Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-10-2025-0229 → TA-10-2025-0298

From
A-10-2025-0229 Plenary report of 12 Nov 2025
To
TA-10-2025-0298 Adopted text of 26 Nov 2025
Changes
48 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+4 added · −10 removed · 49 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic
Title (to)
EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The versions differ only in formal points: the paragraph labels are renumbered from a-av to a-av without changing the text.1234

The notes class 0 changes as substance, 48 as formal, 0 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 4 of 4: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedEXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedThe Arctic is rapidly becoming a strategic theatre of geopolitical competition, military build up, energy transformation, and global environmental change. This recommendation by the European Parliament underscores the urgent need for a robust, security-oriented EU strategy that ensures the Arctic remains governed by the principles of international law, sustainable principles, and peace.

RemovedSecurity concerns are intensifying. Russia’s continued military build-up, including the formation of a Maritime Collegium, has significantly escalated tensions. At the same time, China’s Polar Silk Road strategy increases its economic and technological footprint in the region. These developments call for stronger EU coordination with Member States and NATO allies to deter threats, defend common interests, and protect critical infrastructure—particularly submarine cables and pipelines essential for digital and energy connectivity. The EU must also enhance surveillance, resilience, and deterrence capabilities in close coordination with Arctic partners.

RemovedSustainable energy policies are important to EU-Arctic cooperation. The region provides critical resources for Europe’s strategic autonomy, including Norwegian LNG, Icelandic and Greenlandic renewables, and vast potential for green hydrogen production. Projects such as Polar Connect and Vision 2030 envision a digitally and energetically connected Arctic, directly tied to EU security and sustainability goals. Strengthening partnerships in this domain is key to reducing reliance on external authoritarian powers.

RemovedThe legal framework for Arctic governance must remain anchored in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The EU must resist unilateral claims, promote freedom of navigation, and support diplomatic engagement to uphold maritime law and environmental stewardship.

RemovedThe Parliament also highlights the shifting political momentum toward deeper EU integration in the Arctic. The doors of the EU are open for Iceland, Norway and Greenland to join the EU. The expected referendum in Iceland on EU accession by 2027 and increasing support in Greenland for closer ties—potentially including EU membership—creates a momentum for renewed engagement. The EU should express readiness to support these aspirations, respecting democratic will and offering concrete benefits through deeper political, economic, and security cooperation. Norway, as a critical energy and defence partner, should also be engaged on long-term strategic alignment and even accession, should political conditions evolve.

RemovedThe rights and knowledge of Arctic Indigenous Peoples must be protected and respected. They are essential stewards of the region’s ecosystems and must be fully included in decision-making processes. Their inclusion in international governance structures is not only a matter of justice, but also of policy effectiveness.

RemovedIn conclusion, the EU must seize this moment to assert a clear, values-based, and security-conscious Arctic strategy—anchored in international law, guided by sustainability, and open to deepening partnerships, including eventual EU enlargement in the region.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
5 October 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Changes between A-10-2025-0229 and TA-10-2025-0298”. Text, 26 November 2025. from A-10-2025-0229, to TA-10-2025-0298, reference 2025/2116(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0229/compare/TA-10-2025-0298?all=1&part=4 (retrieved 5 October 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-11-26,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-10-2025-0229 and TA-10-2025-0298}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0229/compare/TA-10-2025-0298?all=1&part=4}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0229/compare/TA-10-2025-0298?all=1&part=4},
  urldate = {2026-10-05},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-10-2025-0229, to TA-10-2025-0298, reference 2025/2116(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}