Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-10-2025-0072 → TA-10-2025-0093

From
A-10-2025-0072 Plenary report of 16 Apr 2025
To
TA-10-2025-0093 Adopted text of 7 May 2025
Changes
9 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+11 added · −7 removed · 4 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Serbia
Title (to)
2023 and 2024 reports on Serbia
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds several paragraphs condemning violence, pressure on academics, and detention of activists, and updates the government change and victim count.2345 The other change is formal: a decimal separator is corrected.1

The notes class 8 changes as substance, 1 as formal, 0 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 4 of 4: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedEXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedThis report provides Parliament’s response to the 2023 and 2024 European Commission Reports on Serbia, reflecting recent events in the country marked by concerns over the state of democracy and the rule of law.

RemovedSerbia has been advancing towards EU accession since 2012, when it received candidate country status. Since the opening of Serbia’s accession negotiations in January 2014, 22 out of 35 chapters have been opened. All chapters in cluster 1 on the fundamentals and all chapters in cluster 4 on the Green agenda and sustainable connectivity have been opened. Two chapters have provisionally been closed. In June 2021, Serbia accepted the revised enlargement methodology.

RemovedDespite some progress in negotiations, Serbia still has major hurdles to overcome: improving internal political dialogue, rule of law and anti-corruption reforms, reaching a comprehensive normalisation agreement with Kosovo, and full alignment with EU foreign policy.

RemovedEnsuring the independence of key institutions, including media regulators such as the Regulatory Authority for Electronic Media (REM), and full implementation of all outstanding and recent recommendations by the OSCE/ODIHR and the Council of Europe bodies on electoral reform in a transparent and inclusive process and well ahead of any new elections, remain of critical importance.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Changes between A-10-2025-0072 and TA-10-2025-0093”. Text, 7 May 2025. from A-10-2025-0072, to TA-10-2025-0093, reference 2025/2022(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0072/compare/TA-10-2025-0093?all=1&part=4 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-05-07,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-10-2025-0072 and TA-10-2025-0093}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0072/compare/TA-10-2025-0093?all=1&part=4}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0072/compare/TA-10-2025-0093?all=1&part=4},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-10-2025-0072, to TA-10-2025-0093, reference 2025/2022(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}