Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members
Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

2024 (from July): 66 final votes with named positions — 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 93.9 % (714 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

729 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Estelle CEULEMANS BelgiumS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %92.2 % of 64−6.1 pts median 98.3 %7.8 % of 640.0 % of 64
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA SpainEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %96.9 % of 65+1.6 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 541.5 % of 65
Estrella GALÁN SpainThe Left92.4 % of 66−1.5 pts median 93.9 %91.8 % of 61+5.3 pts median 86.5 %1.9 % of 538.2 % of 61
Eszter LAKOS HungaryEPP62.1 % of 66−30.3 pts median 92.4 %28 of 41 — median 95.3 %4 of 32 13 of 41
Eugen TOMAC RomaniaRenew50.0 % of 66−45.5 pts median 95.5 %32 of 33 — median 90.9 %0 of 31 0 of 33
Eva MAYDELL BulgariaEPP63.6 % of 66−28.8 pts median 92.4 %33 of 42 — median 95.3 %1 of 33 0 of 42
Evelyn REGNER AustriaS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %95.5 % of 66−2.8 pts median 98.3 %4.5 % of 664.5 % of 66
Evin INCIR SwedenS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %97.0 % of 66−1.3 pts median 98.3 %3.0 % of 661.5 % of 66
Ewa KOPACZ PolandEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %87.9 % of 66−7.5 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 66
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group PolandPatriots90.9 % of 66±0.0 pts median 90.9 %80.0 % of 60−14.4 pts median 94.4 %14.5 % of 5526.7 % of 60
Fabienne KELLER FranceRenew97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %90.2 % of 61−0.7 pts median 90.9 %0.0 % of 543.1 % of 64
Fabio DE MASI GermanyNo group100.0 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 13.6 % of 66
Fabrice LEGGERI FrancePatriots100.0 % of 66+6.1 pts median 93.9 %97.0 % of 66+12.0 pts median 85.0 %0.0 % of 5615.2 % of 66
Fernand KARTHEISER changed group LuxembourgNo group100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %75.4 % of 65−16.7 pts median 92.1 %21.1 % of 577.6 % of 66
Fernando NAVARRETE ROJAS SpainEPP93.9 % of 66+1.5 pts median 92.4 %96.8 % of 62+1.4 pts median 95.3 %2.0 % of 500.0 % of 62
Fidias PANAYIOTOU CyprusNo group83.3 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 14.5 % of 55
Flavio TOSI ItalyEPP87.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 92.4 %96.6 % of 58+1.2 pts median 95.3 %0 of 47 0.0 % of 58
France JAMET FrancePatriots97.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 93.9 %98.4 % of 64+13.5 pts median 85.0 %0.0 % of 5614.1 % of 64
Francesco TORSELLI ItalyECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 65+1.7 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 579.1 % of 66
Francesco VENTOLA ItalyECR97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %93.7 % of 63+1.5 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 559.4 % of 64
Francisco ASSIS PortugalS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %97.0 % of 66−1.3 pts median 98.3 %3.0 % of 661.5 % of 66
Francisco José MILLÁN MON SpainEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %96.9 % of 65+1.6 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 530.0 % of 65
François KALFON FranceS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %93.8 % of 64−4.5 pts median 98.3 %6.3 % of 641.6 % of 64
François-Xavier BELLAMY FranceEPP90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %80.0 % of 60−15.3 pts median 95.3 %2 of 49 5.0 % of 60
Fredis BELERIS GreeceEPP84.8 % of 66−7.6 pts median 92.4 %82.1 % of 56−13.2 pts median 95.3 %1 of 47 0.0 % of 56
Friedrich PÜRNER GermanyNo group100.0 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 28.8 % of 66
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO ItalyEPP50.0 % of 66−42.4 pts median 92.4 %31 of 33 — median 95.3 %0 of 23 0 of 33
Gabriel MATO SpainEPP89.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 92.4 %96.6 % of 59+1.3 pts median 95.3 %1 of 47 0.0 % of 59
Gabriela FIREA RomaniaS&D53.0 % of 66−42.4 pts median 95.5 %34 of 35 — median 98.3 %1 of 35 0 of 35
Gabriele BISCHOFF GermanyS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %96.9 % of 64−1.4 pts median 98.3 %3.1 % of 643.1 % of 64
Gabriella GERZSENYI HungaryEPP89.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 92.4 %72.9 % of 59−22.5 pts median 95.3 %6 of 49 25.4 % of 59
Gaetano PEDULLA' ItalyThe Left100.0 % of 66+6.1 pts median 93.9 %86.4 % of 66−0.2 pts median 86.5 %7.0 % of 577.6 % of 66
Galato ALEXANDRAKI GreeceECR48.5 % of 66−43.9 pts median 92.4 %18 of 31 — median 92.1 %11 of 27 6 of 32
Geadis GEADI CyprusECR97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %87.3 % of 63−4.8 pts median 92.1 %9.1 % of 5510.9 % of 64
Georg MAYER AustriaPatriots97.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 93.9 %79.7 % of 64−5.3 pts median 85.0 %18.5 % of 5417.2 % of 64
Georgiana TEODORESCU RomaniaECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %78.5 % of 65−13.7 pts median 92.1 %21.1 % of 5710.6 % of 66
Georgios AFTIAS GreeceEPP86.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 92.4 %78.9 % of 57−16.4 pts median 95.3 %2 of 47 1.8 % of 57
Gerald HAUSER AustriaPatriots75.8 % of 66−18.2 pts median 93.9 %80.0 % of 50−5.0 pts median 85.0 %8 of 44 14.0 % of 50
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY NetherlandsRenew87.9 % of 66−7.6 pts median 95.5 %90.9 % of 55±0.0 pts median 90.9 %0 of 49 1.7 % of 58
Gerolf ANNEMANS BelgiumPatriots56.1 % of 66−37.9 pts median 93.9 %31 of 37 — median 85.0 %5 of 34 5 of 37
Gheorghe CÂRCIU RomaniaS&D36.4 % of 66−59.1 pts median 95.5 %23 of 24 — median 98.3 %1 of 24 0 of 24
Gheorghe FALCĂ RomaniaEPP93.9 % of 66+1.5 pts median 92.4 %95.2 % of 62−0.2 pts median 95.3 %2.0 % of 510.0 % of 62
Gheorghe PIPEREA RomaniaECR77.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 92.4 %80.0 % of 50−12.1 pts median 92.1 %9 of 47 7.8 % of 51
Gilles BOYER FranceRenew98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %90.3 % of 62−0.6 pts median 90.9 %1.8 % of 551.5 % of 65
Gilles PENNELLE FrancePatriots97.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 93.9 %98.4 % of 64+13.5 pts median 85.0 %0.0 % of 5514.1 % of 64
Giorgio GORI ItalyS&D78.8 % of 66−16.7 pts median 95.5 %98.1 % of 52−0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.9 % of 520.0 % of 52
Giorgos GEORGIOU CyprusThe Left83.3 % of 66−10.6 pts median 93.9 %70.9 % of 55−15.6 pts median 86.5 %11 of 48 16.4 % of 55
Giovanni CROSETTO ItalyECR80.3 % of 66−12.1 pts median 92.4 %92.3 % of 52+0.2 pts median 92.1 %0 of 44 11.3 % of 53
Giuseppe ANTOCI ItalyThe Left97.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 93.9 %87.5 % of 64+1.0 pts median 86.5 %5.5 % of 556.3 % of 64
Giuseppe LUPO ItalyS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 66+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 660.0 % of 66
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.