Text · Plenary report
On the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes
Full title
On the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes
Report A-10-2026-0090 · 14941/2025 – C100369/2025 – 2025/0231(NLE)
- Kind
- Plenary report A-10-2026-0090
- Date
- 15 April 2026
- Committee
- Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
- Rapporteur
- Moritz Körner
- Dossier
- 2025/0231(NLE)
More facts (4)
- Voted
- 20 May 2026 Consent given 497 for, 91 against, 46 abstained
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Subject matter
- COJP
- Reference
- 14941/2025 – C100369/2025 – 2025/0231(NLE)
In short
A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.
AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Parliament gives its consent to the conclusion of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime, which aims to strengthen international cooperation against cybercrime and sharing of electronic evidence.
Position. The rapporteur recommends the conclusion of the UN Cybercrime Convention.
Key points
- Parliament consents to the Council decision concluding the UN Cybercrime Convention on behalf of the EU.
- The convention is seen as important for international cooperation while reinforcing human rights among parties.
- The convention has prompted criticism from civil society and service providers regarding protection of fundamental rights, so safeguards in the convention are key.
- By ratifying, the EU could lead in shaping implementation to ensure a secure and open digital world and promote democratic values.
Who is affected
Legal basis. Article 82(1) and (2), Article 83(1) and Article 87(2), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
Draft european parliament legislative resolution
–having regard to the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes (12735/25),
–having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 82(1) and (2), Article 83(1) and Article 87(2), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C100369/2025),
–having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A10-0090/2026),
Back matter, 2
Parts that accompany the text rather than belong to it: explanatory statement, annexes, opinions appended by other committees. Collapsed.
Explanatory statement 4 blocks
As cybercrime and cyber-enabled offenses escalate at an unprecedented pace, the UN Cybercrime Convention may serve as an important instrument for strengthening international cooperation while reinforcing human rights among its parties. Given the borderless nature of the internet, a comprehensive approach is imperative, one that engages a broad coalition of partners committed to upholding human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. This collective effort is essential to combat online criminal activities effectively and ensure that perpetrators operating in the digital sphere are held accountable.
It should be also mentioned that the convention, as much as it was supported by a broad range of stakeholders, prompted criticism from civil society and service providers, particularly when it comes to ensuring protection of fundamental rights and values. Therefore making use of the safeguards provided in the convention will be key in its application by the competent authorities.
By ratifying the convention, the EU could take a leading role in protecting cyberspace by shaping its implementation. With its strong regulatory framework and commitment to democratic values, the EU is well-positioned to ensure the convention fosters a secure and open digital world while simultaneously promoting such values amongst partners and other parties. Additionally, the EU could shape and endeavour to secure trustworthy international cooperation, preventing abuse of the digital space while enhancing human rights amongst its contracting parties. Upholding robust safeguards is crucial for fostering trust and ensuring an effective global cooperation in criminal matters.
Annex: declaration of input 4 blocks
Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur declares that he included in his report input on matters pertaining to the subject of the file that he received, in the preparation of the report, prior to the adoption thereof in committee, from the following interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from the following representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies:
| 1. Interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register |
| Cybersecurity Tech Accord |
| Epicenter.works |
| Microsoft |
| 2. Representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies |
Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur declares that he has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament's Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.
Procedure pages and committee votes
How the committees handled the text and how their members voted on it. Collapsed.
Procedure – committee responsible 1 block
| Title | Conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes | |
| References | 14941/2025 – C10-0369/2025 – 2025/0231(NLE) | |
| Date of consultation or request for consent | 19.12.2025 | |
| Committee(s) responsible Date announced in plenary | LIBE 27.1.2026 | |
| Rapporteurs Date appointed | Moritz Körner 24.9.2024 | |
| Discussed in committee | 18.3.2026 | |
| Date adopted | 14.4.2026 | |
| Result of final vote | +: –: 0: | 51 12 2 |
| Date tabled | 15.4.2026 |
Final vote by roll call by the committee responsible 3 blocks
51 · For
- ECR
- Nicolas Bay, Paolo Inselvini, Mariusz Kamiński, Assita Kanko, Maciej Wąsik, Charlie Weimers, Jadwiga Wiśniewska
- No group
- Malika Sorel
- EPP
- Fredis Beleris, Hildegard Bentele, Krzysztof Brejza, David Casa, Caterina Chinnici, Lena Düpont, Borja Giménez Larraz, Ondřej Kolář, Jeroen Lenaers, Dolors Montserrat, Nadine Morano, Ana Miguel Pedro, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Tomas Tobé, Axel Voss, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Tomáš Zdechovský, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez
- Patriots
- Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Jaroslav Bžoch, Elisabeth Dieringer, Klara Dostalova, Matthieu Valet, Annamária Vicsek
- Renew
- Sigrid Friis, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Martin Hojsík, Elsi Katainen, Moritz Körner, Marjan Šarec, Sophie Wilmès
- S&D
- Hannes Heide, Evin Incir, Marina Kaljurand, Murielle Laurent, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Ana Catarina Mendes, Chloé Ridel, Sandro Ruotolo, Cecilia Strada, Georgia Tramacere
- The Left
- Giuseppe Antoci
12 · Against
- ESN
- Milan Uhrík, Petar Volgin
- Patriots
- Auke Zijlstra
- The Left
- Damien Carême, Estrella Galán, Ilaria Salis
- Greens
- Saskia Bricmont, Mélissa Camara, Markéta Gregorová, Alice Kuhnke, Erik Marquardt, Anna Strolenberg
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
Its dossier
- Dossier Conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes 2025/0231(NLE) · Non-legislative procedure 20 May 2026 Consent given
Decisions on this text
- Decision United Nations Convention against Cybercrime International agreement · report by Moritz Körner 20 May 2026 Consent given
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes”. Text, 20 May 2026. docId A-10-2026-0090, reference A10-0090/2026, procId 2025-0231. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0090 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: The text on the European Parliament’s website, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0090_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/A-10-2026-0090 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-a-10-2026-0090,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-05-20},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0090}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0090},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId A-10-2026-0090, reference A10-0090/2026, procId 2025-0231. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0090\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}