Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from plenary report to adopted text
A-10-2025-0256 → TA-10-2026-0050
- From
- A-10-2025-0256 Plenary report of 9 Dec 2025
- To
- TA-10-2026-0050 Adopted text of 12 Feb 2026
- Changes
- 5 changes to the text
- Paragraphs
- +5 added · −21 removed · 4 changed
More facts (3)
- Dossier
- 2025/2133(INI)
- Title (from)
- on addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights
- Title (to)
- Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Drops calls for a framework directive and a framework to limit subcontracting chains, and removes the reference to joint liability.24 Removes the call for proposals in the quality jobs act and the call for a minimum EU framework for intermediaries.35 Adds details on registers, fees, and sanctions for labour intermediaries, and deletes two recitals on exploitative models.15
The notes class 5 changes as substance, 0 as formal, 0 as wording only.
Every difference
The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.
Part 3 of 3: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
RemovedEXPLANATORY STATEMENT
RemovedWorkers in sectors such as construction, agriculture, domestic work, transport and logistics, meat and food processing, cleaning services, hospitality and care work are the backbone of our economy. At the same time, in most European countries, these are sectors that are plagued by persistent levels of abuse, exploitation and fraudulent competition, harming workers as well as legitimate businesses, especially SMEs.
RemovedSeveral tragic workplace incidents in recent years across Member States have exposed the real human costs of losing control over who is ultimately responsible for ensuring compliance with basic health and safety and employment standards, raising fundamental concerns about legal accountability, traceability and control over working conditions.
RemovedAt the same time, Europol has warned that almost all of Europe’s most threatening criminal networks are using legal business structures to gain a foothold in the European economy, with logistics, cash-intensive businesses and construction being particularly affected.
RemovedIn today’s security landscape, the lack of oversight can also present opportunities for hostile actors seeking to gain information on, or disrupt, critical infrastructure, or gain access to security sensitive workplaces.
RemovedThere is not one single factor driving labour exploitation and the risks it represents to European workplaces. However, there are certain variables that keep recurring in national and European studies as well as in reports from enforcement authorities. One of those is the increasing reliance on long and complex subcontracting chains and the other is the presence of abusive labour intermediation. Together these two interconnected practices make it more difficult for authorities to prevent and detect fraudulent or criminal actors from entering a workplace.
RemovedFor many workers and businesses on the ground, this does not come as a surprise. The rise of workplaces without adequate control and where responsibility is divided up, diluted and pushed downstream has been the source of discontent for many years.
RemovedIn response to these challenges, Member States have tried to step up, tightening controls and taking action to prevent the most common forms of abuse. They have made efforts to limit long subcontracting chains, strengthen liability requirements, increase information exchange and set up specific control units focusing on detecting and rooting out labour exploitation and abuse. National and sectoral social partners have also stepped up to the challenge and taken autonomous initiatives to help clean up their sectors as well as jointly pushed their governments to do more. It is clear these efforts have had important positive effects, but it is also clear it is not enough and that more needs to be done.
RemovedThe challenges are particularly felt when dealing with companies operating across borders, as cross-border cooperation between enforcement authorities, information exchange and legal frameworks have not kept pace with the developments on the ground. Without a united European response, it becomes easier for fraudulent and criminal actors to exploit weaknesses of the Single Market. There are also several instances where Member States have faced legal challenges when taking action against labour exploitation and to ensure fair competition, often with reference to Union law.
RemovedLabour exploitation in general, and abusive forms of subcontracting and labour intermediation in particular, therefore requires a coordinated response at European level.
RemovedA successful response to these challenges must mean making the business-models of fraudsters and criminals unprofitable, thus protecting workers and making life easier for all law-abiding businesses. This response should be based on three pillars:
Removed1. Prevention, making it as hard as possible to engage in fraudulent activities
Removed2. Control, making the risk of discovery as high as possible
Removed3. Sanctions, making sure the consequences are strongly felt by those who get caught
RemovedUltimately, I hope this report will provide an impetus for intensifying the fight against labour exploitation with a focus on abusive forms of subcontracting and labour intermediation, gathering broad support from across the political aisle and from social partners. While opinions may differ on the precise solutions, it is my sincere hope that we can all depart from the shared recognition that these problems on the European labour market are real, intensifying and in need of urgent attention.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0256/compare/TA-10-2026-0050?all=1&part=3
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 5 October 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “Changes between A-10-2025-0256 and TA-10-2026-0050”. Text, 12 February 2026. from A-10-2025-0256, to TA-10-2026-0050, reference 2025/2133(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0256/compare/TA-10-2026-0050?all=1&part=3 (retrieved 5 October 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2026-02-12,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between A-10-2025-0256 and TA-10-2026-0050}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-02-12},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0256/compare/TA-10-2026-0050?all=1&part=3}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0256/compare/TA-10-2026-0050?all=1&part=3},
urldate = {2026-10-05},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from A-10-2025-0256, to TA-10-2026-0050, reference 2025/2133(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}