Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
▸Jump to an amendment (7)
Alexander Jungbluth, Stanisław Tyszka
on behalf of the ESN Group
Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec
(11216/2025 – C10-0206/2025 – 2025/0210(BUD))
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution16. Is concerned by the fact that part of the EURI financing needs in 2026 is in fact due to the liquidity management cost of 2025; further notes that, for the first time, liquidity management costs have increased significantly due to delays and unpredictability of payment requests as the implementation of the recovery and resilience plans is slowing down in some Member States; underlines that the liquidity management costs are an additional burden in a context of extremely scarce resources; stresses that the currently estimated liquidity management cost of EUR 300 million for 2026 would consume approximately half of the overall availabilities (including margins and special instruments) of the DB without assurances that this is the most efficient and prudent way to manage the unpredictability of payment needs for the RRF; requests in this context that the liquidity management cost is isolated in a separate new budget line for transparency purposes; considers that this cost was never intended by the co-legislator to be included in the amounts subject to the 50 % benchmark within the cascade mechanism agreed during the MFF revision and further clarified in the 2025 conciliation; argues therefore that it should be financed solely from the decommitment compartment of the EURI instrument; | Amendment16. Is seriously concerned that part of EURI's financial needs in 2026 are in fact due to liquidity management costs in 2025; notes that, for the first time, liquidity management costs have increased significantly due to delays in payment requests; stresses that liquidity management costs represent an additional burden in a context of extremely limited resources; regrets that the currently estimated liquidity management costs of EUR 300 million for 2026 would consume around half of the total available funds (including margins and special instruments) in the general budget; In this context, requests that liquidity management costs be separated into a new budget line in order to ensure increased transparency; is firmly convinced that the Commission should find additional resources within existing revenues by proposing cuts in non-essential programmes, rather than introducing new own resources such as the ETS2 system, which will drastically increase the cost of living for Union citizens; |
Sarah Knafo, Alexander Jungbluth, Stanisław Tyszka
on behalf of the ESN Group
Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sections
(11216/2025 – C10-0206/2025 – 2025/0210(BUD))
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment43a. Considers that environmental conditionality has distorted the purpose of the CAP while placing an unjustified bureaucratic burden on farmers; calls for a return to a policy geared towards production and food sovereignty; |
Sarah Knafo, Alexander Jungbluth, Stanisław Tyszka
on behalf of the ESN Group
Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sections
(11216/2025 – C10-0206/2025 – 2025/0210(BUD))
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment43b. Expresses concern about the decline in farmers' incomes and agricultural production in several Member States; believes that farmers should have more freedom to operate and be subject to fewer controls; |
Alexander Jungbluth, Stanisław Tyszka, Sarah Knafo, Stanislav Stoyanov
on behalf of the ESN Group
Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sections
(11216/2025 – C10-0206/2025 – 2025/0210(BUD))
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment54a. Demands appropriate funding for external physical barriers at the Union border; |
Alexander Jungbluth, Stanisław Tyszka, Sarah Knafo, Christine Anderson
on behalf of the ESN Group
Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sections
(11216/2025 – C10-0206/2025 – 2025/0210(BUD))
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment54b. Notes the increasing trend to look into offshoring parts of the Union migration policy; calls on the institutions to explore the idea of developing return hubs outside the Union, and, if necessary, to dedicate appropriate funding to the project |
Alexander Jungbluth, Stanisław Tyszka
on behalf of the ESN Group
Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sections
(11216/2025 – C10-0206/2025 – 2025/0210(BUD))
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment54c. Underlines the failure of Union policies to prevent migration flows and human trafficking; reiterates its concerns about the role played by instruments such as the Internal Security Fund and the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund in the management of the effects of the migration and refugee crisis; stresses that the allocations should be devolved to repatriation and border security; |
Sarah Knafo, Alexander Jungbluth, Stanisław Tyszka
on behalf of the ESN Group
Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sections
(11216/2025 – C10-0206/2025 – 2025/0210(BUD))
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment65a. Considers that foreign development aid spendings are unacceptable to Union taxpayers who are already burdened with high taxes and facing increasing economic difficulties. |