Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members

2025: 2 891 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 91.2 % (724 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

725 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PolandPatriots87.6 % of 2 891−5.7 pts median 93.3 %86.8 % of 2 527+3.7 pts median 83.1 %6.2 % of 2 0419.6 % of 2 533
Anna CAVAZZINI GermanyGreens98.3 % of 2 891+3.3 pts median 95.1 %98.6 % of 2 843+1.4 pts median 97.2 %0.7 % of 2 7814.2 % of 2 843
Anna Maria CISINT ItalyPatriots72.7 % of 2 891−20.6 pts median 93.3 %83.1 % of 2 095±0.0 pts median 83.1 %9.9 % of 1 71411.8 % of 2 101
Anna STROLENBERG NetherlandsGreens99.3 % of 2 891+4.2 pts median 95.1 %97.1 % of 2 870−0.1 pts median 97.2 %1.6 % of 2 8074.3 % of 2 870
Anna STÜRGKH AustriaRenew99.4 % of 2 891+8.4 pts median 91.1 %96.7 % of 2 875+0.7 pts median 96.0 %2.4 % of 2 8021.0 % of 2 875
Anna ZALEWSKA PolandECR98.3 % of 2 891+6.1 pts median 92.1 %90.9 % of 2 833−0.7 pts median 91.5 %3.2 % of 2 4778.1 % of 2 841
Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON FinlandRenew86.9 % of 2 891−4.2 pts median 91.1 %97.7 % of 2 512+1.7 pts median 96.0 %1.5 % of 2 4550.9 % of 2 512
Annalisa CORRADO ItalyS&D81.0 % of 2 891−9.0 pts median 90.0 %97.2 % of 2 341+0.7 pts median 96.5 %2.5 % of 2 3212.0 % of 2 343
Annamária VICSEK HungaryPatriots85.3 % of 2 891−8.0 pts median 93.3 %81.4 % of 2 461−1.6 pts median 83.1 %10.4 % of 1 99712.9 % of 2 466
Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT FrancePatriots92.2 % of 2 891−1.1 pts median 93.3 %93.3 % of 2 659+10.2 pts median 83.1 %0.4 % of 2 15811.3 % of 2 665
Anouk VAN BRUG NetherlandsRenew50.2 % of 2 891−40.9 pts median 91.1 %95.4 % of 1 450−0.5 pts median 96.0 %3.3 % of 1 4130.8 % of 1 450
Anthony SMITH FranceThe Left98.5 % of 2 891+8.2 pts median 90.3 %94.2 % of 2 843+0.8 pts median 93.4 %2.0 % of 2 6384.6 % of 2 847
Antonella SBERNA ItalyECR91.9 % of 2 891−0.2 pts median 92.1 %93.3 % of 2 650+1.8 pts median 91.5 %0.7 % of 2 30711.4 % of 2 657
Antonín STANĚK CzechiaPatriots87.8 % of 1 109−5.5 pts median 93.3 %87.8 % of 970+4.8 pts median 83.1 %6.7 % of 81213.0 % of 974
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE SpainEPP90.1 % of 2 891−0.8 pts median 91.0 %94.1 % of 2 606+0.5 pts median 93.5 %3.2 % of 2 4722.1 % of 2 606
António TÂNGER CORRÊA PortugalPatriots97.3 % of 2 891+4.0 pts median 93.3 %88.6 % of 2 806+5.6 pts median 83.1 %4.2 % of 2 25710.7 % of 2 813
Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN IrelandS&D72.1 % of 2 891−18.0 pts median 90.0 %94.4 % of 2 082−2.1 pts median 96.5 %5.3 % of 2 0604.8 % of 2 083
Arash SAEIDI FranceThe Left84.3 % of 2 891−6.0 pts median 90.3 %94.5 % of 2 433+1.1 pts median 93.4 %1.8 % of 2 2504.4 % of 2 437
Arba KOKALARI SwedenEPP78.0 % of 2 891−13.0 pts median 91.0 %92.1 % of 2 254−1.4 pts median 93.5 %6.8 % of 2 1421.9 % of 2 254
Arkadiusz MULARCZYK PolandECR98.0 % of 2 891+5.9 pts median 92.1 %91.4 % of 2 826−0.1 pts median 91.5 %3.0 % of 2 4697.5 % of 2 834
Arno BAUSEMER GermanyESN77.9 % of 2 891−12.3 pts median 90.3 %99.2 % of 2 250+4.2 pts median 94.9 %0.6 % of 2 1289.6 % of 2 253
Asger CHRISTENSEN DenmarkRenew90.3 % of 2 891−0.7 pts median 91.1 %91.9 % of 2 611−4.1 pts median 96.0 %7.1 % of 2 5431.6 % of 2 611
Assita KANKO BelgiumECR64.7 % of 2 891−27.5 pts median 92.1 %68.3 % of 1 865−23.2 pts median 91.5 %29.4 % of 1 62521.2 % of 1 870
Auke ZIJLSTRA NetherlandsPatriots99.5 % of 2 891+6.2 pts median 93.3 %80.8 % of 2 869−2.2 pts median 83.1 %12.0 % of 2 3119.8 % of 2 876
Aura SALLA FinlandEPP84.3 % of 2 891−6.7 pts median 91.0 %96.1 % of 2 436+2.6 pts median 93.5 %3.1 % of 2 3111.3 % of 2 436
Aurelijus VERYGA LithuaniaECR88.2 % of 2 891−3.9 pts median 92.1 %91.6 % of 2 544+0.1 pts median 91.5 %4.3 % of 2 2197.9 % of 2 550
Aurore LALUCQ FranceS&D84.0 % of 2 891−6.0 pts median 90.0 %94.3 % of 2 428−2.2 pts median 96.5 %5.4 % of 2 4112.3 % of 2 429
Axel VOSS GermanyEPP72.0 % of 2 891−19.0 pts median 91.0 %98.5 % of 2 081+4.9 pts median 93.5 %1.1 % of 1 9990.5 % of 2 081
Barbara BONTE BelgiumPatriots96.4 % of 2 891+3.1 pts median 93.3 %85.3 % of 2 779+2.2 pts median 83.1 %7.5 % of 2 23410.7 % of 2 786
Barry ANDREWS IrelandRenew78.5 % of 2 891−12.6 pts median 91.1 %91.2 % of 2 268−4.8 pts median 96.0 %8.0 % of 2 2221.0 % of 2 268
Barry COWEN IrelandRenew83.9 % of 2 891−7.1 pts median 91.1 %92.3 % of 2 426−3.7 pts median 96.0 %6.8 % of 2 3690.9 % of 2 426
Bart GROOTHUIS NetherlandsRenew85.2 % of 2 891−5.8 pts median 91.1 %92.2 % of 2 464−3.7 pts median 96.0 %6.9 % of 2 4061.8 % of 2 464
Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZ PolandEPP96.7 % of 2 891+5.7 pts median 91.0 %91.2 % of 2 795−2.3 pts median 93.5 %6.0 % of 2 6642.4 % of 2 795
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ PolandEPP93.1 % of 2 891+2.1 pts median 91.0 %88.3 % of 2 691−5.3 pts median 93.5 %9.5 % of 2 5662.6 % of 2 691
Beata SZYDŁO PolandECR91.7 % of 2 891−0.4 pts median 92.1 %91.3 % of 2 645−0.2 pts median 91.5 %3.3 % of 2 3168.0 % of 2 652
Beatrice TIMGREN SwedenECR99.1 % of 2 891+6.9 pts median 92.1 %74.4 % of 2 856−17.1 pts median 91.5 %22.8 % of 2 4948.2 % of 2 864
Benedetta SCUDERI ItalyGreens91.9 % of 2 891−3.2 pts median 95.1 %92.2 % of 2 656−5.0 pts median 97.2 %6.7 % of 2 6063.7 % of 2 656
Benoit CASSART BelgiumRenew84.0 % of 2 891−7.0 pts median 91.1 %96.2 % of 2 429+0.2 pts median 96.0 %2.9 % of 2 3730.8 % of 2 429
Bernard GUETTA FranceRenew82.6 % of 2 891−8.5 pts median 91.1 %95.3 % of 2 387−0.7 pts median 96.0 %3.4 % of 2 3261.1 % of 2 387
Bernd LANGE GermanyS&D86.3 % of 2 891−3.8 pts median 90.0 %98.6 % of 2 492+2.1 pts median 96.5 %1.0 % of 2 4661.8 % of 2 494
Bert-Jan RUISSEN NetherlandsECR99.7 % of 2 891+7.6 pts median 92.1 %87.1 % of 2 875−4.4 pts median 91.5 %9.8 % of 2 5159.5 % of 2 883
Biljana BORZAN CroatiaS&D93.1 % of 2 891+3.1 pts median 90.0 %94.9 % of 2 690−1.6 pts median 96.5 %4.8 % of 2 6653.6 % of 2 692
Billy KELLEHER IrelandRenew92.3 % of 2 891+1.2 pts median 91.1 %92.2 % of 2 668−3.7 pts median 96.0 %6.6 % of 2 6000.9 % of 2 668
Birgit SIPPEL GermanyS&D79.9 % of 2 891−10.2 pts median 90.0 %98.1 % of 2 307+1.6 pts median 96.5 %1.5 % of 2 2900.6 % of 2 309
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI PolandEPP99.0 % of 2 891+8.1 pts median 91.0 %90.9 % of 2 863−2.6 pts median 93.5 %6.3 % of 2 7283.4 % of 2 863
Bogdan RZOŃCA PolandECR99.3 % of 2 891+7.2 pts median 92.1 %91.5 % of 2 864±0.0 pts median 91.5 %2.9 % of 2 5047.5 % of 2 872
Borja GIMÉNEZ LARRAZ SpainEPP99.3 % of 2 891+8.3 pts median 91.0 %94.6 % of 2 871+1.0 pts median 93.5 %3.0 % of 2 7322.0 % of 2 871
Borys BUDKA PolandEPP78.6 % of 2 891−12.3 pts median 91.0 %89.1 % of 2 273−4.5 pts median 93.5 %8.0 % of 2 1503.1 % of 2 273
Brando BENIFEI ItalyS&D74.4 % of 2 891−15.7 pts median 90.0 %96.9 % of 2 148+0.4 pts median 96.5 %2.6 % of 2 1292.4 % of 2 150
Branislav ONDRUŠ SlovakiaNo group59.0 % of 2 891—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 16.1 % of 1 705
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.