Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members
Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

2024 (from July): 66 final votes with named positions — 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 93.9 % (714 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

729 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Lukas MANDL AustriaEPP90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %78.3 % of 60−17.0 pts median 95.3 %2 of 48 5.0 % of 60
Lukas SIEPER changed group GermanyRenew100.0 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 0.0 % of 66
Łukasz KOHUT PolandEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %86.2 % of 65−9.2 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 65
Luke Ming FLANAGAN IrelandThe Left93.9 % of 66±0.0 pts median 93.9 %85.5 % of 62−1.0 pts median 86.5 %5.7 % of 5317.7 % of 62
Lynn BOYLAN IrelandThe Left98.5 % of 66+4.5 pts median 93.9 %86.2 % of 65−0.4 pts median 86.5 %7.1 % of 5613.8 % of 65
Maciej WĄSIK PolandECR97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %95.2 % of 63+3.1 pts median 92.1 %1.8 % of 564.7 % of 64
Magdalena ADAMOWICZ PolandEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %87.7 % of 65−7.7 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 65
Majdouline SBAI FranceGreens98.5 % of 66+1.5 pts median 97.0 %98.5 % of 65+1.6 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 610.0 % of 65
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA PolandECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 65+1.7 pts median 92.1 %1.8 % of 576.1 % of 66
Malik AZMANI NetherlandsRenew98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %93.5 % of 62+2.6 pts median 90.9 %5.5 % of 551.5 % of 65
Malika SOREL changed group FranceNo group97.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 93.9 %93.8 % of 64+8.8 pts median 85.0 %5.4 % of 5618.8 % of 64
Manfred WEBER GermanyEPP77.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 92.4 %98.0 % of 51+2.7 pts median 95.3 %0 of 40 0.0 % of 51
Manon AUBRY FranceThe Left93.9 % of 66±0.0 pts median 93.9 %95.2 % of 62+8.6 pts median 86.5 %0.0 % of 546.5 % of 62
Manuela RIPA GermanyEPP72.7 % of 66−19.7 pts median 92.4 %37 of 48 — median 95.3 %1 of 37 0 of 48
Maravillas ABADÍA JOVER SpainEPP92.4 % of 66±0.0 pts median 92.4 %98.4 % of 61+3.0 pts median 95.3 %2.0 % of 500.0 % of 61
Marc ANGEL LuxembourgS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %98.5 % of 66+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.5 % of 661.5 % of 66
Marc BOTENGA BelgiumThe Left89.4 % of 66−4.5 pts median 93.9 %76.3 % of 59−10.2 pts median 86.5 %17.3 % of 5220.3 % of 59
Marc JONGEN GermanyESN48.5 % of 66−42.4 pts median 90.9 %31 of 31 — median 94.4 %0 of 31 5 of 32
Marcin SYPNIEWSKI PolandESN92.4 % of 66+1.5 pts median 90.9 %86.9 % of 61−7.6 pts median 94.4 %7.1 % of 5621.3 % of 61
Marco FALCONE ItalyEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %96.9 % of 64+1.5 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 531.6 % of 64
Marco SQUARTA ItalyECR87.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 92.4 %93.0 % of 57+0.9 pts median 92.1 %0 of 49 10.3 % of 58
Marco TARQUINIO ItalyS&D95.5 % of 66±0.0 pts median 95.5 %93.7 % of 63−4.6 pts median 98.3 %6.3 % of 634.8 % of 63
Marcos ROS SEMPERE SpainS&D98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %98.5 % of 65+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.5 % of 650.0 % of 65
Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN SpainPatriots98.5 % of 66+4.5 pts median 93.9 %66.2 % of 65−18.8 pts median 85.0 %30.9 % of 5515.4 % of 65
Maria GRAPINI RomaniaS&D92.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 95.5 %93.4 % of 61−4.8 pts median 98.3 %6.6 % of 613.3 % of 61
Maria GUZENINA FinlandS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 66+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 660.0 % of 66
Maria NOICHL GermanyS&D98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %98.5 % of 65+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.5 % of 650.0 % of 65
Maria OHISALO FinlandGreens100.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 97.0 %98.5 % of 66+1.7 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 620.0 % of 66
Maria WALSH IrelandEPP72.7 % of 66−19.7 pts median 92.4 %46 of 48 — median 95.3 %2 of 37 1 of 48
Maria ZACHARIA GreeceNo group100.0 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 19.7 % of 66
Marianne VIND DenmarkS&D77.3 % of 66−18.2 pts median 95.5 %92.2 % of 51−6.1 pts median 98.3 %7.8 % of 513.9 % of 51
Mariateresa VIVALDINI ItalyECR98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %81.3 % of 64−10.9 pts median 92.1 %14.3 % of 569.2 % of 65
Marie DAUCHY FrancePatriots100.0 % of 66+6.1 pts median 93.9 %98.5 % of 66+13.5 pts median 85.0 %0.0 % of 5615.2 % of 66
Marie TOUSSAINT FranceGreens97.0 % of 66±0.0 pts median 97.0 %98.4 % of 64+1.6 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 610.0 % of 64
Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN GermanyRenew87.9 % of 66−7.6 pts median 95.5 %89.1 % of 55−1.8 pts median 90.9 %5 of 48 1.7 % of 58
Marie-Luce BRASIER-CLAIN FrancePatriots98.5 % of 66+4.5 pts median 93.9 %98.5 % of 65+13.5 pts median 85.0 %0.0 % of 5615.4 % of 65
Marieke EHLERS NetherlandsPatriots100.0 % of 66+6.1 pts median 93.9 %74.2 % of 66−10.7 pts median 85.0 %19.6 % of 5621.2 % of 66
Marina KALJURAND EstoniaS&D39.4 % of 66−56.1 pts median 95.5 %18 of 26 — median 98.3 %8 of 26 0 of 26
Marina MESURE FranceThe Left98.5 % of 66+4.5 pts median 93.9 %95.4 % of 65+8.9 pts median 86.5 %0.0 % of 567.7 % of 65
Mario FURORE ItalyThe Left90.9 % of 66−3.0 pts median 93.9 %86.7 % of 60+0.2 pts median 86.5 %5.8 % of 526.7 % of 60
Mario MANTOVANI ItalyECR74.2 % of 66−18.2 pts median 92.4 %46 of 49 — median 92.1 %0 of 42 3 of 49
Marion MARÉCHAL FranceECR81.8 % of 66−10.6 pts median 92.4 %69.8 % of 53−22.3 pts median 92.1 %12 of 46 11.1 % of 54
Marion WALSMANN GermanyEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %98.5 % of 65+3.1 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 65
Marit MAIJ NetherlandsS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 66+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 660.0 % of 66
Mariusz KAMIŃSKI PolandECR97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %93.7 % of 63+1.5 pts median 92.1 %1.8 % of 556.3 % of 64
Marjan ŠAREC SloveniaRenew90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %93.0 % of 57+2.1 pts median 90.9 %0.0 % of 510.0 % of 60
Markéta GREGOROVÁ CzechiaGreens93.9 % of 66−3.0 pts median 97.0 %90.3 % of 62−6.5 pts median 96.8 %5.2 % of 581.6 % of 62
Marko VEŠLIGAJ CroatiaS&D89.2 % of 65−6.2 pts median 95.5 %98.3 % of 58±0.0 pts median 98.3 %1.7 % of 581.7 % of 58
Markus BUCHHEIT GermanyESN93.9 % of 66+3.0 pts median 90.9 %96.7 % of 61+2.3 pts median 94.4 %3.6 % of 5621.0 % of 62
Markus FERBER GermanyEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %85.9 % of 64−9.4 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 64
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.