Text · Plenary report
On the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive (EU) 2015/413 facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences
Report A-9-2023-0396 · COM(2023)0126 – C90034/2023 – 2023/0052(COD)
- Kind
- Plenary report A-9-2023-0396
- Date
- 5 December 2023
- Committee
- Committee on Transport and Tourism
- Rapporteur
- Kosma Złotowski
- Dossier
- 2023-0052
More facts (3)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Subject matter
- TRAN, COJP
- Reference
- COM(2023)0126 – C90034/2023 – 2023/0052(COD)
In short
A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.
AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-flash · 25 Sept 2026
Parliament's amended version of the Commission proposal to amend Directive (EU) 2015/413 on cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences. It extends the list of offences covered, tightens definitions of dangerous overtaking, dangerous parking, hit-and-run and other offences, and adds rules on national contact points and data access. It sets deadlines for Member States to provide requested information and to invoke grounds for refusal, and requires information letters to be sent within one month of the offence. It requires revenues from financial penalties to be used to increase road safety and calls for Commission analysis of enforcement with neighbouring third countries.
Position. The Committee on Transport and Tourism proposes to adopt Parliament's position at first reading with amendments to the Commission proposal, extending the scope of offences, setting deadlines for information exchange, and adding rules on enforcement and revenues.
Key points
- The scope of the Directive is extended to strictly road-safety-related offences with a strong and direct link to road safety, addressing dangerous and unlawful behaviour.
- National contact points must cooperate with other authorities and answer requests without undue delay, regardless of the authority's nature or legal status.
- The Member State of the offence may conduct automated searches in vehicle registers to identify end users, and a data retention period is set for previous owners, holders and end users.
- The Member State of registration or residence must provide requested information within 30 working days; if not possible, it must explain the reasons and may not exceed 20 working days from notification of those reasons.
- Member States must decide within 15 days after receiving a request whether to invoke a ground for refusal, and inform the Member State of the offence no later than 15 working days after that decision.
- The information letter must use understandable wording, include detailed information on legal classification, consequences, appeal rights, payment options and data protection rules, and may include a link and QR code to the CBE Portal.
- For non-resident drivers checked on the spot, the information letter must contain at least certain data, and if the fine is paid on the spot, the driver must receive a receipt, contact information, offence details and a link to the portal.
- Member States must send the information letter no later than one month from the registration of the offence, or 15 days from the event that made subsequent letters necessary.
- The Commission and Member States are joint controllers of the CBE Portal, which must provide information on traffic rules and allow secure communication between authorities and road users.
- The Commission should provide financial support for cross-border cooperation, digitisation of data and information campaigns, and Member States should be encouraged to allocate revenues from fines back into road safety.
- Revenues from financial penalties for road-safety-related offences must be used to increase road safety, with Member States reporting publicly every three years.
- The Commission must analyse enforcement under the 1959 Mutual Assistance Convention, and third countries may participate in vehicle registration data exchange if they conclude an agreement with the Union including data protection provisions.
Who is affected
- Non-resident drivers, who face extended offences, information letters and deadlines for appeals.
- Member States, which must designate national contact points, meet deadlines and report on revenues.
- National authorities and debt collection service providers, which must comply with data protection rules.
- Third countries, which may participate in vehicle registration data exchange under an agreement with the Union.
Figures and deadlines
- 30 working days, deadline for providing requested information.
- 20 working days, maximum delay from notification of reasons for not providing information.
- 15 days, deadline for Member States to decide whether to invoke a ground for refusal.
- 15 working days, deadline to inform the Member State of the offence after a decision to refuse.
- 6 months, minimum retention period for data elements in national vehicle registers after modification of ownership or use.
- 4 years, maximum retention period for data elements in national vehicle registers.
- one month, deadline for sending the information letter from registration of the offence.
- 15 days, deadline for sending subsequent information letters from the event that made them necessary.
Legal basis. Article 294(2) and Article 91(1)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
Jump to an amendment (74)
- Amendment 1
- Amendment 2
- Amendment 3
- Amendment 4
- Amendment 5
- Amendment 6
- Amendment 7
- Amendment 8
- Amendment 9
- Amendment 10
- Amendment 11
- Amendment 12
- Amendment 13
- Amendment 14
- Amendment 15
- Amendment 16
- Amendment 17
- Amendment 18
- Amendment 19
- Amendment 20
- Amendment 21
- Amendment 22
- Amendment 23
- Amendment 24
- Amendment 25
- Amendment 26
- Amendment 27
- Amendment 28
- Amendment 29
- Amendment 30
- Amendment 31
- Amendment 32
- Amendment 33
- Amendment 34
- Amendment 35
- Amendment 36
- Amendment 37
- Amendment 38
- Amendment 39
- Amendment 40
- Amendment 41
- Amendment 42
- Amendment 43
- Amendment 44
- Amendment 45
- Amendment 46
- Amendment 47
- Amendment 48
- Amendment 49
- Amendment 50
- Amendment 51
- Amendment 52
- Amendment 53
- Amendment 54
- Amendment 55
- Amendment 56
- Amendment 57
- Amendment 58
- Amendment 59
- Amendment 60
- Amendment 61
- Amendment 62
- Amendment 63
- Amendment 64
- Amendment 65
- Amendment 66
- Amendment 67
- Amendment 68
- Amendment 69
- Amendment 70
- Amendment 71
- Amendment 72
- Amendment 73
- Amendment 74
Draft european parliament legislative resolution
–having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 91(1)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C90034/2023),
3.Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;
4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (1) Directive (EU) 2015/413 facilitates the cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences and thereby lowers the impunity of non-resident offenders. An effective cross-border investigation and enforcement of road-safety-related traffic offences improves road safety as it encourages non-resident drivers to commit fewer offences and drive more safely. | (1) Directive (EU) 2015/413 facilitates the cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences and thereby lowers the impunity of non-resident offenders. An effective cross-border investigation and enforcement of strictly road-safety-related traffic offences improves road safety as it encourages non-resident drivers to commit fewer offences and drive more safely. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (1a) It is necessary to understand that there is a high probability of an unavoidable penalty to reduce road traffic hazards. Knowledge of the rules in force in the various Member States promotes road safety and a reduction in traffic offences. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (4) The scope of the Directive should be extended to other road-safety-related traffic offences to ensure equal treatment of drivers. Considering the legal basis on which Directive (EU) 2015/413 was adopted, namely Article 91(1), point (c), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, additional offences should demonstrate a strong link to road safety, by addressing dangerous and reckless behaviours which pose a serious risk to road users. The extension of the scope should also reflect the technical progress in the automatic detection of road-safety-related traffic offences. | (4) The scope of the Directive should be extended to other strictly road-safety-related traffic offences to ensure equal treatment of drivers. Considering the legal basis on which Directive (EU) 2015/413 was adopted, namely Article 91(1), point (c), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, additional offences should demonstrate a strong and direct link to road safety, by addressing dangerous and unlawful behaviours which pose a serious risk to road users. The extension of the scope should also reflect the technical progress in the automatic detection of road-safety-related traffic offences. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (6) The responsibilities and competences of national contact points should be defined to ensure that they seamlessly cooperate with other authorities involved in the investigation of the road-safety-related traffic offences which fall within the scope of this Directive. National contact points should always be available for such authorities and answer their requests within reasonable time. This should be the case regardless of the nature of the offence or the legal status of the authority, and in particular regardless of whether the authority has national or subnational or local competence. | (6) The responsibilities and competences of national contact points should be defined to ensure that they seamlessly cooperate with other authorities involved in the investigation of the road-safety-related traffic offences which fall within the scope of this Directive. National contact points should always be available for such authorities and answer their requests without undue delay. This should be the case regardless of the nature of the offence or the legal status of the authority, and in particular regardless of whether the authority has national or subnational or local competence. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (7a) A number of Member States are now facing a phenomenon where serious road offences are being committed in cars rented in other Member States. The drivers of such rental cars who committed a traffic offence are going unpunished because they can exploit differences in rules from one Member State to another, as well as shortcomings as regards the exchange of information |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (8) The Member State of the offence should also be allowed to conduct automated searches in vehicle registers to retrieve data on end users of vehicles where such information is already available. Furthermore, a data retention period should be established as regards the identity of the previous owners, holders and end users of the vehicles to provide authorities with the appropriate information they need for the investigation. | (8) The Member State of the offence should also be allowed to conduct automated searches in vehicle registers to retrieve the data needed to identify end users of vehicles where such information is already available. Furthermore, a data retention period should be established as regards the identity of the previous owners, holders and end users of the vehicles to provide authorities with the appropriate information they need for the investigation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (12) The Member State of registration or Member State of residence should provide the additional information requested by the Member State of the offence necessary for the identification of the liable person within reasonable time. If it is not possible to gather or provide the information, or it is not possible to do so without undue delay, a clear explanation should be given as regards the reasons thereof, and the delay be minimised as far as possible. | (12) The Member State of registration or Member State of residence should provide the additional information requested by the Member State of the offence necessary for the identification of the liable person within a period not exceeding 30 working days. If it is not possible to gather or provide the information, or it is not possible to do within the period set out, a clear explanation should be given as regards the reasons thereof, and the delay may not exceed 20 working days from the date of the notification of these reasons. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (17) As a minimum, the information letter should include detailed information on the legal classification and legal consequences of the offence, in particular as the sanctions for the offences covered by the scope of Directive (EU) 2015/413 can be of a non-pecuniary nature, such as restrictions placed on the offender’s right to drive. The right of appeal should also be supported by providing detailed information on where and how to exercise the rights of defence or lodge an appeal in the Member State of the offence, in a language that the person concerned understands. A description of in absentia procedures should also be provided when applicable, as the presumed liable person may not plan to return to the Member State of offence to participate in the proceedings. Payment options and ways to mitigate the volume of the sanctions should also be made easily understandable in order to incentivise voluntary cooperation. Finally, as the information letter should be the first document the owner, holder or end user of the vehicle or any other presumed liable person receives, it should contain the information under Article 13 of Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council63 , which, pursuant to Article 13(2)(d) should include information from which source the personal data originate, and Articles 13 and 14 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council64 . This information should be provided in the information letter either directly or by way of reference to the place where it is made available. | (17) As a minimum, the information letter should use wording that is understandable to those without legal training and include detailed information on the legal classification and legal consequences of the offence, in particular as the sanctions for the offences covered by the scope of Directive (EU) 2015/413 can be of a non-pecuniary nature, such as restrictions placed on the offender’s right to drive. The right of appeal should also be supported by providing detailed information on where and how to exercise the rights of defence or lodge an appeal in the Member State of the offence, in a language that the person concerned understands. A description of in absentia procedures should also be provided when applicable, as the presumed liable person may not plan to return to the Member State of offence to participate in the proceedings. Payment options and ways to mitigate the volume of the sanctions should also be made easily understandable in order to incentivise voluntary cooperation. Finally, as the information letter should be the first document the owner, holder or end user of the vehicle or any other presumed liable person receives, it should contain the information under Article 13 of Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council63 , which, pursuant to Article 13(2)(d) should include information from which source the personal data originate, and Articles 13 and 14 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council64 . This information should be provided in the information letter either directly or by way of reference to the place where it is made available. |
| 63 Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA, (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 89). | 63 Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA, (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 89). |
| 64 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1). | 64 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (18) When non-resident persons are checked on the spot in a road control, and such action leads to the initiation of follow-up proceedings in relation to the commission of a road-safety-related traffic offence, the information letter should contain only certain essential elements, and be given to the person concerned directly as part of the road control procedures. | (18) When non-resident persons are checked on the spot in a road control, and such action leads to the initiation of follow-up proceedings in relation to the commission of a road-safety-related traffic offence, the information letter should contain only certain essential elements including, in particular, a description of the appeal procedure , and, if possible, be given to the person concerned directly as part of the road control procedures or sent as soon as possible after their completion. Non-resident drivers should also be given sufficient time to avail themselves of any right to appeal or to the mitigation of sanctions. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (20) In the case where it is not possible to deliver documents through registered delivery or electronic means of equal value, the Member State of the offence should be allowed to rely on the Member State of registration or of residence to service the documents and communications to the person concerned under their own national legislation governing the service of documents. | (20) In the case where it is not possible to deliver documents through registered delivery, registered mail, or electronic means of equal value, the Member State of the offence should be allowed to rely on the Member State of registration or of residence to service the documents and communications to the person concerned under their own national legislation governing the service of documents. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (24a) Currently, there are no Union-wide means of electronic identification or a certificate recognised by all Member States that would enable Union citizens to access the content of the notifications deposited in the electronic register of the authority issuing the notification, and to submit written claims and appeals electronically. The Commission, in collaboration with Member States, should therefore carry out a review of models for electronic access to registers of traffic offences managed by national authorities and, if appropriate, develop a dedicated digital solution. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (25a) The Commission should explore different means for enhancing the cooperation and exchange of information on road-safety traffic offences to improve enforcement, between the Member States and neighbouring third countries . While this Directive aims to reduce the impunity of non-resident drivers within the Union, road safety-related offences by non-resident drivers registered outside the Union are a not insignificant problem. This Directive and the use of Eucaris provide a model for the Union and its Member States to establish similar mechanisms for the exchange of information on the covered offences with neighbouring third countries, provided that equivalent protections are afforded to the drivers concerned, particularly as regards data protection. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (25b) To attain the objectives put forward in the EU Road Safety Policy Framework 2021-2030 – Next steps towards “Vision Zero”, the effective implementation of Directive (EU) 2015/413 should be complemented by further measures to address road-safety-related traffic offences committed by third-country nationals. It should be possible for third countries to participate in the exchange of Vehicle Registration Data (VRD), provided that they have concluded an agreement with the Union to this effect. Such an agreement would need to include necessary provisions for data protection. In the event of a long delay before such an agreement is concluded, Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, could develop a dedicated solution to ensure that a traffic offence is signalled at the external border of the Union when the traffic offender intends to cross it, so that the financial penalty can be imposed on the offender by the Member State where the offense took place before he or she leaves the territory of the Union.. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (25c) Since the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union, there is no longer a directive concerning the sharing of data between Member States´ police forces and the United Kingdom’s Driver Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA. A mutual assistance scheme exists instead, but, since it is no longer automatic, it is not as efficient as it would otherwise be. As the conclusion of the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) does not include a reference to Directive (EU) 2015/413 and Decision 2005/214/JHA, the Commission should analyse in the light of a legal opinion how best to effectively enforce the offences defined by this Directive under the European Convention on the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters of 1959 and its protocols (MLA), identifying effective and efficient measures to improve road safety and at the same time safeguarding data protection requirements, in particular of the Union’s vehicle holders and drivers. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) An online portal (the “CBE Portal”) should be established to provide road users in the Union with comprehensive information on road-safety-related traffic rules in place in Member States and allow road users to communicate with Member State authorities in an effective and secure manner. The portal should also facilitate communication between Member States’ authorities on various issues related to the cross-border investigation of road-safety-related traffic offences, such as for the verification of the authenticity of information letters and follow-up documents to eliminate the possibility of fraud. The exchanged personal data should be limited to what is necessary for the cross-border investigations and enforcement of sanctions, particularly the payment of financial penalties. The CBE Portal should be able to connect to other relevant portals, networks, websites or platforms to facilitate the exchange of information related to the enforcement of road-safety-related traffic rules. The Commission should be the controller of the CBE Portal, in accordance with Regulation 2018/1725. | (31) An online portal (the “CBE Portal”) should be established to provide road users in the Union with comprehensive information on road-safety-related traffic rules in place in Member States and allow road users to communicate with Member State authorities in an effective and secure manner. Such information should be understandable and accessible. The portal should also facilitate communication between Member States’ authorities on various issues related to the cross-border investigation of road-safety-related traffic offences, such as for the verification of the authenticity of information letters and follow-up documents to eliminate the possibility of fraud. The exchanged personal data should be limited to what is necessary for the cross-border investigations and enforcement of sanctions, particularly the payment of financial penalties. The CBE Portal should be able to connect to other relevant portals, networks, websites or platforms to facilitate the exchange of information related to the enforcement of road-safety-related traffic rules. Commission and the Member States should be the joint controllers of the CBE Portal, in accordance with Regulation 2018/1725 |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (32) The Commission should provide proportionate financial support to initiatives which improve the cross-border cooperation in the enforcement of road-safety-related traffic rules in the Union. | (32) The Commission should provide proportionate financial support for Member States’ initiatives and projects , which improve the cross-border cooperation in the enforcement of road-safety-related traffic rules in the Union, including support for the digitisation of the data covered by Annex III to Directive 2010/40/EU relevant for the offences covered under this Directive. Financial support should also cover information campaigns throughout the Union on differences in national legislation, with a particular focus on neighbouring countries. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (32a) EU Member States should be encouraged to set up a transparent system for the allocation of revenues generated by fines and channel revenues from enforcement back into road safety work. This would also increase public confidence in the traffic law enforcement system and contribution it can make to improving road safety. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (32b) Given significant increases in the level of cross-border road traffic, and continued divergences between the Member States in the field of road safety enforcement, it is appropriate to update the Commission’s Recommendation 2004/345/EC on enforcement in the field of road safety, which dates from 2004 in order to take account of advancements since then. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (35a) It is necessary to highlight that there is a significant problem of non-enforcement of road traffic offences committed by non-residentsand that the amendments to Article 1 of Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties, as amended by Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA, which lays down the definition of a decision, may not be sufficient to tackle this problem effectively. Therefore, the current situation should be assessed, inter alia in the light of a dedicated legal opinion, following which the Commission should, if appropriate, adopt a legislative proposal with a view to improving cooperation between Members States on this issue. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (35b) Member States should ensure that adequate and effective mechanisms are in place for the enforcement or recovery of financial penalties. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) not keeping sufficient distance from the vehicle in front; | (i) not keeping the required distance from the vehicle in front; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) dangerous overtaking; | (j) dangerous overtaking that does not comply with traffic regulations; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (k) dangerous parking; | (k) dangerous parking in an unauthorised place posing a serious risk to other road users; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (l) crossing one or more solid white lines; | (l) crossing one or more solid lines; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (o) use of an overloaded vehicle.; | (o) driving an overloaded vehicle; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (oa) hit-and-run; |
| Present text | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (-a) point a is replaced by the following: | |
| (a) ‘vehicle’ means any power-driven vehicle, including motorcycles, which is normally used for carrying persons or goods by road; | (a) ‘vehicle’ means any motorised vehicle propelled exclusively by mechanical power, which is normally used for carrying persons or goods by road; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) ‘use of a forbidden lane’ means illegally using part of an already existing permanent or temporary road section, such as a public transport lane or a temporarily closed lane for reasons of congestion or road works, as defined in the law of the Member State of the offence; | (j) ‘use of a forbidden lane’ means illegally using part of an already existing permanent or temporary road section, such as a public transport lane, footpath or cycle lane or a lane which is temporarily closed for reasons of congestion or road works, as defined in the law of the Member State of the offence’; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (l) ‘national contact point’ means a competent authority designated for the purposes of this Directive; | (l) ‘national contact points’ means competent authorities through which information is exchanged between Member State of offence and Member State of registration; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (o) ‘not keeping sufficient distance from the vehicle in front’ means not maintaining the distance necessary to avoid collision with the vehicle in front of the vehicle driven by the driver, if the preceding vehicle were to suddenly slow down or stop, as defined in the law of the Member State of the offence; | (o) ‘not keeping the required distance from the vehicle in front’ means not maintaining the safe distance necessary to avoid collision with the vehicle in front of the vehicle driven by the driver, if the preceding vehicle were to suddenly slow down or stop, as defined in the law of the Member State of the offence; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (p) ‘dangerous overtaking’ means overtaking another vehicle or another road user in a way that infringes the applicable rules on dangerous overtaking in the Member State of the offence; | (p) ‘dangerous overtaking that does not comply with traffic regulations’ means overtaking another vehicle or another road user in a way that infringes the applicable rules on dangerous overtaking in the Member State of the offence; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (q) ‘dangerous parking’ means parking the vehicle in a way that infringes the applicable rules on dangerous parking in the Member State of the offence. Failure to pay parking fees and other similar offences shall not be considered dangerous parking; | (q) ‘dangerous parking in an unauthorised place posing a serious risk to other road users’ means parking the vehicle in a way that infringes the applicable rules on dangerous parking in the Member State of the offence and that has a negative impact on road safety, with the exception of failure to pay parking fees and other similar offences; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (r) ‘crossing one or more solid white lines’ means changing lanes with the vehicle through unlawfully crossing at least one solid white line, as defined in the law of the Member State of the offence; | (r) ‘crossing one or more solid lines’ means changing lanes with the vehicle through unlawfully crossing at least one solid line, as defined in the law of the Member State of the offence; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ta) ‘hit-and-run’ means a situation in which the offender drives away after causing an accident or traffic collision in order to avoid facing the criminal consequences of the offence associated with serious injuries and fatalities; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (za) ‘debt collection service provider’ is a private entity with separate legal personality which administers the follow-up proceedings initiated under Article 5(1) of this Directive, or a part thereof, including the enforcement of financial penalties, accredited at a national contact point to request the vehicle registration data, and a subject to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (zb) ‘competent authority’ is an authority designated for the purposes of this Directive; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. For the purposes of the exchange of information under this Directive, each Member State shall designate a national contact point. The powers of the national contact points shall be governed by the applicable law of the Member State concerned. | 1. For the purposes of the exchange of information and the provision of mutual assistance under this Directive, each Member State shall designate a national contact point. The powers of the national contact points shall be governed by the applicable law of the Member State concerned. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) data relating to owners, holders, or end users of the vehicles where available. | (b) data relating to owners, or holders of vehicles or, where applicable and available, data identifying the end users thereof. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A competent authority may first request access to the data relating to vehicles, as detailed in Section 2, Part 1 of the Annex in order to determine if an offence has been committed. Where, on the basis of such data, it is established that an offence was committed, the competent authority shall request access to the data concerning the owner, holder or end user of the vehicles, as detailed in Section 2, Parts II, III, IV or V of the Annex. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Member States shall retain the data elements referred to in Section 2, Part IV and, when available, Section 2, Part V of the Annex, in the national vehicle registers for at least 6 months after any modification of the ownership or use of the vehicle in question. | 3. Member States shall retain the data elements referred to in Section 2, Part IV and, when available, Section 2, Part V of the Annex, in the national vehicle registers for at least 6 months after any modification of the ownership or use of the vehicle in question, and for no longer than 4 years. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the vehicle’s full registration number is not provided in the search conducted in the form of an outgoing request under paragraph 1; | (b) the vehicle’s full registration number is not provided in the search conducted in the form of an outgoing request under paragraph 1 or is provided but is invalid; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) to ask the owner, holder or end user of the vehicle, or any person presumed to be liable for one of the road-safety-related traffic offences listed in Article 2(1) to provide information on the identity of the liable person, in accordance with its national law. | (b) to ask the owner, holder or end user of the vehicle, or any person presumed to be liable for one of the road-safety-related traffic offences listed in Article 2(1) to provide information on the identity and contact information of the liable person, in accordance with its national law. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the Member State of registration or the Member State of residence receives a request referred to in paragraph 3, it shall gather the requested information, unless it decides to invoke one of the grounds for refusal listed in paragraph 7 or it is not possible to gather the requested information. The Member State of registration or Member State of residence shall transmit the requested information electronically without undue delay via its national contact point to the national contact point of the Member State of the offence. | Where the Member State of registration or the Member State of residence receives a request referred to in paragraph 3, it shall gather the requested information, unless it decides to invoke one of the grounds for refusal listed in paragraph 7 or it is not possible to gather the requested information. The Member State of registration or Member State of residence shall transmit the requested information electronically within a period not exceeding 30 working days via its national contact point to the national contact point of the Member State of the offence. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Member States shall ensure that they provide the requested information without any undue delay from the receipt of the request. | Member States shall ensure that they provide the requested information without any undue delay from the receipt of the request, within a period not exceeding 30 working days. Where it is not possible to gather the information, within a period not exceeding 30 working days from the receipt of the request, the national contact points of the Member State of registration or the Member State of residence shall transmit that information to the Member State of the offence as soon as possible and may not exceed 20 working days from the date of the notification of those reasons, with an adequate explanation of the reasons for the delay. |
| Where it is not possible to gather the information without undue delay from the receipt of the request, the national contact points of the Member State of registration or the Member State of residence shall transmit that information to the Member State of the offence as soon as possible, with an adequate explanation of the reasons for the delay. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Member States shall decide as soon as possible, but at the latest within 15 days after receiving the request, whether they invoke a ground for refusal. Member States which decide to apply a ground for refusal shall inform the Member State of the offence thereof via its national contact point, without any undue delay. | Member States shall decide as soon as possible, but at the latest within 15 days after receiving the request, whether they invoke a ground for refusal. Member States which decide to apply a ground for refusal shall inform the Member State of the offence thereof via its national contact point no later than 15 working days after a decision to refuse the request. Requested Member States shall as a minimum indicate which specific ground for refusal they have decided to apply. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The information provided in response to the request shall be communicated in the language or languages of the Member State of the offence notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 5a(8). | The information provided in response to the request shall be communicated in the language or languages of the Member State of the offence notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 5a(8). In addition, and with a view to reducing the administrative burden and to simplifying the procedure, the Commission may introduce uniform templates, which may also include codes once these are deemed to be sufficiently well-developed, provided that the content and format of the request and response remain sufficently clear for the addressees and authorities to clearly and easily understand them. If the Commission chooses to do so, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 10 in order to introduce these templates and codes. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (aa) name of the competent authority which is making the request and why; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ab) offence or offences listed in Article 2(1) which the request relates to; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| ‘Member States may exchange or access data by using other databases such as driving licence registers or population registers for the sole purpose of the identification of the liable person. They shall do so only in so far as such exchange or access is explicitly based on Union legislation.’ | ‘Member States may exchange or access data by using other databases such as driving licence registers or population registers for the sole purpose of the identification of the liable person. They shall do so only in so far as such exchange or access is allowed based on Union legislation. The exchange or access of data shall be facilitated by automated and electronic means.’ |
Data should be exchanged and accessed by automated and electronic means in order not to create additional administrative burden for authorities and make the exchange as simple as possible.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the Member State of the offence decides to initiate such proceedings, that Member State shall promptly inform the presumed liable person about the road-safety-related traffic offence and of the decision to initiate follow-up proceedings by an information letter. | Where the Member State of the offence decides to initiate such proceedings, that Member State shall promptly inform the presumed liable person about the road-safety-related traffic offence and of the decision to initiate follow-up proceedings by an information letter, whilst respecting the time limit set out in Article 5a, paragraph 2. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (g) where applicable, detailed information on the name, address and International Bank Account Number (IBAN) of the authority where an imposed financial penalty can be settled, on the deadline for the payment and on alternative payment methods, in particular specific software applications, as long as those methods are accessible to both residents and non-residents; | (g) where applicable, detailed information on the name, address and International Bank Account Number (IBAN) of the authority where an imposed financial penalty can be settled, on the deadline for the payment and on viable alternative and accessible payment methods, in particular specific software applications, as long as those methods are accessible to both residents and non-residents; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) information on the applicable data protection rules, the rights of the data subjects and the availability of further information or reference to the place where this information may be easily retrieved pursuant to Article 13 of Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council, including information from which source the personal data originate, or Article 13 and 14 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council; | (h) clear and comprehensive information on the applicable data protection rules, the rights of the data subjects and the availability of further information and reference to the place where this information may be easily retrieved pursuant to Article 13 of Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council, including information from which source the personal data originate, or Article 13 and 14 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ja) a link and, if possible, a QR code to the portal referred to in Article 8 |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, Member States shall ensure that in the case where the liable person is a non-resident driver who was checked on the spot in a road control, the information letter contains at least the data listed in paragraph 2, points (c), (d), (e) and (g). | 3. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, Member States shall ensure that in the case where the liable person is a non-resident driver who was checked on the spot in a road control, the information letter contains at least the data listed in paragraph 2, points (c), (d), (e), (g) and (i). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3a. Member States shall ensure that in cases where the liable person is a non-resident driver who was checked on the spot in the course of a road control and where the enforcement of the committed offence was finalised by the competent authority by the imposition of the financial penalty paid by the liable person on the spot, this person shall receive at least the following information: | |
| (a) a receipt for the financial transaction; | |
| (b) the contact information of the competent authority; | |
| (c) information on the offences committed and, if relevant, how to ensure compliance in future; | |
| (d) a link and, if possible, a QR code to the portal referred to in Article 8. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Member States shall ensure that the start of the time limits for non-residents to exercise their rights of appeal or to mitigate sanctions, in accordance with paragraph 2, points (e) and (i) points (e) and (i), correspond to the date of the receipt of the information letter. | 5. Member States shall ensure that the start of the time limits for non-residents to exercise their rights of appeal or to mitigate sanctions, in accordance with paragraph 2, points (e) and (i) points (e) and (i), are proportionate to ensure the effective exercise of such rights and correspond to the date of the receipt of the information letter.’ |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Member States shall send the information letter and the follow-up documents to the presumed liable persons by registered delivery or electronic means with equal value in accordance with Chapter III, Section 7 of Regulation (EU) 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council*, or in the case referred to in Article 5(3) of this Regulation give the information letter directly to the presumed liable person. | 1. Member States shall send the information letter and the follow-up documents to the presumed liable persons by registered delivery, registered mail or electronic means with equal value in accordance with Chapter III, Section 7 of Regulation (EU) 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council*, or in the case referred to in Article 5(3) of this Regulation give the information letter directly to the presumed liable person. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2 Member States shall ensure that the information letter is sent no later than one month from the registration of a road-safety-related traffic offence listed in Article 2(1), or where more information letters need to be sent during the investigation, 15 days from the event that made sending the subsequent information letters necessary. | 2 Member States shall ensure that the information letter is sent no later than one month from the registration of a road-safety-related traffic offence listed in Article 2(1), counting from the day of the incident, or where more information letters need to be sent during the investigation, 15 days from the event that made sending the subsequent information letters necessary. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the procedural rules under the national law of the Member State of the offence require proof of service of the document, other than proof that can be obtained by registered delivery or by equivalent electronic means; | (b) the procedural rules under the national law of the Member State of the offence require proof of service of the document, other than proof that can be obtained by registered delivery, registered mail or by equivalent electronic means; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) it has not been possible to serve the document by registered delivery or by equivalent electronic means; | (c) it has not been possible to serve the document by registered delivery, registered mail or by equivalent electronic means; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the Member State of the offence has justified reasons for considering that the service of the document by registered delivery or by equivalent electronic means in that particular case will be ineffective or is inappropriate. | (d) the Member State of the offence has justified reasons for considering that the service of the document by registered delivery, registered mail or by equivalent electronic means in that particular case will be ineffective or is inappropriate. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. The request referred to in paragraph 4 shall be communicated in the language or one of the languages of the Member State of registration or Member State of residence notified to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 8. The certificate referred to in paragraph 6 shall be communicated in the language of the Member State of the offence notified of the Commission in accordance with paragraph 8. | 7. The request referred to in paragraph 4 shall be communicated in the language or one of the languages of the Member State of registration or Member State of residence notified to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 8. The certificate referred to in paragraph 6 shall be communicated in the language of the Member State of the offence notified of the Commission in accordance with paragraph 8. With a view to reducing the administrative burden and simplifying the procedure, the Commission may, for both documents referred to in the present paragraph, introduce uniform templates, which may also involve the use of codes once these are deemed to be sufficiently well-developed, provided that the content and format of the request and certificate remain sufficiently clear for the addressees and authorities to clearly and easily understand them. If the Commission chooses to do so, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 10 in order to introduce these templates and codes. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Member States shall ensure that the presumed liable persons are allowed to communicate with the authorities of the Member State of the offence, until the stage of appeal before a court, in any of the languages communicated by either the Member State of registration or the Member State of residence, or by the Member State of the offence to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 8, or, if the concerned person has insufficient knowledge of those languages, in a Union language that the person speaks or understands. | 9. Member States shall ensure that the presumed liable persons are allowed to communicate with the authorities of the Member State of the offence, until the stage of appeal before a court, in any of the languages communicated by either the Member State of registration or the Member State of residence, or by the Member State of the offence to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 8, or, if the concerned person has insufficient knowledge of those languages, in a Union language that the person speaks or understands. Member States are encouraged to permit persons who are presumed to be liable to connect remotely to court proceedings by video link. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Member States shall ensure that such a private entity enforcing financial penalties acts in accordance with data protection requirements, pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1 At the latest on the following dates: 6 May 2024, 6 May 2026 (…), each Member State shall send a comprehensive report to the Commission in accordance with the second and third subparagraph of this paragraph. | 1 At the latest on 6 May 2024, and every two years thereafter, each Member State shall send a comprehensive report to the Commission in accordance with the second and third subparagraph of this paragraph. (...) |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The report shall also include a description of the situation at national level in relation to the follow-up given to the road-safety-related traffic offences. The description shall at least specify: | The report shall also include a description of the situation at national level in relation to the follow-up given to the road-safety-related traffic offences and any related problems encountered by Member States. The description shall at least specify: (...) |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission shall assess the reports sent by the Member States and inform the Committee referred to in Article 10a on their content no later than 6 months after receiving the reports from all the Member States. | 4. The Commission shall assess the reports sent by the Member States and inform the Committee referred to in Article 10a on their content no later than 6 months after receiving the reports from all the Member States. Those reports shall also be published on the website of the portal referred to in Article 8. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) sharing information with road users on the rules in force in Member States in the field covered by this Directive, in particular road-safety-related traffic rules, appeal procedures, applied sanctions, and the schemes and available means for the payment of financial penalties; | (a) sharing information with road users on the rules in force in Member States in the field covered by this Directive, in particular road-safety-related traffic rules and how drivers can comply with them, appeal procedures, applied sanctions, and the schemes and available means for the payment of financial penalties; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Member States shall help road users in verifying the authenticity of the information letters and follow-up documents. For this purpose, Member States shall share with each other and with the Commission through the CBE Portal the templates of information letters and follow-up documents issued by their authorities, which are used in cross-border cases. Member States shall also inform each other on the authorities and empowered legal entities that have the right to issue those letters and documents. The Commission shall be the controller of the CBE Portal, in accordance with Regulation 2018/1725**. | 3. Member States shall help road users in verifying the authenticity of the information letters and follow-up documents. For this purpose, Member States shall share with each other and with the Commission through the CBE Portal the templates of information letters and follow-up documents issued by their authorities, which are used in cross-border cases. Member States shall also inform each other on the authorities and empowered legal entities that have the right to issue those letters and documents. The Commission and Member States shall be the joint controllers of the CBE Portal, in accordance with Regulation 2018/1725**. |
| ** Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC, (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39). | ** Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC, (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Member States shall provide up-to-date information to each other and to the Commission, for the purposes of this Article, and interact with road users through the CBE Portal on a regular basis. | 5. Member States shall provide up-to-date information to each other and to the Commission, for the purposes of this Article, and interact with road users through the CBE Portal on a regular basis. Member States shall ensure that a link to the online portal is provided on the websites of their national contact points. Any personal data processes under this Article shall be retained for a maximum of four years. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 8a | Article 8a |
| Financial support for cross-border cooperation in enforcement activities | Financial support for cross-border cooperation in enforcement activities |
| The Commission shall provide financial support to initiatives that contribute to cross-border cooperation in the enforcement of road-safety-related traffic rules in the Union, in particular the exchange of best practices, the application of smart enforcement methodologies and techniques in the Member States, increasing the capacity building of enforcement authorities and awareness raising campaigns regarding cross-border enforcement actions. | The Commission shall provide financial support to initiatives that contribute to cross-border cooperation in the enforcement of road-safety-related traffic rules in the Union, in particular the exchange of best practices, the application of smart enforcement methodologies and techniques in the Member States increasing the capacity building of enforcement authorities and awareness raising campaigns regarding cross-border enforcement actions. The exchange of best practices should be based on the publishing of new and revised Commission's Recommendation 2004/345 on enforcement and sanctions in the field of road safety. These new and revised recommendations should encourage Member States to achieve high standards on enforcement. |
| The Commission and Member States shall also support Member States in digitising the data covered in Annex III of Directive 2010/40/EU that are relevant for the offences set out in Article 2(1). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (9a) the following article is inserted: | |
| ‘Article 8aa | |
| Enforcement | |
| Revenues generated from financial penalties for road safety-related traffic offences, or the equivalent in the financial value of those revenues, shall be used to increase road safety. | |
| Where such revenues are allocated to the general budget of a Member State, a Member State shall be deemed to have complied with the first subparagraph of this paragraph if it implements financial support policies to increase road safety which have a value equivalent to the revenues generated from financial penalties to road-safety-related traffic offences defined in Article 3 of this Directive. | |
| By [6 May 2026], and every [three] years thereafter, Member States shall make public in aggregate form a report on the use of revenues generated from financial penalties. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (9b) the following article is inserted: | |
| ‘Article 8ab | |
| Exchange of information on traffic offences with neighbouring third countries | |
| By no later than [two years after the entry into force of this Directive], the Commission shall analyse in the light of a legal opinion how to effectively enforce the offences defined by this Directive under European Convention on the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters of 1959 and its protocols (MLA) identifying effective and efficient measures to improve road safety and at the same time safeguarding data protection requirements, in particular of the Union vehicle holders and drivers; | |
| With the view to addressing road-safety-related traffic offences committed by third-country nationals, it shall be possible for third countries to participate in the exchange of Vehicle Registration Data (VRD), provided that they have concluded an agreement with the Union to this effect. Such an agreement shall include necessary provisions for data protection. | |
| In case of a long waiting time for the conclusion of such an agreement, Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall develop a dedicated solution to detect presumed traffic offenders on the spot while they try to cross external borders of the Union in order to charge a financial penalty for the road-safety-related traffic offence that took place on its territory. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | ||
| Item | M/O (1) | Remarks |
| Member State of registration | M | Distinguishing sign(2) of the Member State of registration of the detected vehicle |
| Registration number | M | Full registration number of the detected vehicle |
| Data relating to the offence | M | |
| Member State of the offence | M | Distinguishing sign(3) of the Member State of the offence |
| Reference date of the offence | M | |
| Reference time of the offence | M | |
| Purpose of the search | M | Code indicating the type of road-safety-related traffic offence as listed in Article 2(1) 1. = Speeding 2. = Drink-driving 3. = Failing to use a seat belt 4. = Failing to stop at a red traffic light 5. = Use of a forbidden lane 10. = Driving under the influence of drugs 11. = Failing to wear a safety helmet 12. = Illegally using a mobile phone or any other communication devices while driving […] = Not keeping sufficient distance from the vehicle in front […] = Dangerous overtaking […] = Dangerous parking […] = Crossing one or more solid white lines […] = Wrong-way driving […] = Not respecting the rules on the creation and use of emergency corridors […] = Using an overloaded vehicle |
| (1) M = Mandatory communication of the data element, O = Optional communication of the data element. | ||
| (2) (3) Distinguishing sign in accordance with Article 37 of Vienna Convention of 8 November 1968 concluded under the auspices of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. | ||
| Amendment | ||
| Item | M/O (1) | Remarks |
| Member State of registration | M | Distinguishing sign(2) of the Member State of registration of the detected vehicle |
| Registration number | M | Full registration number of the detected vehicle |
| Data relating to the offence | M | |
| Member State of the offence | M | Distinguishing sign(3) of the Member State of the offence |
| Reference date of the offence | M | |
| Reference time of the offence | M | |
| Purpose of the search | M | Code indicating the type of road-safety-related traffic offence as listed in Article 2(1) 1. = Speeding 2. = Drink-driving 3. = Failing to use a seat belt 4. = Failing to stop at a red traffic light 5. = Use of a forbidden lane 10. = Driving under the influence of drugs 11. = Failing to wear a safety helmet 12. = Illegally using a mobile phone or any other communication devices while driving […] = Not keeping the required distance from the vehicle in front […] = Dangerous overtaking that does not comply with traffic regulations; […] = Dangerous parking in an unauthorised place posing a serious risk to other road users; […] = Crossing one or more solid white lines […] = Wrong-way driving […] = Not respecting the rules on the creation and use of emergency corridors […] = driving an overloaded vehicle […] = hit and run |
| (1) M = Mandatory communication of the data element, O = Optional communication of the data element. | ||
| (2) (3) Distinguishing sign in accordance with Article 37 of Vienna Convention of 8 November 1968 concluded under the auspices of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. |
Back matter, 1
Parts that accompany the text rather than belong to it: explanatory statement, annexes, opinions appended by other committees. Collapsed.
Annex: entities or persons from whom the rapporteur has received input 3 blocks
Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur declares that he has received input from the following entities or persons in the preparation of the report, until the adoption thereof in committee:
| Entity and/or person |
| European Transport Safety Council |
| Federation of European Motorcyclists Associations |
| European Parking Association |
| Polish Organisation of Parking Industry |
Procedure pages and committee votes
How the committees handled the text and how their members voted on it. Collapsed.
Procedure – committee responsible 1 block
| Title | Amending Directive (EU) 2015/413 facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences | |
| References | COM(2023)0126 – C9-0034/2023 – 2023/0052(COD) | |
| Date submitted to Parliament | 1.3.2023 | |
| Committee responsible Date announced in plenary | TRAN 16.3.2023 | |
| Committees asked for opinions Date announced in plenary | BUDG 16.3.2023 | LIBE 16.3.2023 |
| Not delivering opinions Date of decision | BUDG 28.3.2023 | LIBE 31.3.2023 |
| Rapporteurs Date appointed | Kosma Złotowski 14.4.2023 | |
| Discussed in committee | 27.6.2023 | |
| Date adopted | 29.11.2023 | |
| Result of final vote | +: –: 0: | 37 0 5 |
| Members present for the final vote | Andris Ameriks, José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Karolin Braunsberger-Reinhold, Ciarán Cuffe, Jakop G. Dalunde, Isabel García Muñoz, Jens Gieseke, Elsi Katainen, Elena Kountoura, Bogusław Liberadzki, Peter Lundgren, Benoît Lutgen, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Tilly Metz, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Bergur Løkke Rasmussen, Dominique Riquet, Thomas Rudner, Massimiliano Salini, Vera Tax, István Ujhelyi, Achille Variati, Henna Virkkunen, Petar Vitanov, Roberts Zīle, Kosma Złotowski | |
| Substitutes present for the final vote | Pablo Arias Echeverría, Ignazio Corrao, Andor Deli, Angel Dzhambazki, Roman Haider, Ljudmila Novak, Marianne Vind | |
| Substitutes under Rule 209(7) present for the final vote | Hildegard Bentele, Theresa Bielowski, Vasile Blaga, Janina Ochojska, Francesca Peppucci, Catharina Rinzema | |
| Date tabled | 5.12.2023 |
Final vote by roll call in committee responsible 3 blocks
37 · For
- ECR
- Angel Dzhambazki, Peter Lundgren, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Roberts Zīle, Kosma Złotowski
- No group
- Andor Deli
- EPP
- Pablo Arias Echeverría, Hildegard Bentele, Vasile Blaga, Karolin Braunsberger-Reinhold, Jens Gieseke, Benoît Lutgen, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar, Ljudmila Novak, Janina Ochojska, Francesca Peppucci, Massimiliano Salini, Henna Virkkunen
- Renew
- José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Elsi Katainen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Bergur Løkke Rasmussen, Catharina Rinzema, Dominique Riquet
- S&D
- Andris Ameriks, Theresa Bielowski, Isabel García Muñoz, Bogusław Liberadzki, Thomas Rudner, Vera Tax, István Ujhelyi, Achille Variati, Marianne Vind, Petar Vitanov
- The Left
- Elena Kountoura
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2023). “REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive (EU) 2015/413 facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences”. Text, 5 December 2023. docId A-9-2023-0396, reference A9-0396/2023. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2023-0396 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: The text on the European Parliament’s website, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0396_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/A-9-2023-0396 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-a-9-2023-0396,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive (EU) 2015/413 facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences}},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-12-05},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2023-0396}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2023-0396},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId A-9-2023-0396, reference A9-0396/2023. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0396\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}