Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

727 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PolandPatriots91.2 % of 2 521+0.8 pts median 90.4 %83.5 % of 2 292+0.4 pts median 83.1 %7.9 % of 1 80810.4 % of 2 299
Anna CAVAZZINI GermanyGreens99.5 % of 2 521+7.1 pts median 92.5 %98.6 % of 2 508+1.2 pts median 97.5 %0.7 % of 2 4685.1 % of 2 509
Anna Maria CISINT ItalyPatriots98.4 % of 2 521+8.0 pts median 90.4 %83.7 % of 2 473+0.6 pts median 83.1 %9.0 % of 1 95011.7 % of 2 481
Anna STROLENBERG NetherlandsGreens99.7 % of 2 521+7.2 pts median 92.5 %97.1 % of 2 512−0.3 pts median 97.5 %2.5 % of 2 4715.2 % of 2 513
Anna STÜRGKH AustriaRenew44.1 % of 2 521−47.7 pts median 91.7 %96.5 % of 1 110+1.4 pts median 95.1 %1.7 % of 1 0731.2 % of 1 111
Anna ZALEWSKA PolandECR98.4 % of 2 521+6.5 pts median 91.9 %91.0 % of 2 475+0.5 pts median 90.5 %3.3 % of 2 1558.5 % of 2 481
Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON FinlandRenew89.6 % of 2 521−2.2 pts median 91.7 %97.7 % of 2 256+2.6 pts median 95.1 %1.3 % of 2 1891.6 % of 2 258
Annalisa CORRADO ItalyS&D74.3 % of 2 521−15.9 pts median 90.1 %96.6 % of 1 872+0.8 pts median 95.8 %2.5 % of 1 8381.6 % of 1 872
Annamária VICSEK HungaryPatriots78.8 % of 2 521−11.6 pts median 90.4 %78.6 % of 1 979−4.5 pts median 83.1 %14.6 % of 1 56916.3 % of 1 986
Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT FrancePatriots83.5 % of 2 521−6.9 pts median 90.4 %91.0 % of 2 098+7.9 pts median 83.1 %0.9 % of 1 65611.0 % of 2 105
Anouk VAN BRUG NetherlandsRenew99.0 % of 2 521+7.2 pts median 91.7 %91.1 % of 2 493−4.0 pts median 95.1 %7.6 % of 2 4200.9 % of 2 495
Anthony SMITH FranceThe Left81.6 % of 2 521−6.6 pts median 88.2 %95.1 % of 2 051+1.5 pts median 93.6 %1.4 % of 1 9065.3 % of 2 057
Antonella SBERNA ItalyECR81.1 % of 2 521−10.8 pts median 91.9 %93.0 % of 2 038+2.5 pts median 90.5 %1.4 % of 1 77711.2 % of 2 044
Antonín STANĚK CzechiaPatriots99.3 % of 2 521+8.9 pts median 90.4 %83.1 % of 2 496±0.0 pts median 83.1 %8.7 % of 1 96514.3 % of 2 504
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE SpainEPP91.2 % of 2 521+0.2 pts median 91.0 %93.9 % of 2 299+0.2 pts median 93.7 %4.3 % of 2 2102.9 % of 2 299
António TÂNGER CORRÊA PortugalPatriots68.3 % of 2 521−22.1 pts median 90.4 %85.7 % of 1 718+2.6 pts median 83.1 %6.0 % of 1 35114.9 % of 1 722
Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN IrelandS&D81.3 % of 2 521−8.8 pts median 90.1 %97.1 % of 2 050+1.2 pts median 95.8 %2.3 % of 2 0061.3 % of 2 050
Arash SAEIDI FranceThe Left62.9 % of 2 521−25.3 pts median 88.2 %94.1 % of 1 581+0.5 pts median 93.6 %1.7 % of 1 4585.9 % of 1 585
Arba KOKALARI SwedenEPP93.9 % of 2 521+2.9 pts median 91.0 %91.1 % of 2 367−2.6 pts median 93.7 %7.6 % of 2 2751.3 % of 2 367
Arkadiusz MULARCZYK PolandECR94.1 % of 2 521+2.2 pts median 91.9 %91.2 % of 2 367+0.7 pts median 90.5 %3.6 % of 2 0578.7 % of 2 372
Arno BAUSEMER GermanyESN95.9 % of 2 521+0.4 pts median 95.5 %97.9 % of 2 414+4.4 pts median 93.5 %1.4 % of 2 2796.6 % of 2 418
Asger CHRISTENSEN DenmarkRenew97.0 % of 2 521+5.3 pts median 91.7 %87.6 % of 2 444−7.5 pts median 95.1 %11.2 % of 2 3713.6 % of 2 446
Assita KANKO BelgiumECR63.4 % of 2 521−28.5 pts median 91.9 %63.8 % of 1 595−26.7 pts median 90.5 %34.2 % of 1 35824.6 % of 1 598
Auke ZIJLSTRA NetherlandsPatriots94.2 % of 2 521+3.8 pts median 90.4 %78.8 % of 2 367−4.3 pts median 83.1 %12.1 % of 1 8447.8 % of 2 374
Aura SALLA FinlandEPP80.0 % of 2 521−10.9 pts median 91.0 %94.7 % of 2 018+1.0 pts median 93.7 %3.8 % of 1 9421.3 % of 2 018
Aurelijus VERYGA LithuaniaECR91.9 % of 2 521±0.0 pts median 91.9 %89.0 % of 2 311−1.4 pts median 90.5 %7.1 % of 2 0106.4 % of 2 316
Aurore LALUCQ FranceS&D76.6 % of 2 521−13.5 pts median 90.1 %91.7 % of 1 931−4.2 pts median 95.8 %7.4 % of 1 8961.7 % of 1 931
Axel VOSS GermanyEPP82.3 % of 2 521−8.7 pts median 91.0 %98.6 % of 2 074+4.8 pts median 93.7 %0.8 % of 2 0030.7 % of 2 074
Barbara BONTE BelgiumPatriots99.5 % of 2 521+9.1 pts median 90.4 %83.4 % of 2 501+0.3 pts median 83.1 %7.8 % of 1 97011.6 % of 2 509
Barry ANDREWS IrelandRenew98.3 % of 2 521+6.5 pts median 91.7 %93.0 % of 2 476−2.1 pts median 95.1 %6.1 % of 2 4010.5 % of 2 478
Barry COWEN IrelandRenew84.4 % of 2 521−7.3 pts median 91.7 %92.5 % of 2 127−2.6 pts median 95.1 %6.5 % of 2 0620.6 % of 2 128
Bart GROOTHUIS NetherlandsRenew65.5 % of 2 521−26.3 pts median 91.7 %90.4 % of 1 650−4.7 pts median 95.1 %7.8 % of 1 5960.7 % of 1 650
Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZ PolandEPP99.4 % of 2 521+8.4 pts median 91.0 %92.8 % of 2 505−0.9 pts median 93.7 %5.8 % of 2 4011.4 % of 2 505
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ PolandEPP97.6 % of 2 521+6.6 pts median 91.0 %92.8 % of 2 460−1.0 pts median 93.7 %5.4 % of 2 3591.5 % of 2 460
Beata SZYDŁO PolandECR94.6 % of 2 521+2.7 pts median 91.9 %90.7 % of 2 379+0.3 pts median 90.5 %3.4 % of 2 0698.3 % of 2 385
Beatrice TIMGREN SwedenECR98.1 % of 2 521+6.2 pts median 91.9 %74.3 % of 2 467−16.2 pts median 90.5 %21.9 % of 2 1449.6 % of 2 473
Benedetta SCUDERI ItalyGreens98.8 % of 2 521+6.3 pts median 92.5 %92.1 % of 2 490−5.4 pts median 97.5 %7.1 % of 2 4492.7 % of 2 491
Benoit CASSART BelgiumRenew98.9 % of 2 521+7.2 pts median 91.7 %94.5 % of 2 492−0.6 pts median 95.1 %4.0 % of 2 4181.2 % of 2 494
Bernard GUETTA FranceRenew93.4 % of 2 521+1.7 pts median 91.7 %96.5 % of 2 353+1.4 pts median 95.1 %2.5 % of 2 2841.1 % of 2 355
Bernd LANGE GermanyS&D94.2 % of 2 521+4.0 pts median 90.1 %98.0 % of 2 374+2.2 pts median 95.8 %1.2 % of 2 3211.5 % of 2 374
Bert-Jan RUISSEN NetherlandsECR99.9 % of 2 521+8.0 pts median 91.9 %85.8 % of 2 512−4.7 pts median 90.5 %11.5 % of 2 18411.6 % of 2 518
Biljana BORZAN CroatiaS&D90.3 % of 2 521+0.2 pts median 90.1 %90.2 % of 2 276−5.7 pts median 95.8 %8.7 % of 2 2264.7 % of 2 276
Billy KELLEHER IrelandRenew99.2 % of 2 521+7.5 pts median 91.7 %93.6 % of 2 500−1.5 pts median 95.1 %5.5 % of 2 4250.6 % of 2 502
Birgit SIPPEL GermanyS&D80.9 % of 2 521−9.2 pts median 90.1 %96.4 % of 2 040+0.5 pts median 95.8 %2.8 % of 1 9980.9 % of 2 040
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI PolandEPP97.8 % of 2 521+6.8 pts median 91.0 %92.5 % of 2 465−1.2 pts median 93.7 %4.9 % of 2 3713.6 % of 2 465
Bogdan RZOŃCA PolandECR98.8 % of 2 521+7.0 pts median 91.9 %89.9 % of 2 486−0.6 pts median 90.5 %4.4 % of 2 1588.6 % of 2 492
Borja GIMÉNEZ LARRAZ SpainEPP94.8 % of 2 521+3.8 pts median 91.0 %94.5 % of 2 389+0.8 pts median 93.7 %4.0 % of 2 3012.3 % of 2 389
Borys BUDKA PolandEPP89.4 % of 2 521−1.6 pts median 91.0 %92.9 % of 2 253−0.9 pts median 93.7 %4.7 % of 2 1601.9 % of 2 253
Brando BENIFEI ItalyS&D82.6 % of 2 521−7.5 pts median 90.1 %95.3 % of 2 083−0.5 pts median 95.8 %3.9 % of 2 0431.3 % of 2 083
Branislav ONDRUŠ SlovakiaNo group92.3 % of 2 521—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 17.1 % of 2 327
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.