Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members
Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

2024 (from July): 66 final votes with named positions — 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 93.9 % (714 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

729 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Daniele POLATO ItalyECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 65+1.7 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 579.1 % of 66
Danilo DELLA VALLE ItalyThe Left93.9 % of 66±0.0 pts median 93.9 %85.5 % of 62−1.0 pts median 86.5 %7.5 % of 538.1 % of 62
Danuše NERUDOVÁ CzechiaEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %95.5 % of 66+0.1 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 541.5 % of 66
Dario NARDELLA ItalyS&D74.2 % of 66−21.2 pts median 95.5 %49 of 49 — median 98.3 %0 of 49 0 of 49
Dario TAMBURRANO ItalyThe Left97.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 93.9 %85.9 % of 64−0.6 pts median 86.5 %7.3 % of 557.8 % of 64
Dariusz JOŃSKI PolandEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %87.9 % of 66−7.5 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 66
David CASA MaltaEPP90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %88.3 % of 60−7.0 pts median 95.3 %4 of 48 5.0 % of 60
David CORMAND FranceGreens95.5 % of 66−1.5 pts median 97.0 %96.8 % of 63±0.0 pts median 96.8 %1.7 % of 591.6 % of 63
David MCALLISTER GermanyEPP89.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 92.4 %98.3 % of 59+3.0 pts median 95.3 %0 of 47 0.0 % of 59
Davor Ivo STIER CroatiaEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %82.8 % of 64−12.5 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 530.0 % of 64
Delara BURKHARDT GermanyS&D80.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 95.5 %96.2 % of 53−2.0 pts median 98.3 %3.8 % of 531.9 % of 53
Denis NESCI ItalyECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 65+1.7 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 579.1 % of 66
Dennis RADTKE GermanyEPP86.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 92.4 %96.5 % of 57+1.1 pts median 95.3 %1 of 48 0.0 % of 57
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ RomaniaNo group51.5 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 12 of 34
Diana RIBA I GINER SpainGreens59.1 % of 66−37.9 pts median 97.0 %36 of 39 — median 96.8 %2 of 38 2 of 39
Dick ERIXON SwedenECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %55.4 % of 65−36.7 pts median 92.1 %40.4 % of 577.6 % of 66
Diego SOLIER changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.SpainECR83.3 % of 66—no group line9 of 10 —no group line0 of 7 10.9 % of 55
Dimitris TSIODRAS GreeceEPP93.9 % of 66+1.5 pts median 92.4 %80.6 % of 62−14.7 pts median 95.3 %3.9 % of 511.6 % of 62
Dirk GOTINK NetherlandsEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %96.9 % of 65+1.6 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 530.0 % of 65
Dolors MONTSERRAT SpainEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %95.3 % of 64±0.0 pts median 95.3 %3.8 % of 521.6 % of 64
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI PolandECR62.1 % of 66−30.3 pts median 92.4 %38 of 40 — median 92.1 %0 of 36 3 of 41
Dóra DÁVID HungaryEPP86.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 92.4 %75.4 % of 57−19.9 pts median 95.3 %5 of 48 22.8 % of 57
Dragoş BENEA RomaniaS&D83.3 % of 66−12.1 pts median 95.5 %98.2 % of 55−0.1 pts median 98.3 %1.8 % of 550.0 % of 55
Eero HEINÄLUOMA FinlandS&D98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 65+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 650.0 % of 65
Elena DONAZZAN ItalyECR86.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 92.4 %92.9 % of 56+0.7 pts median 92.1 %0 of 48 8.8 % of 57
Elena KOUNTOURA GreeceThe Left74.2 % of 66−19.7 pts median 93.9 %42 of 49 — median 86.5 %4 of 44 5 of 49
Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO SpainEPP87.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 92.4 %96.6 % of 58+1.2 pts median 95.3 %1 of 47 1.7 % of 58
Elena SANCHO MURILLO SpainS&D98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %98.5 % of 65+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.5 % of 650.0 % of 65
Elena YONCHEVA changed group BulgariaECR39.4 % of 66−56.1 pts median 95.5 %18 of 23 — median 90.9 %1 of 18 0 of 26
Eleonora MELETI GreeceEPP95.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 92.4 %81.0 % of 63−14.4 pts median 95.3 %3.8 % of 521.6 % of 63
Elio DI RUPO BelgiumS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %96.9 % of 64−1.4 pts median 98.3 %3.1 % of 640.0 % of 64
Elisabeth DIERINGER AustriaPatriots100.0 % of 66+6.1 pts median 93.9 %80.3 % of 66−4.6 pts median 85.0 %17.9 % of 5616.7 % of 66
Elisabeth GROSSMANN AustriaS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %97.0 % of 66−1.3 pts median 98.3 %3.0 % of 663.0 % of 66
Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group ItalyRenew90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 60+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 600.0 % of 60
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI GreeceEPP39.4 % of 66−53.0 pts median 92.4 %23 of 26 — median 95.3 %1 of 24 1 of 26
Elsi KATAINEN FinlandRenew98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %93.5 % of 62+2.6 pts median 90.9 %3.6 % of 551.5 % of 65
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA PolandEPP95.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 92.4 %84.1 % of 63−11.2 pts median 95.3 %3.9 % of 511.6 % of 63
Emil RADEV BulgariaEPP57.6 % of 66−34.8 pts median 92.4 %28 of 38 — median 95.3 %0 of 28 0 of 38
Emma FOURREAU FranceThe Left100.0 % of 66+6.1 pts median 93.9 %93.9 % of 66+7.4 pts median 86.5 %1.8 % of 577.6 % of 66
Emma RAFOWICZ FranceS&D87.9 % of 66−7.6 pts median 95.5 %89.7 % of 58−8.6 pts median 98.3 %10.3 % of 585.2 % of 58
Emma WIESNER SwedenRenew98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %90.3 % of 62−0.6 pts median 90.9 %7.3 % of 551.5 % of 65
Emmanouil FRAGKOS GreeceECR90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %42.4 % of 59−49.7 pts median 92.1 %56.9 % of 5135.0 % of 60
Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS GreeceEPP77.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 92.4 %76.5 % of 51−18.9 pts median 95.3 %2 of 41 2.0 % of 51
Engin EROGLU GermanyRenew89.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 95.5 %78.6 % of 56−12.3 pts median 90.9 %22.0 % of 508.5 % of 59
Enikő GYŐRI HungaryPatriots69.7 % of 66−24.2 pts median 93.9 %40 of 46 — median 85.0 %2 of 42 3 of 46
Eric SARGIACOMO FranceS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %92.2 % of 64−6.1 pts median 98.3 %7.8 % of 646.3 % of 64
Erik KALIŇÁK SlovakiaNo group100.0 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 18.2 % of 66
Erik MARQUARDT GermanyGreens100.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 97.0 %100.0 % of 66+3.2 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 620.0 % of 66
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS HungaryPatriots72.7 % of 66−21.2 pts median 93.9 %42 of 48 — median 85.0 %2 of 44 3 of 48
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS SpainEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %96.9 % of 65+1.6 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 531.5 % of 65
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.