Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-10-2026-0162 → TA-10-2026-0218

From
A-10-2026-0162 Plenary report of 9 Jun 2026
To
TA-10-2026-0218 Adopted text of 17 Jun 2026
Changes
6 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+6 added · −12 removed · 5 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on the 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia
Title (to)
2025 Commission report on North Macedonia
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds calls on North Macedonia regarding remembrance with Bulgaria, Albanian language use, and commends response to an antisemitic attack.123 Welcomes a recent EU disbursement and updates the roaming negotiation process to include Council authorisation and reciprocal market opening.56 The other changes are formal: renumbering and punctuation corrections.4

The notes class 5 changes as substance, 1 as formal, 0 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 4 of 4: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedEXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedThis year, I have the honour of presenting my second country report on North Macedonia. The report seeks to provide a balanced and objective assessment of the country’s progress in the accession process and, as per established practice, comes in response to the Commission’s 2025 Enlargement Package.

RemovedNorth Macedonia currently finds itself in a difficult position, as the accession process remains at a standstill:

RemovedDespite some positive reform steps, progress on the EU reform agenda - particularly in key areas such as the rule of law, judicial reform, and the fight against corruption - has been insufficient. This is attributable to the election campaign, limited capacities within the public administration, and a lack of sustained political commitment.

RemovedNo progress has been made on the constitutional amendments, due to concerns about potential additional bilateral blockades or demands from its neighbouring country. There is an urgent need for increased political will on both sides to move beyond this impasse.

RemovedHowever, at a time of major shifts in the international order as Europe has known it - notably linked to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, unprecedented uncertainty surrounding the future of the transatlantic alliance, and broader threats to the rules-based international order - it is essential that Europe stands together. There is no room for ambiguity.

RemovedAgainst this geopolitical backdrop, opportunities may arise to reinvigorate and accelerate the accession process. That process will, in any scenario, remain merit-based and firmly grounded in progress on the fundamentals, particularly the rule of law. It is therefore essential that all political stakeholders in North Macedonia, notably the Government and Members of Parliament of the ruling majority, recognise this renewed sense of urgency and start delivering tangible, convincing, and genuine results in these core areas without any further delay.

RemovedAdvancing reforms in the rule of law is not only decisive for moving closer to EU membership; it is equally vital for building a prosperous and resilient state that serves all its citizens. A functioning rule of law and a predictable, trustworthy investment climate are prerequisites for sustainable economic development. It will also enable the country and its citizens to fully benefit from gradual integration schemes and projects offered by the European Union.

RemovedAt the same time, the EU and its Member States must also deliver. We must fully support the country, including through active diplomatic engagement to help North Macedonia making progress on its own commitments and overcome existing obstacles.

RemovedAs for this House, and as in the previous reporting period, I remain committed to fostering a stable, constructive, pro-European, pro-democratic, and pro-enlargement majority in support of North Macedonia’s EU accession. I look forward to securing the backing of all Members who share this strategic objective.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Changes between A-10-2026-0162 and TA-10-2026-0218”. Text, 17 June 2026. from A-10-2026-0162, to TA-10-2026-0218, reference 2025/2254(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0162/compare/TA-10-2026-0218?all=1&part=4 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2026-06-17,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-10-2026-0162 and TA-10-2026-0218}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0162/compare/TA-10-2026-0218?all=1&part=4}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0162/compare/TA-10-2026-0218?all=1&part=4},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-10-2026-0162, to TA-10-2026-0218, reference 2025/2254(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}