Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

727 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Branko GRIMS changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.SloveniaNo group89.6 % of 2 521not compared median 91.0 %70.9 % of 1 836not compared median 93.7 %27.3 % of 1 7626.7 % of 2 259
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG NetherlandsRenew88.2 % of 2 521−3.5 pts median 91.7 %96.9 % of 2 222+1.8 pts median 95.1 %1.9 % of 2 1570.3 % of 2 224
Bruno GONÇALVES PortugalS&D88.3 % of 2 521−1.9 pts median 90.1 %95.3 % of 2 225−0.6 pts median 95.8 %4.0 % of 2 1741.7 % of 2 225
Bruno TOBBACK BelgiumS&D92.1 % of 2 521+1.9 pts median 90.1 %98.0 % of 2 321+2.2 pts median 95.8 %1.1 % of 2 2661.7 % of 2 321
Camilla LAURETI ItalyS&D95.4 % of 2 521+5.2 pts median 90.1 %99.5 % of 2 404+3.6 pts median 95.8 %0.3 % of 2 3581.6 % of 2 404
Carla TAVARES PortugalS&D87.1 % of 2 521−3.0 pts median 90.1 %99.0 % of 2 196+3.2 pts median 95.8 %0.5 % of 2 1481.2 % of 2 196
Carlo CICCIOLI ItalyECR89.6 % of 2 521−2.3 pts median 91.9 %92.6 % of 2 254+2.1 pts median 90.5 %1.9 % of 1 95711.1 % of 2 259
Carlo FIDANZA ItalyECR92.4 % of 2 521+0.6 pts median 91.9 %92.8 % of 2 325+2.3 pts median 90.5 %1.4 % of 2 01611.6 % of 2 330
Carmen CRESPO DÍAZ SpainEPP83.6 % of 2 521−7.4 pts median 91.0 %93.3 % of 2 108−0.5 pts median 93.7 %4.7 % of 2 0253.5 % of 2 108
Carolina MORACE ItalyThe Left98.3 % of 2 521+10.1 pts median 88.2 %92.1 % of 2 471−1.4 pts median 93.6 %5.5 % of 2 2936.8 % of 2 478
Catarina MARTINS PortugalThe Left95.4 % of 2 521+7.2 pts median 88.2 %96.8 % of 2 397+3.3 pts median 93.6 %1.0 % of 2 2324.5 % of 2 404
Catarina VIEIRA NetherlandsGreens83.4 % of 2 521−9.1 pts median 92.5 %98.8 % of 2 101+1.3 pts median 97.5 %1.0 % of 2 0665.4 % of 2 102
Caterina CHINNICI ItalyEPP55.9 % of 2 521−35.1 pts median 91.0 %94.8 % of 1 409+1.1 pts median 93.7 %3.6 % of 1 3561.7 % of 1 409
Catherine GRISET FrancePatriots87.7 % of 2 521−2.7 pts median 90.4 %90.9 % of 2 203+7.8 pts median 83.1 %1.7 % of 1 74111.0 % of 2 210
Cecilia STRADA ItalyS&D97.9 % of 2 521+7.8 pts median 90.1 %91.7 % of 2 468−4.2 pts median 95.8 %7.4 % of 2 4131.9 % of 2 468
Céline IMART FranceEPP89.8 % of 2 521−1.2 pts median 91.0 %84.9 % of 2 263−8.8 pts median 93.7 %13.8 % of 2 1884.7 % of 2 263
César LUENA SpainS&D98.7 % of 2 521+8.6 pts median 90.1 %95.5 % of 2 489−0.3 pts median 95.8 %3.4 % of 2 4352.7 % of 2 489
Charles GOERENS LuxembourgRenew97.2 % of 2 521+5.5 pts median 91.7 %97.8 % of 2 449+2.7 pts median 95.1 %1.3 % of 2 3781.5 % of 2 451
Charlie WEIMERS SwedenECR98.6 % of 2 521+6.7 pts median 91.9 %74.4 % of 2 480−16.1 pts median 90.5 %22.0 % of 2 1609.9 % of 2 486
Chiara GEMMA ItalyECR97.9 % of 2 521+6.0 pts median 91.9 %92.6 % of 2 462+2.1 pts median 90.5 %1.8 % of 2 14211.5 % of 2 468
Chloé RIDEL FranceS&D59.3 % of 2 521−30.9 pts median 90.1 %90.0 % of 1 494−5.9 pts median 95.8 %9.5 % of 1 4582.6 % of 1 494
Christel SCHALDEMOSE DenmarkS&D96.4 % of 2 521+6.3 pts median 90.1 %88.8 % of 2 431−7.1 pts median 95.8 %10.7 % of 2 3843.2 % of 2 431
Christian DOLESCHAL GermanyEPP75.3 % of 2 521−15.7 pts median 91.0 %97.5 % of 1 899+3.8 pts median 93.7 %2.0 % of 1 8230.9 % of 1 899
Christian EHLER GermanyEPP83.2 % of 2 521−7.8 pts median 91.0 %97.1 % of 2 098+3.4 pts median 93.7 %2.4 % of 2 0200.5 % of 2 098
Christine ANDERSON GermanyESN88.2 % of 2 521−7.3 pts median 95.5 %99.6 % of 2 222+6.2 pts median 93.5 %0.1 % of 2 0957.2 % of 2 223
Christine SINGER GermanyRenew89.8 % of 2 521−2.0 pts median 91.7 %81.1 % of 2 261−14.0 pts median 95.1 %18.0 % of 2 2043.8 % of 2 263
Christophe BAY FrancePatriots74.7 % of 2 521−15.7 pts median 90.4 %90.2 % of 1 880+7.1 pts median 83.1 %1.9 % of 1 45910.9 % of 1 884
Christophe CLERGEAU FranceS&D88.6 % of 2 521−1.5 pts median 90.1 %91.4 % of 2 233−4.4 pts median 95.8 %7.7 % of 2 1812.1 % of 2 233
Christophe GOMART FranceEPP91.4 % of 2 521+0.4 pts median 91.0 %74.2 % of 2 303−19.6 pts median 93.7 %24.3 % of 2 2144.7 % of 2 303
Christophe GRUDLER FranceRenew87.9 % of 2 521−3.9 pts median 91.7 %94.2 % of 2 213−0.9 pts median 95.1 %4.7 % of 2 1442.1 % of 2 215
Ciaran MULLOOLY IrelandRenew70.9 % of 2 521−20.8 pts median 91.7 %89.7 % of 1 787−5.4 pts median 95.1 %9.9 % of 1 7424.3 % of 1 788
Claire FITA FranceS&D86.3 % of 2 521−3.8 pts median 90.1 %91.2 % of 2 176−4.6 pts median 95.8 %7.9 % of 2 1282.6 % of 2 176
Claudiu MANDA RomaniaS&D36.3 % of 2 521−53.8 pts median 90.1 %95.1 % of 915−0.8 pts median 95.8 %4.5 % of 9043.2 % of 915
Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU RomaniaECR98.5 % of 2 521+6.7 pts median 91.9 %86.9 % of 2 478−3.5 pts median 90.5 %8.8 % of 2 15410.2 % of 2 484
Costas MAVRIDES CyprusS&D70.4 % of 2 521−19.8 pts median 90.1 %92.4 % of 1 774−3.4 pts median 95.8 %7.2 % of 1 7422.4 % of 1 774
Cristian TERHEŞ RomaniaECR94.9 % of 2 521+3.1 pts median 91.9 %84.2 % of 2 387−6.2 pts median 90.5 %11.8 % of 2 0796.6 % of 2 393
Cristina GUARDA ItalyGreens92.3 % of 2 521−0.2 pts median 92.5 %91.4 % of 2 325−6.1 pts median 97.5 %7.9 % of 2 2892.8 % of 2 326
Cristina MAESTRE SpainS&D91.2 % of 2 521+1.1 pts median 90.1 %96.2 % of 2 300+0.3 pts median 95.8 %2.8 % of 2 2462.3 % of 2 300
Csaba BOGDÁN HungaryEPP90.9 % of 891−0.1 pts median 91.0 %89.5 % of 810−4.2 pts median 93.7 %8.1 % of 7786.8 % of 810
Csaba DÖMÖTÖR HungaryPatriots90.1 % of 2 521−0.3 pts median 90.4 %78.4 % of 2 264−4.7 pts median 83.1 %14.6 % of 1 81816.7 % of 2 271
Csaba MOLNÁR HungaryS&D80.0 % of 2 521−10.1 pts median 90.1 %94.3 % of 2 018−1.6 pts median 95.8 %4.9 % of 1 9760.7 % of 2 018
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ IrelandRenew84.4 % of 2 521−7.4 pts median 91.7 %92.7 % of 2 126−2.4 pts median 95.1 %6.4 % of 2 0600.6 % of 2 127
Dainius ŽALIMAS LithuaniaRenew99.6 % of 2 521+7.8 pts median 91.7 %98.6 % of 2 508+3.5 pts median 95.1 %0.9 % of 2 4330.7 % of 2 510
Damian BOESELAGER GermanyGreens91.2 % of 2 521−1.2 pts median 92.5 %97.6 % of 2 299+0.1 pts median 97.5 %2.0 % of 2 2605.3 % of 2 300
Damien CARÊME FranceThe Left72.3 % of 2 521−15.9 pts median 88.2 %94.2 % of 1 816+0.7 pts median 93.6 %1.9 % of 1 6806.0 % of 1 822
Dan BARNA RomaniaRenew92.6 % of 2 521+0.9 pts median 91.7 %98.2 % of 2 333+3.1 pts median 95.1 %0.8 % of 2 2640.7 % of 2 335
Dan NICA RomaniaS&D62.0 % of 2 521−28.2 pts median 90.1 %95.9 % of 1 562+0.1 pts median 95.8 %3.6 % of 1 5301.0 % of 1 562
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU RomaniaEPP53.3 % of 2 521−37.7 pts median 91.0 %96.8 % of 1 343+3.1 pts median 93.7 %1.6 % of 1 2731.6 % of 1 343
Daniel ATTARD MaltaS&D82.5 % of 2 521−7.6 pts median 90.1 %87.8 % of 2 080−8.0 pts median 95.8 %11.3 % of 2 0425.1 % of 2 080
Daniel BUDA RomaniaEPP99.0 % of 2 521+8.1 pts median 91.0 %98.1 % of 2 497+4.4 pts median 93.7 %0.7 % of 2 3931.2 % of 2 497
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.