Members

Every member who served in the 10th term, current and former, with their record in roll-call votes. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; members who changed group are marked ⇄.

Filter the members · filtered ▾

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

Name Country All countriesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSweden Group All groupsThe LeftGreensS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESNNo group Members Current and formerCurrent onlyFormer only

Apply Clear

2024 (from July): 66 final votes with named positions — 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. Chamber median participation 93.9 % (714 members with enough votes). How the figures are computed.

53 members match the filters

Compare selected (2–6)

Export▾

• CSV
• JSON

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

Members’ voting records

Select	Member, sort Z to A↑	Country, sort A to Z	Group, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Alexandra GEESE	Alexandra GEESE	Germany	Greens	95.5 % of 66	−1.5 pts median 97.0 %	98.4 % of 63	+1.6 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 59	0.0 % of 63
Select Alice KUHNKE	Alice KUHNKE	Sweden	Greens	98.5 % of 66	+1.5 pts median 97.0 %	93.8 % of 65	−3.0 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 61	1.5 % of 65
Select Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Spain	Greens	98.5 % of 66	+1.5 pts median 97.0 %	84.6 % of 65	−12.2 pts median 96.8 %	14.8 % of 61	10.8 % of 65
Select Anna CAVAZZINI	Anna CAVAZZINI	Germany	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	100.0 % of 66	+3.2 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 62	0.0 % of 66
Select Anna STROLENBERG	Anna STROLENBERG	Netherlands	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	95.5 % of 66	−1.4 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 62	0.0 % of 66
Select Benedetta SCUDERI	Benedetta SCUDERI	Italy	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	92.4 % of 66	−4.4 pts median 96.8 %	6.5 % of 62	3.0 % of 66
Select Catarina VIEIRA	Catarina VIEIRA	Netherlands	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	95.5 % of 66	−1.4 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 62	0.0 % of 66
Select Cristina GUARDA	Cristina GUARDA	Italy	Greens	1.5 % of 66	−95.5 pts median 97.0 %	0 of 1	— median 96.8 %	1 of 1	0 of 1
Select Damian BOESELAGER	Damian BOESELAGER	Germany	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	93.9 % of 66	−2.9 pts median 96.8 %	1.6 % of 62	1.5 % of 66
Select Daniel FREUND	Daniel FREUND	Germany	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	97.0 % of 66	+0.1 pts median 96.8 %	1.6 % of 62	1.5 % of 66
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	France	Greens	95.5 % of 66	−1.5 pts median 97.0 %	96.8 % of 63	±0.0 pts median 96.8 %	1.7 % of 59	1.6 % of 63
Select Diana RIBA I GINER	Diana RIBA I GINER	Spain	Greens	59.1 % of 66	−37.9 pts median 97.0 %	36 of 39	— median 96.8 %	2 of 38	2 of 39
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Germany	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	100.0 % of 66	+3.2 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 62	0.0 % of 66
Select Gordan BOSANAC	Gordan BOSANAC	Croatia	Greens	98.5 % of 66	+1.5 pts median 97.0 %	98.5 % of 65	+1.6 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 61	0.0 % of 65
Select Hannah NEUMANN	Hannah NEUMANN	Germany	Greens	92.4 % of 66	−4.5 pts median 97.0 %	100.0 % of 61	+3.2 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 57	0.0 % of 61
Select Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Italy	Greens	95.5 % of 66	−1.5 pts median 97.0 %	93.7 % of 63	−3.2 pts median 96.8 %	1.7 % of 60	0.0 % of 63
Select Isabella LÖVIN	Isabella LÖVIN	Sweden	Greens	92.4 % of 66	−4.5 pts median 97.0 %	93.4 % of 61	−3.4 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 57	1.6 % of 61
Select Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Spain	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	87.9 % of 66	−8.9 pts median 96.8 %	11.3 % of 62	9.1 % of 66
Select Jutta PAULUS	Jutta PAULUS	Germany	Greens	97.0 % of 66	±0.0 pts median 97.0 %	98.4 % of 64	+1.6 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 60	0.0 % of 64
Select Kai TEGETHOFF	Kai TEGETHOFF	Germany	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	95.5 % of 66	−1.4 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 62	0.0 % of 66
Select Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Germany	Greens	95.5 % of 66	−1.5 pts median 97.0 %	96.8 % of 63	±0.0 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 59	1.6 % of 63
Select Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Netherlands	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	95.5 % of 66	−1.4 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 62	0.0 % of 66
Select Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Denmark	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	95.5 % of 66	−1.4 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 62	0.0 % of 66
Select Lena SCHILLING	Lena SCHILLING	Austria	Greens	90.9 % of 66	−6.1 pts median 97.0 %	93.3 % of 60	−3.5 pts median 96.8 %	5.4 % of 56	5.0 % of 60
Select Leoluca ORLANDO	Leoluca ORLANDO	Italy	Greens	92.4 % of 66	−4.5 pts median 97.0 %	88.5 % of 61	−8.3 pts median 96.8 %	5.3 % of 57	1.6 % of 61
Select Majdouline SBAI	Majdouline SBAI	France	Greens	98.5 % of 66	+1.5 pts median 97.0 %	98.5 % of 65	+1.6 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 61	0.0 % of 65
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Finland	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	98.5 % of 66	+1.7 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 62	0.0 % of 66
Select Marie TOUSSAINT	Marie TOUSSAINT	France	Greens	97.0 % of 66	±0.0 pts median 97.0 %	98.4 % of 64	+1.6 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 61	0.0 % of 64
Select Markéta GREGOROVÁ	Markéta GREGOROVÁ	Czechia	Greens	93.9 % of 66	−3.0 pts median 97.0 %	90.3 % of 62	−6.5 pts median 96.8 %	5.2 % of 58	1.6 % of 62
Select Martin HÄUSLING	Martin HÄUSLING	Germany	Greens	95.5 % of 66	−1.5 pts median 97.0 %	98.4 % of 63	+1.6 pts median 96.8 %	1.7 % of 59	0.0 % of 63
Select Mārtiņš STAĶIS	Mārtiņš STAĶIS	Latvia	Greens	95.5 % of 66	−1.5 pts median 97.0 %	96.8 % of 63	±0.0 pts median 96.8 %	3.4 % of 59	3.2 % of 63
Select Mélissa CAMARA	Mélissa CAMARA	France	Greens	93.9 % of 66	−3.0 pts median 97.0 %	98.4 % of 62	+1.6 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 58	0.0 % of 62
Select Michael BLOSS	Michael BLOSS	Germany	Greens	97.0 % of 66	±0.0 pts median 97.0 %	100.0 % of 64	+3.2 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 60	0.0 % of 64
Select Mounir SATOURI	Mounir SATOURI	France	Greens	98.5 % of 66	+1.5 pts median 97.0 %	96.9 % of 65	+0.1 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 61	0.0 % of 65
Select Nela RIEHL	Nela RIEHL	Germany	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	93.9 % of 66	−2.9 pts median 96.8 %	1.6 % of 62	0.0 % of 66
Select Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ	Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ	Romania	Greens	77.3 % of 66	−19.7 pts median 97.0 %	100.0 % of 51	+3.2 pts median 96.8 %	0 of 47	0.0 % of 51
Select Pär HOLMGREN	Pär HOLMGREN	Sweden	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	93.9 % of 66	−2.9 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 62	1.5 % of 66
Select Rasmus ANDRESEN	Rasmus ANDRESEN	Germany	Greens	98.5 % of 66	+1.5 pts median 97.0 %	96.9 % of 65	+0.1 pts median 96.8 %	1.6 % of 62	3.1 % of 65
Select Rasmus NORDQVIST	Rasmus NORDQVIST	Denmark	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	95.5 % of 66	−1.4 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 62	0.0 % of 66
Select Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	Netherlands	Greens	98.5 % of 66	+1.5 pts median 97.0 %	95.4 % of 65	−1.4 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 61	0.0 % of 65
Select Sara MATTHIEU	Sara MATTHIEU	Belgium	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	98.5 % of 66	+1.7 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 62	0.0 % of 66
Select Saskia BRICMONT	Saskia BRICMONT	Belgium	Greens	72.7 % of 66	−24.2 pts median 97.0 %	47 of 48	— median 96.8 %	0 of 47	0 of 48
Select Sergey LAGODINSKY	Sergey LAGODINSKY	Germany	Greens	95.5 % of 66	−1.5 pts median 97.0 %	100.0 % of 63	+3.2 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 59	0.0 % of 63
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Germany	Greens	97.0 % of 66	±0.0 pts median 97.0 %	100.0 % of 64	+3.2 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 62	0.0 % of 64
Select Thomas WAITZ	Thomas WAITZ	Austria	Greens	97.0 % of 66	±0.0 pts median 97.0 %	93.8 % of 64	−3.1 pts median 96.8 %	5.0 % of 60	4.7 % of 64
Select Tilly METZ	Tilly METZ	Luxembourg	Greens	97.0 % of 66	±0.0 pts median 97.0 %	96.9 % of 64	±0.0 pts median 96.8 %	1.6 % of 61	1.6 % of 64
Select Tineke STRIK	Tineke STRIK	Netherlands	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	100.0 % of 66	+3.2 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 62	0.0 % of 66
Select Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Spain	Greens	100.0 % of 66	+3.0 pts median 97.0 %	84.8 % of 66	−12.0 pts median 96.8 %	14.5 % of 62	10.6 % of 66
Select Ville NIINISTÖ	Ville NIINISTÖ	Finland	Greens	72.7 % of 66	−24.2 pts median 97.0 %	48 of 48	— median 96.8 %	0 of 47	0 of 48
Select Villy SØVNDAL	Villy SØVNDAL	Denmark	Greens	93.9 % of 66	−3.0 pts median 97.0 %	95.2 % of 62	−1.7 pts median 96.8 %	0.0 % of 58	0.0 % of 62

• “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same. The President does not vote.
• A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip. Non-attached members have no group line.
• Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it.
• Positions are as recorded; later corrections of voting intention are not applied.