Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-8-2018-0250 → TA-8-2018-0340

From
A-8-2018-0250 Plenary report of 4 Jul 2018
To
TA-8-2018-0340 Adopted text of 12 Sept 2018
Changes
19 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+8 added · −160 removed · 20 changed
More facts (2)
Title (from)
on a proposal calling on the Council to determine, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded
Title (to)
The situation in Hungary

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 2 of 9: MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

RemovedMOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

AddedPE620.837

ChangedEuropean Parliament resolution of 12 September 2018 on a proposal calling on the Council to determine, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded (2017/2131(INL))

Removed(2017/2131(INL))

The European Parliament,

– having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 2 and Article 7(1) thereof,

– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,

Changed– having regard to the European Convention onfor the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the Protocols thereto,

7 unchanged paragraphs

– having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,

– having regard to the international human rights treaties of the United Nations and the Council of Europe, such as the European Social Charter and the Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention),

– having regard to its resolution of 17 May 2017 on the situation in Hungary,

– having regard to its resolutions of 16 December 2015 and 10 June 2015 on the situation in Hungary,

– having regard to its resolution of 3 July 2013 on the situation of fundamental rights: standards and practices in Hungary (pursuant to the European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012),

– having regard to its resolutions of 16 February 2012 on the recent political developments in Hungary and of 10 March 2011 on media law in Hungary,

– having regard to its resolution of 25 October 2016 with recommendations to the Commission on the establishment of an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights,

Changed– having regard to its legislative resolution of 120 April 2004 on the Commission communication on Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union: Respect for and promotion of the values on which the Union is based,

5 unchanged paragraphs

– having regard to Communication of 15 October 2003 from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union - Respect for and promotion of the values on which the Union is based,

– having regard to the annual reports of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) and European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF),

– having regard to Rules 45, 52 and 83 of its Rules of Procedure,

– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Budgetary Control, the Committee on Culture and Education, the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (A8-0250/2018),

A. whereas the Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities, as set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and as reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and embedded in international human rights treaties, and whereas those values, which are common to the Member States and to which all Member States have freely subscribed, constitute the foundation of the rights enjoyed by those living in the Union;

Change 1

ChangedB. whereas any clear risk of a serious breach by a Member State of the values enshrinedreferred to in Article 2 TEU does not concern solely the individual Member State where the risk materialises but has an impact on the other Member States, on mutual trust between them and on the very nature of the Union and its citizens’ fundamental rights under Union law;

Change 2

ChangedC. whereas, as indicated in the 2003 Commission Communication on Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union, the scope of Article 7 TEU is not confined to the obligations under the Treaties, as in Article 258 TFEU,of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and whereas the Union can assess the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach of the common values in areas falling under Member States’ competences;

17 unchanged paragraphs

D. whereas Article 7(1) TEU constitutes a preventive phase endowing the Union with the capacity to intervene in the event of a clear risk of a serious breach of the common values; whereas such preventive action provides for a dialogue with the Member State concerned and is intended to avoid possible sanctions;

E. whereas, while the Hungarian authorities have consistently been ready to discuss the legality of any specific measure, the situation has not been addressed and many concerns remain, having a negative impact on the image of the Union, as well as its effectiveness and credibility in the defence of fundamental rights, human rights and democracy globally, and revealing the need to address them by a concerted action of the Union;

1. States that the concerns of Parliament relate to the following issues:

– the functioning of the constitutional and electoral system;

– the independence of the judiciary and of other institutions and the rights of judges;

– corruption and conflicts of interest;

– privacy and data protection;

– freedom of expression;

– academic freedom;

– freedom of religion;

– freedom of association;

– the right to equal treatment;

– the rights of persons belonging to minorities, including Roma and Jews, and protection against hateful statements against such minorities;

– the fundamental rights of migrants, asylum seekers and refugees;

– economic and social rights.

2. Believes that the facts and trends mentioned in the Annex to this resolution taken together represent a systemic threat to the values of Article 2 TEU and constitute a clear risk of a serious breach thereof;

3. Notes the outcome of the parliamentary elections in Hungary, which took place on 8 April 2018; highlights the fact that any Hungarian government is responsible for the elimination of the risk of a serious breach of the values of Article 2 TEU, even if this risk is a lasting consequence of the policy decisions suggested or approved by previous governments;

Change 3

Changed44. Submits, therefore, in accordance with Article 7(1) TEU, thisthe annexed reasoned proposal to the Council, inviting the Council to determine whether there is a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values referred to in Article 2 TEU and to address appropriate recommendations to Hungary in this regard;

Changed5. Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the reasoned proposal for a Council decision annexed hereto to the Commission andCouncil, the CouncilCommission and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2018). “Changes between A-8-2018-0250 and TA-8-2018-0340”. Text, 12 September 2018. from A-8-2018-0250, to TA-8-2018-0340. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-8-2018-0250/compare/TA-8-2018-0340?all=1&part=2 (retrieved 28 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2018-09-12,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-8-2018-0250 and TA-8-2018-0340}},
  year = {2018},
  date = {2018-09-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-8-2018-0250/compare/TA-8-2018-0340?all=1&part=2}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-8-2018-0250/compare/TA-8-2018-0340?all=1&part=2},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-8-2018-0250, to TA-8-2018-0340. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}