Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-9-2023-0394 → TA-9-2024-0360

From
A-9-2023-0394 Plenary report of 5 Dec 2023
To
TA-9-2024-0360 Adopted text of 24 Apr 2024
Changes
Not comparable
Paragraphs
+10 added · −114 removed · 1 changed
More facts (2)
Title (from)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2009/102/EC and (EU) 2017/1132 as regards further expanding and upgrading the use of digital tools and processes in company law
Title (to)
Company law - Further expanding and upgrading the use of digital tools and processes

These two texts have too little in common to be compared paragraph by paragraph (under 15 % of their paragraphs match): they are different documents rather than versions of one — for example a group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted.

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 4 of 4: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedEXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedIntroduction

RemovedThe Rapporteur welcomes the Commission’s proposal for a Directive upgrading the use of digital tools and processes in company law. The Rapporteur recognises the importance of addressing the developments in digitalisation and technology of the recent years and believes that the changes to how businesses register, companies and authorities operate and communicate on company law-related issues need to be reflected in the EU legal framework.

RemovedIn the view of the Rapporteur, the main aim of this proposal should be a reduction in administrative burden for companies in order for them to fully benefit from a harmonised, integrated and digitalised single market, without administrative barriers.

RemovedComplementary public electronic controls of identity, legal capacity and legality

RemovedThe Rapporteur believes that the legality of company law transactions, the protection of reliable public registers and the prevention of illegal activities require the correct and secure identification of the participants to company law transactions as well as the verification of their legal capacity. The reliable identification of the customer in line with the know-your-customer principle under AML/CFT rules is the prerequisite for any AML/CFT customer due diligence obligations and thus any ML/TF prevention.

RemovedNo additional administrative burdens on companies through yearly confirmations of group information

RemovedThe Rapporteur does not agree with placing new obligations and unnecessary burdens on companies and therefore opposes the Commission proposal to place parent companies under the obligation to update or confirm the group information, at least once per year.

RemovedNo fees for obtaining an EU Company Certificate

RemovedThe Rapporteur believes that companies should be encouraged to apply for an EU Company Certificate and therefore opposes the idea that Member States require a fee from companies for obtaining an EU Company Certificate.

RemovedEU power of attorney

RemovedThe Rapporteur believes that the EU power of attorney should be signed using qualified electronic signatures or in case the digital EU power of attorney is certified or authenticated, the certifying or authenticating authority should use qualified electronic signatures or seals. Once filed, the digital EU power of attorney should be deemed to be valid in its published in the register form. Any amendment or revocation of the EU power of attorney has to be published in the register.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Changes between A-9-2023-0394 and TA-9-2024-0360”. Text, 24 April 2024. from A-9-2023-0394, to TA-9-2024-0360. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2023-0394/compare/TA-9-2024-0360?all=1&part=4 (retrieved 28 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2024-04-24,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-9-2023-0394 and TA-9-2024-0360}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-04-24},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2023-0394/compare/TA-9-2024-0360?all=1&part=4}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2023-0394/compare/TA-9-2024-0360?all=1&part=4},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-9-2023-0394, to TA-9-2024-0360. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}