Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-9-2024-0003 → TA-9-2024-0339

From
A-9-2024-0003 Plenary report of 12 Jan 2024
To
TA-9-2024-0339 Adopted text of 24 Apr 2024
Changes
Not comparable
Paragraphs
+9 added · −112 removed · 3 changed
More facts (2)
Title (from)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Disability Card and the European Parking Card for persons with disabilities
Title (to)
European Disability Card and European Parking Card for persons with disabilities

These two texts have too little in common to be compared paragraph by paragraph (under 15 % of their paragraphs match): they are different documents rather than versions of one — for example a group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted.

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 5 of 5: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedEXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedThe EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU establish equality as a cornerstone of EU law. The fundamental right to free movement of persons is established by Article 21 of TFEU and Article 45 of the Charter. However the exercise of this right is very often not a reality for persons with disabilities who face significant barriers travelling to and visiting other Member States for work, tourism etc. Even where they do manage to do so, services, including passenger transport services, and other activities, facilities and infrastructure are regularly very difficult or even impossible to access.

RemovedThe introduction of a new European Disability Card (EDC) and updated European Parking Card for persons with disabilities (EPC) should help to address these obstacles and make it easier for persons with disabilities to travel across the EU by ensuring they can, on an equal basis with nationals, access special conditions, preferential treatment, and parking rights when visiting another Member State. The binding nature of the proposal and the expansion of the scope as compared to the pilot project are very welcome indeed.

RemovedNevertheless, the area of social benefits, assistance and protection is unfortunately not addressed. Currently, access to these supports is lost when a person with disabilities moves to another Member State to work, study or take part in an EU mobility programme and the wait to obtain them via reassessment of disability status in the new Member State can take months or even years. In the intervening period, persons with disabilities are without the support that helps ensure their inclusion and personal autonomy - principles enshrined in the UNCRPD, which all Member States and the EU itself are a party to. This creates a huge barrier in persons with disabilities truly enjoying their fundamental freedoms on an equal basis with others - in essence these freedoms are reserved for those without disabilities or those wealthy enough to cover the extra costs resulting from their disability out of their own pocket. This is not real equality and is unacceptable in a ‘Social Europe’. The draft report therefore includes such benefits, assistance and protection for EDC holders for the period in which their disability status is being reassessed where they move for employment, education or to participate in an EU mobility programme.

RemovedThe draft report further aims to strengthen the Commission proposal by, inter alia, expressly providing that the EDC can never be required as proof in order to access or exercise existing rights for persons with disabilities in other Union or national law, that competent authorities issuing or renewing either card must do so free of charge and within a reasonable period that does not exceed 60 days, as well as ensuring the right of persons with disabilities to appeal decisions by authorities concerning the cards.

RemovedAs regards the EPC the Commission should gather, within an EU database, information to be provided by Member States’ public authorities concerning what the different parking conditions and facilities offered in each Member State are at local, regional and national level. This will greatly facilitate persons with disabilities in planning and organising the travel the cards aim to encourage.

RemovedRegarding provisions on avoiding risks of fraud or forgery, it is important that any measures taken to achieve this aim do not interfere with the rights and interests of persons with disabilities using the card correctly or lead in any way to stigmatisation.

RemovedMeasures concerning availability and accessibility of information, as well as awareness raising measures, have also been strengthened and include an EU awareness raising campaign to be undertaken by the Commission, a dedicated EU website to gather information on the conditions and rules, practices, and procedures to issue, renew or withdraw as well as how to obtain, use and renew the cards in the different Member States. Member States shall also be obliged to establish national websites outlining the relevant special conditions and preferential treatment offered by public authorities so that persons with disabilities, service providers and the public in general are informed of the advantages the cards entail.

RemovedFinally, amendments to strengthen the enforcement of the directive and ensure the right to redress including through adequate compensation as well as to better involve the representative organisations of persons with disabilities in the implementation and evaluation of the cards have been tabled.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Changes between A-9-2024-0003 and TA-9-2024-0339”. Text, 24 April 2024. from A-9-2024-0003, to TA-9-2024-0339. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2024-0003/compare/TA-9-2024-0339?all=1&part=5 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2024-04-24,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-9-2024-0003 and TA-9-2024-0339}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-04-24},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2024-0003/compare/TA-9-2024-0339?all=1&part=5}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2024-0003/compare/TA-9-2024-0339?all=1&part=5},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-9-2024-0003, to TA-9-2024-0339. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}