Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members
Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

2024 (from July): 66 final votes with named positions — 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 93.9 % (714 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

729 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Giuseppe MILAZZO ItalyECR53.0 % of 66−39.4 pts median 92.4 %30 of 34 — median 92.1 %0 of 27 5 of 35
Giusi PRINCI ItalyEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %95.3 % of 64±0.0 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 521.6 % of 64
Gordan BOSANAC CroatiaGreens98.5 % of 66+1.5 pts median 97.0 %98.5 % of 65+1.6 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 610.0 % of 65
Grégory ALLIONE FranceRenew83.3 % of 66−12.1 pts median 95.5 %98.2 % of 55+7.3 pts median 90.9 %0.0 % of 531.8 % of 55
Grzegorz BRAUN PolandNo group100.0 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 13.6 % of 66
Guillaume PELTIER FranceECR95.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 92.4 %69.4 % of 62−22.8 pts median 92.1 %27.3 % of 5512.7 % of 63
Günther SIDL AustriaS&D87.9 % of 66−7.6 pts median 95.5 %96.6 % of 58−1.7 pts median 98.3 %3.4 % of 581.7 % of 58
György HÖLVÉNYI HungaryPatriots43.9 % of 66−50.0 pts median 93.9 %26 of 29 — median 85.0 %0 of 26 2 of 29
Hana JALLOUL MURO SpainS&D92.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 61+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 610.0 % of 61
Hanna GEDIN SwedenThe Left98.5 % of 66+4.5 pts median 93.9 %87.7 % of 65+1.2 pts median 86.5 %5.4 % of 560.0 % of 65
Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ PolandEPP88.9 % of 54−3.5 pts median 92.4 %39 of 48 — median 95.3 %1 of 39 0 of 48
Hannah NEUMANN GermanyGreens92.4 % of 66−4.5 pts median 97.0 %100.0 % of 61+3.2 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 570.0 % of 61
Hannes HEIDE AustriaS&D92.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 95.5 %95.1 % of 61−3.2 pts median 98.3 %4.9 % of 613.3 % of 61
Hans NEUHOFF GermanyESN93.9 % of 66+3.0 pts median 90.9 %98.4 % of 61+3.9 pts median 94.4 %0.0 % of 5624.2 % of 62
Harald VILIMSKY AustriaPatriots89.4 % of 66−4.5 pts median 93.9 %76.3 % of 59−8.7 pts median 85.0 %18.0 % of 5015.3 % of 59
Hélder SOUSA SILVA PortugalEPP89.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 92.4 %98.3 % of 59+3.0 pts median 95.3 %1 of 48 0.0 % of 59
Heléne FRITZON SwedenS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %98.5 % of 66+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.5 % of 660.0 % of 66
Helmut BRANDSTÄTTER AustriaRenew87.9 % of 66−7.6 pts median 95.5 %96.4 % of 55+5.5 pts median 90.9 %1 of 49 1.7 % of 58
Henrik DAHL DenmarkEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %97.0 % of 66+1.6 pts median 95.3 %3.7 % of 541.5 % of 66
Herbert DORFMANN ItalyEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %97.0 % of 66+1.6 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 66
Hermann TERTSCH SpainPatriots68.2 % of 66−25.8 pts median 93.9 %35 of 45 — median 85.0 %7 of 40 7 of 45
Hilde VAUTMANS BelgiumRenew98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %95.2 % of 62+4.3 pts median 90.9 %1.8 % of 550.0 % of 65
Hildegard BENTELE GermanyEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %95.4 % of 65±0.0 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 530.0 % of 65
Hristo PETROV BulgariaRenew97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %88.5 % of 61−2.4 pts median 90.9 %0.0 % of 544.7 % of 64
Idoia MENDIA SpainS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 64+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 640.0 % of 64
Ignazio Roberto MARINO ItalyGreens95.5 % of 66−1.5 pts median 97.0 %93.7 % of 63−3.2 pts median 96.8 %1.7 % of 600.0 % of 63
Ilaria SALIS ItalyThe Left87.9 % of 66−6.1 pts median 93.9 %91.4 % of 58+4.9 pts median 86.5 %3.9 % of 5110.3 % of 58
Ilhan KYUCHYUK BulgariaRenew81.8 % of 66−13.6 pts median 95.5 %84.3 % of 51−6.6 pts median 90.9 %2 of 44 3.7 % of 54
Ilia LAZAROV BulgariaEPP69.7 % of 66−22.7 pts median 92.4 %36 of 46 — median 95.3 %1 of 36 3 of 46
Inese VAIDERE LatviaEPP69.7 % of 66−22.7 pts median 92.4 %38 of 46 — median 95.3 %0 of 35 0 of 46
Ingeborg TER LAAK NetherlandsEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %96.9 % of 65+1.6 pts median 95.3 %3.8 % of 531.5 % of 65
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN RomaniaEPP51.5 % of 66−40.9 pts median 92.4 %32 of 34 — median 95.3 %0 of 30 0 of 34
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ SpainS&D90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 60+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 600.0 % of 60
Irena JOVEVA SloveniaRenew78.8 % of 66−16.7 pts median 95.5 %43 of 49 — median 90.9 %1 of 43 1.9 % of 52
Irene MONTERO SpainThe Left78.8 % of 66−15.2 pts median 93.9 %82.7 % of 52−3.8 pts median 86.5 %4 of 45 7.7 % of 52
Irene TINAGLI ItalyS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 64+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 640.0 % of 64
Irmhild BOSSDORF GermanyESN78.8 % of 66−12.1 pts median 90.9 %98.1 % of 52+3.6 pts median 94.4 %0 of 47 21.2 % of 52
Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA SpainEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %97.0 % of 66+1.6 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 540.0 % of 66
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ SpainThe Left98.5 % of 66+4.5 pts median 93.9 %81.5 % of 65−5.0 pts median 86.5 %10.7 % of 5610.8 % of 65
Isabel WISELER-LIMA LuxembourgEPP77.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 92.4 %94.1 % of 51−1.2 pts median 95.3 %1 of 48 0.0 % of 51
Isabella LÖVIN SwedenGreens92.4 % of 66−4.5 pts median 97.0 %93.4 % of 61−3.4 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 571.6 % of 61
Isabella TOVAGLIERI ItalyPatriots80.3 % of 66−13.6 pts median 93.9 %86.8 % of 53+1.8 pts median 85.0 %2 of 46 9.4 % of 53
Isabelle LE CALLENNEC FranceEPP90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %71.7 % of 60−23.7 pts median 95.3 %5 of 48 13.3 % of 60
Isilda GOMES PortugalS&D95.5 % of 66±0.0 pts median 95.5 %96.8 % of 63−1.5 pts median 98.3 %3.2 % of 630.0 % of 63
Iuliu WINKLER RomaniaEPP90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %86.7 % of 60−8.7 pts median 95.3 %5 of 48 8.3 % of 60
Ivan DAVID CzechiaESN98.5 % of 66+7.6 pts median 90.9 %70.3 % of 64−24.1 pts median 94.4 %23.7 % of 5929.2 % of 65
Ivars IJABS LatviaRenew59.1 % of 66−36.4 pts median 95.5 %30 of 36 — median 90.9 %2 of 30 0 of 39
Ivaylo VALCHEV BulgariaECR98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %90.6 % of 64−1.5 pts median 92.1 %5.4 % of 5612.3 % of 65
Jaak MADISON EstoniaECR92.4 % of 66±0.0 pts median 92.4 %65.0 % of 60−27.1 pts median 92.1 %32.7 % of 5213.1 % of 61
Jacek OZDOBA PolandECR90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %88.1 % of 59−4.0 pts median 92.1 %7.7 % of 5210.0 % of 60
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.