Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-10-2026-0047 → TA-10-2026-0120

From
A-10-2026-0047 Plenary report of 11 Mar 2026
To
TA-10-2026-0120 Adopted text of 28 Apr 2026
Changes
7 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+6 added · −14 removed · 15 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on the importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU
Title (to)
Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds a definition of rape culture and makes training for professionals mandatory, extending it to all legal professionals and law enforcement staff.67 The other changes are formal: corrected punctuation and removed footnote markers.1234

The notes class 2 changes as substance, 5 as formal, 0 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 2 of 3: Paragraphs 61–116

14 unchanged paragraphs

Y. whereas the aim of emphasising the importance of sexual autonomy is to promote gender equality and, in particular, the fulfilment of the rights of women and girls; whereas consent-based rape legislation particularly underlines women’s right to make decisions about themselves and their own bodies;

Z. whereas consent should be a central component of legislation on rape; whereas consent-based rape legislation is necessary in order to more effectively cover situations where the sexual act begins so abruptly that the victim has no opportunity to express their will or defend themselves before the act is initiated; whereas consent-based rape legislation is also essential to better address situations in which the victim is unable to oppose the act because of fear;

AA. whereas evidence shows that most rapes are committed by acquaintances or intimate partners and occur indoors, yet victims in such cases are often met with suspicion and disbelief within the criminal justice system, particularly in jurisdictions where outdated evidentiary requirements still apply, perpetuating the myths that rapes are typically committed by strangers in public places and that victims provoke or fabricate rape; whereas such myths are further reinforced by inadequate media portrayals, public discourse, and a lack of public awareness;

AB. whereas commonly accepted myths and beliefs around rape and sexual assault are detrimental to defining the crime of rape and pose further threats to survivors’ well-being, willingness to report and protection from secondary victimisation and prevent prosecution and access to justice; whereas these accepted beliefs and myths are one of the factors that help perpetuate the impunity surrounding rape and preclude the development of appropriate legislation;

AC. whereas the extent of sexual violence continues to be greatly underestimated and downplayed, as the vast majority of sexual crimes remain undisclosed; whereas many reported rapes are never prosecuted, and the vast majority of prosecutions for rape do not end in a conviction; whereas this deepens women’s lack of trust in the system, leads to low reporting rates and perpetuates a societal sense of impunity, leading to the normalisation of sexual violence, including rape; whereas widespread impunity for rape contributes to the prevalent complex of beliefs and social norms that encourage male sexual aggression and support violence against women, creating an environment in which sexual violence is normalised and justified through persistent gender inequalities and harmful attitudes about gender and sexuality; whereas it is unacceptable that there are no consequences for committing rape without physical violence; whereas the consistent prosecution of all forms of rape is essential in order to maintain public confidence in justice systems and is key for preventing sexual violence; whereas consent-based rape legislation is crucial in both reflecting and shifting the attitudes around sexual offences and in raising awareness throughout the EU, thereby ultimately reducing the number of sexual offences; whereas consent-based legislation can induce a paradigm shift towards the need to seek consent rather than merely a lack of clear opposition to a sexual act;

AD. whereas the Explanatory Report to the Istanbul Convention clarifies, with regard to Article 36(2) of the Convention, that prosecution of sexual violence, including rape, ‘will require a context-sensitive assessment of the evidence to establish on a case-by-case basis whether the victim has freely consented to the sexual act performed. Such an assessment must recognize the wide range of behavioural responses to sexual violence and rape which victims exhibit and shall not be based on assumptions of typical behaviour in such situations. It is equally important to ensure that interpretations of rape legislation and the prosecution of rape cases are not influenced by gender stereotypes and myths about male and female sexuality’;

AE. whereas the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, in its Communication No 34/2011, urges states to revise rape legislation by removing requirements relating to force or proof of penetration and placing the absence of consent at the core of the offence, and in its General Recommendation No 35 (2017), urges states to recognise gender-based violence as a form of discrimination and to adopt legal reforms that ensure the elimination of such violence, including by criminalising non-consensual sexual acts and supporting access to justice and services for all women and girls, particularly those facing intersecting forms of discrimination;

AF. whereas gender equality and non-discrimination are core values of the EU, fundamental rights, key principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights and essential conditions for progress; whereas discrimination on the basis of sex, gender and other grounds is prohibited under Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;

AG. whereas intersectionality is an important guiding principle enshrined in EU law; whereas women experience intersecting inequalities and discrimination, including linked to their race, ethnic or social origin, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, religion or belief, residence status or disability; whereas gender-based sexual violence is one of the most significant gender equality issues and real progress on gender equality can be made only by implementing an intersectional approach; whereas applying an intersectional approach makes it possible to address structural barriers to gender equality and gather evidence in order to create benchmarks and set a path to move towards strategic and effective policies to combat systemic discrimination, exclusion and social inequalities;

AH. whereas given the structural nature of gender inequality and gender-based violence, consent may be given under conditions of coercion or social pressure, which highlights the need for an approach that incorporates not only individual autonomy, but also social power dynamics, gender norms and the unequal distribution of agency between men and women;

AI. whereas gender-based violence, including sexual violence, is both a cause and a consequence of the structural inequalities and power asymmetries rooted in gender stereotypes and social norms; whereas addressing such violence requires challenging these norms and implementing comprehensive legal, social and educational reforms;

AJ. whereas deeply rooted gender stereotypes regarding women’s sexuality and morality contribute to the prevalent complex of beliefs and social norms that encourage male sexual aggression and support violence against women, creating an environment in which sexual violence is normalised and justified through persistent gender inequalities and harmful attitudes about gender and sexuality; whereas this results in the stigmatisation and discriminatory treatment of certain women and other people because of their transgression of gendered social and sexual norms or their non-conformity with gender roles;

AK. whereas rape, including elements possibly preceding the crime, such as grooming and online scams, can take place in cross-border contexts; whereas violence against women and girls occurs in both online and offline spaces, and includes technology-facilitated sexual violence, harassment, non-consensual sharing of intimate images, and coercive control; whereas such forms of abuse disproportionately affect women and marginalised groups and remain insufficiently addressed in many national frameworks;

AL. whereas victims of rape need immediate, multidisciplinary, accessible and comprehensive medical care, including clinical management of rape, sexual and reproductive healthcare, which comprises emergency contraception, post-exposure prophylaxis, treatment for sexually transmitted infections, as well as access to safe and legal abortion, and trauma support, and must furthermore have the option of long-term support, including psychological counselling; whereas access to certain essential healthcare services is not provided in some Member States;

Change 6

RemovedAM. whereas the high prevalence of secondary victimisation shows the profound failure not only of justice systems, but also of outdated laws that are not based on consent, to provide survivors with access to justice17, as evidenced by the low reporting rates among victims, the lack of assistance in line with their needs, the availability of accessible procedures and the low conviction rates in rape cases, which highlight systematic deficiencies in the way law enforcement authorities and judicial systems address cases of rape, resulting, in turn, in a widespread societal sense of impunity for the crime of rape and constituting a serious impairment to gender equality;

AddedAM. whereas rape culture is defined as a structural and widespread system of attitudes, behaviours, values and social norms that normalise and trivialise sexual violence, undermine consent, perpetuate rape myths, and foster the societal normalisation of such violence;

AddedAN. whereas the high prevalence of secondary victimisation shows the profound failure not only of justice systems, but also of outdated laws that are not based on consent, to provide survivors with access to justice, as evidenced by the low reporting rates among victims, the lack of assistance in line with their needs, the availability of accessible procedures and the low conviction rates in rape cases, which highlight systematic deficiencies in the way law enforcement authorities and judicial systems address cases of rape, resulting, in turn, in a widespread societal sense of impunity for the crime of rape and constituting a serious impairment to gender equality;

21 unchanged paragraphs

AO. whereas secondary victimisation occurs when victims suffer further harm not as a direct result of the criminal act of rape, but as a result of the manner in which institutions and other individuals deal with them; whereas secondary victimisation is caused by repeated exposure of the victim to the perpetrator, by insensitive treatment, such as repeated interrogation about the same events, by victim-blaming attitudes, by the use of inappropriate language or insensitive comments by those who come into contact with victims, by medical interventions and by legal proceedings, including their length, and other institutional processes; whereas secondary victimisation undermines victims’ rights, impedes their access to justice and perpetuates their trauma, including by causing post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety, thus hindering their recovery;

AP. whereas the traumatic nature of rape and its long-term impact on the physical and psychological health, security, bodily integrity, well-being and social life of victims require a coordinated, gender- and trauma-sensitive response by trained and specialised staff, particularly in law enforcement agencies and in the judiciary, to address cases of rape and avoid secondary victimisation; whereas the training of legal and law enforcement professionals remains non-homogeneous and insufficient in some Member States; whereas the effective implementation of consent-based definitions of rape in law is dependent on the capacity of police officers, prosecutors and judicial authorities to correctly interpret and apply these provisions and thus ensure that the focus remains on the absence of freely given consent and not on evidence of resistance or physical violence; whereas placing the burden of proof on victims to provide evidence of a lack of consent reinforces harmful stereotypes about rape;

AQ. whereas comprehensive, consent-based sexuality and relationships education is essential for reducing misinformation and myths about rape and sexuality, addressing gender norms and preventing all forms of gender-based violence, including rape; whereas engaging men and boys in promoting gender equality, challenging harmful gender stereotypes and unhealthy and harmful models of masculinity and questioning entitlement-based views of sex is crucial for prevention efforts; whereas shifting to a consent-based culture is key to ensuring an environment of mutual respect and safety centred on healthy social interactions; whereas the provision of gender-sensitive, comprehensive and age-appropriate sexuality, consent and relationships education is a crucial tool in preventing rape and sexual violence and addressing the root causes;

AR. whereas SDG 5 of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development calls for the achievement of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls, and SDG 16 calls for the promotion of peaceful and inclusive societies, access to justice and effective, accountable institutions;

AS. whereas the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the principle of ‘leaving no one behind’, and in particular SDGs 3, 4, 5, 10 and 16, call for the elimination of sexual violence, the achievement of gender equality, access to justice, inclusive education and respect, and the protection of all individuals’ physical and mental integrity;

AT. whereas Member States’ shortcomings in addressing the structural and normative factors that result in impunity for perpetrators are being challenged by marches, protests and civil society movements, such as the #MeToo movement, which are breaking the silence on rape and have been the drivers for legislative changes in some Member States; whereas cases that have sparked widespread protests include the case of the ‘Wolf Pack’ in Spain and that of Gisèle Pelicot in France, which highlight the inadequacy of definitions of rape that are based on force and not centred on consent;

1. Calls on the Commission to propose, without delay, legislation establishing an EU-wide definition of rape that is based on the requirement of freely given, informed consent that can be withdrawn, in line with Article 36 of the Istanbul Convention;

2. Calls on the Member States that still use definitions of rape based on the assumption of violence to commence legislative changes to bring the definition into line with the latest international standards and to provide the necessary and adequate support and protection to victims and survivors of rape;

3. Welcomes the fact that an increasing number of Member States have introduced consent-based definitions of sexual violence, in line with Article 36 of the Istanbul Convention, and calls on the Commission to encourage the Member States that have not yet done so to ratify the Istanbul Convention;

4. Reiterates that legislation criminalising rape on the basis of the absence of consent is an international human rights standard set in the Istanbul Convention; recalls the Member States’ obligation to meet international human rights standards and invites them to go even further in order to protect and support survivors and victims of rape and to eradicate all the manifestations of the prevalent complex set of beliefs and social norms that encourage male sexual aggression and support violence against women, creating an environment in which sexual violence is normalised and justified through persistent gender inequalities and harmful attitudes about gender and sexuality;

5. Reiterates that legislation based on the absence of consent is the only adequate, comprehensive, trauma-informed and evidence-based framework that allows access to justice for survivors of rape; notes that consent-based rape legislation has positive outcomes for access to justice, including higher reporting rates and convictions, and provides better prospects for survivors’ recovery and emotional well-being;

6. Reiterates its call on the Commission to submit, on the basis of the third subparagraph of Article 83(1) TFEU, a proposal for a Council decision identifying gender-based violence as a new area of EU crime in order to ensure a common approach with a view to effectively combating all forms of gender-based violence, which is one of the most widespread fundamental rights violations in the EU;

7. Stresses that only a clear, affirmative, freely given and unambiguous indication of consent is valid and that silence, a lack of verbal or physical resistance or the absence of a ‘no’ cannot be interpreted as consent, and that prior consent, past sexual conduct or any past or present relationship with an offender, including marital or any other partnership status, does not imply ongoing or future consent for any sexual acts; stresses that consent can be withdrawn at any time before or during a sexual act; notes that consent can be expressed in any way as long as it is given voluntarily as a result of the person’s free will and is assessed in the context of the surrounding circumstances, in accordance with Article 36 of the Istanbul Convention;

8. Underlines that consent must be assessed in the context of the surrounding circumstances, recognising that consent cannot be given where there is violence, threat, surprise, deceit, an abuse of power, including control, coercion, a physical or mental condition, such as a state of fear, intimidation, unconsciousness, freezing caused by fear or trauma, intoxication, chemical submission, sleep, illness, bodily injury, disability or in an otherwise particularly vulnerable situation, or age; acknowledges that such states can prevent the ability to give voluntary and informed consent;

9. Stresses the importance of recognising trauma responses such as tonic immobility or the ‘freeze response’, an involuntary neurobiological reaction to fear or threat that can lead to temporary paralysis and immobility and a loss of the ability to speak, and the ‘fawn response’, which is a survival strategy that develops under coercion and involves appeasing the perpetrator in an attempt to avoid escalation or harm; underlines that such trauma responses occur during rape and sexual violence and must therefore be reflected in legislation and judicial practice to ensure a trauma-informed, survivor-centred approach, thus legally recognising that the absence of resistance does not equal consent;

10. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to apply an intersectional and victim-centred approach to all relevant policies in order to ensure access to justice and achieve gender equality, acknowledging that gender-based violence and discrimination, including sexual violence such as rape, are often compounded by other factors of discrimination and gender stereotypes, and that the intersection of these factors creates multiple and unique forms of discrimination that require targeted context-specific measures, including legislation, to ensure equal protection and support for all victims and survivors;

11. Stresses that consent-based rape legislation must also apply in digital and virtual environments, where non-consensual sexual acts, such as simulated rape or coerced sexual interactions, can take place; underlines that such acts can have severe psychological consequences for survivors and must therefore be legally recognised and prosecuted accordingly;

12. Calls on the Member States to ensure that victims and survivors of rape have full access to immediate, comprehensive, safe, confidential, and specialised medical care and services for as long as necessary, such as clinical management of rape and the provision of sexual and reproductive health and rights, including clinical emergency contraception, post-exposure prophylaxis, treatment for sexually transmitted infections and access to safe and legal abortion, complemented by access to long-term trauma care, psychological and psychosocial support, and appropriate follow-up services to support recovery; reiterates the critical nature of these services for survivors and their importance in guaranteeing the best possible health outcomes and helping survivors to regain their sense of bodily autonomy;

13. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the Member States comply with Article 26 of Directive (EU) 2024/1385 on combating violence against women and domestic violence as regards providing specialist support for victims of sexual violence that is adapted to their specific needs, free of charge and in a sufficient geographical distribution and capacity; highlights the need for all victims and survivors of sexual violence to have access to resources such as 24-hour crisis centres, where they can receive medical care, psychological support and legal advice without having to have filed a formal report; further calls on the Member States to ensure that victims and survivors have access to legal support;

14. Encourages a continuous exchange of best practice among the Member States in order to promote the harmonisation of treatment standards and ensure consistent, educated and high-quality support and treatment for victims and survivors of sexual violence across the entire EU;

15. Firmly calls for public services to be available at all stages of the reparation process, in particular with regard to the provision of essential psychological and legal support and assistance with seeking employment; calls on the Member States to comply with the Istanbul Convention by providing protective and supportive measures for victims and survivors with a focus on the human rights and safety of the person, thus avoiding secondary victimisation;

Change 7

Changed16. Calls on the Member States to ensure that professionals who are likely to come into contact with rape victims, including law enforcement officers, forensic medical personnel, court staff, judges and prosecutors, lawyers, healthcare professionals, social services employees, educational and other relevant staff and frontline professionals, receive mandatory, regular, adequate, effective and tailored training; stresses that this training should be aimed at preventing the secondary victimisation of the survivors in order to avoid and identify harmful gender stereotypes, eliminate victim-blaming behaviours and attitudes and treat victims in a trauma-, gender-, child- and disability-sensitive manner, in line with Article 36 of Directive (EU) 2024/1385 and without prejudice to judicial independence and differences in the organisation of the judiciary across the EU; calls on the Commission to expand EU-supported training programmes aligned with judicial best practice and calls on the Member States to ensure that frontline services have the capacity and resources to respond effectively to the needs of victims and survivors;survivors by securing mandatory training for all legal professionals and law enforcement staff in contact with victims of rape;

17 unchanged paragraphs

17. Calls on the Member States to ensure that health professionals, including paediatricians, gynaecologists, obstetricians, midwives and psychological support staff, receive targeted training to identify and address, in an intersectional manner, the physical, psychological and sexual consequences of rape in survivors;

18. Calls on the Member States to increase cooperation between law enforcement authorities, judicial authorities, civil society, community-based organisations, the EIGE and other relevant specialised actors on the development of training, in particular on harmful gender stereotypes, intersectional discrimination and misconceptions, myths and stereotypes about rape, all of which still hinder the implementation of consent-based rape legislation; highlights that police officers and judges with increased knowledge and skills to understand and respect all survivors of sexual violence, contribute to lower under-reporting and minimise revictimisation while also creating a safer environment for survivors; further calls on the Member States to ensure that training for members of the judiciary and legal and law enforcement professionals follows international human rights standards and case-law with respect to rape;

19. Calls on the Member States to develop and issue, in consultation with civil society organisations and women’s specialist services, specialised and gender-sensitive guidelines for relevant authorities, including judges that are involved in criminal and, where relevant, civil proceedings relating to the crime of rape; underlines that these guidelines must provide instructions on how to treat victims in a trauma- and gender-sensitive manner, identify and avoid gender stereotypes, and ensure that victims, including those experiencing intersectional discrimination, are respected and protected from secondary victimisation and revictimisation; underlines, furthermore, that the guidelines must include instructions on how to refer victims to specialist support services, including medical services, to ensure that they receive appropriate treatment; calls for the guidelines to be regularly reviewed and updated in collaboration with civil society organisations and women’s specialist services in order to ensure their effectiveness and secure the best possible outcomes for victims, as well as ending the systemic and structural deficiencies that foster a societal sense of impunity for rape and allow the perpetrators of sexual violence to go unpunished;

20. Notes that legislative reform must be complemented by educational measures aimed at fostering behavioural change and increasing understanding of the importance of consent in sexual relationships; calls for the Commission to put forward, in 2026, EU guidelines, accessible in all 24 EU languages, on gender-sensitive, intersectional and comprehensive consent-based sexuality and relationships education, which should be aimed at challenging gender stereotypes, stressing the structural nature of gender inequality and its presence in sexuality and relationships, promoting non-violent behaviour, and working towards ultimately eradicating gender-based violence, including rape, inequality and discrimination; further calls on the Commission to closely monitor the Member States’ implementation of these guidelines and publish an assessment thereof before the end of the current term; calls, therefore, on the Member States to ensure the inclusion of age-appropriate comprehensive sexuality and relationships education in national educational curricula;

21. Underlines the critical role of public awareness-raising campaigns and prevention programmes in addressing rape myths and promoting a culture of consent, especially among young people, given that the continued absence of sexuality education fuels misinformation and harmful stereotypes; calls on the Commission to carry out EU-wide public awareness-raising campaigns to educate people about consent, relationships, sexual integrity and bodily autonomy and to counter myths surrounding rape; further calls on the Commission to develop campaigns that combat anti-gender content and incel propaganda online, which particularly target young men, normalise sexual violence and perpetuate harmful gender stereotypes that contribute to the prevalent complex set of beliefs and social norms that encourage male sexual aggression and support violence against women, creating an environment in which sexual violence is normalised and justified through persistent gender inequalities and harmful attitudes about gender and sexuality;

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the Member States comply with Article 35 of Directive (EU) 2024/1385 on combating violence against women and domestic violence by adopting and regularly carrying out evidence- and consent-based education initiatives, awareness-raising campaigns and measures aimed at fostering behavioural change and understanding that recognises consent as freely given, mutual and fully grounded in the principles of bodily autonomy and sexual integrity; calls on the Commission to closely monitor the Member States’ transposition of that directive, and particularly of Article 35 thereof;

23. Invites the Member States to adapt their legislation regarding the limitation period for rape offences, given that lack of consent is the central element of these offences and many victims are only able to recognise, name or report the facts after a significant lapse of time, often because of trauma, fear, social pressure or a lack of knowledge of the dynamics of consent; stresses, therefore, the need to extend the statute of limitations in order to guarantee effective access to justice in line with fundamental rights; recalls that Parliament recently called on the Member States to ensure that no limitation period applies to the offences referred to in Articles 3 and 9 of the Child Sexual Abuse Directive; stresses that excessively short limitation periods prevent victims from seeking justice and undermine their protection; calls on the Member States to address the root causes of under-reporting and ensure that limitation periods do not prevent the effective prosecution of rape offences;

24. Calls on the Member States to ensure the provision of effective reparation, including compensation, for all victims of gender-based violence, including sexual violence, in accordance with national law; recalls that such reparation should be adequate, without delay, holistic and proportionate to the gravity of the harm suffered and should take into consideration the risks of intersectional discrimination;

25. Requests that the Member States take appropriate measures to ensure that programmes for offenders are available to those who are referred or self-refer, including outside of the criminal justice system, and that immediate access to support is available, recognising their role in preventing future gender-based violence, breaking the silence around rape, and eradicating the prevalent complex of beliefs and social norms that encourage male sexual aggression and support violence against women, creating an environment in which sexual violence is normalised and justified through persistent gender inequalities and harmful attitudes about gender and sexuality in our society;

26. Strongly supports civil society and survivors of rape in breaking the silence around rape; acknowledges that pressure from civil society and survivors of rape has been the main driving force in pushing for legislative changes in the Member States; recalls the importance of the right to peaceful assembly in bringing about societal changes and pushing for consent-based rape legislation;

27. Recognises the crucial role played by non-governmental organisations and women’s specialist services, including women’s support centres, women’s shelters, helplines, rape crisis centres, sexual violence referral centres and primary prevention services, in providing advice and support for victims; calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide adequate funding to ensure the maintenance and development of such services; demands strengthened support for these civil society organisations and women’s rights defenders, through increased and earmarked financial support in the EU budget;

28. Stresses the need for strong and sustainable partnerships with grassroots organisations and women’s rights defenders, particularly in countries where the civic space is under threat and backlash against gender equality and sexual and reproductive rights is increasing;

29. Emphasises the importance of strengthening the implementation, enforcement and monitoring of legislation on sexual violence and rape, and calls for the development of EU-wide benchmarks and indicators to assess effectiveness and impact;

30. Underlines the role of the EU in strengthening cooperation with UN agencies, such as UN Women and UN Population Fund, and international partners, including the Council of Europe, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, in advancing gender equality and combating sexual and gender-based violence within the framework of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the Beijing Platform for Action and the International Conference on Population and Development Programme of Action;

31. Encourages continued dialogue and cooperation between the EU institutions, the Member States, and civil society in ensuring that sexual violence is addressed not only as an individual act of harm, but also as a manifestation of broader gender inequality and structural discrimination;

32. Calls on the Member States to ensure that established systems for data collection on gender-based violence cover the collection, development, production and dissemination of statistics on rape, including disaggregated data on, but not limited to, gender, age group (child/adult), the racial and ethnic origins of the victim and of the perpetrator, and the relationship between the victim and the perpetrator; requests that EIGE and FRA support the monitoring process and further contribute to data collection and research on all forms of gender-based violence, including rape;

33. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Changes between A-10-2026-0047 and TA-10-2026-0120”. Text, 28 April 2026. from A-10-2026-0047, to TA-10-2026-0120, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0047/compare/TA-10-2026-0120?all=1&part=2 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2026-04-28,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-10-2026-0047 and TA-10-2026-0120}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0047/compare/TA-10-2026-0120?all=1&part=2}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0047/compare/TA-10-2026-0120?all=1&part=2},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-10-2026-0047, to TA-10-2026-0120, reference 2025/2040(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}