Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply

2025: 2 891 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 91.2 % (724 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

725 members

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Marko VEŠLIGAJ	Marko VEŠLIGAJ	Croatia	S&D	71.5 % of 2 891	−18.5 pts median 90.0 %	92.8 % of 2 065	−3.7 pts median 96.5 %	6.8 % of 2 045	4.7 % of 2 067
Select Markus BUCHHEIT	Markus BUCHHEIT	Germany	ESN	92.6 % of 2 891	+2.3 pts median 90.3 %	96.6 % of 2 675	+1.7 pts median 94.9 %	2.7 % of 2 558	8.2 % of 2 677
Select Markus FERBER	Markus FERBER	Germany	EPP	96.6 % of 2 891	+5.6 pts median 91.0 %	96.7 % of 2 793	+3.2 pts median 93.5 %	1.6 % of 2 658	1.1 % of 2 793
Select Marlena MALĄG	Marlena MALĄG	Poland	ECR	97.2 % of 2 891	+5.1 pts median 92.1 %	91.2 % of 2 803	−0.4 pts median 91.5 %	2.9 % of 2 447	7.4 % of 2 811
Select Marta TEMIDO	Marta TEMIDO	Portugal	S&D	86.3 % of 2 891	−3.8 pts median 90.0 %	98.9 % of 2 492	+2.4 pts median 96.5 %	0.9 % of 2 468	1.2 % of 2 494
Select Marta WCISŁO	Marta WCISŁO	Poland	EPP	98.5 % of 2 891	+7.6 pts median 91.0 %	89.0 % of 2 849	−4.5 pts median 93.5 %	8.6 % of 2 715	2.6 % of 2 849
Select Martin GÜNTHER	Martin GÜNTHER	Germany	The Left	97.1 % of 1 109	+6.8 pts median 90.3 %	97.3 % of 1 077	+3.9 pts median 93.4 %	1.3 % of 1 019	2.8 % of 1 077
Select Martin HÄUSLING	Martin HÄUSLING	Germany	Greens	96.2 % of 2 891	+1.1 pts median 95.1 %	97.9 % of 2 781	+0.7 pts median 97.2 %	1.2 % of 2 721	4.8 % of 2 781
Select Martin HOJSÍK	Martin HOJSÍK	Slovakia	Renew	93.0 % of 2 891	+2.0 pts median 91.1 %	96.9 % of 2 689	+0.9 pts median 96.0 %	2.2 % of 2 621	1.5 % of 2 689
Select Martin SCHIRDEWAN	Martin SCHIRDEWAN	Germany	The Left	94.2 % of 2 891	+3.9 pts median 90.3 %	96.3 % of 2 720	+2.9 pts median 93.4 %	1.7 % of 2 516	5.4 % of 2 724
Select Martin SONNEBORN	Martin SONNEBORN	Germany	No group	83.7 % of 2 891	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	27.9 % of 2 419
Select Martine KEMP	Martine KEMP	Luxembourg	EPP	78.8 % of 2 891	−12.2 pts median 91.0 %	96.2 % of 2 278	+2.7 pts median 93.5 %	2.1 % of 2 150	1.2 % of 2 278
Select Mārtiņš STAĶIS	Mārtiņš STAĶIS	Latvia	Greens	97.3 % of 2 891	+2.2 pts median 95.1 %	93.6 % of 2 812	−3.7 pts median 97.2 %	5.3 % of 2 750	6.5 % of 2 812
Select Mary KHAN	Mary KHAN	Germany	ESN	95.5 % of 2 891	+5.2 pts median 90.3 %	97.0 % of 2 759	+2.0 pts median 94.9 %	2.6 % of 2 628	10.2 % of 2 761
Select Massimiliano SALINI	Massimiliano SALINI	Italy	EPP	99.5 % of 2 891	+8.5 pts median 91.0 %	89.9 % of 2 877	−3.7 pts median 93.5 %	8.3 % of 2 738	2.6 % of 2 877
Select Matej TONIN	Matej TONIN	Slovenia	EPP	97.9 % of 2 891	+6.9 pts median 91.0 %	89.6 % of 2 830	−3.9 pts median 93.5 %	8.1 % of 2 695	1.5 % of 2 830
Select Mathilde ANDROUËT	Mathilde ANDROUËT	France	Patriots	85.8 % of 2 891	−7.5 pts median 93.3 %	93.8 % of 2 475	+10.7 pts median 83.1 %	0.3 % of 2 007	11.3 % of 2 481
Select Matjaž NEMEC	Matjaž NEMEC	Slovenia	S&D	92.0 % of 2 891	+2.0 pts median 90.0 %	94.1 % of 2 658	−2.4 pts median 96.5 %	5.6 % of 2 631	2.4 % of 2 660
Select Matteo RICCI	Matteo RICCI	Italy	S&D	81.8 % of 2 891	−8.2 pts median 90.0 %	97.5 % of 2 364	+1.0 pts median 96.5 %	2.1 % of 2 342	1.9 % of 2 366
Select Matthias ECKE	Matthias ECKE	Germany	S&D	91.8 % of 2 891	+1.8 pts median 90.0 %	97.6 % of 2 653	+1.1 pts median 96.5 %	1.9 % of 2 627	2.3 % of 2 655
Select Matthieu VALET	Matthieu VALET	France	Patriots	71.9 % of 2 891	−21.4 pts median 93.3 %	93.4 % of 2 075	+10.4 pts median 83.1 %	0.5 % of 1 649	12.2 % of 2 080
Select Mélanie DISDIER	Mélanie DISDIER	France	Patriots	97.7 % of 2 891	+4.4 pts median 93.3 %	92.9 % of 2 817	+9.9 pts median 83.1 %	0.6 % of 2 274	11.1 % of 2 824
Select Mélissa CAMARA	Mélissa CAMARA	France	Greens	92.9 % of 2 891	−2.1 pts median 95.1 %	93.9 % of 2 687	−3.4 pts median 97.2 %	5.1 % of 2 626	2.7 % of 2 687
Select Merja KYLLÖNEN	Merja KYLLÖNEN	Finland	The Left	93.2 % of 2 891	+2.9 pts median 90.3 %	85.4 % of 2 690	−8.0 pts median 93.4 %	10.9 % of 2 492	4.7 % of 2 694
Select Michael BLOSS	Michael BLOSS	Germany	Greens	97.0 % of 2 891	+1.9 pts median 95.1 %	97.9 % of 2 803	+0.7 pts median 97.2 %	1.2 % of 2 742	4.1 % of 2 803
Select Michael GAHLER	Michael GAHLER	Germany	EPP	93.5 % of 2 891	+2.5 pts median 91.0 %	98.2 % of 2 703	+4.6 pts median 93.5 %	1.2 % of 2 572	0.4 % of 2 703
Select Michael MCNAMARA	Michael MCNAMARA	Ireland	Renew	89.7 % of 2 891	−1.3 pts median 91.1 %	80.8 % of 2 594	−15.2 pts median 96.0 %	18.4 % of 2 528	8.0 % of 2 594
Select Michael VON DER SCHULENBURG	Michael VON DER SCHULENBURG	Germany	No group	96.9 % of 2 891	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	27.2 % of 2 800
Select Michał DWORCZYK	Michał DWORCZYK	Poland	ECR	68.8 % of 2 891	−23.4 pts median 92.1 %	92.0 % of 1 982	+0.5 pts median 91.5 %	2.8 % of 1 747	7.5 % of 1 988
Select Michał KOBOSKO	Michał KOBOSKO	Poland	Renew	97.0 % of 2 891	+6.0 pts median 91.1 %	97.1 % of 2 805	+1.1 pts median 96.0 %	2.0 % of 2 733	1.2 % of 2 805
Select Michał SZCZERBA	Michał SZCZERBA	Poland	EPP	98.1 % of 2 891	+7.1 pts median 91.0 %	89.0 % of 2 836	−4.5 pts median 93.5 %	8.9 % of 2 698	2.1 % of 2 836
Select Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	Poland	EPP	90.1 % of 2 891	−0.8 pts median 91.0 %	91.3 % of 2 606	−2.3 pts median 93.5 %	6.6 % of 2 480	1.8 % of 2 606
Select Michal WIEZIK	Michal WIEZIK	Slovakia	Renew	87.3 % of 2 891	−3.7 pts median 91.1 %	97.0 % of 2 525	+1.0 pts median 96.0 %	2.2 % of 2 467	1.7 % of 2 525
Select Michalis HADJIPANTELA	Michalis HADJIPANTELA	Cyprus	EPP	92.5 % of 2 891	+1.5 pts median 91.0 %	91.3 % of 2 673	−2.2 pts median 93.5 %	7.0 % of 2 537	3.4 % of 2 673
Select Michele PICARO	Michele PICARO	Italy	ECR	92.1 % of 2 891	±0.0 pts median 92.1 %	93.3 % of 2 656	+1.8 pts median 91.5 %	1.2 % of 2 321	10.8 % of 2 663
Select Mieke ANDRIESE	Mieke ANDRIESE	Netherlands	Patriots	82.5 % of 458	−10.8 pts median 93.3 %	75.8 % of 376	−7.3 pts median 83.1 %	14.3 % of 301	12.7 % of 378
Select Mihai TUDOSE	Mihai TUDOSE	Romania	S&D	57.2 % of 2 891	−32.8 pts median 90.0 %	94.6 % of 1 655	−2.0 pts median 96.5 %	5.3 % of 1 646	5.2 % of 1 655
Select Mika AALTOLA	Mika AALTOLA	Finland	EPP	88.3 % of 2 891	−2.6 pts median 91.0 %	98.2 % of 2 554	+4.7 pts median 93.5 %	0.8 % of 2 423	0.4 % of 2 554
Select Milan MAZUREK	Milan MAZUREK ⇄changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Slovakia	ESN	90.4 % of 2 891	not compared median 90.3 %	78.0 % of 2 610	not compared median 94.9 %	18.6 % of 2 483	16.3 % of 2 614
Select Milan UHRÍK	Milan UHRÍK	Slovakia	ESN	87.7 % of 2 891	−2.6 pts median 90.3 %	77.3 % of 2 531	−17.6 pts median 94.9 %	19.1 % of 2 398	17.0 % of 2 534
Select Milan ZVER	Milan ZVER	Slovenia	EPP	88.2 % of 2 891	−2.7 pts median 91.0 %	77.9 % of 2 551	−15.6 pts median 93.5 %	19.6 % of 2 413	4.3 % of 2 551
Select Mimmo LUCANO	Mimmo LUCANO	Italy	The Left	41.7 % of 2 891	−48.6 pts median 90.3 %	94.4 % of 1 205	+1.1 pts median 93.4 %	2.7 % of 1 118	3.2 % of 1 206
Select Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	Romania	EPP	98.0 % of 2 891	+7.1 pts median 91.0 %	98.2 % of 2 834	+4.7 pts median 93.5 %	0.4 % of 2 696	1.0 % of 2 834
Select Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN	Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN	Spain	Patriots	89.0 % of 2 891	−4.3 pts median 93.3 %	82.7 % of 2 569	−0.4 pts median 83.1 %	8.3 % of 2 062	8.4 % of 2 574
Select Miriam LEXMANN	Miriam LEXMANN	Slovakia	EPP	87.6 % of 2 891	−3.4 pts median 91.0 %	79.2 % of 2 533	−14.4 pts median 93.5 %	18.4 % of 2 402	6.5 % of 2 533
Select Mirosława NYKIEL	Mirosława NYKIEL	Poland	EPP	99.1 % of 2 891	+8.1 pts median 91.0 %	90.4 % of 2 865	−3.2 pts median 93.5 %	7.2 % of 2 727	2.6 % of 2 865
Select Mohammed CHAHIM	Mohammed CHAHIM	Netherlands	S&D	96.9 % of 2 891	+6.8 pts median 90.0 %	95.0 % of 2 798	−1.6 pts median 96.5 %	4.7 % of 2 776	2.3 % of 2 800
Select Monika BEŇOVÁ	Monika BEŇOVÁ	Slovakia	No group	74.1 % of 2 891	—no group line	no votes	—no group line	no votes	12.9 % of 2 141
Select Monika HOHLMEIER	Monika HOHLMEIER	Germany	EPP	76.8 % of 2 891	−14.1 pts median 91.0 %	96.8 % of 2 221	+3.2 pts median 93.5 %	2.2 % of 2 111	1.5 % of 2 221
Select Moritz KÖRNER	Moritz KÖRNER	Germany	Renew	97.3 % of 2 891	+6.3 pts median 91.1 %	91.9 % of 2 814	−4.1 pts median 96.0 %	7.1 % of 2 744	1.7 % of 2 814

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.