status agreement can only be established under the condition that it strictly adheres, including during operations, to the protection of human rights and personal data, the principle of non-refoulement, the prohibition of arbitrary detention and the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, as enshrined in Article 73(2) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1896; insists on the inclusion of a clear human rights clause and guarantees of accountability in Senegal and reporting of human rights violations by Frontex in relation to all its activities concerning migration and asylum in Senegal;

2.Calls for the inclusion of an adequate human rights monitoring mechanism for Frontex activities in all Frontex missions through the deployment of Frontex’s Fundamental Rights Monitors in third countries and clear commitments to transparency and information sharing regarding Frontex activities;

3.Calls on the Commission to conduct a thorough and independent assessment of the human rights situation in Senegal as regards the treatment of migrants and refugees and the relevant areas covered by the status agreement before concluding the negotiations with Senegal, in order to be able to fully consider the impact of potential cooperation and to negotiate the necessary safeguards;

4.Underlines that the launch of Frontex operational activities under a status agreement should fully respect, promote and strengthen human rights and EU values including with regard to the protection of personal data, the principle of non-refoulement, the prohibition of arbitrary detention and the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; considers that any status agreement providing for Frontex operations in third countries should integrate this aspect;

5.Considers it necessary that Frontex staff who are granted immunity for their activities in Senegal must continue to be held accountable under EU or Member State law; calls on the Executive Director to adopt guidelines on the mandatory waiving of immunity for deployed staff, specifying how requests from the third country authorities will be dealt with, as well as enshrining a strong role for the Fundamental Rights Officer; considers that Frontex staff should not only avoid complicity in human rights violations by Senegalese security forces, but should actively denounce such actions; calls for a clear, swift and efficient mechanism to ensure accountability of Frontex staff in their home country;

6.Calls for clear guidelines, prepared in consultation with experts and civil society organisations, and training to be provided to Frontex staff deployed in Senegal and to Senegalese border guards on the regional and Senegalese human rights situation and the legal framework in which they operate, which includes international human rights and humanitarian law and standards;

7.Calls for the EU to assist the Senegalese authorities with strengthening their capacity to train and educate Senegalese civil servants tasked with processing asylum applications and handling asylum seekers’ complaints;

8.Calls for consistent, regular and transparent reporting on Frontex activities in Senegal under any potential status agreement, with a focus on human rights compliance and on the human rights context;

9.Considers that national and human rights institutions must have access to all the information deemed necessary for them to scrutinise the impact of this status agreement on migration management in Senegal and to scrutinise the conduct of Senegalese security forces in conducting migration management, as well as the human rights risks and consequences;

10.Notes the efforts made by the Senegalese authorities in receiving and processing migrants and refugees in the region; highlights and condemns the repeated occurrences of pushbacks of migrants and refugees from the Mauritanian and Malian borders to Senegal; reiterates and underlines that Frontex should not take part in any form of pushbacks; calls for the EU to continue to support Senegal in providing adequate protection for migrants and refugees in transit and to assist with capacity building and the strengthening of the asylum procedure; calls for the establishment of a mechanism to ensure effective remedy for people impacted by Frontex actions, in the event that a status agreement is concluded;

11.Calls for the establishment of a robust and efficient complaint mechanism that is independent and easily accessible to the public, and for an incident reporting mechanism for Frontex activities; considers that this incident reporting mechanism should guarantee the anonymity and confidentiality of individuals reporting on Frontex activities that infringe international humanitarian law or violate human rights;

12.Calls for the EU and Senegalese authorities to enable inclusive, constructive and transparent dialogue in the preparation of the status agreement; stresses, in this context, the importance for the EU to engage in regular dialogue with local human rights organisations and other non-governmental organisations regarding the human rights situation in the country;

13.Is of the opinion that any deployment of Frontex personnel to Senegal and the conducting of operational activities with local and regional security forces can only take place where adequate human rights protection can be guaranteed for migrants and asylum seekers throughout the entire process of their application or return;

14.Considers that the EU and Frontex should suspend their activities on migration and asylum carried out in cooperation with the Senegalese authorities under the status agreement in the event of persistent and serious human rights violations, as set out under the standards of the International Criminal Court;

15.Underlines that the provision of development aid by the EU and its Member States is to be carried out in full transparency and under parliamentary scrutiny;

16.Calls on the Commission to support local civil society organisations that protect and promote the rights of migrants, as well as those monitoring the cooperation of the Senegalese authorities with Frontex;

17.Calls on the Commission to ensure that the conclusion of this status agreement with Senegal and Frontex’s activities in Senegal do not impede the right to freedom of movement of individuals as guaranteed under the Economic Community of West African States Treaty, which provides for the long-term establishment of a free movement zone for goods, capital and people;

18.Calls for the EU and its Member States to ensure safe and legal pathways for migrants and refugees living or in transit in Senegal and seeking a better life in the EU.

Back matter, 1

Parts that accompany the text rather than belong to it: explanatory statement, annexes, opinions appended by other committees. Collapsed.

Information on adoption in committee asked for opinion 1 block
Table from the text: Date adopted
Date adopted20.9.2023
Result of final vote+: –: 0:29 5 23
Members present for the final voteAlviina Alametsä, Alexander Alexandrov Yordanov, Traian Băsescu, Anna Bonfrisco, Reinhard Bütikofer, Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Katalin Cseh, Michael Gahler, Giorgos Georgiou, Sunčana Glavak, Raphaël Glucksmann, Klemen Grošelj, Bernard Guetta, Dietmar Köster, Andrius Kubilius, David Lega, Miriam Lexmann, Nathalie Loiseau, Leopoldo López Gil, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Thierry Mariani, Marisa Matias, David McAllister, Vangelis Meimarakis, Sven Mikser, Alessandra Moretti, Javier Nart, Matjaž Nemec, Demetris Papadakis, Kostas Papadakis, Tonino Picula, Manu Pineda, Thijs Reuten, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Isabel Santos, Mounir Satouri, Andreas Schieder, Jordi Solé, Hermann Tertsch, Hilde Vautmans, Anders Vistisen, Thomas Waitz, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Željana Zovko
Substitutes present for the final voteVladimír Bilčík, Angel Dzhambazki, Andrey Kovatchev, Georgios Kyrtsos, Carina Ohlsson, Juozas Olekas, Nikos Papandreou, Mick Wallace, Javier Zarzalejos
Substitutes under Rule 209(7) present for the final voteGheorghe Falcă, Dace Melbārde, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez

Procedure pages and committee votes

How the committees handled the text and how their members voted on it. Collapsed.

Final vote by roll call in committee asked for opinion 3 blocks

29 · For

EPP
Željana Zovko
Renew
Katalin Cseh, Klemen Grošelj, Bernard Guetta, Georgios Kyrtsos, Nathalie Loiseau, Javier Nart, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Hilde Vautmans
S&D
Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Raphaël Glucksmann, Dietmar Köster, Sven Mikser, Alessandra Moretti, Matjaž Nemec, Carina Ohlsson, Juozas Olekas, Demetris Papadakis, Nikos Papandreou, Tonino Picula, Thijs Reuten, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Isabel Santos, Andreas Schieder
Greens
Alviina Alametsä, Reinhard Bütikofer, Mounir Satouri, Jordi Solé, Thomas Waitz

5 · Against

ID
Anna Bonfrisco, Thierry Mariani, Anders Vistisen
No group
Kostas Papadakis
The Left
Giorgos Georgiou

23 · Abstained

ECR
Angel Dzhambazki, Hermann Tertsch
EPP
Alexander Alexandrov Yordanov, Traian Băsescu, Vladimír Bilčík, Gheorghe Falcă, Michael Gahler, Sunčana Glavak, Andrey Kovatchev, Andrius Kubilius, David Lega, Miriam Lexmann, Leopoldo López Gil, Antonio López-Istúriz White, David McAllister, Vangelis Meimarakis, Dace Melbārde, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Javier Zarzalejos, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez
The Left
Marisa Matias, Manu Pineda, Mick Wallace

Connections

The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2023). “OPINION on the ongoing negotiations on a status agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) in Senegal”. Text, 21 September 2023. docId AFET-AD-749909. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-AD-749909 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/AFET-AD-749909 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-afet-ad-749909,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{OPINION on the ongoing negotiations on a status agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) in Senegal}},
  year = {2023},
  date = {2023-09-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-AD-749909}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-AD-749909},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. docId AFET-AD-749909. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}