Text · Amendment list
The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies
Report A-10-2025-0269-AM-030-035 · 2025/2079(INL)
- Kind
- Amendment list A-10-2025-0269-AM-030-035
- Date
- 14 January 2026
- Dossier
- 2025/2079(INL)
More facts (2)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Reference
- 2025/2079(INL)
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
Jump to an amendment (6)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to Articles 50 and 114(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, | – having regard to Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C a. whereas Europe’s lack of competitiveness and attractiveness stems from the significant regulatory burdens imposed on European companies under the Green Deal; ; whereas it is necessary for the Commission to pursue real simplification rather than considering harmonising all the social, fiscal and statutory rules applicable to companies; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| E a. whereas such harmonised rules on company law, social law and taxation are particularly sensitive issues for Member States; whereas a unified European corporate law system in these areas must respect the principle of sovereignty by guaranteeing unanimous voting in the Council; whereas Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union is therefore the only appropriate legal basis for ensuring that the various national interests are respected; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Stresses that a 28th regime must be ambitious in substance and in form; underlines that the rules concerning the 28th regime must be the same throughout the entire Union and that Member States should not be allowed to maintain or introduce, in their national law, provisions which diverge from those laid down in the legal act on the 28th regime; considers the use of a regulation as the most appropriate measure to introduce a 28th regime; acknowledges that a maximum harmonisation directive could serve the same objective; is opposed to using Article 352(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) as a legal basis because it requires unanimity in the Council, which could significantly delay the adoption of the legal act on the 28th regime and jeopardise the ambition and coherence of the corporate form adopted under the 28th regime; insists on the use of a legal basis that will make it possible to adopt the legal act on the 28th regime in the Council by qualified majority; considers, therefore, that the 28th regime might have to consist of a package of separate legislative proposals; acknowledges that the appropriate legal basis for corporate law matters is Article 50 and 114(1) TFEU; is of the opinion that a directive on the 28th regime needs to be a maximum harmonisation directive in order to achieve the objectives of the 28th regime; | 2. Stresses that a 28th regime must not impede the national sovereignty of Member States; is in favor of using Article 352(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) as a legal basis because it requires unanimity in the Council, which is the only legal basis that respect the principle of sovereignty as it requires unanimity in the Council; is opposed to the use of a legal basis that will make it possible to adopt the legal act on the 28th regime in the Council by qualified majority; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 37. Considers that an alternative dispute resolution mechanism should be established for disputes relating to S.EU s to ensure fast and specialised dispute resolution; further believes that Member States should consider introducing a special panel within their national courts dedicated to disputes between companies relating to S.EU s and that it should be possible for such special panels to conduct the dispute resolution in English; | deleted |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 40. Requests that the Commission submit, by the first quarter of 2026 on the basis of Articles 50 and 114 TFEU, a proposal for a directive following the recommendations set out in the Annex hereto; | 40. Requests that the Commission refrain from presenting a legislative proposal scheduled for the first quarter of 2026; |
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “A10-0269/30 - Amendement 30 - Pascale Piera - au nom du groupe PfE - Rapport A10-0269/2025 - René Repasi - Le 28e régime: un nouveau cadre juridique pour les entreprises innovantes - (2025/2079(INL))”. Text, 14 January 2026. docId A-10-2025-0269-AM-030-035, reference A10-0269/2025. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0269-AM-030-035 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/A-10-2025-0269-AM-030-035 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-a-10-2025-0269-am-030-035,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{A10-0269/30 - Amendement 30 - Pascale Piera - au nom du groupe PfE - Rapport A10-0269/2025 - René Repasi - Le 28e régime: un nouveau cadre juridique pour les entreprises innovantes - (2025/2079(INL))}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-01-14},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0269-AM-030-035}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0269-AM-030-035},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId A-10-2025-0269-AM-030-035, reference A10-0269/2025. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}