Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

2026: 2 521 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 90.9 % (725 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

54 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Alexandra GEESE	Alexandra GEESE	Germany	Greens	87.4 % of 2 521	−5.1 pts median 92.5 %	98.1 % of 2 202	+0.6 pts median 97.5 %	1.2 % of 2 162	6.0 % of 2 203
Select Alice KUHNKE	Alice KUHNKE	Sweden	Greens	99.5 % of 2 521	+7.1 pts median 92.5 %	97.3 % of 2 508	−0.1 pts median 97.5 %	2.1 % of 2 467	5.4 % of 2 509
Select Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Spain	Greens	74.0 % of 2 521	−18.4 pts median 92.5 %	90.5 % of 1 865	−7.0 pts median 97.5 %	8.7 % of 1 835	2.8 % of 1 866
Select Anna CAVAZZINI	Anna CAVAZZINI	Germany	Greens	99.5 % of 2 521	+7.1 pts median 92.5 %	98.6 % of 2 508	+1.2 pts median 97.5 %	0.7 % of 2 468	5.1 % of 2 509
Select Anna STROLENBERG	Anna STROLENBERG	Netherlands	Greens	99.7 % of 2 521	+7.2 pts median 92.5 %	97.1 % of 2 512	−0.3 pts median 97.5 %	2.5 % of 2 471	5.2 % of 2 513
Select Benedetta SCUDERI	Benedetta SCUDERI	Italy	Greens	98.8 % of 2 521	+6.3 pts median 92.5 %	92.1 % of 2 490	−5.4 pts median 97.5 %	7.1 % of 2 449	2.7 % of 2 491
Select Catarina VIEIRA	Catarina VIEIRA	Netherlands	Greens	83.4 % of 2 521	−9.1 pts median 92.5 %	98.8 % of 2 101	+1.3 pts median 97.5 %	1.0 % of 2 066	5.4 % of 2 102
Select Cristina GUARDA	Cristina GUARDA	Italy	Greens	92.3 % of 2 521	−0.2 pts median 92.5 %	91.4 % of 2 325	−6.1 pts median 97.5 %	7.9 % of 2 289	2.8 % of 2 326
Select Damian BOESELAGER	Damian BOESELAGER	Germany	Greens	91.2 % of 2 521	−1.2 pts median 92.5 %	97.6 % of 2 299	+0.1 pts median 97.5 %	2.0 % of 2 260	5.3 % of 2 300
Select Daniel FREUND	Daniel FREUND	Germany	Greens	99.8 % of 2 521	+7.3 pts median 92.5 %	98.4 % of 2 515	+1.0 pts median 97.5 %	0.9 % of 2 474	5.0 % of 2 516
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	France	Greens	96.1 % of 2 521	+3.6 pts median 92.5 %	92.1 % of 2 421	−5.4 pts median 97.5 %	7.1 % of 2 380	2.6 % of 2 422
Select Diana RIBA I GINER	Diana RIBA I GINER	Spain	Greens	81.4 % of 2 521	−11.0 pts median 92.5 %	90.6 % of 2 052	−6.9 pts median 97.5 %	8.5 % of 2 020	3.5 % of 2 053
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Germany	Greens	97.1 % of 2 521	+4.6 pts median 92.5 %	98.6 % of 2 446	+1.1 pts median 97.5 %	0.8 % of 2 406	5.4 % of 2 447
Select Gordan BOSANAC	Gordan BOSANAC	Croatia	Greens	99.2 % of 2 521	+6.7 pts median 92.5 %	95.3 % of 2 499	−2.2 pts median 97.5 %	3.9 % of 2 458	4.1 % of 2 500
Select Hannah NEUMANN	Hannah NEUMANN	Germany	Greens	98.3 % of 2 521	+5.8 pts median 92.5 %	98.4 % of 2 477	+0.9 pts median 97.5 %	1.0 % of 2 437	5.2 % of 2 478
Select Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Italy	Greens	64.6 % of 2 521	−27.8 pts median 92.5 %	92.2 % of 1 628	−5.3 pts median 97.5 %	7.1 % of 1 601	3.1 % of 1 629
Select Isabella LÖVIN	Isabella LÖVIN	Sweden	Greens	76.3 % of 2 521	−16.1 pts median 92.5 %	97.6 % of 1 923	+0.1 pts median 97.5 %	1.9 % of 1 886	5.4 % of 1 924
Select Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Spain	Greens	63.6 % of 2 521	−28.8 pts median 92.5 %	88.5 % of 1 603	−8.9 pts median 97.5 %	10.3 % of 1 575	3.8 % of 1 604
Select Jutta PAULUS	Jutta PAULUS	Germany	Greens	94.1 % of 2 521	+1.7 pts median 92.5 %	97.7 % of 2 372	+0.2 pts median 97.5 %	1.7 % of 2 334	5.5 % of 2 373
Select Kai TEGETHOFF	Kai TEGETHOFF	Germany	Greens	76.6 % of 2 521	−15.9 pts median 92.5 %	97.0 % of 1 929	−0.5 pts median 97.5 %	2.5 % of 1 892	4.9 % of 1 930
Select Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Germany	Greens	88.5 % of 2 521	−4.0 pts median 92.5 %	98.8 % of 2 230	+1.4 pts median 97.5 %	0.7 % of 2 193	4.9 % of 2 231
Select Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Netherlands	Greens	84.5 % of 2 521	−8.0 pts median 92.5 %	98.7 % of 2 128	+1.3 pts median 97.5 %	1.0 % of 2 098	5.4 % of 2 129
Select Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Denmark	Greens	84.6 % of 2 521	−7.9 pts median 92.5 %	98.2 % of 2 132	+0.8 pts median 97.5 %	1.2 % of 2 096	6.4 % of 2 133
Select Lena SCHILLING	Lena SCHILLING	Austria	Greens	94.3 % of 2 521	+1.8 pts median 92.5 %	98.3 % of 2 376	+0.9 pts median 97.5 %	0.9 % of 2 336	5.7 % of 2 377
Select Leoluca ORLANDO	Leoluca ORLANDO	Italy	Greens	82.5 % of 2 521	−9.9 pts median 92.5 %	90.6 % of 2 080	−6.9 pts median 97.5 %	8.6 % of 2 046	3.2 % of 2 081
Select Majdouline SBAI	Majdouline SBAI	France	Greens	21.5 % of 2 521	−70.9 pts median 92.5 %	92.6 % of 542	−4.8 pts median 97.5 %	6.0 % of 532	3.3 % of 543
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Finland	Greens	99.4 % of 2 521	+6.9 pts median 92.5 %	99.5 % of 2 504	+2.0 pts median 97.5 %	0.2 % of 2 464	4.6 % of 2 505
Select Marie TOUSSAINT	Marie TOUSSAINT	France	Greens	90.3 % of 2 521	−2.1 pts median 92.5 %	91.3 % of 2 276	−6.2 pts median 97.5 %	7.9 % of 2 237	2.3 % of 2 277
Select Markéta GREGOROVÁ	Markéta GREGOROVÁ	Czechia	Greens	99.6 % of 2 521	+7.1 pts median 92.5 %	97.2 % of 2 509	−0.3 pts median 97.5 %	2.0 % of 2 468	4.9 % of 2 510
Select Martin HÄUSLING	Martin HÄUSLING	Germany	Greens	94.0 % of 2 521	+1.5 pts median 92.5 %	98.4 % of 2 368	+0.9 pts median 97.5 %	0.9 % of 2 328	5.4 % of 2 369
Select Mārtiņš STAĶIS	Mārtiņš STAĶIS	Latvia	Greens	98.9 % of 2 521	+6.5 pts median 92.5 %	91.9 % of 2 493	−5.6 pts median 97.5 %	7.4 % of 2 452	8.6 % of 2 494
Select Mélissa CAMARA	Mélissa CAMARA	France	Greens	76.3 % of 2 521	−16.2 pts median 92.5 %	90.9 % of 1 922	−6.6 pts median 97.5 %	8.0 % of 1 885	2.1 % of 1 923
Select Michael BLOSS	Michael BLOSS	Germany	Greens	98.9 % of 2 521	+6.5 pts median 92.5 %	98.1 % of 2 493	+0.6 pts median 97.5 %	1.3 % of 2 453	5.1 % of 2 494
Select Mounir SATOURI	Mounir SATOURI	France	Greens	75.4 % of 2 521	−17.1 pts median 92.5 %	93.1 % of 1 899	−4.4 pts median 97.5 %	5.9 % of 1 862	2.9 % of 1 900
Select Nela RIEHL	Nela RIEHL	Germany	Greens	99.4 % of 2 521	+7.0 pts median 92.5 %	97.4 % of 2 506	−0.1 pts median 97.5 %	2.2 % of 2 465	5.3 % of 2 507
Select Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ	Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ	Romania	Greens	65.4 % of 2 521	−27.1 pts median 92.5 %	97.6 % of 1 648	+0.1 pts median 97.5 %	1.8 % of 1 613	4.2 % of 1 649
Select Pär HOLMGREN	Pär HOLMGREN	Sweden	Greens	90.5 % of 2 521	−2.0 pts median 92.5 %	97.3 % of 2 281	−0.1 pts median 97.5 %	2.1 % of 2 247	4.9 % of 2 281
Select Rasmus ANDRESEN	Rasmus ANDRESEN	Germany	Greens	91.4 % of 2 521	−1.1 pts median 92.5 %	97.2 % of 2 302	−0.2 pts median 97.5 %	2.1 % of 2 265	4.8 % of 2 303
Select Rasmus NORDQVIST	Rasmus NORDQVIST	Denmark	Greens	99.8 % of 2 521	+7.3 pts median 92.5 %	98.8 % of 2 515	+1.3 pts median 97.5 %	0.8 % of 2 475	5.5 % of 2 516
Select Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	Netherlands	Greens	97.5 % of 2 521	+5.0 pts median 92.5 %	97.4 % of 2 457	−0.1 pts median 97.5 %	2.2 % of 2 416	5.3 % of 2 458
Select Sara MATTHIEU	Sara MATTHIEU	Belgium	Greens	99.8 % of 2 521	+7.3 pts median 92.5 %	98.7 % of 2 514	+1.3 pts median 97.5 %	0.8 % of 2 473	4.6 % of 2 515
Select Saskia BRICMONT	Saskia BRICMONT	Belgium	Greens	92.8 % of 2 521	+0.4 pts median 92.5 %	92.9 % of 2 339	−4.5 pts median 97.5 %	6.2 % of 2 301	2.3 % of 2 340
Select Sergey LAGODINSKY	Sergey LAGODINSKY	Germany	Greens	77.6 % of 2 521	−14.8 pts median 92.5 %	96.6 % of 1 956	−0.9 pts median 97.5 %	2.8 % of 1 920	6.3 % of 1 957
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Germany	Greens	96.5 % of 2 521	+4.1 pts median 92.5 %	99.4 % of 2 434	+1.9 pts median 97.5 %	0.2 % of 2 403	4.7 % of 2 434
Select Thomas WAITZ	Thomas WAITZ	Austria	Greens	99.4 % of 2 521	+6.9 pts median 92.5 %	98.1 % of 2 505	+0.7 pts median 97.5 %	1.0 % of 2 464	5.7 % of 2 506
Select Tilly METZ	Tilly METZ	Luxembourg	Greens	92.7 % of 2 521	+0.2 pts median 92.5 %	93.6 % of 2 335	−3.9 pts median 97.5 %	5.7 % of 2 302	2.9 % of 2 336
Select Tineke STRIK	Tineke STRIK	Netherlands	Greens	87.3 % of 2 521	−5.1 pts median 92.5 %	98.5 % of 2 201	+1.1 pts median 97.5 %	1.1 % of 2 166	5.5 % of 2 202
Select Ufuk KÂHYA	Ufuk KÂHYA	Netherlands	Greens	98.3 % of 645	+5.8 pts median 92.5 %	99.1 % of 634	+1.6 pts median 97.5 %	0.5 % of 623	3.0 % of 634
Select Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Spain	Greens	99.0 % of 2 521	+6.6 pts median 92.5 %	89.8 % of 2 496	−7.7 pts median 97.5 %	9.4 % of 2 455	3.1 % of 2 497
Select Ville NIINISTÖ	Ville NIINISTÖ	Finland	Greens	60.3 % of 2 521	−32.1 pts median 92.5 %	99.3 % of 1 520	+1.8 pts median 97.5 %	0.5 % of 1 497	6.0 % of 1 521

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.