Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

2026: 261 final votes with named positions — 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 90.8 % (723 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

54 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Alexandra GEESE	Alexandra GEESE	Germany	Greens	92.0 % of 261	−0.6 pts median 92.5 %	94.2 % of 240	−1.1 pts median 95.3 %	3.5 % of 230	6.3 % of 240
Select Alice KUHNKE	Alice KUHNKE	Sweden	Greens	98.9 % of 261	+6.3 pts median 92.5 %	95.7 % of 258	+0.5 pts median 95.3 %	2.8 % of 247	5.0 % of 258
Select Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Spain	Greens	76.6 % of 261	−15.9 pts median 92.5 %	82.0 % of 200	−13.3 pts median 95.3 %	17.2 % of 192	11.0 % of 200
Select Anna CAVAZZINI	Anna CAVAZZINI	Germany	Greens	98.9 % of 261	+6.3 pts median 92.5 %	93.8 % of 258	−1.5 pts median 95.3 %	3.6 % of 247	5.4 % of 258
Select Anna STROLENBERG	Anna STROLENBERG	Netherlands	Greens	98.5 % of 261	+5.9 pts median 92.5 %	95.7 % of 257	+0.5 pts median 95.3 %	3.3 % of 246	5.8 % of 257
Select Benedetta SCUDERI	Benedetta SCUDERI	Italy	Greens	96.9 % of 261	+4.4 pts median 92.5 %	90.5 % of 253	−4.7 pts median 95.3 %	8.7 % of 242	8.3 % of 253
Select Catarina VIEIRA	Catarina VIEIRA	Netherlands	Greens	79.7 % of 261	−12.8 pts median 92.5 %	95.7 % of 208	+0.4 pts median 95.3 %	3.5 % of 200	7.7 % of 208
Select Cristina GUARDA	Cristina GUARDA	Italy	Greens	92.7 % of 261	+0.2 pts median 92.5 %	90.5 % of 242	−4.8 pts median 95.3 %	8.6 % of 233	7.4 % of 242
Select Damian BOESELAGER	Damian BOESELAGER	Germany	Greens	89.7 % of 261	−2.9 pts median 92.5 %	95.3 % of 234	±0.0 pts median 95.3 %	3.6 % of 223	6.4 % of 234
Select Daniel FREUND	Daniel FREUND	Germany	Greens	99.2 % of 261	+6.7 pts median 92.5 %	95.4 % of 259	+0.1 pts median 95.3 %	2.0 % of 248	3.5 % of 259
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	France	Greens	96.9 % of 261	+4.4 pts median 92.5 %	90.9 % of 253	−4.4 pts median 95.3 %	7.9 % of 242	7.5 % of 253
Select Diana RIBA I GINER	Diana RIBA I GINER	Spain	Greens	77.4 % of 261	−15.1 pts median 92.5 %	88.1 % of 202	−7.1 pts median 95.3 %	10.8 % of 195	8.9 % of 202
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Germany	Greens	95.8 % of 261	+3.3 pts median 92.5 %	94.4 % of 250	−0.9 pts median 95.3 %	2.9 % of 239	6.4 % of 250
Select Gordan BOSANAC	Gordan BOSANAC	Croatia	Greens	99.2 % of 261	+6.7 pts median 92.5 %	98.1 % of 259	+2.8 pts median 95.3 %	0.4 % of 248	4.6 % of 259
Select Hannah NEUMANN	Hannah NEUMANN	Germany	Greens	97.7 % of 261	+5.2 pts median 92.5 %	94.1 % of 255	−1.1 pts median 95.3 %	3.3 % of 244	5.5 % of 255
Select Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Italy	Greens	69.3 % of 261	−23.2 pts median 92.5 %	86.2 % of 181	−9.1 pts median 95.3 %	12.1 % of 173	11.6 % of 181
Select Isabella LÖVIN	Isabella LÖVIN	Sweden	Greens	83.5 % of 261	−9.0 pts median 92.5 %	95.9 % of 218	+0.6 pts median 95.3 %	2.9 % of 208	6.0 % of 218
Select Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Spain	Greens	62.8 % of 261	−29.7 pts median 92.5 %	81.7 % of 164	−13.6 pts median 95.3 %	16.7 % of 156	11.6 % of 164
Select Jutta PAULUS	Jutta PAULUS	Germany	Greens	95.0 % of 261	+2.5 pts median 92.5 %	94.0 % of 248	−1.3 pts median 95.3 %	3.4 % of 237	6.0 % of 248
Select Kai TEGETHOFF	Kai TEGETHOFF	Germany	Greens	83.9 % of 261	−8.6 pts median 92.5 %	96.3 % of 219	+1.1 pts median 95.3 %	1.9 % of 209	5.0 % of 219
Select Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Germany	Greens	85.8 % of 261	−6.7 pts median 92.5 %	94.6 % of 224	−0.6 pts median 95.3 %	3.7 % of 215	6.3 % of 224
Select Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Netherlands	Greens	82.4 % of 261	−10.2 pts median 92.5 %	95.3 % of 215	+0.1 pts median 95.3 %	3.4 % of 207	7.0 % of 215
Select Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Denmark	Greens	84.7 % of 261	−7.9 pts median 92.5 %	95.5 % of 221	+0.2 pts median 95.3 %	2.8 % of 212	5.0 % of 221
Select Lena SCHILLING	Lena SCHILLING	Austria	Greens	96.6 % of 261	+4.0 pts median 92.5 %	97.2 % of 252	+2.0 pts median 95.3 %	0.4 % of 242	6.0 % of 252
Select Leoluca ORLANDO	Leoluca ORLANDO	Italy	Greens	79.7 % of 261	−12.8 pts median 92.5 %	89.9 % of 208	−5.4 pts median 95.3 %	9.0 % of 200	7.7 % of 208
Select Majdouline SBAI	Majdouline SBAI	France	Greens	20.3 % of 261	−72.2 pts median 92.5 %	86.8 % of 53	−8.5 pts median 95.3 %	9.8 % of 51	5.7 % of 53
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Finland	Greens	98.5 % of 261	+5.9 pts median 92.5 %	98.4 % of 257	+3.2 pts median 95.3 %	0.4 % of 246	3.9 % of 257
Select Marie TOUSSAINT	Marie TOUSSAINT	France	Greens	88.9 % of 261	−3.6 pts median 92.5 %	89.7 % of 232	−5.6 pts median 95.3 %	8.6 % of 221	8.6 % of 232
Select Markéta GREGOROVÁ	Markéta GREGOROVÁ	Czechia	Greens	98.1 % of 261	+5.6 pts median 92.5 %	95.7 % of 256	+0.4 pts median 95.3 %	2.4 % of 245	5.5 % of 256
Select Martin HÄUSLING	Martin HÄUSLING	Germany	Greens	96.2 % of 261	+3.6 pts median 92.5 %	95.2 % of 251	±0.0 pts median 95.3 %	2.1 % of 241	4.8 % of 251
Select Mārtiņš STAĶIS	Mārtiņš STAĶIS	Latvia	Greens	98.9 % of 261	+6.3 pts median 92.5 %	89.1 % of 258	−6.1 pts median 95.3 %	8.1 % of 247	6.2 % of 258
Select Mélissa CAMARA	Mélissa CAMARA	France	Greens	73.2 % of 261	−19.3 pts median 92.5 %	90.1 % of 191	−5.2 pts median 95.3 %	8.3 % of 181	6.8 % of 191
Select Michael BLOSS	Michael BLOSS	Germany	Greens	98.5 % of 261	+5.9 pts median 92.5 %	94.6 % of 257	−0.7 pts median 95.3 %	3.3 % of 246	5.4 % of 257
Select Mounir SATOURI	Mounir SATOURI	France	Greens	81.6 % of 261	−10.9 pts median 92.5 %	90.1 % of 213	−5.1 pts median 95.3 %	8.4 % of 203	8.0 % of 213
Select Nela RIEHL	Nela RIEHL	Germany	Greens	99.6 % of 261	+7.1 pts median 92.5 %	96.2 % of 260	+0.9 pts median 95.3 %	2.8 % of 249	5.8 % of 260
Select Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ	Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ	Romania	Greens	67.0 % of 261	−25.5 pts median 92.5 %	97.7 % of 175	+2.5 pts median 95.3 %	0.0 % of 166	4.6 % of 175
Select Pär HOLMGREN	Pär HOLMGREN	Sweden	Greens	91.2 % of 261	−1.3 pts median 92.5 %	95.4 % of 238	+0.1 pts median 95.3 %	3.1 % of 227	6.7 % of 238
Select Rasmus ANDRESEN	Rasmus ANDRESEN	Germany	Greens	90.8 % of 261	−1.7 pts median 92.5 %	94.9 % of 237	−0.3 pts median 95.3 %	2.2 % of 227	4.6 % of 237
Select Rasmus NORDQVIST	Rasmus NORDQVIST	Denmark	Greens	99.2 % of 261	+6.7 pts median 92.5 %	97.3 % of 259	+2.0 pts median 95.3 %	1.2 % of 249	3.5 % of 259
Select Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	Netherlands	Greens	97.3 % of 261	+4.8 pts median 92.5 %	95.7 % of 254	+0.4 pts median 95.3 %	2.9 % of 243	5.5 % of 254
Select Sara MATTHIEU	Sara MATTHIEU	Belgium	Greens	98.9 % of 261	+6.3 pts median 92.5 %	96.5 % of 258	+1.3 pts median 95.3 %	2.4 % of 247	5.0 % of 258
Select Saskia BRICMONT	Saskia BRICMONT	Belgium	Greens	89.7 % of 261	−2.9 pts median 92.5 %	94.0 % of 234	−1.2 pts median 95.3 %	4.9 % of 225	6.4 % of 234
Select Sergey LAGODINSKY	Sergey LAGODINSKY	Germany	Greens	81.6 % of 261	−10.9 pts median 92.5 %	92.0 % of 213	−3.2 pts median 95.3 %	5.9 % of 203	6.6 % of 213
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Germany	Greens	94.3 % of 261	+1.7 pts median 92.5 %	98.8 % of 246	+3.5 pts median 95.3 %	0.0 % of 238	2.8 % of 246
Select Thomas WAITZ	Thomas WAITZ	Austria	Greens	98.9 % of 261	+6.3 pts median 92.5 %	96.9 % of 258	+1.6 pts median 95.3 %	0.8 % of 247	6.6 % of 258
Select Tilly METZ	Tilly METZ	Luxembourg	Greens	93.1 % of 261	+0.6 pts median 92.5 %	93.4 % of 243	−1.8 pts median 95.3 %	5.6 % of 234	6.6 % of 243
Select Tineke STRIK	Tineke STRIK	Netherlands	Greens	83.5 % of 261	−9.0 pts median 92.5 %	95.9 % of 218	+0.6 pts median 95.3 %	2.8 % of 211	7.3 % of 218
Select Ufuk KÂHYA	Ufuk KÂHYA	Netherlands	Greens	98.6 % of 72	+6.1 pts median 92.5 %	95.8 % of 71	+0.5 pts median 95.3 %	2.9 % of 69	8.5 % of 71
Select Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Spain	Greens	98.5 % of 261	+5.9 pts median 92.5 %	86.4 % of 257	−8.9 pts median 95.3 %	12.6 % of 246	10.1 % of 257
Select Ville NIINISTÖ	Ville NIINISTÖ	Finland	Greens	51.7 % of 261	−40.8 pts median 92.5 %	99.3 % of 135	+4.0 pts median 95.3 %	0.0 % of 133	5.9 % of 135

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.