Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-9-2024-0068 → TA-9-2024-0157

From
A-9-2024-0068 Plenary report of 5 Mar 2024
To
TA-9-2024-0157 Adopted text of 13 Mar 2024
Changes
5 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+5 added · −276 removed · 9 changed
More facts (2)
Title (from)
on general guidelines for the preparation of the 2025 budget, Section III – Commission
Title (to)
Guidelines for the 2025 Budget - Section III

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 16 of 20: LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON CULTURE AND EDUCATION

RemovedLETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON CULTURE AND EDUCATION

RemovedMr Johan Van OvertveldtChair

RemovedCommittee on Budget

RemovedBRUSSELS

RemovedSubject: Opinion on Guidelines for the 2025 Budget –Section III (2023/2220(BUI))

RemovedDear Mr Johan Van Overtveldt,

RemovedUnder the procedure referred to above, the Committee on Culture and Education has been asked to submit an opinion to your committee. At its meeting of 28 November 2023, the committee decided to send the opinion in the form of a letter. It considered the matter at its meeting of 24 January 2024 and adopted the opinion at that meeting.

RemovedThe Committee on Culture and Education:

RemovedInsists on simplification, administrative efficiency and synergies with other funding programmes and on fresh money to improve the overall success rate of Erasmus+, Creative Europe, European Solidarity Corps (ESC), and the third strand of the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values (CERV).

RemovedStresses that learning mobility grants in Erasmus+ should cover increases in living costs to ensure widely accessible and inclusive participation. Calls for financial stability for the European Universities initiative and the Teacher Academies, together with the allocation of dedicated funding to the European Education Area (EEA) in the future. Calls for increased synergies between the EEA, the Digital Education Action Plan and the European Skills Agenda. Warns against cuts to the programme: the disappointing results obtained in the latest round of the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) can only be reversed by investing in education.

RemovedCalls for an increase in the 2025 Creative Europe's budget to avoid the detrimental impact that frontloading in the first half of the financial cycle could have on the second half. Notes that the current financial allocation cannot meet the high demand for projects. Stresses the importance of maintaining a balance between the strands: calls for the adequate financing of the music sector, and of the European Capitals of Culture by increasing the Melina Mercouri Prize (Culture strand), the support of the cross-border circulation of European films, of cinemas and of video games (Media strand) and of quality journalism and media literacy (Cross-sectorial strand).

RemovedCalls for the secretariat of the future European Board for Media Services to be resourced adequately, in line with the future European Media Freedom Act. Reiterates the long-standing Parliament’s call for a permanent EU editorial and news media fund.

RemovedStresses the need for increased funding for the ESC programme, which is massively oversubscribed by young people, as a flat-rate budget increase would not be adequate to mitigate inflation rates and would curtail the participating organisations’ ability to comply with the highest standards and inclusion measures set out in the programme; given the opportunities it offers to young people and its promotion of European values, emphasizes the need for securing regular funding for label holders over several years, increase the financial support and ensure greater flexibility among the project strands to face the increasing requests for solidarity after recurrent crises.

RemovedEmphasises that a proportionate and increased budget should be foreseen, as Citizen’s engagement in the CERV programme is crucial to address the social polarisation, the low institutional trust, the democratic backsliding, the erosion of the rule of law, the shrinking space for civil society, and the instrumentalisation of Euroscepticism.

RemovedUrges the Commission to support the system of European schools to enable high teaching standards and increase the exchange of best practices with national educational systems.

RemovedWhile acknowledging the need for redeployments, in the light of mandatory NGEU repayments, recalls the importance of Erasmus+, the European Solidarity Corps, Creative Europe and CERV, and calls for all possible efforts to keep their 7-year programme funding allocations intact.

RemovedEmphasises the importance of pilot projects and preparatory actions; stresses the need to ensure sufficient financing of proposals submitted by the Committee on Culture and Education.

RemovedYours sincerely,

RemovedSabine Verheyen

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Changes between A-9-2024-0068 and TA-9-2024-0157”. Text, 13 March 2024. from A-9-2024-0068, to TA-9-2024-0157. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2024-0068/compare/TA-9-2024-0157?all=1&part=16 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2024-03-13,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-9-2024-0068 and TA-9-2024-0157}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-03-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2024-0068/compare/TA-9-2024-0157?all=1&part=16}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2024-0068/compare/TA-9-2024-0157?all=1&part=16},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-9-2024-0068, to TA-9-2024-0157. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}