Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members
Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

2024 (from July): 66 final votes with named positions — 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 93.9 % (714 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

729 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG NetherlandsRenew98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %91.9 % of 62+1.0 pts median 90.9 %0.0 % of 551.5 % of 65
Bruno GONÇALVES PortugalS&D90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %95.0 % of 60−3.3 pts median 98.3 %5.0 % of 605.0 % of 60
Bruno TOBBACK BelgiumS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %98.5 % of 66+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.5 % of 661.5 % of 66
Camilla LAURETI ItalyS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 64+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 640.0 % of 64
Carla TAVARES PortugalS&D98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %98.5 % of 65+0.2 pts median 98.3 %1.5 % of 650.0 % of 65
Carlo CICCIOLI ItalyECR75.8 % of 66−16.7 pts median 92.4 %45 of 49 — median 92.1 %0 of 41 10.0 % of 50
Carlo FIDANZA ItalyECR97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 64+1.6 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 567.8 % of 64
Carmen CRESPO DÍAZ SpainEPP77.3 % of 66−15.2 pts median 92.4 %98.0 % of 51+2.7 pts median 95.3 %1 of 40 0.0 % of 51
Carolina MORACE ItalyThe Left100.0 % of 66+6.1 pts median 93.9 %86.4 % of 66−0.2 pts median 86.5 %7.0 % of 577.6 % of 66
Catarina MARTINS PortugalThe Left97.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 93.9 %90.6 % of 64+4.1 pts median 86.5 %3.6 % of 5512.5 % of 64
Catarina VIEIRA NetherlandsGreens100.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 97.0 %95.5 % of 66−1.4 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 620.0 % of 66
Caterina CHINNICI ItalyEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %95.4 % of 65±0.0 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 541.5 % of 65
Catherine GRISET FrancePatriots100.0 % of 66+6.1 pts median 93.9 %97.0 % of 66+12.0 pts median 85.0 %0.0 % of 5615.2 % of 66
Cecilia STRADA ItalyS&D92.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 95.5 %91.8 % of 61−6.5 pts median 98.3 %8.2 % of 616.6 % of 61
Céline IMART FranceEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %78.5 % of 65−16.9 pts median 95.3 %5.7 % of 537.7 % of 65
César LUENA SpainS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 66+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 660.0 % of 66
Charles GOERENS LuxembourgRenew95.5 % of 66±0.0 pts median 95.5 %98.3 % of 60+7.4 pts median 90.9 %0.0 % of 531.6 % of 63
Charlie WEIMERS SwedenECR89.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 92.4 %51.7 % of 58−40.4 pts median 92.1 %44.0 % of 508.5 % of 59
Chiara GEMMA ItalyECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 65+1.7 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 579.1 % of 66
Chloé RIDEL FranceS&D92.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 95.5 %93.4 % of 61−4.8 pts median 98.3 %6.6 % of 613.3 % of 61
Christel SCHALDEMOSE DenmarkS&D90.9 % of 66−4.5 pts median 95.5 %93.3 % of 60−4.9 pts median 98.3 %6.7 % of 605.0 % of 60
Christian DOLESCHAL GermanyEPP74.2 % of 66−18.2 pts median 92.4 %47 of 49 — median 95.3 %0 of 39 1 of 49
Christian EHLER GermanyEPP59.1 % of 66−33.3 pts median 92.4 %38 of 39 — median 95.3 %0 of 30 0 of 39
Christine ANDERSON GermanyESN92.4 % of 66+1.5 pts median 90.9 %98.3 % of 60+3.9 pts median 94.4 %1.8 % of 5521.3 % of 61
Christine SINGER GermanyRenew89.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 95.5 %78.6 % of 56−12.3 pts median 90.9 %22.0 % of 506.8 % of 59
Christophe BAY FrancePatriots94.7 % of 57+0.8 pts median 93.9 %98.1 % of 54+13.2 pts median 85.0 %0 of 45 16.7 % of 54
Christophe CLERGEAU FranceS&D89.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 95.5 %91.5 % of 59−6.8 pts median 98.3 %8.5 % of 595.1 % of 59
Christophe GOMART FranceEPP92.4 % of 66±0.0 pts median 92.4 %75.4 % of 61−19.9 pts median 95.3 %4 of 49 9.8 % of 61
Christophe GRUDLER FranceRenew92.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 95.5 %89.7 % of 58−1.3 pts median 90.9 %0.0 % of 511.6 % of 61
Ciaran MULLOOLY IrelandRenew71.2 % of 66−24.2 pts median 95.5 %38 of 44 — median 90.9 %2 of 39 9 of 47
Claire FITA FranceS&D95.5 % of 66±0.0 pts median 95.5 %93.7 % of 63−4.6 pts median 98.3 %6.3 % of 634.8 % of 63
Claudiu MANDA RomaniaS&D43.9 % of 66−51.5 pts median 95.5 %29 of 29 — median 98.3 %0 of 29 0 of 29
Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU RomaniaECR86.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 92.4 %85.7 % of 56−6.4 pts median 92.1 %4 of 49 7.0 % of 57
Costas MAVRIDES CyprusS&D72.7 % of 66−22.7 pts median 95.5 %48 of 48 — median 98.3 %0 of 48 0 of 48
Cristian TERHEŞ RomaniaECR15.2 % of 66−77.3 pts median 92.4 %9 of 10 — median 92.1 %1 of 10 0 of 10
Cristina GUARDA ItalyGreens1.5 % of 66−95.5 pts median 97.0 %0 of 1 — median 96.8 %1 of 1 0 of 1
Cristina MAESTRE SpainS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %89.1 % of 64−9.2 pts median 98.3 %10.9 % of 640.0 % of 64
Csaba DÖMÖTÖR HungaryPatriots82.5 % of 57−11.5 pts median 93.9 %39 of 47 — median 85.0 %4 of 43 3 of 47
Csaba MOLNÁR HungaryS&D87.9 % of 66−7.6 pts median 95.5 %96.6 % of 58−1.7 pts median 98.3 %3.4 % of 580.0 % of 58
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ IrelandRenew97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %95.1 % of 61+4.2 pts median 90.9 %3.7 % of 540.0 % of 64
Dainius ŽALIMAS LithuaniaRenew100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %88.9 % of 63−2.0 pts median 90.9 %1.8 % of 551.5 % of 66
Damian BOESELAGER GermanyGreens100.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 97.0 %93.9 % of 66−2.9 pts median 96.8 %1.6 % of 621.5 % of 66
Damien CARÊME FranceThe Left100.0 % of 66+6.1 pts median 93.9 %93.9 % of 66+7.4 pts median 86.5 %1.8 % of 577.6 % of 66
Dan BARNA RomaniaRenew92.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 95.5 %89.7 % of 58−1.3 pts median 90.9 %5.8 % of 523.3 % of 61
Dan NICA RomaniaS&D56.1 % of 66−39.4 pts median 95.5 %36 of 37 — median 98.3 %1 of 37 1 of 37
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU RomaniaEPP40.9 % of 66−51.5 pts median 92.4 %25 of 27 — median 95.3 %0 of 24 0 of 27
Daniel ATTARD MaltaS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %87.5 % of 64−10.8 pts median 98.3 %12.5 % of 647.8 % of 64
Daniel BUDA RomaniaEPP69.7 % of 66−22.7 pts median 92.4 %42 of 46 — median 95.3 %1 of 42 1 of 46
Daniel FREUND GermanyGreens100.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 97.0 %97.0 % of 66+0.1 pts median 96.8 %1.6 % of 621.5 % of 66
Daniel OBAJTEK PolandECR69.7 % of 66−22.7 pts median 92.4 %44 of 45 — median 92.1 %0 of 41 2 of 46
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.