Skip to content

Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members
Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

2024 (from July): 66 final votes with named positions — 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 93.9 % (714 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

729 members

Export
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members’ voting records
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZGroup, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Marlena MALĄG PolandECR95.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 92.4 %93.5 % of 62+1.4 pts median 92.1 %1.9 % of 546.3 % of 63
Marta TEMIDO PortugalS&D93.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 95.5 %98.4 % of 62+0.1 pts median 98.3 %1.6 % of 621.6 % of 62
Marta WCISŁO PolandEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %84.6 % of 65−10.7 pts median 95.3 %1.9 % of 531.5 % of 65
Martin HÄUSLING GermanyGreens95.5 % of 66−1.5 pts median 97.0 %98.4 % of 63+1.6 pts median 96.8 %1.7 % of 590.0 % of 63
Martin HOJSÍK SlovakiaRenew95.5 % of 66±0.0 pts median 95.5 %90.0 % of 60−0.9 pts median 90.9 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 63
Martin SCHIRDEWAN GermanyThe Left95.5 % of 66+1.5 pts median 93.9 %87.3 % of 63+0.8 pts median 86.5 %1.9 % of 547.9 % of 63
Martin SONNEBORN GermanyNo group93.9 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 11.3 % of 62
Martine KEMP LuxembourgEPP18 of 18 — median 92.4 %17 of 18 — median 95.3 %1 of 17 0 of 18
Mārtiņš STAĶIS LatviaGreens95.5 % of 66−1.5 pts median 97.0 %96.8 % of 63±0.0 pts median 96.8 %3.4 % of 593.2 % of 63
Mary KHAN GermanyESN90.9 % of 66±0.0 pts median 90.9 %98.3 % of 60+3.9 pts median 94.4 %1.8 % of 5520.0 % of 60
Massimiliano SALINI ItalyEPP92.4 % of 66±0.0 pts median 92.4 %95.1 % of 61−0.3 pts median 95.3 %0 of 49 0.0 % of 61
Matej TONIN SloveniaEPP98.5 % of 66+6.1 pts median 92.4 %83.1 % of 65−12.3 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 530.0 % of 65
Mathilde ANDROUËT FrancePatriots97.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 93.9 %98.4 % of 64+13.5 pts median 85.0 %0.0 % of 5514.1 % of 64
Matjaž NEMEC SloveniaS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %95.3 % of 64−3.0 pts median 98.3 %4.7 % of 644.7 % of 64
Matteo RICCI ItalyS&D98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 65+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 650.0 % of 65
Matthias ECKE GermanyS&D93.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 95.5 %91.9 % of 62−6.3 pts median 98.3 %8.1 % of 624.8 % of 62
Matthieu VALET FrancePatriots100.0 % of 66+6.1 pts median 93.9 %97.0 % of 66+12.0 pts median 85.0 %0.0 % of 5615.2 % of 66
Mélanie DISDIER FrancePatriots98.5 % of 66+4.5 pts median 93.9 %98.5 % of 65+13.5 pts median 85.0 %0.0 % of 5515.4 % of 65
Mélissa CAMARA FranceGreens93.9 % of 66−3.0 pts median 97.0 %98.4 % of 62+1.6 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 580.0 % of 62
Merja KYLLÖNEN FinlandThe Left95.5 % of 66+1.5 pts median 93.9 %87.3 % of 63+0.8 pts median 86.5 %7.4 % of 541.6 % of 63
Michael BLOSS GermanyGreens97.0 % of 66±0.0 pts median 97.0 %100.0 % of 64+3.2 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 600.0 % of 64
Michael GAHLER GermanyEPP90.9 % of 66−1.5 pts median 92.4 %100.0 % of 60+4.7 pts median 95.3 %0 of 49 0.0 % of 60
Michael MCNAMARA IrelandRenew74.2 % of 66−21.2 pts median 95.5 %35 of 46 — median 90.9 %6 of 40 5 of 49
Michael VON DER SCHULENBURG GermanyNo group87.9 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 13.8 % of 58
Michał DWORCZYK PolandECR97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %96.8 % of 63+4.7 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 564.7 % of 64
Michał KOBOSKO PolandRenew98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %93.5 % of 62+2.6 pts median 90.9 %1.8 % of 553.1 % of 65
Michał SZCZERBA PolandEPP97.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 92.4 %85.9 % of 64−9.4 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 520.0 % of 64
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ PolandEPP95.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 92.4 %87.3 % of 63−8.0 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 510.0 % of 63
Michal WIEZIK SlovakiaRenew98.5 % of 66+3.0 pts median 95.5 %90.3 % of 62−0.6 pts median 90.9 %0.0 % of 550.0 % of 65
Michalis HADJIPANTELA CyprusEPP75.8 % of 66−16.7 pts median 92.4 %82.0 % of 50−13.3 pts median 95.3 %1 of 40 0.0 % of 50
Michele PICARO ItalyECR100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %93.8 % of 65+1.7 pts median 92.1 %0.0 % of 579.1 % of 66
Mihai TUDOSE RomaniaS&D53.0 % of 66−42.4 pts median 95.5 %35 of 35 — median 98.3 %0 of 35 0 of 35
Mika AALTOLA FinlandEPP86.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 92.4 %98.2 % of 57+2.9 pts median 95.3 %0 of 45 0.0 % of 57
Milan MAZUREK changed group SlovakiaESN100.0 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 18.2 % of 66
Milan UHRÍK SlovakiaESN100.0 % of 66+9.1 pts median 90.9 %78.5 % of 65−16.0 pts median 94.4 %16.7 % of 6022.7 % of 66
Milan ZVER SloveniaEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %78.8 % of 66−16.6 pts median 95.3 %3.7 % of 543.0 % of 66
Mimmo LUCANO ItalyThe Left40.9 % of 66−53.0 pts median 93.9 %25 of 27 — median 86.5 %0 of 24 3 of 27
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA RomaniaEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %93.9 % of 66−1.4 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 66
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN SpainPatriots97.0 % of 66+3.0 pts median 93.9 %65.6 % of 64−19.3 pts median 85.0 %31.5 % of 5415.6 % of 64
Miriam LEXMANN SlovakiaEPP89.4 % of 66−3.0 pts median 92.4 %81.4 % of 59−14.0 pts median 95.3 %2 of 49 3.4 % of 59
Mirosława NYKIEL PolandEPP100.0 % of 66+7.6 pts median 92.4 %87.9 % of 66−7.5 pts median 95.3 %0.0 % of 540.0 % of 66
Mohammed CHAHIM NetherlandsS&D100.0 % of 66+4.5 pts median 95.5 %100.0 % of 66+1.7 pts median 98.3 %0.0 % of 660.0 % of 66
Monika BEŇOVÁ SlovakiaNo group69.7 % of 66—no group lineno votes —no group lineno votes 7 of 46
Monika HOHLMEIER GermanyEPP86.4 % of 66−6.1 pts median 92.4 %98.2 % of 57+2.9 pts median 95.3 %0 of 45 0.0 % of 57
Moritz KÖRNER GermanyRenew97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %91.8 % of 61+0.9 pts median 90.9 %7.4 % of 541.6 % of 64
Morten LØKKEGAARD DenmarkRenew74.2 % of 66−21.2 pts median 95.5 %46 of 46 — median 90.9 %0 of 41 0 of 49
Mounir SATOURI FranceGreens98.5 % of 66+1.5 pts median 97.0 %96.9 % of 65+0.1 pts median 96.8 %0.0 % of 610.0 % of 65
Murielle LAURENT FranceS&D97.0 % of 66+1.5 pts median 95.5 %92.2 % of 64−6.1 pts median 98.3 %7.8 % of 644.7 % of 64
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR SpainS&D87.9 % of 66−7.6 pts median 95.5 %98.3 % of 58±0.0 pts median 98.3 %1.7 % of 580.0 % of 58
Nadine MORANO FranceEPP84.8 % of 66−7.6 pts median 92.4 %80.4 % of 56−15.0 pts median 95.3 %13.5 % of 5214.3 % of 56
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
  • Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.