Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from plenary report to adopted text
A-9-2023-0254 → TA-9-2024-0060
- From
- A-9-2023-0254 Plenary report of 27 Jul 2023
- To
- TA-9-2024-0060 Adopted text of 6 Feb 2024
- Changes
- Not comparable
- Paragraphs
- +8 added · −347 removed · 2 changed
More facts (2)
- Title (from)
- on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down measures for a high level of public sector interoperability across the Union (Interoperable Europe Act)
- Title (to)
- Measures for a high level of public sector interoperability across the Union (Interoperable Europe Act)
These two texts have too little in common to be compared paragraph by paragraph (under 15 % of their paragraphs match): they are different documents rather than versions of one — for example a group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted.
Every difference
The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.
Part 7 of 7: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
RemovedEXPLANATORY STATEMENT
RemovedThe Rapporteur welcomes the Regulation for a high level of public sector interoperability across the Union. The proposal presents a timely and logical step in the evolution of a process that has started in 1994 with the first EU programmes in support of the development and dissemination of interoperability solutions for public administrations and businesses and setting up cross-border digital services infrastructures ‘to enable citizens of the Union, economic operators and regional and local communities to derive full benefit from the setting-up of an area without internal frontiers’
RemovedDigital transformation is amongst the highest priorities for public administrations, and Member States are investing heavily in their digitisation. This process does not happen in legal vacuum and in this respect the rapporteur believes that the new Regulation should take due account of legal developments and most importantly in regards of the interoperability requirements to be set in the upcoming Data Act.
RemovedWhile more and more services provided by the EU public sector become digital, their level of interoperability is still insufficient. The Regulation is a very welcomed development to address the need for further progress and in his draft the rapporteur proposes that the annual strategic planning exercise ‘Interoperable Europe Agenda’ should also measure the progress achieved against clear key performance indicators.
RemovedRaising the level of Interoperability is a mighty lever in reducing the costs to citizens in interacting with public administrations. It is also critical for reducing the costs of doing business in the EU. To this end the draft report seeks to further strengthen the provisions for accessibility and free of charge access.
RemovedThe availability and the speed of provision of public services also heavily depend on the ability of public administrations to communicate efficiently with each other. What is harder to measure, but not less important is the value of interoperability for civil rights, digital involvement for all, diversity and democratising public knowledge.
RemovedThe Rapporteur believes that the European Interoperability Framework (EIF) should further the principle of multilingualism in the public service sector and encourage use of the most advanced technologies (such as artificial intelligence) to preserve linguistic diversity while enhancing efficiency of the exchanges between information systems across language boundaries.
RemovedStrengthening public sector interoperability also widens the opportunities for innovation, better planning ahead (e.g. in crisis situations) and improved technological sovereignty of the EU. In this respect the draft suggests a widening of the scope of the regulation beyond only those systems that electronically are delivering public services. All public sector IT systems interacting across borders with each-other should be interoperable not depending on the reason for interaction – providing public service (G2C and G2B) or administration’s internal needs (G2G).
RemovedAn excellent innovation introduced by the proposal is the new system of peer reviews. To safeguard that it remains a mechanism facilitating mutual learning and sharing of best practices, and not of comparisons mechanism between public entities with very different budgets and staffing numbers, the rapporteur introduced a proposal that the reviews shall be conducted only at the request of a public sector body.
RemovedThe proposal represents a further step in the development of the EIF which was first established in 2004, by setting up a governance structure to support its development and establishing it as a benchmark for the new interoperability assessments. The Interoperable Europe Board (IEB), overseeing the EIF will now also recommend interoperability solutions, distinguishing them with the label ‘Interoperable Europe solution’. The rapporteur believes that the value of the recommendation as a mark of excellence could be better guaranteed if the IEB can also remove the ‘Interoperable Europe solution’ label, when necessary.
RemovedThe proposal also formalises and strengthens the ‘Interoperable Europe Community’ already emergent between relevant stakeholders in the field of cross-border and cross-sector interoperability, and re-energises and rebrands their online platform JoinUp, which has already more than 10 years history, as a one-stop-shop ‘Interoperable Europe portal’. In support of the entities sharing and re-using solutions the draft report foresees that the IEB shall adopt clear guidelines to guarantee the ease of use and comparison.
RemovedLast but not least the proposal has in its scope the European Institutions, Bodies, Agencies and offices. In this respect the rapporteur believes that the European Parliament should be represented in the IEB.
RemovedMember States and the Union have been working for more than two decades to support the modernisation of administrations through digital transformation and foster the deep interconnections needed for a truly European digital space. With this regulation we will be creating a strong legal foundations for the next digital decade.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2023-0254/compare/TA-9-2024-0060?all=1&part=7
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 29 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2024). “Changes between A-9-2023-0254 and TA-9-2024-0060”. Text, 6 February 2024. from A-9-2023-0254, to TA-9-2024-0060. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2023-0254/compare/TA-9-2024-0060?all=1&part=7 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2024-02-06,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between A-9-2023-0254 and TA-9-2024-0060}},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-02-06},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2023-0254/compare/TA-9-2024-0060?all=1&part=7}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-9-2023-0254/compare/TA-9-2024-0060?all=1&part=7},
urldate = {2026-09-29},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from A-9-2023-0254, to TA-9-2024-0060. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}