Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-9-2024-0067 → TA-9-2024-0229

From
A-9-2024-0067 Plenary report of 1 Mar 2024
To
TA-9-2024-0229 Adopted text of 11 Apr 2024
Changes
36 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+24 added · −9 removed · 20 changed
More facts (2)
Title (from)
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022, Section I – European Parliament
Title (to)
Discharge 2022: EU general budget - European Parliament

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 2 of 5: 2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

Change 1

Removed2. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

Added2. European Parliament resolution of 11 April 2024 with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022, Section I – European Parliament (2023/2130(DEC))

Removedwith observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022, Section I – European Parliament

Removed(2023/2130(DEC))

8 unchanged paragraphs

The European Parliament,

– having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022, Section I – European Parliament,

– having regard to Rule 100 and Rule 104(3) of, and Annex V to, its Rules of Procedure,

– having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs,

– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0067/2024),

A. whereas, in his certification of the final accounts, the European Parliament’s (the ‘Parliament’) accounting officer stated his reasonable assurance that the accounts, in all material aspects, present fairly the financial position, the results of the operations and the cash-flow of Parliament;

B. whereas, in accordance with the usual procedure, 60 questions were sent to Parliament’s administration and written replies were received and discussed publicly by Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control on 4 December 2023, in the presence of the Secretary-General, the director of the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations (the ‘Authority’) and the Internal Auditor;

C. whereas there is always scope for improvement in terms of quality, efficiency and effectiveness, as well as transparency in the management of public finances; whereas thorough scrutiny is imperative to ensure that political leadership and Parliament’s administration are held accountable to Union citizens; whereas Parliament’s integrity is paramount for the functioning of European democracy and increases the citizens’ trust in European institutions;

Change 2

AddedD. whereas foreign interference, information manipulation and disinformation constitute a serious violation of the values on which the Union is founded; whereas the Parliament’s Special Committee on foreign interference in all democratic processes in the Union, including disinformation (INGE), created in June 2022, exposed in detail third countries' efforts and operations to infiltrate, influence and interfere with European democracies and the Union institutions;

AddedE. whereas allegedly Members were paid to promote Russian propaganda;

23 unchanged paragraphs

Parliament’s budgetary and financial management

1. Notes that Parliament’s final appropriations for 2022 totalled EUR 2 161 million, or 19,55 % of Heading 7 of the Multiannual Financial Framework set aside for the 2022 administrative expenditure of the Union institutions as a whole, representing a 4,76 % increase compared to the 2021 budget (EUR 2 064 million);

2. Notes that total revenue entered in the accounts as of 31 December 2022 was EUR 250 473 772 (compared to EUR 215 332 108 in 2021); notes that assigned revenue made available in 2022 amounted to EUR 61 267 620 (compared to EUR 37 150 962 in 2021);

3. Emphasises that five chapters accounted for 76,5 % of total commitments: Chapter 10 ‘Members of the institution’; Chapter 12 ‘Officials and temporary staff’; Chapter 14 ‘Other staff and external services’; Chapter 20 ‘Buildings and associated costs’; and Chapter 42 ‘Expenditure relating to parliamentary assistance’;

4. Notes the figures on the basis of which Parliament’s accounts for the financial year 2022 were closed, namely:

5. Notes that 21 transfers were approved by Parliament’s Committee on Budgets (‘C transfers’), in accordance with Articles 31 and 49 of the Financial Regulation, in the financial year 2022, amounting to EUR 88 449 115 or 4,09 % of final appropriations; notes that the President authorised 11 transfers (‘P transfers’) amounting to EUR 34 246 879 or 1,6 % of the 2022 budget; enquires between which budget lines these P transfers occurred; calls on the presidency to inform the Committee on Budgetary Control proactively of the amounts and budget lines concerned;

6. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic is estimated to have generated a moderate surplus of EUR 16 417 325, which was transferred out of items such as those related to travel expenses, the organisation and reception of groups of visitors, the operation of Parliament visitors' centres, external in-person training, documentation/publications and local parliamentary assistants and trainees for Members; observes that at the same time, the COVID-19 pandemic made it necessary to reinforce other budget lines by a total of EUR 7 549 000; highlights that those lines relate mainly to the provision of financial support to staff working at home, health and prevention, and additional expenditure on interpretation to support teleworking and multilingual remote and hybrid meetings;

7. Notes the fact that 2022 was a year of transition for the Union institutions, including Parliament; notes that measures introduced as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic were discontinued by June 2022; welcomes the efforts of all DGs and the Secretary-General to put the necessary tools in place to resume parliamentary work so that it functions in the same way as it did before the COVID-19 pandemic; welcomes the successful resumption of in-presence plenary sessions as of March 2022; remarks that this followed a two-year period during which more than 12 000 voting operations had to take place remotely over no fewer than 175 voting sessions, spread over 30 part-sessions;

8. Notes that the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine and the exceptionally high level of inflation, which by the end of the year 2022 still stood at 10,4 % for the Union on an annual basis, had a profound influence on the 2022 financial year; acknowledges that the Parliament’s administration has put considerable effort into the implementation of the budget with a view to meeting urgent needs arising from the crisis situation; welcomes the donations of technical equipment by Parliament to support Ukraine in difficult times of war;

European Court of Auditors’ opinions on the reliability of the 2022 accounts and on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts

9. Recalls that the European Court of Auditors (the ‘Court’) performs a specific assessment of administrative and other expenditure as a single policy group for all Union institutions; highlights that administrative expenditure comprises expenditure on human resources including pensions, which in 2022 accounted for about 70 % of the total administrative expenditure, and on buildings, equipment, energy, communications and information technology; highlights that the Court’s work over many years indicates that, overall, this spending is low risk;

10. Notes that the Multiannual Financial Framework Heading 7 ‘European public administration’ accounts for EUR 11,6 billion or 5,9% of the Union budget in 2022, of which Parliament accounts for EUR 2,2 billion or 18,9 %; welcomes the fact that the Court found that the level of error in spending on ‘European public administration’ was not material; calls on the Parliament to check and identify which type of transactions had a high share of errors, although below the materiality threshold and explore the changes in procedure needed to avoid and detect similar errors in the future;

11. Notes that the Court’s annual report on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2022 presents specific findings on Parliament; notes the Court’s recommendation that Parliament’s administration strengthens its guidance on the implementation of budget appropriations by the political groups and that it keeps working to improve the internal rules and ensure compliance with procurement rules and procedures;

12. Notes that the Court selected a sample of 13 transactions for Parliament, and that they found quantifiable errors in three of them; notes that procurement was one of the issues raised by the Court; highlights that this type of finding has also been raised in the past;

13. Takes note of the observations of the Court with regard to Parliament’s internal rules; recalls that the political groups manage the funds allocated to them according to the principles of indirect management of funds in analogical application of Article 62(1)(c) of the Financial Regulation; considers that these rules themselves replace the ‘contribution agreements’ (as referred to in Article 155(6) of the Financial Regulation);

14. Recalls, that according to Parliament’s internal rules, the political groups are responsible to the institution for the management of appropriations, within the limits of the powers conferred upon them by the Bureau; takes note that the appropriations are to be managed in accordance with these rules and appropriate action should be taken to prevent any non-compliance;

15. The political groups receive assistance and advice from Parliament when they request; notes that in 2022 the financial departments of the political groups intensified their signatures with national delegations in order to ensure the sound management of the appropriations in line 400;

16. Welcomes the commitment of the administration to increase the guidance for political groups on the proper implementation of Parliament’s internal rules and assist them with the aim of improving their internal financial management; welcomes the fact that it will further clarify the guidelines on procurement by political groups;

Internal Auditor’s annual report

17. Notes that, at the meeting between the committee responsible and the internal auditor held on 4 December 2023, the internal auditor presented his annual report and described the assurance audits he carried out and consulting services he provided and reported on the outcome of the current state of play, which in 2022 covered a transversal follow-up of open actions from internal audit reports, an audit of staff missions, a review of Parliament’s risk management framework, an audit of the procurement process in DG INLO, an audit of the purchase and use of security equipment and services in DG SAFE, an audit of the financing of European political parties and European political foundations – second assignment, and a periodic review of the ADENAUER 2 building project – Phase 3 (completion of East Wing);

18. Welcomes and supports the actions that the internal auditor has agreed with the directorates-general responsible, as a result of the assurance assignments with regard to the audit of staff missions, with regard to the review of Parliament’s risk management framework, and with regard to the audit of the procurement process in DG INLO;

19. Takes note of the assurance assignments for which preliminary conclusions are currently being prepared or for which fieldwork is still ongoing, and which are currently following the process envisaged by the charter of the internal auditor;

20. Notes that the 2022 follow-up process resulted in the closure of 38 of the 92 open actions and for which the agreed due dates for implementation had expired; is concerned by the fact that as of 31 December 2022, 29 open actions were overdue for more than 12 months; expects the different directorates-general to ensure that the remaining actions are closed without any further delay and that the agreed actions are implemented in accordance with the due dates set in the internal auditor’s annual report;

Change 3

Changed21. Acknowledges that, in accordance with Article 118(9) of the Financial Regulation, the reports and findings of the internal auditor, as well as the report of the Union institution concerned, shall be accessible to the public as soon as the internal auditor has validated the action taken for their implementation; notes that, in practice, the reports and findings are only published once all recommendations have been implemented;implemented resulting in a de facto delay of publication for years; calls on the Bureau to make each internal audit report available to the public one year after its finalisation, once the internal auditor has validated the actions taken to implement the previous year’s recommendation; recalls that Members may only have access to confidential documents under the Bureau's rules on a need-to-know basis, ;basis; recalls that all Members of the Committee on Budgetary Control have the right to request confidential access to the internal audit report with regard to the discharge procedure; welcomes the fact that the internal auditor reports to the Committee on Budgetary Control on the annual audit activities carried out;

8 unchanged paragraphs

22. Notes that as a consequence of a post that remained vacant throughout the year, envisaged for an information systems auditor, one planned audit in the field of IT (on cybersecurity staff awareness) could not be carried out in 2022; notes the difficulty in finding specific audit staff profiles, including in the field of IT, to perform audits as planned according to their requirements; calls the Internal Audit Service to address the issue in order to ensure the completion of the remaining audit in time for the next discharge cycle;

23. Welcomes the fact that the Internal Audit Service has, through its 2022 quality assurance and improvement programme, continued to seek the enhancement of its activity in providing objective assurance to the decision-making and oversight authorities, to authorising officers and to management; takes note that the internal auditor stated that he did not receive instructions or guidance from any source, which would be such as to compromise his independence;

Follow-up to the 2021 discharge resolution

24. Takes note of the written answers to the 2021 discharge resolution provided to Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control on 13 September 2023, the presentation by the Secretary-General addressing the issues in Parliament's 2021 discharge resolution and the exchange of views with Members that followed;

25. Recalls that once the Plenary calls for different rules or measures to be implemented by Parliament, the rules or measures proposed shall be discussed and voted on by the Bureau; recalls, in light of Rule 25 of the Rules of Procedure, that the Bureau is responsible for taking decisions on financial, organisational and administrative matters concerning Members; recalls that the Bureau is composed of the President of the European Parliament, the 14 Vice-Presidents and the five Quaestors (non-voting members) democratically elected by Parliament; notes, that the members of the Bureau deliberate on Parliament’s draft estimates; recalls that the discharge is an exercise of democratic scrutiny and that the concrete demands adopted by Plenary in discharge resolutions shall be reflected in the discussions of the Bureau;

26. Is aware of the fact that since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 and until the gradual lifting of sanitary restrictions at the beginning of 2022, the Bureau’s deliberations were focused primarily on decisions aiming to protect the integrity of Members and staff while ensuring business continuity and implementing practical solidarity measures vis-à-vis the three host Member States of Parliament;

Directorate-General for the Presidency

27. Recalls that the Directorate-General for the Presidency (DG PRES) provides expertise and facilitates the legislative and parliamentary work of the President, the Plenary and Parliament's governing bodies and Members at each stage of the parliamentary and legislative process; recalls that it is also responsible for interinstitutional relations, for protocol support to official visits and events sponsored by the President, for the management of Union classified information, and for the management of official and registered mail, and that it was responsible for interparliamentary relations until November 2022; notes that by 31 December 2022, there were 364 members of staff, of which 307 were officials, 19 temporary agents, 37 contract agents, and 1 agency member of staff;

Change 4

Changed28. Notes that DG PRES’s final appropriations amounted to EUR 1 275 565 in 2022, representing 0,1 % of Parliament’s budget; highlights that, of that amount, a total of EUR 1 169 055.78055,78 was committed; welcomes the high use of appropriations;

29. Welcomes the progress made in the implementation of the various components of the eLegislate programme using XML technology for faster and easier drafting of both amendments to legislative proposals and preparatory documents for interinstitutional legislative negotiations; calls on the various services involved to further intensify their efforts and ensure that all steps in the parliamentary legislative process are assisted by the eLegislate tools from the start of the legislative process in the 10th parliamentary term;

Change 5

Changed30. Stresses that transparency, accountability, and integrity are essential ethics principles within the Union institutions and in particular Parliament as the house of European democracy; welcomes the prompt actions taken by Parliament regarding the events related to alleged corruption cases concerning Members and employees in December 2022; welcomes the contribution of DG PRES to the 14-point action plan proposed by the President and its efforts in implementing the new rules on integrity and transparency; further welcomes the efforts by Parliament’s political authorities to enhance transparency, integrity and accountability in Parliament; calls on the administration to track the budgetary and financial impact of these measures; notes that Parliament reconfirms trust in the Union’s decision-making process by improving transparency, ethics and good conduct in the most representative Union institution through its actions; recalls that these events are commonly known as Qatargate;

Change 6

Removed31. Recalls that these events are commonly known as the Qatargate;

31. Notes that 2022 marked the first year of the full implementation of the mandatory transparency register under the revised Interinstitutional agreement (IIA), adopted in July 2021 by Parliament, the Commission and the Council; notes that while introducing some principles to enhance a common culture of transparency, the IIA leaves it to the three signatories to implement the conditionality and subsequent complementary measures as they see fit; points out that Parliament has improved conditionality while the Council’s participation remains limited;

32. Recalls the significance of this register as a pivotal instrument in fostering transparent and ethical interest representation at Union level, establishing mandatory registration as a prerequisite for interest representatives to be able to engage in specific activities with the Union institutions, including Parliament; calls for the provision of all necessary resources to ensure that the internal rules related to the transparency register are effectively enforced, including, where appropriate, the imposition of adequate sanctions;

33. Welcomes the increased use of the transparency register as an information and reference tool for interest representation activities at Union level, shown by the rise in applications for registration and increased number of visits to the website year-on-year; welcomes the regular communication, helpdesk and awareness-raising activities undertaken by the Secretariat among stakeholders both within the institutions and outside, as well as the development of IT solutions to improve the transparency register; recalls the necessity to keep strengthening data quality checks of new applicants; notes that the quality of entries in the transparency register has improved over recent years due to increased targeted quality monitoring and as a result of investigations based on complaints or own initiative investigations by the Secretariat, and commends, despite limited resources, the role of the Joint Secretariat in that improvement; notes that the Secretariat's targeted quality checks of 4 238 entries over the course of 2022 found that 44% provided satisfactory data quality from the outset, (a number similar to 2021, + 4%) while an additional 35,2% of interest representatives improved the information further to the targeted checks, and 13,6 % were removed following the checks as a result of ineligibility or a failure to update; stresses the need to allocate additional resources to the Secretariat to allow for scrutiny of the transparency register to ensure data quality; calls for an expansion of its scope to include representatives of non-EU countries; recommends that IT solutions are used to integrate the transparency register in all Parliament’s activities involving external entities to allow their participation to be recorded and tracked through the relevant databases;

Change 7

Added34. Reiterates its concerns about large-scale foreign interference and disinformation campaigns targeting the Union, particularly by Russia; emphasises the need for an enhanced security culture within Parliament; calls for a mandatory and regular security and integrity training for Members and members of staff, appropriate security clearance and reinforced screening of members of staff, in particular those attending in camera meetings; calls for stricter scrutiny of the organisation of events, of the invitation of external guests to Parliament and of access to Parliament’s communication platforms; calls for an urgent investigation into allegations of Russian influence in Parliament;

35. Calls, as a consequence of the events of alleged corruption within the European Parliament that occurred at the end of 2022, for the establishment of robust standards on transparency and access to Union institutions for all entities listed in the transparency register; recalls that NGOs were allegedly misused as vectors of foreign interference in Parliament's decision-making processes; reiterates, in this context, the need for comprehensive financial pre-screening of all entities, disclosing all funding sources, before they are listed in the transparency register; recalls the obligation of registering in the transparency register prior to participating in the organisation of events and conferences on Parliament’s premises;

Change 8

Changed36. Calls on the Commission to ensure that all Union funds are effectively traceable from the direct recipient to the final beneficiary when funds are passed on in a chain as reflected in the proposal for a recast of the Financial Regulation and as requested in the own-initiative report “Transparency and accountability of non-governmental organisations funded from the EU Budget” adopted on the 17th of17 January 2024; calls for a revision of the guidelines for registration in the transparency register to disclose all incoming and outgoing funds, including the transfer of funds from one entity stakeholder to another; underlines that all registrants or entities receiving money from third parties, whose registration in the transparency register is not required, need to disclose the source of their funding;

37. Recalls that Rule 11 of the Rules of Procedure obliges members to publish their meetings with interest representatives; notes with great concern that in the period until 26 January 2023, 261 current Members had not published a single meeting with an interest representative on Parliament’s website; recalls that information and reminder notices on the obligation to publish meetings should be sent to all Members at regular intervals;

Change 9

Added38. Notes the revised code of conduct for Members and the increased focus on integrity and transparency regarding Members' declarations of financial interests, potential conflict of interests, meetings with representatives and declarations of input; stresses that the new rules are welcomed but that their interpretation has raised many questions and require action by Parliament’s administration and the Code of Conduct committee; highlights that in order for Members to be in compliance with the new rules, clear and reliable interpretation is necessary to allow the highest level of legal certainty; calls for regular information updates to be sent to Members' offices to allow for greater visibility and accessibility;

39. Considers roll call votes (RCV) to be a key instrument for transparency and accountability towards the Union’s citizens; calls for introducing automatic RCV to any final vote except for secret ballots, and for increasing the number of RCV that are possible for a political group to ask for per part-session in Rule 190(2), or exempting legislative files from that limitation;

40. Notes with satisfaction the successful organisation of mid-term elections in 2022 of the President, Vice-Presidents and the Quaestors in a remote format, as decided by the Conference of Presidents; acknowledges the importance of the plenary remote voting system in the successful running of such a sensitive and complex secret vote;

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Changes between A-9-2024-0067 and TA-9-2024-0229”. Text, 11 April 2024. from A-9-2024-0067, to TA-9-2024-0229. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2024-0067/compare/TA-9-2024-0229?all=1&part=2 (retrieved 28 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2024-04-11,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-9-2024-0067 and TA-9-2024-0229}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-04-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2024-0067/compare/TA-9-2024-0229?all=1&part=2}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2024-0067/compare/TA-9-2024-0229?all=1&part=2},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-9-2024-0067, to TA-9-2024-0229. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}