Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

2025: 2 891 roll-call votes with named positions. Chamber median participation 91.2 % (724 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

53 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Alexandra GEESE	Alexandra GEESE	Germany	Greens	89.9 % of 2 891	−5.2 pts median 95.1 %	98.3 % of 2 598	+1.0 pts median 97.2 %	1.0 % of 2 542	4.0 % of 2 598
Select Alice KUHNKE	Alice KUHNKE	Sweden	Greens	98.5 % of 2 891	+3.5 pts median 95.1 %	96.3 % of 2 849	−0.9 pts median 97.2 %	2.9 % of 2 787	4.5 % of 2 849
Select Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Spain	Greens	84.3 % of 2 891	−10.8 pts median 95.1 %	88.0 % of 2 438	−9.3 pts median 97.2 %	10.9 % of 2 376	3.7 % of 2 438
Select Anna CAVAZZINI	Anna CAVAZZINI	Germany	Greens	98.3 % of 2 891	+3.3 pts median 95.1 %	98.6 % of 2 843	+1.4 pts median 97.2 %	0.7 % of 2 781	4.2 % of 2 843
Select Anna STROLENBERG	Anna STROLENBERG	Netherlands	Greens	99.3 % of 2 891	+4.2 pts median 95.1 %	97.1 % of 2 870	−0.1 pts median 97.2 %	1.6 % of 2 807	4.3 % of 2 870
Select Benedetta SCUDERI	Benedetta SCUDERI	Italy	Greens	91.9 % of 2 891	−3.2 pts median 95.1 %	92.2 % of 2 656	−5.0 pts median 97.2 %	6.7 % of 2 606	3.7 % of 2 656
Select Catarina VIEIRA	Catarina VIEIRA	Netherlands	Greens	98.9 % of 2 891	+3.8 pts median 95.1 %	97.9 % of 2 860	+0.7 pts median 97.2 %	1.4 % of 2 798	3.7 % of 2 860
Select Cristina GUARDA	Cristina GUARDA	Italy	Greens	89.9 % of 2 891	−5.2 pts median 95.1 %	91.8 % of 2 600	−5.4 pts median 97.2 %	7.2 % of 2 554	3.5 % of 2 600
Select Damian BOESELAGER	Damian BOESELAGER	Germany	Greens	97.5 % of 2 891	+2.4 pts median 95.1 %	96.8 % of 2 819	−0.4 pts median 97.2 %	1.8 % of 2 758	4.5 % of 2 819
Select Daniel FREUND	Daniel FREUND	Germany	Greens	98.7 % of 2 891	+3.6 pts median 95.1 %	98.2 % of 2 854	+0.9 pts median 97.2 %	0.9 % of 2 791	3.9 % of 2 854
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	France	Greens	97.1 % of 2 891	+2.0 pts median 95.1 %	94.2 % of 2 807	−3.0 pts median 97.2 %	4.8 % of 2 744	2.6 % of 2 807
Select Diana RIBA I GINER	Diana RIBA I GINER	Spain	Greens	90.8 % of 2 891	−4.3 pts median 95.1 %	91.4 % of 2 624	−5.8 pts median 97.2 %	7.6 % of 2 574	4.1 % of 2 624
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Germany	Greens	92.0 % of 2 891	−3.1 pts median 95.1 %	98.9 % of 2 660	+1.6 pts median 97.2 %	0.6 % of 2 599	4.2 % of 2 660
Select Gordan BOSANAC	Gordan BOSANAC	Croatia	Greens	97.4 % of 2 891	+2.4 pts median 95.1 %	96.3 % of 2 817	−1.0 pts median 97.2 %	3.1 % of 2 755	4.4 % of 2 817
Select Hannah NEUMANN	Hannah NEUMANN	Germany	Greens	86.4 % of 2 891	−8.7 pts median 95.1 %	98.1 % of 2 497	+0.8 pts median 97.2 %	0.9 % of 2 438	4.2 % of 2 497
Select Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Italy	Greens	81.6 % of 2 891	−13.5 pts median 95.1 %	91.3 % of 2 360	−6.0 pts median 97.2 %	7.5 % of 2 311	3.6 % of 2 360
Select Isabella LÖVIN	Isabella LÖVIN	Sweden	Greens	99.6 % of 2 891	+4.5 pts median 95.1 %	96.5 % of 2 880	−0.7 pts median 97.2 %	2.8 % of 2 818	4.5 % of 2 880
Select Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Spain	Greens	91.6 % of 2 891	−3.5 pts median 95.1 %	89.2 % of 2 649	−8.0 pts median 97.2 %	9.8 % of 2 588	4.9 % of 2 649
Select Jutta PAULUS	Jutta PAULUS	Germany	Greens	87.7 % of 2 891	−7.4 pts median 95.1 %	98.5 % of 2 535	+1.3 pts median 97.2 %	0.8 % of 2 487	3.7 % of 2 535
Select Kai TEGETHOFF	Kai TEGETHOFF	Germany	Greens	99.7 % of 2 891	+4.6 pts median 95.1 %	97.3 % of 2 882	+0.1 pts median 97.2 %	1.5 % of 2 819	4.3 % of 2 882
Select Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Germany	Greens	92.8 % of 2 891	−2.2 pts median 95.1 %	98.1 % of 2 684	+0.8 pts median 97.2 %	1.0 % of 2 626	3.5 % of 2 684
Select Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Netherlands	Greens	98.0 % of 2 891	+2.9 pts median 95.1 %	97.9 % of 2 834	+0.7 pts median 97.2 %	1.4 % of 2 772	3.9 % of 2 834
Select Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Denmark	Greens	96.4 % of 2 891	+1.3 pts median 95.1 %	97.4 % of 2 786	+0.2 pts median 97.2 %	1.9 % of 2 723	4.5 % of 2 786
Select Lena SCHILLING	Lena SCHILLING	Austria	Greens	97.1 % of 2 891	+2.0 pts median 95.1 %	97.5 % of 2 807	+0.2 pts median 97.2 %	1.7 % of 2 745	4.8 % of 2 807
Select Leoluca ORLANDO	Leoluca ORLANDO	Italy	Greens	89.1 % of 2 891	−6.0 pts median 95.1 %	89.2 % of 2 575	−8.0 pts median 97.2 %	9.8 % of 2 517	5.8 % of 2 575
Select Majdouline SBAI	Majdouline SBAI	France	Greens	62.5 % of 2 891	−32.6 pts median 95.1 %	92.9 % of 1 807	−4.4 pts median 97.2 %	5.8 % of 1 761	2.9 % of 1 807
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Finland	Greens	70.7 % of 2 891	−24.4 pts median 95.1 %	99.4 % of 2 045	+2.1 pts median 97.2 %	0.1 % of 2 005	3.9 % of 2 045
Select Marie TOUSSAINT	Marie TOUSSAINT	France	Greens	95.3 % of 2 891	+0.2 pts median 95.1 %	93.4 % of 2 754	−3.9 pts median 97.2 %	5.6 % of 2 692	2.6 % of 2 754
Select Markéta GREGOROVÁ	Markéta GREGOROVÁ	Czechia	Greens	86.3 % of 2 891	−8.8 pts median 95.1 %	96.1 % of 2 495	−1.2 pts median 97.2 %	3.0 % of 2 440	4.7 % of 2 495
Select Martin HÄUSLING	Martin HÄUSLING	Germany	Greens	96.2 % of 2 891	+1.1 pts median 95.1 %	97.9 % of 2 781	+0.7 pts median 97.2 %	1.2 % of 2 721	4.8 % of 2 781
Select Mārtiņš STAĶIS	Mārtiņš STAĶIS	Latvia	Greens	97.3 % of 2 891	+2.2 pts median 95.1 %	93.6 % of 2 812	−3.7 pts median 97.2 %	5.3 % of 2 750	6.5 % of 2 812
Select Mélissa CAMARA	Mélissa CAMARA	France	Greens	92.9 % of 2 891	−2.1 pts median 95.1 %	93.9 % of 2 687	−3.4 pts median 97.2 %	5.1 % of 2 626	2.7 % of 2 687
Select Michael BLOSS	Michael BLOSS	Germany	Greens	97.0 % of 2 891	+1.9 pts median 95.1 %	97.9 % of 2 803	+0.7 pts median 97.2 %	1.2 % of 2 742	4.1 % of 2 803
Select Mounir SATOURI	Mounir SATOURI	France	Greens	98.2 % of 2 891	+3.1 pts median 95.1 %	93.7 % of 2 840	−3.5 pts median 97.2 %	5.3 % of 2 779	2.7 % of 2 840
Select Nela RIEHL	Nela RIEHL	Germany	Greens	85.6 % of 2 891	−9.5 pts median 95.1 %	97.1 % of 2 474	−0.1 pts median 97.2 %	1.8 % of 2 427	4.1 % of 2 474
Select Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ	Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ	Romania	Greens	62.8 % of 2 891	−32.3 pts median 95.1 %	97.3 % of 1 815	+0.1 pts median 97.2 %	1.9 % of 1 776	3.3 % of 1 815
Select Pär HOLMGREN	Pär HOLMGREN	Sweden	Greens	99.7 % of 2 891	+4.6 pts median 95.1 %	96.7 % of 2 883	−0.6 pts median 97.2 %	2.6 % of 2 821	4.4 % of 2 883
Select Rasmus ANDRESEN	Rasmus ANDRESEN	Germany	Greens	89.8 % of 2 891	−5.3 pts median 95.1 %	97.8 % of 2 596	+0.5 pts median 97.2 %	1.5 % of 2 535	4.3 % of 2 596
Select Rasmus NORDQVIST	Rasmus NORDQVIST	Denmark	Greens	99.6 % of 2 891	+4.5 pts median 95.1 %	97.7 % of 2 879	+0.5 pts median 97.2 %	1.7 % of 2 816	4.6 % of 2 879
Select Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	Netherlands	Greens	96.5 % of 2 891	+1.4 pts median 95.1 %	97.2 % of 2 789	±0.0 pts median 97.2 %	1.6 % of 2 730	4.3 % of 2 789
Select Sara MATTHIEU	Sara MATTHIEU	Belgium	Greens	74.9 % of 2 891	−20.2 pts median 95.1 %	99.6 % of 2 164	+2.3 pts median 97.2 %	0.1 % of 2 118	3.2 % of 2 164
Select Saskia BRICMONT	Saskia BRICMONT	Belgium	Greens	95.1 % of 2 891	±0.0 pts median 95.1 %	93.5 % of 2 749	−3.7 pts median 97.2 %	5.3 % of 2 688	3.6 % of 2 749
Select Sergey LAGODINSKY	Sergey LAGODINSKY	Germany	Greens	64.4 % of 2 891	−30.6 pts median 95.1 %	96.0 % of 1 863	−1.2 pts median 97.2 %	3.0 % of 1 827	5.2 % of 1 863
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Germany	Greens	87.9 % of 2 891	−7.2 pts median 95.1 %	98.7 % of 2 542	+1.5 pts median 97.2 %	0.6 % of 2 501	4.0 % of 2 542
Select Thomas WAITZ	Thomas WAITZ	Austria	Greens	90.8 % of 2 891	−4.3 pts median 95.1 %	97.6 % of 2 626	+0.3 pts median 97.2 %	1.6 % of 2 567	4.7 % of 2 626
Select Tilly METZ	Tilly METZ	Luxembourg	Greens	98.9 % of 2 891	+3.8 pts median 95.1 %	95.5 % of 2 860	−1.7 pts median 97.2 %	3.3 % of 2 798	3.5 % of 2 860
Select Tineke STRIK	Tineke STRIK	Netherlands	Greens	98.5 % of 2 891	+3.4 pts median 95.1 %	97.8 % of 2 847	+0.5 pts median 97.2 %	1.7 % of 2 784	3.8 % of 2 847
Select Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Spain	Greens	82.6 % of 2 891	−12.5 pts median 95.1 %	88.4 % of 2 387	−8.8 pts median 97.2 %	10.6 % of 2 331	4.1 % of 2 387
Select Ville NIINISTÖ	Ville NIINISTÖ	Finland	Greens	84.8 % of 2 891	−10.2 pts median 95.1 %	99.2 % of 2 453	+1.9 pts median 97.2 %	0.2 % of 2 393	3.5 % of 2 453
Select Villy SØVNDAL	Villy SØVNDAL	Denmark	Greens	94.7 % of 2 891	−0.3 pts median 95.1 %	97.7 % of 2 739	+0.4 pts median 97.2 %	1.9 % of 2 689	4.7 % of 2 739

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.