Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply

Whole term: 5 928 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.2 % (737 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

743 members

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Daniel FREUND	Daniel FREUND	Germany	Greens	99.2 % of 5 928	+7.1 pts median 92.2 %	98.4 % of 5 882	+1.3 pts median 97.1 %	0.9 % of 5 760	4.5 % of 5 883
Select Daniel OBAJTEK	Daniel OBAJTEK	Poland	ECR	82.8 % of 5 928	−8.8 pts median 91.6 %	91.4 % of 4 893	+0.2 pts median 91.1 %	3.2 % of 4 248	7.9 % of 4 909
Select Daniele POLATO	Daniele POLATO	Italy	ECR	98.2 % of 5 928	+6.6 pts median 91.6 %	92.6 % of 5 805	+1.4 pts median 91.1 %	1.3 % of 5 044	11.4 % of 5 822
Select Danilo DELLA VALLE	Danilo DELLA VALLE	Italy	The Left	96.0 % of 5 928	+7.5 pts median 88.5 %	90.2 % of 5 678	−2.6 pts median 92.8 %	7.2 % of 5 246	8.0 % of 5 691
Select Danuše NERUDOVÁ	Danuše NERUDOVÁ	Czechia	EPP	95.3 % of 5 928	+5.4 pts median 89.9 %	89.7 % of 5 652	−3.9 pts median 93.6 %	9.2 % of 5 385	4.8 % of 5 652
Select Dario NARDELLA	Dario NARDELLA	Italy	S&D	66.8 % of 5 928	−23.1 pts median 89.9 %	96.5 % of 3 957	+0.3 pts median 96.3 %	2.7 % of 3 889	2.2 % of 3 959
Select Dario TAMBURRANO	Dario TAMBURRANO	Italy	The Left	93.9 % of 5 928	+5.5 pts median 88.5 %	89.7 % of 5 554	−3.0 pts median 92.8 %	7.6 % of 5 125	8.2 % of 5 568
Select Dariusz JOŃSKI	Dariusz JOŃSKI	Poland	EPP	97.7 % of 5 928	+7.8 pts median 89.9 %	90.5 % of 5 793	−3.1 pts median 93.6 %	7.1 % of 5 512	1.9 % of 5 793
Select David CASA	David CASA	Malta	EPP	96.5 % of 5 928	+6.6 pts median 89.9 %	92.7 % of 5 723	−0.9 pts median 93.6 %	5.3 % of 5 442	2.5 % of 5 723
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	France	Greens	96.4 % of 5 928	+4.2 pts median 92.2 %	93.2 % of 5 712	−3.9 pts median 97.1 %	5.8 % of 5 597	2.5 % of 5 713
Select David MCALLISTER	David MCALLISTER	Germany	EPP	83.8 % of 5 928	−6.1 pts median 89.9 %	97.9 % of 4 968	+4.3 pts median 93.6 %	1.3 % of 4 747	1.2 % of 4 968
Select Davor Ivo STIER	Davor Ivo STIER	Croatia	EPP	85.2 % of 5 928	−4.7 pts median 89.9 %	91.5 % of 5 051	−2.1 pts median 93.6 %	6.1 % of 4 827	2.0 % of 5 051
Select Delara BURKHARDT	Delara BURKHARDT	Germany	S&D	77.1 % of 5 928	−12.8 pts median 89.9 %	96.9 % of 4 568	+0.7 pts median 96.3 %	2.2 % of 4 483	1.6 % of 4 569
Select Denis NESCI	Denis NESCI	Italy	ECR	99.6 % of 5 928	+8.0 pts median 91.6 %	92.7 % of 5 888	+1.5 pts median 91.1 %	1.3 % of 5 122	11.2 % of 5 905
Select Dennis RADTKE	Dennis RADTKE	Germany	EPP	81.7 % of 5 928	−8.2 pts median 89.9 %	97.3 % of 4 844	+3.7 pts median 93.6 %	1.5 % of 4 621	0.8 % of 4 844
Select Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ	Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ	Romania	No group	66.1 % of 5 928	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	30.2 % of 3 919
Select Diana RIBA I GINER	Diana RIBA I GINER	Spain	Greens	85.0 % of 5 928	−7.2 pts median 92.2 %	90.2 % of 5 038	−6.9 pts median 97.1 %	8.8 % of 4 942	4.3 % of 5 039
Select Dick ERIXON	Dick ERIXON	Sweden	ECR	98.4 % of 5 928	+6.8 pts median 91.6 %	73.8 % of 5 816	−17.4 pts median 91.1 %	23.2 % of 5 054	8.8 % of 5 833
Select Diego SOLIER	Diego SOLIER ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Spain	ECR	94.9 % of 5 928	not compared median 91.6 %	93.6 % of 5 274	not compared median 91.1 %	2.3 % of 4 603	9.9 % of 5 628
Select Dimitris TSIODRAS	Dimitris TSIODRAS	Greece	EPP	89.9 % of 5 928	±0.0 pts median 89.9 %	93.8 % of 5 331	+0.2 pts median 93.6 %	4.4 % of 5 083	1.8 % of 5 331
Select Dirk GOTINK	Dirk GOTINK	Netherlands	EPP	97.6 % of 5 928	+7.7 pts median 89.9 %	94.4 % of 5 787	+0.8 pts median 93.6 %	4.2 % of 5 506	2.1 % of 5 787
Select Dolors MONTSERRAT	Dolors MONTSERRAT	Spain	EPP	90.4 % of 5 928	+0.5 pts median 89.9 %	93.8 % of 5 361	+0.2 pts median 93.6 %	3.9 % of 5 112	2.5 % of 5 361
Select Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Poland	ECR	64.0 % of 5 928	−27.6 pts median 91.6 %	90.9 % of 3 781	−0.3 pts median 91.1 %	3.6 % of 3 249	8.4 % of 3 795
Select Dóra DÁVID	Dóra DÁVID	Hungary	EPP	67.4 % of 5 928	−22.6 pts median 89.9 %	87.0 % of 3 993	−6.6 pts median 93.6 %	10.6 % of 3 825	6.9 % of 3 993
Select Dragoş BENEA	Dragoş BENEA	Romania	S&D	60.5 % of 5 928	−29.4 pts median 89.9 %	94.2 % of 3 583	−2.1 pts median 96.3 %	5.4 % of 3 530	3.8 % of 3 585
Select Eero HEINÄLUOMA	Eero HEINÄLUOMA	Finland	S&D	90.3 % of 5 928	+0.4 pts median 89.9 %	95.4 % of 5 350	−0.9 pts median 96.3 %	4.2 % of 5 255	4.0 % of 5 352
Select Elena DONAZZAN	Elena DONAZZAN	Italy	ECR	87.8 % of 5 928	−3.9 pts median 91.6 %	92.7 % of 5 186	+1.6 pts median 91.1 %	1.3 % of 4 509	10.9 % of 5 202
Select Elena KOUNTOURA	Elena KOUNTOURA	Greece	The Left	67.7 % of 5 928	−20.8 pts median 88.5 %	94.9 % of 4 007	+2.1 pts median 92.8 %	3.1 % of 3 750	5.2 % of 4 013
Select Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO	Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO	Spain	EPP	89.0 % of 5 928	−0.9 pts median 89.9 %	93.6 % of 5 276	±0.0 pts median 93.6 %	4.2 % of 5 019	2.6 % of 5 276
Select Elena SANCHO MURILLO	Elena SANCHO MURILLO	Spain	S&D	99.2 % of 5 928	+9.3 pts median 89.9 %	97.3 % of 5 877	+1.1 pts median 96.3 %	1.9 % of 5 781	2.3 % of 5 879
Select Elena YONCHEVA	Elena YONCHEVA ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Bulgaria	ECR	51.3 % of 5 928	—no group line	87.5 % of 455	—no group line	10.4 % of 425	7.2 % of 3 041
Select Eleonora MELETI	Eleonora MELETI	Greece	EPP	78.7 % of 5 928	−11.3 pts median 89.9 %	93.6 % of 4 663	±0.0 pts median 93.6 %	4.5 % of 4 422	1.8 % of 4 663
Select Elio DI RUPO	Elio DI RUPO	Belgium	S&D	89.9 % of 5 928	±0.0 pts median 89.9 %	90.2 % of 5 326	−6.1 pts median 96.3 %	9.2 % of 5 240	2.4 % of 5 328
Select Elisabeth DIERINGER	Elisabeth DIERINGER	Austria	Patriots	99.1 % of 5 928	+8.0 pts median 91.1 %	76.3 % of 5 853	−6.4 pts median 82.7 %	16.2 % of 4 652	13.8 % of 5 874
Select Elisabeth GROSSMANN	Elisabeth GROSSMANN	Austria	S&D	98.9 % of 5 928	+9.1 pts median 89.9 %	96.2 % of 5 863	−0.1 pts median 96.3 %	3.2 % of 5 771	3.4 % of 5 864
Select Elisabetta GUALMINI	Elisabetta GUALMINI ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Italy	Renew	83.9 % of 5 928	not compared median 89.9 %	96.3 % of 4 970	not compared median 96.3 %	3.2 % of 4 886	2.7 % of 4 973
Select Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI	Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI	Greece	EPP	65.5 % of 5 928	−24.4 pts median 89.9 %	93.0 % of 3 885	−0.6 pts median 93.6 %	5.4 % of 3 729	1.9 % of 3 885
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Finland	Renew	97.8 % of 5 928	+7.4 pts median 90.4 %	96.9 % of 5 795	+1.3 pts median 95.5 %	2.1 % of 5 635	0.9 % of 5 800
Select Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	Poland	EPP	94.2 % of 5 928	+4.3 pts median 89.9 %	90.7 % of 5 587	−2.9 pts median 93.6 %	6.8 % of 5 311	2.1 % of 5 587
Select Emil RADEV	Emil RADEV	Bulgaria	EPP	73.7 % of 5 928	−16.2 pts median 89.9 %	91.2 % of 4 368	−2.4 pts median 93.6 %	6.3 % of 4 149	4.2 % of 4 368
Select Emma FOURREAU	Emma FOURREAU	France	The Left	90.2 % of 5 928	+1.7 pts median 88.5 %	94.1 % of 5 335	+1.4 pts median 92.8 %	1.8 % of 4 926	5.1 % of 5 348
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	France	S&D	70.3 % of 5 928	−19.5 pts median 89.9 %	92.8 % of 4 169	−3.5 pts median 96.3 %	6.5 % of 4 109	2.2 % of 4 170
Select Emma WIESNER	Emma WIESNER	Sweden	Renew	78.1 % of 5 928	−12.4 pts median 90.4 %	93.1 % of 4 624	−2.4 pts median 95.5 %	5.8 % of 4 502	1.6 % of 4 628
Select Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Greece	ECR	96.2 % of 5 928	+4.6 pts median 91.6 %	68.8 % of 5 685	−22.3 pts median 91.1 %	27.8 % of 4 955	15.9 % of 5 702
Select Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Greece	EPP	88.1 % of 5 928	−1.9 pts median 89.9 %	94.4 % of 5 220	+0.8 pts median 93.6 %	4.2 % of 5 012	1.1 % of 5 220
Select Engin EROGLU	Engin EROGLU	Germany	Renew	92.2 % of 5 928	+1.8 pts median 90.4 %	79.1 % of 5 463	−16.4 pts median 95.5 %	19.9 % of 5 313	5.0 % of 5 468
Select Enikő GYŐRI	Enikő GYŐRI	Hungary	Patriots	79.6 % of 5 928	−11.5 pts median 91.1 %	78.5 % of 4 708	−4.2 pts median 82.7 %	13.4 % of 3 775	14.8 % of 4 721
Select Eric SARGIACOMO	Eric SARGIACOMO	France	S&D	93.2 % of 5 928	+3.3 pts median 89.9 %	93.0 % of 5 520	−3.2 pts median 96.3 %	6.3 % of 5 438	2.5 % of 5 522
Select Erik KALIŇÁK	Erik KALIŇÁK	Slovakia	No group	91.3 % of 5 928	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	12.6 % of 5 413
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Germany	Greens	94.8 % of 5 928	+2.6 pts median 92.2 %	98.6 % of 5 619	+1.6 pts median 97.1 %	0.7 % of 5 500	4.6 % of 5 620

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.