Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members

2026: 261 final votes with named positions — 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 90.8 % (723 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

727 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Patryk JAKI PolandECR92.3 % of 261−0.4 pts median 92.7 %86.7 % of 240+0.8 pts median 85.8 %5.1 % of 19819.5 % of 241
Paulius SAUDARGAS LithuaniaEPP97.7 % of 261+6.5 pts median 91.2 %98.4 % of 255+3.5 pts median 94.9 %1.2 % of 2411.2 % of 255
Paulo CUNHA PortugalEPP97.7 % of 261+6.5 pts median 91.2 %98.8 % of 255+3.9 pts median 94.9 %0.8 % of 2410.4 % of 255
Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL PortugalEPP87.7 % of 261−3.4 pts median 91.2 %97.4 % of 229+2.5 pts median 94.9 %2.3 % of 2160.4 % of 229
Pekka TOVERI FinlandEPP93.1 % of 261+1.9 pts median 91.2 %98.8 % of 243+3.8 pts median 94.9 %1.3 % of 2320.4 % of 243
Per CLAUSEN DenmarkThe Left95.4 % of 261+8.4 pts median 87.0 %81.0 % of 247−4.2 pts median 85.2 %13.1 % of 19810.0 % of 249
Pernando BARRENA ARZA SpainThe Left59.0 % of 261−28.0 pts median 87.0 %85.5 % of 152+0.3 pts median 85.2 %6.3 % of 12626.6 % of 154
Petar VOLGIN BulgariaESN98.5 % of 261+6.1 pts median 92.3 %83.7 % of 257−7.3 pts median 91.0 %14.6 % of 24617.5 % of 257
Peter AGIUS MaltaEPP70.1 % of 261−21.1 pts median 91.2 %90.2 % of 183−4.8 pts median 94.9 %10.5 % of 1718.2 % of 183
Peter LIESE GermanyEPP93.5 % of 261+2.3 pts median 91.2 %99.2 % of 244+4.3 pts median 94.9 %0.9 % of 2300.0 % of 244
Petr BYSTRON GermanyESN85.8 % of 261−6.5 pts median 92.3 %96.9 % of 224+5.9 pts median 91.0 %2.8 % of 21317.0 % of 224
Petra STEGER AustriaPatriots95.0 % of 261+5.7 pts median 89.3 %70.4 % of 247−8.4 pts median 78.9 %21.8 % of 18816.5 % of 248
Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS LithuaniaRenew98.9 % of 261+6.5 pts median 92.3 %95.7 % of 257+2.6 pts median 93.1 %0.8 % of 2361.2 % of 258
Petras GRAŽULIS LithuaniaESN81.6 % of 261−10.7 pts median 92.3 %69.0 % of 213−21.9 pts median 91.0 %29.1 % of 20325.4 % of 213
Philippe OLIVIER FrancePatriots81.2 % of 261−8.0 pts median 89.3 %94.3 % of 211+15.5 pts median 78.9 %0.0 % of 16214.2 % of 212
Pierfrancesco MARAN ItalyS&D95.4 % of 261+5.4 pts median 90.0 %99.6 % of 249+2.2 pts median 97.4 %0.0 % of 2470.0 % of 249
Pierre JOUVET FranceS&D73.2 % of 261−16.9 pts median 90.0 %92.7 % of 191−4.7 pts median 97.4 %6.3 % of 1893.7 % of 191
Pierre PIMPIE FrancePatriots98.5 % of 261+9.2 pts median 89.3 %94.1 % of 256+15.3 pts median 78.9 %0.0 % of 19413.6 % of 257
Pierre-Romain THIONNET FrancePatriots92.3 % of 261+3.1 pts median 89.3 %93.8 % of 240+14.9 pts median 78.9 %0.0 % of 18612.4 % of 241
Pietro FIOCCHI ItalyECR84.7 % of 261−8.0 pts median 92.7 %90.0 % of 220+4.2 pts median 85.8 %4.9 % of 18219.9 % of 221
Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA SpainEPP72.8 % of 261−18.4 pts median 91.2 %94.7 % of 190−0.2 pts median 94.9 %3.3 % of 1802.1 % of 190
Pina PICIERNO changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.ItalyRenew85.1 % of 261not compared median 90.0 %96.4 % of 221not compared median 97.4 %1.4 % of 2121.4 % of 222
Piotr MÜLLER PolandECR75.9 % of 261−16.9 pts median 92.7 %85.3 % of 197−0.6 pts median 85.8 %4.3 % of 16119.7 % of 198
Rachel BLOM NetherlandsPatriots99.6 % of 261+10.3 pts median 89.3 %74.1 % of 259−4.7 pts median 78.9 %14.2 % of 19710.0 % of 260
Rada LAYKOVA BulgariaESN80.5 % of 261−11.9 pts median 92.3 %91.0 % of 210±0.0 pts median 91.0 %7.8 % of 20415.2 % of 210
Radan KANEV BulgariaEPP67.4 % of 261−23.8 pts median 91.2 %92.0 % of 176−2.9 pts median 94.9 %5.3 % of 1706.8 % of 176
Raffaele STANCANELLI ItalyPatriots70.5 % of 261−18.8 pts median 89.3 %82.0 % of 183+3.1 pts median 78.9 %13.7 % of 13923.9 % of 184
Raffaele TOPO ItalyS&D97.7 % of 261+7.7 pts median 90.0 %98.4 % of 255+1.1 pts median 97.4 %1.6 % of 2530.4 % of 255
Ralf SEEKATZ GermanyEPP87.4 % of 261−3.8 pts median 91.2 %100.0 % of 228+5.1 pts median 94.9 %0.0 % of 2150.0 % of 228
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN FranceS&D85.4 % of 261−4.6 pts median 90.0 %94.2 % of 223−3.2 pts median 97.4 %5.4 % of 2213.1 % of 223
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE NetherlandsRenew99.6 % of 261+7.3 pts median 92.3 %94.6 % of 259+1.5 pts median 93.1 %1.7 % of 2380.8 % of 260
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ LithuaniaEPP75.9 % of 261−15.3 pts median 91.2 %99.5 % of 198+4.6 pts median 94.9 %0.0 % of 1910.0 % of 198
Rasmus ANDRESEN GermanyGreens90.8 % of 261−1.7 pts median 92.5 %94.9 % of 237−0.3 pts median 95.3 %2.2 % of 2274.6 % of 237
Rasmus NORDQVIST DenmarkGreens99.2 % of 261+6.7 pts median 92.5 %97.3 % of 259+2.0 pts median 95.3 %1.2 % of 2493.5 % of 259
Raúl DE LA HOZ QUINTANO SpainEPP90.4 % of 261−0.8 pts median 91.2 %94.5 % of 236−0.4 pts median 94.9 %3.6 % of 2223.0 % of 236
Regina DOHERTY IrelandEPP84.7 % of 261−6.5 pts median 91.2 %99.1 % of 221+4.2 pts median 94.9 %1.0 % of 2090.5 % of 221
Reinhold LOPATKA AustriaEPP97.7 % of 261+6.5 pts median 91.2 %92.9 % of 255−2.0 pts median 94.9 %4.1 % of 2432.4 % of 255
Reinier VAN LANSCHOT NetherlandsGreens97.3 % of 261+4.8 pts median 92.5 %95.7 % of 254+0.4 pts median 95.3 %2.9 % of 2435.5 % of 254
Reinis POZŅAKS LatviaECR96.6 % of 261+3.8 pts median 92.7 %86.9 % of 251+1.0 pts median 85.8 %8.7 % of 20815.5 % of 252
René AUST GermanyESN92.3 % of 261±0.0 pts median 92.3 %98.8 % of 241+7.8 pts median 91.0 %0.9 % of 23016.6 % of 241
René REPASI GermanyS&D95.4 % of 261+5.4 pts median 90.0 %98.0 % of 249+0.6 pts median 97.4 %1.2 % of 2470.4 % of 249
Rihards KOLS LatviaECR86.2 % of 261−6.5 pts median 92.7 %84.8 % of 224−1.0 pts median 85.8 %11.3 % of 18616.4 % of 225
Riho TERRAS EstoniaEPP80.8 % of 261−10.3 pts median 91.2 %93.4 % of 211−1.6 pts median 94.9 %6.1 % of 1981.9 % of 211
Rima HASSAN FranceThe Left82.0 % of 261−5.0 pts median 87.0 %91.9 % of 211+6.8 pts median 85.2 %0.6 % of 17317.3 % of 214
Robert BIEDROŃ PolandS&D99.6 % of 261+9.6 pts median 90.0 %98.8 % of 260+1.5 pts median 97.4 %1.2 % of 2580.4 % of 260
Roberta METSOLA No vote recorded while in office in this period (not the same as absent: chairing the sittings, as the President does, looks the same).MaltaEPP0.0 % of 261not compared median 91.2 %no votes not compared median 94.9 %no votes no votes
Roberto VANNACCI changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.ItalyESN99.2 % of 261not compared median 92.3 %83.7 % of 233not compared median 91.0 %12.4 % of 21722.0 % of 259
Roberts ZĪLE LatviaECR84.3 % of 261−8.4 pts median 92.7 %85.8 % of 219±0.0 pts median 85.8 %11.0 % of 18215.9 % of 220
Rody TOLASSY FrancePatriots87.7 % of 261−1.5 pts median 89.3 %94.3 % of 228+15.4 pts median 78.9 %0.0 % of 17413.5 % of 229
Roman HAIDER AustriaPatriots99.6 % of 261+10.3 pts median 89.3 %71.0 % of 259−7.8 pts median 78.9 %20.8 % of 19716.5 % of 260
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.