Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members
Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

2024 (from July): 66 final votes with named positions — 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 93.9 % (714 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

729 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Karlo RESSLER CroatiaEPP69.7 % of 66−22.7 pts median 92.4 %36 of 46 — median 95.3 %0 of 35 0 of 46
Katarina BARLEY GermanyS&D50.0 % of 66−45.5 pts median 95.5 %32 of 33 — median 98.3 %1 of 33 1 of 33
Katarína ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ SlovakiaNo group100.0 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 16.7 % of 66
Kateřina KONEČNÁ CzechiaNo group87.9 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 6.9 % of 58
Kathleen FUNCHION IrelandThe Left98.5 % of 66+4.5 pts median 93.9 %86.2 % of 65−0.4 pts median 86.5 %7.1 % of 5613.8 % of 65
Kathleen VAN BREMPT BelgiumS&D89.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 95.5 %98.3 % of 59±0.0 pts median 98.3 %1.7 % of 591.7 % of 59
Katri KULMUNI FinlandRenew95.5 % of 66±0.0 pts median 95.5 %95.0 % of 60+4.1 pts median 90.9 %3.7 % of 541.6 % of 63
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN GermanyGreens95.5 % of 66−1.5 pts median 97.0 %96.8 % of 63±0.0 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 591.6 % of 63
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK NetherlandsGreens100.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 97.0 %95.5 % of 66−1.4 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 620.0 % of 66
Kinga GÁL HungaryPatriots68.2 % of 66−25.8 pts median 93.9 %37 of 45 — median 85.0 %5 of 42 4 of 45
Kinga KOLLÁR HungaryEPP62.1 % of 66−30.3 pts median 92.4 %27 of 41 — median 95.3 %4 of 31 14 of 41
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN DenmarkGreens100.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 97.0 %95.5 % of 66−1.4 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 620.0 % of 66
Klára DOBREV HungaryS&D59.1 % of 66−36.4 pts median 95.5 %38 of 39 — median 98.3 %1 of 39 0 of 39
Klara DOSTALOVA CzechiaPatriots97.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 93.9 %60.9 % of 64−24.0 pts median 85.0 %33.3 % of 5420.3 % of 64
Konstantinos ARVANITIS GreeceThe Left63.6 % of 66−30.3 pts median 93.9 %39 of 42 — median 86.5 %1 of 36 4 of 42
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI PolandECR87.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 92.4 %93.0 % of 57+0.9 pts median 92.1 %1 of 49 6.9 % of 58
Kostas PAPADAKIS GreeceNo group97.0 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 9.4 % of 64
Kris VAN DIJCK BelgiumECR89.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 92.4 %69.0 % of 58−23.2 pts median 92.1 %25.0 % of 5211.9 % of 59
Kristian VIGENIN BulgariaS&D60.6 % of 66−34.8 pts median 95.5 %34 of 40 — median 98.3 %6 of 40 3 of 40
Kristoffer STORM DenmarkECR75.8 % of 66−16.7 pts median 92.4 %26 of 49 — median 92.1 %16 of 41 8.0 % of 50
Krzysztof BREJZA PolandEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %86.2 % of 65−9.2 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 65
Krzysztof HETMAN PolandEPP81.8 % of 66−10.6 pts median 92.4 %85.2 % of 54−10.2 pts median 95.3 %0 of 43 0.0 % of 54
Krzysztof ŚMISZEK PolandS&D98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %98.5 % of 65+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.5 % of 650.0 % of 65
Lara MAGONI ItalyECR97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 64+1.6 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 569.4 % of 64
Lara WOLTERS NetherlandsS&D87.9 % of 66−7.6 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 58+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 580.0 % of 58
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA SpainS&D81.8 % of 66−13.6 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 54+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 54
Laurence FARRENG FranceRenew90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %91.2 % of 57+0.3 pts median 90.9 %0.0 % of 511.7 % of 60
Laurence TROCHU FranceECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %67.7 % of 65−24.4 pts median 92.1 %28.1 % of 5713.6 % of 66
Laurent CASTILLO changed group FrancePatriots80.3 % of 66−12.1 pts median 92.4 %73.6 % of 53−21.8 pts median 95.3 %4 of 42 9.4 % of 53
Lefteris NIKOLAOU-ALAVANOS GreeceNo group60.6 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 3 of 40
Leila CHAIBI FranceThe Left87.9 % of 66−6.1 pts median 93.9 %93.1 % of 58+6.6 pts median 86.5 %2.0 % of 515.2 % of 58
Leire PAJÍN SpainS&D98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 65+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 650.0 % of 65
Lena DÜPONT GermanyEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %98.4 % of 64+3.1 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 520.0 % of 64
Lena SCHILLING AustriaGreens90.9 % of 66−6.1 pts median 97.0 %93.3 % of 60−3.5 pts median 96.8 %5.4 % of 565.0 % of 60
Leoluca ORLANDO ItalyGreens92.4 % of 66−4.5 pts median 97.0 %88.5 % of 61−8.3 pts median 96.8 %5.3 % of 571.6 % of 61
Letizia MORATTI ItalyEPP63.6 % of 66−28.8 pts median 92.4 %40 of 42 — median 95.3 %0 of 32 0 of 42
Li ANDERSSON FinlandThe Left83.3 % of 66−10.6 pts median 93.9 %90.9 % of 55+4.4 pts median 86.5 %4 of 49 1.8 % of 55
Lídia PEREIRA PortugalEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %98.5 % of 66+3.1 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 540.0 % of 66
Liesbet SOMMEN BelgiumEPP69.7 % of 66−22.7 pts median 92.4 %46 of 46 — median 95.3 %0 of 35 0 of 46
Lina GÁLVEZ SpainS&D86.4 % of 66−9.1 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 57+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 570.0 % of 57
Liudas MAŽYLIS LithuaniaEPP18 of 18 — median 92.4 %16 of 18 — median 95.3 %1 of 17 1 of 18
Loránt VINCZE RomaniaEPP77.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 92.4 %86.3 % of 51−9.1 pts median 95.3 %4 of 47 9.8 % of 51
Loucas FOURLAS CyprusEPP59.1 % of 66−33.3 pts median 92.4 %31 of 39 — median 95.3 %0 of 29 0 of 39
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ SlovakiaRenew97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %90.2 % of 61−0.7 pts median 90.9 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 64
Ľuboš BLAHA SlovakiaNo group68.2 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 9 of 45
Lucia ANNUNZIATA ItalyS&D78.8 % of 66−16.7 pts median 95.5 %94.2 % of 52−4.0 pts median 98.3 %5.8 % of 523.8 % of 52
Lucia YAR SlovakiaRenew98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %90.3 % of 62−0.6 pts median 90.9 %0.0 % of 550.0 % of 65
Luděk NIEDERMAYER CzechiaEPP93.9 % of 66+1.5 pts median 92.4 %96.8 % of 62+1.4 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 500.0 % of 62
Ľudovít ÓDOR SlovakiaRenew98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %90.3 % of 62−0.6 pts median 90.9 %0.0 % of 550.0 % of 65
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS RomaniaNo group100.0 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 37.9 % of 66
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.