Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-10-2025-0240 → TA-10-2025-0343

From
A-10-2025-0240 Plenary report of 25 Nov 2025
To
TA-10-2025-0343 Adopted text of 18 Dec 2025
Changes
None of substance
Paragraphs
+4 added · −7 removed · 2 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on the implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime
Title (to)
Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime

The two versions differ only in presentation: cover page, numbering, or the parts a report carries that the adopted text does not.

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 4 of 4: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedEXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedBackground

RemovedIn December 2020, as part of the legislative package on the EU’s Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2021-2027, the Parliament and the Council adopted a Regulation on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the EU budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law (the ‘Conditionality Regulation’). The rule of law conditionality mechanism forms part of the EU’s ‘rule of law toolbox’, which should ensure adherence of all Member States to the rule of law, which is one of the fundamental values enshrined in Article 2 TEU. The Conditionality Regulation is to protect the EU’s budget and financial interests in the case of breaches of the rule of law, which affect the financial management of the EU budget or the protection of the EU’s financial interests. Under the Regulation, the Commission is obliged to monitor the situation in all Member States. So far, the mechanism has only been triggered once, in December 2022 against Hungary. Following two reassessments of the situation by the Commission, the measures are still in place, and Hungary has already lost EUR 1 billion, which have been irreversibly decommitted.

RemovedAim and timing of the report

RemovedSince the conditionality mechanism has been in place for almost five years, it is an opportune moment for Parliament to assess its application and to draw lessons for the future, in particular in view of the forthcoming discussions on the post-2027 MFF. In this context, the co-rapporteurs wish to put particular emphasis on the transparency of the process, areas of applicability, revision of the guidelines, deterrent effect, and the scrutiny role of the Parliament.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Changes between A-10-2025-0240 and TA-10-2025-0343”. Text, 18 December 2025. from A-10-2025-0240, to TA-10-2025-0343, reference 2025/2061(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0240/compare/TA-10-2025-0343?all=1&part=4 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-12-18,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-10-2025-0240 and TA-10-2025-0343}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0240/compare/TA-10-2025-0343?all=1&part=4}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0240/compare/TA-10-2025-0343?all=1&part=4},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-10-2025-0240, to TA-10-2025-0343, reference 2025/2061(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}