Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from plenary report to adopted text
A-10-2025-0093 → TA-10-2025-0130
- From
- A-10-2025-0093 Plenary report of 20 May 2025
- To
- TA-10-2025-0130 Adopted text of 18 Jun 2025
- Changes
- 2 changes to the text
- Paragraphs
- +4 added · −13 removed · 3 changed
More facts (3)
- Dossier
- 2025/2020(INI)
- Title (from)
- on the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Montenegro
- Title (to)
- 2023 and 2024 reports on Montenegro
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Every difference
The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.
Part 3 of 3: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
RemovedEXPLANATORY STATEMENT
RemovedThe report reflects the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Montenegro, assessing the progress Montenegro has made in its accession path over the last two years. It mainly focuses on Montenegro’s commitment to the accession process, democracy and rule of law, fundamental freedoms, human rights and socio-economic reforms.
RemovedMontenegro is a nation with a rich, albeit sometimes turbulent, history and the country’s present political and social reality remains deeply shaped by it. Though there is no need to revisit past events, they are to be continually kept in mind.
RemovedMontenegro finds itself in a familiar political scenario: a single party governed for three decades, playing a pivotal role in securing the nation’s independence and its accession to NATO. However, this long-standing governance also left behind numerous unresolved challenges, many of which it either failed to address or, in some instances, actively contributed to creating. The current ruling coalition is highly diverse, necessitating significant coordination and, consequently, the acceptance of various compromises. Thus, it would be inaccurate to claim that Montenegro lacks a functioning democracy. Moreover, the country’s media landscape displays a level of plurality that far exceeds what is observed elsewhere in the region.
RemovedIn 2024, the ruling coalition, working constructively with the parliamentary opposition, made considerable progress by passing legislation essential for closing key negotiation chapters. Montenegro has successfully concluded three out of the four anticipated chapters—an achievement that should not be underestimated. The remaining chapter is temporarily stalled due to objections from Croatia, yet it remains firmly on the table.
RemovedHistory is particularly relevant to this unresolved chapter, as it is deeply rooted in the historical context of both neighbouring countries. The rapporteur is confident that it will ultimately be resolved in accordance with European values—the very foundation of the European Union and its raison d’être.
RemovedThe ruling coalition has reaffirmed its commitment to enacting the necessary legislative changes to advance Montenegro’s alignment with the European Union, thereby facilitating the completion of the negotiation process. Public opinion surveys consistently indicate strong support for EU accession among Montenegrin citizens. This widespread approval serves as an additional impetus for the authorities to persist in implementing the reforms and legislative measures required for this process.
RemovedFor the state to function effectively, local governance must operate efficiently. However, the current electoral legislation, which allows municipal elections to be held on different dates rather than on a single nationwide election day, hinders this efficiency. This inconsistency generates political tensions that, given the country’s size and population, have broader ramifications at the national level. Additionally, it undermines the operational effectiveness of both municipal and state governance. Amendments to the electoral legislation should be introduced to rectify these inconsistencies and address other outstanding issues related to the electoral process.
RemovedIt is crucial to address the judiciary, which must be firmly established as an independent branch of power, particularly given that one of Montenegro’s major challenges is combating crime and corruption. However, it would be unfair to claim that this issue is unique to Montenegro, as no country is immune to such challenges. There are, however, differences in how countries approach and address these issues. The Rapporteur recognises a high level of awareness regarding these challenges in Montenegro, which is a positive and encouraging sign.
RemovedThe Rapporteur’s overall assessment is that there is no shortage of political will to continue on the European path. However, it is imperative to ensure that the daily fluctuations of political life do not obstruct the enactment of essential legislation required to complete the negotiation process. The legislation must be both as effective as possible and must not succumb to the temptation of being merely “cosmetic.”
RemovedAbove all, Montenegro should draw strength from its rich and proud history, recognising the considerable progress it has made. As an independent and sovereign state, it should move forward without any unnecessary complex of smallness. It has every opportunity to join the EU within the current mandate of the European institutions.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0093/compare/TA-10-2025-0130?all=1&part=3
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 29 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “Changes between A-10-2025-0093 and TA-10-2025-0130”. Text, 18 June 2025. from A-10-2025-0093, to TA-10-2025-0130, reference 2025/2020(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0093/compare/TA-10-2025-0130?all=1&part=3 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-06-18,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between A-10-2025-0093 and TA-10-2025-0130}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-06-18},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0093/compare/TA-10-2025-0130?all=1&part=3}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0093/compare/TA-10-2025-0130?all=1&part=3},
urldate = {2026-09-29},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from A-10-2025-0093, to TA-10-2025-0130, reference 2025/2020(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}