Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members

2026: 261 final votes with named positions — 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 90.8 % (723 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

727 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PolandPatriots89.3 % of 261±0.0 pts median 89.3 %78.9 % of 232±0.0 pts median 78.9 %13.2 % of 17419.7 % of 233
Anna CAVAZZINI GermanyGreens98.9 % of 261+6.3 pts median 92.5 %93.8 % of 258−1.5 pts median 95.3 %3.6 % of 2475.4 % of 258
Anna Maria CISINT ItalyPatriots98.1 % of 261+8.8 pts median 89.3 %78.8 % of 255±0.0 pts median 78.9 %15.4 % of 19521.9 % of 256
Anna STROLENBERG NetherlandsGreens98.5 % of 261+5.9 pts median 92.5 %95.7 % of 257+0.5 pts median 95.3 %3.3 % of 2465.8 % of 257
Anna STÜRGKH AustriaRenew47.1 % of 261−45.2 pts median 92.3 %91.0 % of 122−2.1 pts median 93.1 %2.8 % of 1082.4 % of 123
Anna ZALEWSKA PolandECR96.2 % of 261+3.4 pts median 92.7 %85.6 % of 250−0.2 pts median 85.8 %6.2 % of 21019.1 % of 251
Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON FinlandRenew89.3 % of 261−3.1 pts median 92.3 %96.1 % of 232+3.0 pts median 93.1 %1.4 % of 2121.3 % of 233
Annalisa CORRADO ItalyS&D81.6 % of 261−8.4 pts median 90.0 %99.5 % of 213+2.2 pts median 97.4 %0.0 % of 2120.0 % of 213
Annamária VICSEK HungaryPatriots79.7 % of 261−9.6 pts median 89.3 %79.2 % of 207+0.4 pts median 78.9 %10.1 % of 15921.2 % of 208
Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT FrancePatriots86.2 % of 261−3.1 pts median 89.3 %94.2 % of 224+15.3 pts median 78.9 %0.0 % of 17212.4 % of 225
Anouk VAN BRUG NetherlandsRenew98.1 % of 261+5.7 pts median 92.3 %87.5 % of 255−5.7 pts median 93.1 %9.8 % of 2353.1 % of 256
Anthony SMITH FranceThe Left83.5 % of 261−3.4 pts median 87.0 %92.6 % of 216+7.4 pts median 85.2 %1.1 % of 17717.0 % of 218
Antonella SBERNA ItalyECR89.3 % of 261−3.4 pts median 92.7 %95.3 % of 232+9.4 pts median 85.8 %0.5 % of 19221.5 % of 233
Antonín STANĚK CzechiaPatriots99.2 % of 261+10.0 pts median 89.3 %59.7 % of 258−19.2 pts median 78.9 %33.7 % of 19625.5 % of 259
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE SpainEPP90.0 % of 261−1.1 pts median 91.2 %94.9 % of 235±0.0 pts median 94.9 %3.6 % of 2213.0 % of 235
António TÂNGER CORRÊA PortugalPatriots66.7 % of 261−22.6 pts median 89.3 %82.2 % of 174+3.3 pts median 78.9 %10.4 % of 13424.1 % of 174
Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN IrelandS&D72.8 % of 261−17.2 pts median 90.0 %97.4 % of 190±0.0 pts median 97.4 %2.7 % of 1881.1 % of 190
Arash SAEIDI FranceThe Left69.0 % of 261−18.0 pts median 87.0 %91.6 % of 178+6.4 pts median 85.2 %0.7 % of 14717.2 % of 180
Arba KOKALARI SwedenEPP96.9 % of 261+5.7 pts median 91.2 %94.9 % of 253−0.1 pts median 94.9 %5.0 % of 2400.4 % of 253
Arkadiusz MULARCZYK PolandECR96.2 % of 261+3.4 pts median 92.7 %87.2 % of 250+1.4 pts median 85.8 %4.8 % of 20918.7 % of 251
Arno BAUSEMER GermanyESN92.3 % of 261±0.0 pts median 92.3 %98.3 % of 241+7.4 pts median 91.0 %1.3 % of 23215.4 % of 241
Asger CHRISTENSEN DenmarkRenew98.1 % of 261+5.7 pts median 92.3 %90.6 % of 255−2.5 pts median 93.1 %6.8 % of 2342.7 % of 256
Assita KANKO BelgiumECR69.3 % of 261−23.4 pts median 92.7 %75.0 % of 180−10.8 pts median 85.8 %22.1 % of 15418.8 % of 181
Auke ZIJLSTRA NetherlandsPatriots95.4 % of 261+6.1 pts median 89.3 %74.2 % of 248−4.7 pts median 78.9 %14.2 % of 1909.6 % of 249
Aura SALLA FinlandEPP82.8 % of 261−8.4 pts median 91.2 %95.4 % of 216+0.4 pts median 94.9 %4.4 % of 2031.4 % of 216
Aurelijus VERYGA LithuaniaECR92.3 % of 261−0.4 pts median 92.7 %90.4 % of 240+4.6 pts median 85.8 %7.0 % of 19913.7 % of 241
Aurore LALUCQ FranceS&D71.6 % of 261−18.4 pts median 90.0 %94.7 % of 187−2.7 pts median 97.4 %5.3 % of 1872.7 % of 187
Axel VOSS GermanyEPP88.1 % of 261−3.1 pts median 91.2 %99.1 % of 230+4.2 pts median 94.9 %0.9 % of 2180.4 % of 230
Barbara BONTE BelgiumPatriots99.6 % of 261+10.3 pts median 89.3 %79.2 % of 259+0.3 pts median 78.9 %10.7 % of 19716.2 % of 260
Barry ANDREWS IrelandRenew98.5 % of 261+6.1 pts median 92.3 %97.3 % of 256+4.1 pts median 93.1 %0.9 % of 2350.4 % of 257
Barry COWEN IrelandRenew82.4 % of 261−10.0 pts median 92.3 %97.2 % of 215+4.1 pts median 93.1 %0.5 % of 1990.5 % of 215
Bart GROOTHUIS NetherlandsRenew78.9 % of 261−13.4 pts median 92.3 %89.3 % of 206−3.8 pts median 93.1 %6.5 % of 1861.9 % of 206
Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZ PolandEPP98.9 % of 261+7.7 pts median 91.2 %95.7 % of 258+0.8 pts median 94.9 %3.3 % of 2441.6 % of 258
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ PolandEPP95.4 % of 261+4.2 pts median 91.2 %96.0 % of 249+1.1 pts median 94.9 %2.5 % of 2361.2 % of 249
Beata SZYDŁO PolandECR93.5 % of 261+0.8 pts median 92.7 %85.6 % of 243−0.2 pts median 85.8 %5.4 % of 20217.6 % of 244
Beatrice TIMGREN SwedenECR99.6 % of 261+6.9 pts median 92.7 %58.7 % of 259−27.2 pts median 85.8 %40.7 % of 21611.9 % of 260
Benedetta SCUDERI ItalyGreens96.9 % of 261+4.4 pts median 92.5 %90.5 % of 253−4.7 pts median 95.3 %8.7 % of 2428.3 % of 253
Benoit CASSART BelgiumRenew96.2 % of 261+3.8 pts median 92.3 %94.0 % of 250+0.9 pts median 93.1 %1.7 % of 2301.6 % of 251
Bernard GUETTA FranceRenew92.3 % of 261±0.0 pts median 92.3 %92.5 % of 240−0.6 pts median 93.1 %3.6 % of 2212.9 % of 241
Bernd LANGE GermanyS&D95.4 % of 261+5.4 pts median 90.0 %98.8 % of 249+1.4 pts median 97.4 %0.8 % of 2480.8 % of 249
Bert-Jan RUISSEN NetherlandsECR99.6 % of 261+6.9 pts median 92.7 %79.5 % of 259−6.3 pts median 85.8 %15.7 % of 21619.2 % of 260
Biljana BORZAN CroatiaS&D89.7 % of 261−0.4 pts median 90.0 %97.0 % of 234−0.4 pts median 97.4 %2.6 % of 2322.1 % of 234
Billy KELLEHER IrelandRenew100.0 % of 261+7.7 pts median 92.3 %97.7 % of 260+4.6 pts median 93.1 %0.4 % of 2390.4 % of 261
Birgit SIPPEL GermanyS&D75.9 % of 261−14.2 pts median 90.0 %97.0 % of 198−0.4 pts median 97.4 %2.0 % of 1961.0 % of 198
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI PolandEPP98.5 % of 261+7.3 pts median 91.2 %91.8 % of 257−3.1 pts median 94.9 %3.7 % of 2436.2 % of 257
Bogdan RZOŃCA PolandECR99.2 % of 261+6.5 pts median 92.7 %84.9 % of 258−1.0 pts median 85.8 %6.0 % of 21517.4 % of 259
Borja GIMÉNEZ LARRAZ SpainEPP94.6 % of 261+3.4 pts median 91.2 %95.5 % of 247+0.6 pts median 94.9 %3.0 % of 2332.0 % of 247
Borys BUDKA PolandEPP89.3 % of 261−1.9 pts median 91.2 %94.4 % of 233−0.5 pts median 94.9 %2.3 % of 2200.9 % of 233
Brando BENIFEI ItalyS&D81.6 % of 261−8.4 pts median 90.0 %100.0 % of 213+2.6 pts median 97.4 %0.0 % of 2120.5 % of 213
Branislav ONDRUŠ SlovakiaNo group94.3 % of 261—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 17.9 % of 246
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.