Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply

2026: 261 final votes with named positions — 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 90.8 % (723 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

727 members

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Daniel FREUND	Daniel FREUND	Germany	Greens	99.2 % of 261	+6.7 pts median 92.5 %	95.4 % of 259	+0.1 pts median 95.3 %	2.0 % of 248	3.5 % of 259
Select Daniel OBAJTEK	Daniel OBAJTEK	Poland	ECR	83.9 % of 261	−8.8 pts median 92.7 %	86.2 % of 218	+0.4 pts median 85.8 %	4.9 % of 183	19.2 % of 219
Select Daniele POLATO	Daniele POLATO	Italy	ECR	99.2 % of 261	+6.5 pts median 92.7 %	94.6 % of 258	+8.7 pts median 85.8 %	1.4 % of 215	20.8 % of 259
Select Danilo DELLA VALLE	Danilo DELLA VALLE	Italy	The Left	96.9 % of 261	+10.0 pts median 87.0 %	85.6 % of 250	+0.4 pts median 85.2 %	5.5 % of 199	16.6 % of 253
Select Danuše NERUDOVÁ	Danuše NERUDOVÁ	Czechia	EPP	94.3 % of 261	+3.1 pts median 91.2 %	97.6 % of 246	+2.6 pts median 94.9 %	1.7 % of 233	1.6 % of 246
Select Dario NARDELLA	Dario NARDELLA	Italy	S&D	72.8 % of 261	−17.2 pts median 90.0 %	98.9 % of 190	+1.6 pts median 97.4 %	1.1 % of 188	0.5 % of 190
Select Dario TAMBURRANO	Dario TAMBURRANO	Italy	The Left	87.0 % of 261	±0.0 pts median 87.0 %	83.0 % of 224	−2.2 pts median 85.2 %	6.7 % of 179	16.7 % of 227
Select Dariusz JOŃSKI	Dariusz JOŃSKI	Poland	EPP	99.2 % of 261	+8.0 pts median 91.2 %	93.8 % of 259	−1.1 pts median 94.9 %	2.4 % of 245	1.2 % of 259
Select David CASA	David CASA	Malta	EPP	95.4 % of 261	+4.2 pts median 91.2 %	90.4 % of 249	−4.6 pts median 94.9 %	9.7 % of 236	8.4 % of 249
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	France	Greens	96.9 % of 261	+4.4 pts median 92.5 %	90.9 % of 253	−4.4 pts median 95.3 %	7.9 % of 242	7.5 % of 253
Select David MCALLISTER	David MCALLISTER	Germany	EPP	91.2 % of 261	±0.0 pts median 91.2 %	100.0 % of 238	+5.1 pts median 94.9 %	0.0 % of 225	0.0 % of 238
Select Davor Ivo STIER	Davor Ivo STIER	Croatia	EPP	85.8 % of 261	−5.4 pts median 91.2 %	93.8 % of 224	−1.2 pts median 94.9 %	2.8 % of 213	0.9 % of 224
Select Delara BURKHARDT	Delara BURKHARDT	Germany	S&D	95.8 % of 261	+5.7 pts median 90.0 %	98.0 % of 250	+0.6 pts median 97.4 %	1.2 % of 248	0.4 % of 250
Select Denis NESCI	Denis NESCI	Italy	ECR	100.0 % of 261	+7.3 pts median 92.7 %	94.2 % of 260	+8.4 pts median 85.8 %	1.4 % of 217	20.3 % of 261
Select Dennis RADTKE	Dennis RADTKE	Germany	EPP	83.5 % of 261	−7.7 pts median 91.2 %	100.0 % of 218	+5.1 pts median 94.9 %	0.0 % of 206	0.0 % of 218
Select Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ	Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ	Romania	No group	64.0 % of 261	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	29.9 % of 167
Select Diana RIBA I GINER	Diana RIBA I GINER	Spain	Greens	77.4 % of 261	−15.1 pts median 92.5 %	88.1 % of 202	−7.1 pts median 95.3 %	10.8 % of 195	8.9 % of 202
Select Dick ERIXON	Dick ERIXON	Sweden	ECR	98.1 % of 261	+5.4 pts median 92.7 %	58.8 % of 255	−27.0 pts median 85.8 %	40.1 % of 212	11.7 % of 256
Select Diego SOLIER	Diego SOLIER ⇄changed group	Spain	ECR	98.5 % of 261	+5.7 pts median 92.7 %	90.6 % of 256	+4.8 pts median 85.8 %	4.7 % of 215	16.7 % of 257
Select Dimitris TSIODRAS	Dimitris TSIODRAS	Greece	EPP	90.4 % of 261	−0.8 pts median 91.2 %	93.6 % of 236	−1.3 pts median 94.9 %	1.8 % of 222	1.3 % of 236
Select Dirk GOTINK	Dirk GOTINK	Netherlands	EPP	96.6 % of 261	+5.4 pts median 91.2 %	96.4 % of 252	+1.5 pts median 94.9 %	3.3 % of 239	2.0 % of 252
Select Dolors MONTSERRAT	Dolors MONTSERRAT	Spain	EPP	96.9 % of 261	+5.7 pts median 91.2 %	95.3 % of 253	+0.3 pts median 94.9 %	3.3 % of 239	3.2 % of 253
Select Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Poland	ECR	68.6 % of 261	−24.1 pts median 92.7 %	84.4 % of 179	−1.5 pts median 85.8 %	6.2 % of 146	19.6 % of 179
Select Dóra DÁVID	Dóra DÁVID	Hungary	EPP	71.6 % of 261	−19.5 pts median 91.2 %	86.6 % of 187	−8.3 pts median 94.9 %	8.0 % of 176	3.2 % of 187
Select Dragoş BENEA	Dragoş BENEA	Romania	S&D	60.2 % of 261	−29.9 pts median 90.0 %	93.6 % of 157	−3.7 pts median 97.4 %	6.4 % of 157	0.0 % of 157
Select Eero HEINÄLUOMA	Eero HEINÄLUOMA	Finland	S&D	93.1 % of 261	+3.1 pts median 90.0 %	95.5 % of 243	−1.9 pts median 97.4 %	4.6 % of 241	3.7 % of 243
Select Elena DONAZZAN	Elena DONAZZAN	Italy	ECR	76.2 % of 261	−16.5 pts median 92.7 %	93.9 % of 198	+8.1 pts median 85.8 %	1.8 % of 163	20.6 % of 199
Select Elena KOUNTOURA	Elena KOUNTOURA	Greece	The Left	68.6 % of 261	−18.4 pts median 87.0 %	86.5 % of 178	+1.3 pts median 85.2 %	8.2 % of 147	17.3 % of 179
Select Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO	Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO	Spain	EPP	88.9 % of 261	−2.3 pts median 91.2 %	94.0 % of 232	−1.0 pts median 94.9 %	4.5 % of 223	3.9 % of 232
Select Elena SANCHO MURILLO	Elena SANCHO MURILLO	Spain	S&D	99.6 % of 261	+9.6 pts median 90.0 %	98.1 % of 260	+0.7 pts median 97.4 %	1.9 % of 258	1.2 % of 260
Select Elena YONCHEVA	Elena YONCHEVA ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Bulgaria	ECR	57.1 % of 261	—no group line	26 of 34	—no group line	6 of 28	8.1 % of 149
Select Eleonora MELETI	Eleonora MELETI	Greece	EPP	87.7 % of 261	−3.4 pts median 91.2 %	92.6 % of 229	−2.3 pts median 94.9 %	2.8 % of 216	1.3 % of 229
Select Elio DI RUPO	Elio DI RUPO	Belgium	S&D	88.9 % of 261	−1.1 pts median 90.0 %	92.2 % of 232	−5.1 pts median 97.4 %	7.8 % of 230	3.9 % of 232
Select Elisabeth DIERINGER	Elisabeth DIERINGER	Austria	Patriots	98.5 % of 261	+9.2 pts median 89.3 %	71.1 % of 256	−7.8 pts median 78.9 %	20.6 % of 194	16.7 % of 257
Select Elisabeth GROSSMANN	Elisabeth GROSSMANN	Austria	S&D	99.2 % of 261	+9.2 pts median 90.0 %	96.9 % of 259	−0.5 pts median 97.4 %	2.7 % of 257	1.9 % of 259
Select Elisabetta GUALMINI	Elisabetta GUALMINI ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Italy	Renew	73.9 % of 261	not compared median 92.3 %	96.4 % of 192	not compared median 93.1 %	0.6 % of 181	3.1 % of 193
Select Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI	Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI	Greece	EPP	65.5 % of 261	−25.7 pts median 91.2 %	90.1 % of 171	−4.9 pts median 94.9 %	5.0 % of 159	1.2 % of 171
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Finland	Renew	99.2 % of 261	+6.9 pts median 92.3 %	93.4 % of 258	+0.3 pts median 93.1 %	2.5 % of 237	1.5 % of 259
Select Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	Poland	EPP	98.1 % of 261	+6.9 pts median 91.2 %	91.8 % of 256	−3.1 pts median 94.9 %	4.1 % of 242	1.2 % of 256
Select Emil RADEV	Emil RADEV	Bulgaria	EPP	82.8 % of 261	−8.4 pts median 91.2 %	93.1 % of 216	−1.9 pts median 94.9 %	2.4 % of 205	1.4 % of 216
Select Emma FOURREAU	Emma FOURREAU	France	The Left	87.7 % of 261	+0.8 pts median 87.0 %	91.6 % of 226	+6.4 pts median 85.2 %	1.1 % of 181	17.9 % of 229
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	France	S&D	62.5 % of 261	−27.6 pts median 90.0 %	92.6 % of 163	−4.7 pts median 97.4 %	6.8 % of 162	2.5 % of 163
Select Emma WIESNER	Emma WIESNER	Sweden	Renew	79.7 % of 261	−12.6 pts median 92.3 %	87.9 % of 207	−5.2 pts median 93.1 %	9.6 % of 188	3.8 % of 208
Select Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Greece	ECR	98.9 % of 261	+6.1 pts median 92.7 %	45.9 % of 257	−39.9 pts median 85.8 %	49.3 % of 215	25.6 % of 258
Select Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Greece	EPP	96.2 % of 261	+5.0 pts median 91.2 %	93.6 % of 251	−1.3 pts median 94.9 %	2.5 % of 238	0.8 % of 251
Select Engin EROGLU	Engin EROGLU	Germany	Renew	88.1 % of 261	−4.2 pts median 92.3 %	81.2 % of 229	−11.9 pts median 93.1 %	17.0 % of 212	3.9 % of 230
Select Enikő GYŐRI	Enikő GYŐRI	Hungary	Patriots	77.8 % of 261	−11.5 pts median 89.3 %	77.2 % of 202	−1.6 pts median 78.9 %	10.7 % of 150	22.7 % of 203
Select Eric SARGIACOMO	Eric SARGIACOMO	France	S&D	93.9 % of 261	+3.8 pts median 90.0 %	93.1 % of 245	−4.3 pts median 97.4 %	6.6 % of 243	3.3 % of 245
Select Erik KALIŇÁK	Erik KALIŇÁK	Slovakia	No group	92.3 % of 261	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	18.3 % of 241
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Germany	Greens	95.8 % of 261	+3.3 pts median 92.5 %	94.4 % of 250	−0.9 pts median 95.3 %	2.9 % of 239	6.4 % of 250

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.