Skip to content

Text · Plenary report

On the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes

Full title

On the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes

Report A-10-2026-0090 · 14941/2025 – C100369/2025 – 2025/0231(NLE)

Kind
Plenary report A-10-2026-0090
Date
15 April 2026
Committee
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
Rapporteur
Moritz Körner
More facts (4)
Voted
  • 20 May 2026 Consent given 497 for, 91 against, 46 abstained
Subject matter
COJP
Reference
14941/2025 – C100369/2025 – 2025/0231(NLE)
More

In short

A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.

AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Parliament gives its consent to the conclusion of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime, which aims to strengthen international cooperation against cybercrime and sharing of electronic evidence.

Position. The rapporteur recommends the conclusion of the UN Cybercrime Convention.

Key points

  1. Parliament consents to the Council decision concluding the UN Cybercrime Convention on behalf of the EU.
  2. The convention is seen as important for international cooperation while reinforcing human rights among parties.
  3. The convention has prompted criticism from civil society and service providers regarding protection of fundamental rights, so safeguards in the convention are key.
  4. By ratifying, the EU could lead in shaping implementation to ensure a secure and open digital world and promote democratic values.

Who is affected

  • EU member states and the EU institutions, as parties to the convention, will apply its safeguards.

Legal basis. Article 82(1) and (2), Article 83(1) and Article 87(2), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Read the text · Report a problem

Text

The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.

Draft european parliament legislative resolution

(14941/2025 – C100369/2025 – 2025/0231(NLE))

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

–having regard to the draft Council decision (14941/2025),

–having regard to the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes (12735/25),

–having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 82(1) and (2), Article 83(1) and Article 87(2), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C100369/2025),

–having regard to Rule 107(1) and (4) and Rule 117(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

–having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A10-0090/2026),

1.Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;

2.Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and to the United Nations.

Back matter, 2

Parts that accompany the text rather than belong to it: explanatory statement, annexes, opinions appended by other committees. Collapsed.

Explanatory statement 4 blocks

As cybercrime and cyber-enabled offenses escalate at an unprecedented pace, the UN Cybercrime Convention may serve as an important instrument for strengthening international cooperation while reinforcing human rights among its parties. Given the borderless nature of the internet, a comprehensive approach is imperative, one that engages a broad coalition of partners committed to upholding human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. This collective effort is essential to combat online criminal activities effectively and ensure that perpetrators operating in the digital sphere are held accountable.

It should be also mentioned that the convention, as much as it was supported by a broad range of stakeholders, prompted criticism from civil society and service providers, particularly when it comes to ensuring protection of fundamental rights and values. Therefore making use of the safeguards provided in the convention will be key in its application by the competent authorities.

By ratifying the convention, the EU could take a leading role in protecting cyberspace by shaping its implementation. With its strong regulatory framework and commitment to democratic values, the EU is well-positioned to ensure the convention fosters a secure and open digital world while simultaneously promoting such values amongst partners and other parties. Additionally, the EU could shape and endeavour to secure trustworthy international cooperation, preventing abuse of the digital space while enhancing human rights amongst its contracting parties. Upholding robust safeguards is crucial for fostering trust and ensuring an effective global cooperation in criminal matters.

Against this background, the rapporteur recommends the conclusion of the UN Cybercrime Convention.

Annex: declaration of input 4 blocks

Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur declares that he included in his report input on matters pertaining to the subject of the file that he received, in the preparation of the report, prior to the adoption thereof in committee, from the following interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from the following representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies:

Table from the text: 1. Interest representatives falling within the scope of the
1. Interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register
Cybersecurity Tech Accord
Epicenter.works
Microsoft
2. Representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies

The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur.

Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur declares that he has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament's Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.

Procedure pages and committee votes

How the committees handled the text and how their members voted on it. Collapsed.

Procedure – committee responsible 1 block
Table from the text: Title
TitleConclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes
References14941/2025 – C10-0369/2025 – 2025/0231(NLE)
Date of consultation or request for consent19.12.2025
Committee(s) responsible Date announced in plenaryLIBE 27.1.2026
Rapporteurs Date appointedMoritz Körner 24.9.2024
Discussed in committee18.3.2026
Date adopted14.4.2026
Result of final vote+: –: 0:51 12 2
Date tabled15.4.2026
Final vote by roll call by the committee responsible 3 blocks

51 · For

ECR
Nicolas Bay, Paolo Inselvini, Mariusz Kamiński, Assita Kanko, Maciej Wąsik, Charlie Weimers, Jadwiga Wiśniewska
No group
Malika Sorel
EPP
Fredis Beleris, Hildegard Bentele, Krzysztof Brejza, David Casa, Caterina Chinnici, Lena Düpont, Borja Giménez Larraz, Ondřej Kolář, Jeroen Lenaers, Dolors Montserrat, Nadine Morano, Ana Miguel Pedro, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Tomas Tobé, Axel Voss, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Tomáš Zdechovský, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez
Patriots
Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Jaroslav Bžoch, Elisabeth Dieringer, Klara Dostalova, Matthieu Valet, Annamária Vicsek
Renew
Sigrid Friis, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Martin Hojsík, Elsi Katainen, Moritz Körner, Marjan Šarec, Sophie Wilmès
S&D
Hannes Heide, Evin Incir, Marina Kaljurand, Murielle Laurent, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Ana Catarina Mendes, Chloé Ridel, Sandro Ruotolo, Cecilia Strada, Georgia Tramacere
The Left
Giuseppe Antoci

12 · Against

ESN
Milan Uhrík, Petar Volgin
Patriots
Auke Zijlstra
The Left
Damien Carême, Estrella Galán, Ilaria Salis
Greens
Saskia Bricmont, Mélissa Camara, Markéta Gregorová, Alice Kuhnke, Erik Marquardt, Anna Strolenberg

2 · Abstained

No group
Erik Kaliňák
The Left
Konstantinos Arvanitis

Connections

The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes”. Text, 20 May 2026. docId A-10-2026-0090, reference A10-0090/2026, procId 2025-0231. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0090 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: The text on the European Parliament’s website, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0090_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/A-10-2026-0090 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-a-10-2026-0090,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0090}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0090},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. docId A-10-2026-0090, reference A10-0090/2026, procId 2025-0231. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0090\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}